RESUMO
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide structured information on the patient's health experience and facilitate shared clinical decision-making. Registries that collect PROMs generate essential information about the clinical course and efficacy of interventions. Whilst PROMs are increasingly being used in adult orthopaedic registries, their use in paediatric orthopaedic registries is not well known. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the frequency and scope of registries that collect PROMs in paediatric orthopaedic patient groups. In July 2023, six databases were systematically searched to identify studies that collected PROMs using a registry amongst patients aged under 18 years with orthopaedic diagnoses. Of 3190 identified articles, 128 unique registries were identified. Three were exclusively paediatric, 27 were majority paediatric, and the remainder included a minority of paediatric patients. One hundred and twenty-eight registries collected 72 different PROMs, and 58% of these PROMs were not validated for a paediatric population. The largest group of orthopaedic registries collected PROMs on knee ligament injuries (21%). There are few reported dedicated orthopaedic registries collecting PROMs in paediatric populations. The majority of PROMs collected amongst paediatric populations by orthopaedic registries are not validated for patients under the age of 18 years. The use of non-validated PROMs by registries greatly impedes their utility and impact. Dedicated orthopaedic registries collecting paediatric-validated PROMs are needed to increase health knowledge, improve decision-making between patients and healthcare providers, and optimise orthopaedic management.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Longitudinal fibular deficiency (LFD) is the most common congenital long bone deficiency. This study aimed to objectively assess the physical performance of children and adolescents with LFD compared with unaffected peers, and to examine trends over age for subgroups of the LFD population. METHODS: Differences between children with LFD and unaffected peers were examined with hand-held dynamometry for lower-limb muscle strength, Six-Minute Walk Test, Timed up and down stairs test, Star Excursion Balance Test, and Standing long jump. RESULTS: Thirty-nine children with LFD and 284 unaffected peers participated. Children with LFD performed at a lower level than their unaffected peers, on all measures of physical performance (mean 2.1 z-scores lower, all p < 0.01), except in long jump (p = 0.27). When comparing the performance of children with LFD to their unaffected peers across four age groups, there was a significant between-groups difference on all strength measures, and on the Six-Minute Walk distance, between children with and without LFD. These differences were smallest in young children (3-6 years) and largest in the older children (15-18 years) (all p < 0.01). Children with no lengthening surgery performed better on the Six-Minute Walk Test, covering a greater distance during the test, than those who had surgery (mean difference 83 metres, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between children who had or had not undergone an amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Children with LFD performed at a significantly lower level than unaffected peers on all measures of physical performance other than jumping. The largest differences were in older children. This paper provides baseline functional data for future interventions in LFD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Cross-sectional study.Implications for RehabilitationThis paper provides the first baseline functional data using validated objective measures on a consecutive cohort of children and adolescents with longitudinal fibular deficiency.Children with LFD performed significantly worse than their unaffected peers on all measures of physical performance other than jumping, with children falling further behind their peers as they age.Children who undergo an amputation typically have the most severe anatomical presentation and yet perform at an equivalent functional level.This paper identifies multiple modifiable impairments that represent potential opportunities for rehabilitation professionals to target with conservative treatment options to improve functional performance.
