Expanded Series and Personalized Patch Tests for Children: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Epicutaneous patch testing was developed as a simple and effective method for diagnosing allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Despite its proven value in ACD diagnoses, there is no defined standard for patch testing in children. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to assess patch test positivity in pediatric patients with and without a history of atopic dermatitis suspected to have ACD, to compare these results with what the Thin-Layer Rapid Use Epicutaneous (T.R.U.E.) Test would have captured, and to evaluate likely exposures. METHODS: Pediatric patients receiving a North American 80 Comprehensive Series patch test or a personalized patch test were analyzed for allergen sensitization 48 to 72 hours after patch removal. These data were analyzed for allergen inclusion in the North American 80 Comprehensive Series patch test compared with the T.R.U.E. Test, as well as compared with patients with and without a history of atopic dermatitis. RESULTS: Of the 29 patients (mean ± SD age = 10.9 ± 5.1 years), 25 children demonstrated at least 1 positive reaction, with a total of 81 reactions overall. 40 (49.4%) of the reactions came from allergens outside of the T.R.U.E. Test, including cocamidopropyl betaine, which was frequent in patients with atopic dermatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Expanded and personalized patch tests provide a more comprehensive allergen inventory than the traditional T.R.U.E. Test. Pediatric patients frequently have reactions to allergens not included in the T.R.U.E. Test, and these allergens are commonly found in household products. Cocamidopropyl betaine was a particularly relevant allergen in our population. Expanded series patch testing and appropriate counseling should be provided to pediatric patients with ACD.

Comparative Performance and Neuropathologic Validation of the AD8 Dementia Screening Instrument.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The AD8 informant-based screening instrument has been validated with molecular biomarkers of Alzheimer disease (AD) but not with the gold standard of neuropathologic AD. The objective of this study was to validate the AD8 with neuropathologic AD and compare its predictive performance with that of the Mini-Mental State Examination and both participant-derived and informant-derived subjective memory complaint (SMC) regarding the participant. METHODS: This longitudinal cohort study at the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center at Washington University included 230 participants, ages 50 to 91 years, who later had a neuropathologic examination. Four dementia screening instruments from their baseline assessment were evaluated: the AD8, Mini-Mental State Examination, participant SMC, and informant SMC. The primary outcome was a neuropathologic diagnosis of AD. RESULTS: The average participant age at baseline was 80.4 years, 48% were female. All 4 dementia screening tests were predictive of neuropathologic AD. There was no significant difference in the predictive performance of the AD8 compared with the other instruments, but the AD8 had superior sensitivity and combined positive and negative predictive values. CONCLUSION: The AD8 is a brief and sensitive screening instrument that may facilitate earlier and more accurate AD diagnosis in a variety of care settings.