RESUMO
Drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) is a major public health concern and contributes to high morbidity and mortality. New evidence supports the use of shorter duration, all-oral regimens, which represent an encouraging treatment strategy for drug-resistant TB. As a result, the landscape of drug-resistant TB pharmacotherapy has drastically evolved regarding treatment principles and preferred agents. This narrative review focuses on the key updates of drug-resistant TB treatment, including the use of short-duration all-oral regimens, while calling attention to current gaps in knowledge that may be addressed in future observational studies.
Assuntos
Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos , Humanos , Antituberculosos/farmacologia , Antituberculosos/uso terapêutico , Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos/tratamento farmacológico , PulmãoRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: The rise of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens, especially MDR Gram-negatives, poses a significant challenge to clinicians and public health. These resilient bacteria have rendered many traditional antibiotics ineffective, underscoring the urgency for innovative therapeutic solutions. Eravacycline, a broad-spectrum fluorocycline tetracycline antibiotic approved by the FDA in 2018, emerges as a promising candidate, exhibiting potential against a diverse array of MDR bacteria, including Gram-negative, Gram-positive, anaerobic strains, and Mycobacterium. However, comprehensive data on its real-world application remain scarce. This retrospective cohort study, one of the largest of its kind, delves into the utilization of eravacycline across various infectious conditions in the USA during its initial 4 years post-FDA approval. Through assessing clinical, microbiological, and tolerability outcomes, the research offers pivotal insights into eravacycline's efficacy in addressing the pressing global challenge of MDR bacterial infections.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Tetraciclinas , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tetraciclinas/uso terapêutico , Tetraciclinas/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Bactérias Gram-NegativasRESUMO
Biofilm-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections pose a severe threat to public health and are responsible for high morbidity and mortality. Phage-antibiotic combinations (PACs) are a promising strategy for combatting multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and difficult-to-treat P. aeruginosa infections. Ten MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa strains and five P. aeruginosa-specific phages were genetically characterized and evaluated based upon their antibiotic susceptibilities and phage sensitivities. Two selected strains, AR351 (XDR) and I0003-1 (MDR), were treated singly and in combination with either a broad-spectrum or narrow-spectrum phage, phage EM-T3762627-2_AH (EM), or 14207, respectively, and bactericidal antibiotics of five classes in biofilm time-kill analyses. Synergy and/or bactericidal activity was demonstrated with all PACs against one or both drug-resistant P. aeruginosa strains (average reduction: -Δ3.32 log10 CFU/cm2). Slightly improved ciprofloxacin susceptibility was observed in both strains after exposure to phages (EM and 14207) in combination with ciprofloxacin and colistin. Based on phage cocktail optimization with four phages (EM, 14207, E20050-C (EC), and 109), we identified several effective phage-antibiotic cocktails for further analysis in a 4-day pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic in vitro biofilm model. Three-phage cocktail, EM + EC + 109, in combination with ciprofloxacin demonstrated the greatest biofilm reduction against AR351 (-Δ4.70 log10 CFU/cm2 from baseline). Of remarkable interest, the addition of phage 109 prevented phage resistance development to EM and EC in the biofilm model. PACs can demonstrate synergy and offer enhanced eradication of biofilm against drug-resistant P. aeruginosa while preventing the emergence of resistance.
Assuntos
Bacteriófagos , Infecções por Pseudomonas , Humanos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Ciprofloxacina/farmacologia , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , BiofilmesRESUMO
Elizabethkingia anophelis is a Gram-negative bacillus that can exhibit highly resistant phenotypes against most antibiotics with evidence of efficacy and safety in the neonatal population. Given the limited antimicrobial options, clinicians may be forced into challenging treatment scenarios when faced with central nervous system infections in premature neonates caused by E. anophelis . We report a case of successful treatment of hospital-acquired meningitis and bacteremia caused by E. anophelis at 11 days of life in a male infant born at 29 weeks, 1 day gestation and birth weight of 1.41 kg. Therapy consisted of vancomycin, dose adjusted to maintain goal troughs of 15-20 mg/L, and rifampin 10 mg/kg/dose every 12 hours, with ciprofloxacin 15 mg/kg/dose every 12 hours and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 5 mg/kg/dose every 12 hours added due to antimicrobial susceptibilities and unsatisfactory response, for a total of 21 days. Following initiation of this multidrug regimen, repeat cultures were negative, laboratory parameters improved [with exception of elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) white blood cell count], the patient remained otherwise stable, and there were no adverse effects noted from therapy. Complications after treatment included the requirement of bilateral hearing aids and the development of hydrocephalus necessitating ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. To our knowledge, we report the first case of meningitis in a premature neonate initially identified as E. anophelis in the United States treated with this regimen which led to successful microbiologic eradication with no antimicrobial safety concerns.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Flavobacteriaceae , Doenças do Recém-Nascido , Meningite , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Doenças do Recém-Nascido/tratamento farmacológico , Meningite/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Infections due to nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) continue to increase in prevalence, leading to problematic clinical outcomes. Omadacycline (OMC) is an aminomethylcycline antibiotic with FDA orphan drug and fast-track designations for pulmonary NTM infections, including Mycobacteroides abscessus (MAB). This multicenter retrospective study across 16 U.S. medical institutions from January 2020 to March 2023 examined the long-term clinical success, safety, and tolerability of OMC for NTM infections. The cohort included patients aged ≥18 yr, who were clinically evaluable, and` had been treated with OMC for ≥3 mo without a previous diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. The primary outcome was 3 mo clinical success, with secondary outcomes including clinical improvement and mortality at 6- and 12 mo, persistence or reemergence of infection, adverse effects, and reasons for OMC utilization. Seventy-five patients were included in this analysis. Most patients were female (48/75, 64.0%) or Caucasian (58/75, 77.3%), with a median (IQR) age of 59 yr (49-67). Most had NTM pulmonary disease (33/75, 44.0%), skin and soft tissue disease (19/75, 25.3%), or osteomyelitis (10/75, 13.3%), and Mycobacterium abscessus (60/75, 80%) was the most commonly isolated NTM pathogen. The median (IQR) treatment duration was 6 mo (4 - 14), and the most commonly co-administered antibiotic was azithromycin (33/70, 47.1%). Three-month clinical success was observed in 80.0% (60/75) of patients, and AEs attributable to OMC occurred in 32.0% (24/75) of patients, leading to drug discontinuation in 9.3% (7/75).
Assuntos
Fibrose Cística , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas , Mycobacterium abscessus , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas/microbiologia , Micobactérias não Tuberculosas , Fibrose Cística/microbiologia , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de SaúdeRESUMO
Biofilm-associated infections lead to substantial morbidity. Omadacycline (OMC) is a novel aminomethylcycline with potent in vitro activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, but data surrounding its use in biofilm-associated infections are lacking. We investigated the activity of OMC alone and in combination with rifampin (RIF) against 20 clinical strains of staphylococci in multiple in vitro biofilm analyses, including an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) CDC biofilm reactor (CBR) model (simulating human exposures). The observed MICs for OMC demonstrated potent activity against the evaluated strains (0.125 to 1 mg/L), with an increase of MICs generally observed in the presence of biofilm (0.25 to >64 mg/L). Furthermore, RIF was shown to reduce OMC biofilm MICs (bMICs) in 90% of strains, and OMC plus RIF combination in biofilm time-kill analyses (TKAs) exhibited synergistic activity in most of the strains. Within the PK/PD CBR model, OMC monotherapy primarily displayed bacteriostatic activity, while RIF monotherapy generally exhibited initial bacterial eradication, followed by rapid regrowth likely due to the emergence of RIF resistance (RIF bMIC, >64 mg/L). However, the combination of OMC plus RIF produced rapid and sustained bactericidal activity in nearly all the strains (3.76 to 4.03 log10 CFU/cm2 reductions from starting inoculum in strains in which bactericidal activity was reached). Furthermore, OMC was shown to prevent the emergence of RIF resistance. Our data provide preliminary evidence that OMC in combination with RIF could be a viable option for biofilm-associated infections with S. aureus and S. epidermidis. Further research involving OMC in biofilm-associated infections is warranted.
Assuntos
Rifampina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Rifampina/farmacologia , Staphylococcus aureus , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Staphylococcus epidermidis , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Biofilmes , Testes de Sensibilidade MicrobianaRESUMO
Staphylococcus aureus is a major cause of nosocomial and community-acquired infections and contributes to significant increase in morbidity and mortality especially when associated with medical devices and in biofilm form. Biofilm structure provides a pathway for the enrichment of resistant and persistent phenotypes of S. aureus leading to relapse and recurrence of infection. Minimal diffusion of antibiotics inside biofilm structure leads to heterogeneity and distinct physiological activity. Additionally, horizontal gene transfer between cells in proximity adds to the challenges associated with eradication of biofilms. This narrative review focuses on biofilm-associated infections caused by S. aureus, the impact of environmental conditions on biofilm formation, interactions inside biofilm communities, and the clinical challenges that they present. Conclusively, potential solutions, novel treatment strategies, combination therapies, and reported alternatives are discussed.
Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus , Biofilmes , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/fisiologia , Testes de Sensibilidade MicrobianaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Vancomycin (VAN)-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) is increased when VAN is combined with certain beta-lactams (BLs) such as piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) but has not been evaluated with ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T). Our aim was to investigate the AKI incidence of VAN in combination with C/T (VAN/C/T) compared with VAN in combination to TZP (VAN-TZP). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, observational, comparative study across the United States. The primary analysis was a composite outcome of AKI and risk, injury, failure, loss, end stage renal disease; Acute Kidney Injury Network; or VAN-induced nephrotoxicity according to the consensus guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to adjust for confounding variables and stratified Kaplan-Meir analysis to assess the time to nephrotoxicity between the 2 groups. RESULTS: We included VAN/C/T (n = 90) and VAN-TZP (n = 284) at an enrollment ratio of 3:1. The primary outcome occurred in 12.2% vs 25.0% in the VAN-C/T and VAN-TZP groups, respectively (P = .011). After adjusting for confounding variables, VAN-TZP was associated with increased odds of AKI compared with VAN-C/T; with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.308 (95% confidence interval, 1.560-6.993). Results of the stratified Kaplan-Meir analysis with log-rank time-to-nephrotoxicity analysis indicate that time to AKI was significantly shorter among patients who received VAN-TZP (P = .004). Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that TZP was consistent with the primary analysis (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, our results suggest that the AKI is not likely to be related to tazobactam but rather to piperacillin, which is a component in VAN-TZP but not in VAN-C/T.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Humanos , Vancomicina/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , beta-Lactamas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam/efeitos adversos , Tazobactam/efeitos adversos , Piperacilina/efeitos adversos , Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Quimioterapia CombinadaRESUMO
Forty-six patients were treated with eravacycline (ERV) for Acinetobacter baumannii infections, where 69.5% of isolates were carbapenem resistant (CRAB). Infections were primarily pulmonary (58.3%), and most patients received combination therapy (84.4%). The median (IQR) ERV duration was 6.9 days (5.1 to 11.1). Thirty-day mortality was 23.9% in the cohort and 21.9% in CRAB patients. One patient experienced an ERV-possible adverse event. IMPORTANCE Acinetobacter baumannii, particularly when carbapenem resistant (CRAB), is one of the most challenging pathogens in the health care setting. This is complicated by the fact that there is no consensus guideline regarding management of A. baumannii infections. However, the recent Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for treatment of resistant Gram-negative infections provided expert recommendations for CRAB management. The panel suggest using minocycline among tetracycline derivatives rather than eravacycline (ERV) until sufficient clinical data are available. Therefore, we present the largest multicenter real-world cohort in patients treated with ERV for A. baumannii, where the majority of isolates were CRAB (69.5%). Our analysis demonstrate that patients treated with ERV-based regimens achieved a 30-day mortality of 23.9% and had a low incidence of ERV-possible adverse events (2.1%). This study is important as it fills the gap in the literature regarding the use of a novel tetracycline (i.e., ERV) in the treatment of this challenging health care infection.
Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter , Acinetobacter baumannii , Humanos , Minociclina/farmacologia , Minociclina/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterococcus faecium is a challenging nosocomial pathogen known to colonize medical device surfaces and form biofilms. Bacterio (phages) may constitute an emerging anti-infective option for refractory, biofilm-mediated infections. This study evaluates eight MDR E. faecium strains for biofilm production and phage susceptibility against nine phages. Two E. faecium strains isolated from patients with bacteremia and identified to be biofilm producers, R497 (daptomycin (DAP)-resistant) and HOU503 (DAP-susceptible dose-dependent (SDD), in addition to four phages with the broadest host ranges (ATCC 113, NV-497, NV-503-01, NV-503-02) were selected for further experiments. Preliminary phage-antibiotic screening was performed with modified checkerboard minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) assays to efficiently screen for bacterial killing and phage-antibiotic synergy (PAS). Data were compared by one-way ANOVA and Tukey (HSD) tests. Time kill analyses (TKA) were performed against R497 and HOU503 with DAP at 0.5× MBIC, ampicillin (AMP) at free peak = 72 µg/mL, and phage at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01. In 24 h TKA against R497, phage-antibiotic combinations (PAC) with DAP, AMP, or DAP + AMP combined with 3- or 4-phage cocktails demonstrated significant killing compared to the most effective double combination (ANOVA range of mean differences 2.998 to 3.102 log10 colony forming units (CFU)/mL; p = 0.011, 2.548 to 2.868 log10 colony forming units (CFU)/mL; p = 0.023, and 2.006 to 2.329 log10 colony forming units (CFU)/mL; p = 0.039, respectively), with preserved phage susceptibility identified in regimens with 3-phage cocktails containing NV-497 and the 4-phage cocktail. Against HOU503, AMP combined with any 3- or 4-phage cocktail and DAP + AMP combined with the 3-phage cocktail ATCC 113 + NV-497 + NV-503-01 demonstrated significant PAS and bactericidal activity (ANOVA range of mean differences 2.251 to 2.466 log10 colony forming units (CFU)/mL; p = 0.044 and 2.119 to 2.350 log10 colony forming units (CFU)/mL; p = 0.028, respectively), however, only PAC with DAP + AMP maintained phage susceptibility at the end of 24 h TKA. R497 and HOU503 exposure to DAP, AMP, or DAP + AMP in the presence of single phage or phage cocktail resulted in antibiotic resistance stabilization (i.e., no antibiotic MBIC elevation compared to baseline) without identified antibiotic MBIC reversion (i.e., lowering of antibiotic MBIC compared to baseline in DAP-resistant and DAP-SDD isolates) at the end of 24 h TKA. In conclusion, against DAP-resistant R497 and DAP-SDD HOU503 E. faecium clinical blood isolates, the use of DAP + AMP combined with 3- and 4-phage cocktails effectively eradicated biofilm-embedded MDR E. faecium without altering antibiotic MBIC or phage susceptibility compared to baseline.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and difficult-to-treat (DTR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa are increasingly challenging to combat. Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) is a novel ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combination now commonly used to treat MDR and XDR P. aeruginosa. Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) remain the most common source of infection caused by MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa. Comparative effectiveness studies to date have been limited by the type of comparator agents (i.e., aminoglycosides and polymyxins) and the inclusion of multiple infection sources (i.e., urinary tract, abdominal, skin and soft tissue, etc.). METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective analysis of adults with LRTI caused by MDR or XDR P. aeruginosa admitted from January 2014 to December 2019. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes between patients who received C/T (n = 118) versus best alternative therapy (n = 88). The primary outcome was clinical failure, defined as 30-day mortality and/or an adverse drug reaction on antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: Two hundred and six patients met inclusion criteria. The C/T group had a significantly higher proportion of XDR P. aeruginosa and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP). After multivariable logistic regression, C/T treatment was independently associated with a 73.3% reduction in clinical failure compared to those who received best alternative therapy (P < 0.001). The number needed to harm with best alternative therapy was 3. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that C/T is a safe and effective therapeutic regimen for patients with MDR and XDR P. aeruginosa LRTI.
RESUMO
AIMS: Here, we investigate the impact of phage-antibiotic combinations (PAC) on bacterial killing, resistance development and outer membrane vesicle (OMV) production in multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa. METHODS AND RESULTS: After screening 10 well-characterized MDR P. aeruginosa strains against three P. aeruginosa phages, representative strains, R10266 and R9316, were selected for synergy testing based on high phage sensitivity and substantial antibiotic resistance patterns, while phage EM was chosen based on host range. To understand the impact of phage-antibiotic combinations (PAC) against MDR P. aeruginosa, time-kill analyses, OMV quantification and phage/antibiotic resistance testing were performed. Phage and meropenem demonstrated synergistic activity against both MDR strains. Triple combination regimens, phage-meropenem-colistin and phage-ciprofloxacin-colistin, resulted in the greatest CFU reduction for strains R9316 (3.50 log10 CFU ml-1 ) and R10266 (4.50 log10 CFU ml-1 ) respectively. PAC resulted in regained and improved antibiotic susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (MIC 2 to 0.0625) and meropenem (MIC 32 to 16), respectively, in R9316. Phage resistance was prevented or reduced in the presence of several classes of antibiotics and OMV production was reduced in the presence of phage for both strains, which was associated with significantly improved bacterial eradication. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the potential of phage-antibiotic synergy (PAS) to augment killing of MDR P. aeruginosa. Systematic in vitro and in vivo studies are needed to better understand phage interactions with antipseudomonal antibiotics, to define the role of OMV production in P. aeruginosa PAC therapy and to outline pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters conducive to PAS. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF STUDY: This study identifies novel bactericidal phage-antibiotic combinations capable of thwarting resistance development in MDR and XDR P. aeruginosa strains. Furthermore, phage-mediated OMV reduction is identified as a potential mechanism through which PAC potentiates bacterial killing.
Assuntos
Bacteriófagos , Infecções por Pseudomonas , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Ciprofloxacina/farmacologia , Colistina/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Humanos , Meropeném/farmacologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/microbiologia , Pseudomonas aeruginosaRESUMO
Tedizolid has activity against Gram-positive pathogens as well as Mycobacterium spp and Nocardia spp. Real-world evidence supporting long-term tolerability and clinical success of tedizolid is lacking. Prolonged tedizolid therapy (median, 188 days; interquartile range, 62-493 days) appeared to be well tolerated in 37 patients (8.1% experienced adverse effect leading to discontinuation). Clinical success was 81.3% in those evaluated.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Inappropriate antibiotic use in COVID-19 is often due to treatment of presumed bacterial coinfection. Predictive factors to distinguish COVID-19 from COVID-19 with bacterial coinfection or bloodstream infection are limited. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 595 COVID-19 patients admitted between March 8, 2020, and April 4, 2020, to describe factors associated with a bacterial bloodstream coinfection (BSI). The primary outcome was any characteristic associated with BSI in COVID-19, with secondary outcomes including 30-day mortality and days of antibiotic therapy (DOT) by antibiotic consumption (DOT/1000 patient-days). Variables of interest were compared between true BSI (n = 25) and all other COVID-19 cases (n = 570). A secondary comparison was performed between positive blood cultures with true BSI (n = 25) and contaminants (n = 33) on antibiotic use. RESULTS: Fever (> 38 °C) (as a COVID-19 symptom) was not different between true BSI (n = 25) and all other COVID-19 patients (n = 570) (p = 0.93), although it was different as a reason for emergency department (ED) admission (p = 0.01). Neurological symptoms (ED reason or COVID-19 symptom) were significantly higher in the true BSI group (p < 0.01, p < 0.01) and were independently associated with true BSI (ED reason: OR = 3.27, p < 0.01; COVID-19 symptom: OR = 2.69, p = 0.03) on multivariate logistic regression. High (15-19.9 × 109/L) white blood cell (WBC) count at admission was also higher in the true BSI group (p < 0.01) and was independently associated with true BSI (OR = 2.56, p = 0.06) though was not statistically significant. Thirty-day mortality was higher among true BSI (p < 0.01). Antibiotic consumption (DOT/1000 patient-days) between true BSI and contaminants was not different (p = 0.34). True bloodstream coinfection was 4.2% (25/595) over the 28-day period. CONCLUSION: True BSI in COVID-19 was associated with neurological symptoms and nonsignificant higher WBC, and led to overall higher 30-day mortality and worse patient outcomes.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria have been associated with substantial morbidity and mortality and have limited treatment options available. Omadacycline (OMC) is an aminomethylcycline antibiotic that has been shown to exhibit broad in vitro activity against antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Given the lack of real-world data, the primary objective of our report was to describe early experience with OMC for the treatment of resistant Gram-negative infections. METHODS: This was a real-world, multicenter, observational cases series/pilot study conducted in the USA. Inclusion criteria included any adult patient aged ≥ 18 years who received OMC for ≥ 72 h either in the inpatient and/or outpatient setting. Clinical success was defined as a composite of 90-day survival from initiation of OMC, lack of alteration in treatment/addition of other antibiotic due to concerns of OMC failure, and lack of microbiologic recurrence within 30 days from the end of therapy. RESULTS: Oral OMC was used in nine cases primarily for multidrug-resistant (MDR)/extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections (55.6% XDR and/or carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii [CRAB]). The majority of infections were of bone/joint (55.6%) origin, followed by intra-abdominal (33.3%) origin. Clinical success occurred in 66.7% of cases, with 80.0% success each in infections of bone/joint origin or those caused by CRAB. One patient experienced an adverse effect that was not treatment limiting while on therapy (gastrointestinal). CONCLUSION: The use of oral OMC in MDR/XDR Gram-negative infections exhibited a relatively high success rate with minimal adverse effects. Real-world studies with larger case numbers are needed to confirm our initial findings.
RESUMO
Clinicians, researchers, and the public frequently turn to digital channels and social media for up-to-the-minute information on novel therapeutics and vaccines. The value of credible infectious diseases drug information is more apparent in the setting of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This viewpoint by the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP) provides guidance on utilizing social media platforms to optimize infectious diseases pharmacotherapy. It includes tips for all levels of users but primarily serves a guide for the infectious diseases clinician who has not yet joined social media. It compares various social media platforms and suggests which to begin with based on user needs, recommends efficient curation of social media content, and outlines a stepwise approach (shown below) to increasing engagement over time. This summary will hopefully spur further quality content and engagement regarding drug information from the infectious diseases social media network.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Transmissíveis , Mídias Sociais , Doenças Transmissíveis/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pandemias , FarmacêuticosRESUMO
Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterococcus faecium is a challenging pathogen known to cause biofilm-mediated infections with limited effective therapeutic options. Lytic bacteriophages target, infect, and lyse specific bacterial cells and have anti-biofilm activity, making them a possible treatment option. Here, we examine two biofilm-producing clinical E. faecium strains, daptomycin (DAP)-resistant R497 and DAP-susceptible dose-dependent (SDD) HOU503, with initial susceptibility to E. faecium bacteriophage 113 (ATCC 19950-B1). An initial synergy screening was performed with modified checkerboard MIC assays developed by our laboratory to efficiently screen for antibiotic and phage synergy, including at very low phage multiplicity of infection (MOI). The data were compared by one-way ANOVA and Tukey (HSD) tests. In 24 h time kill analyses (TKA), combinations with phage-DAP-ampicillin (AMP), phage-DAP-ceftaroline (CPT), and phage-DAP-ertapenem (ERT) were synergistic and bactericidal compared to any single agent (ANOVA range of mean differences 3.34 to 3.84 log10 CFU/mL; p < 0.001). Furthermore, phage-DAP-AMP and phage-DAP-CPT prevented the emergence of DAP and phage resistance. With HOU503, the combination of phage-DAP-AMP showed the best killing effect, followed closely by phage-DAP-CPT; both showed bactericidal and synergistic effects compared to any single agent (ANOVA range of mean differences 3.99 to 4.08 log10 CFU/mL; p < 0.001).
RESUMO
Bacterial biofilms are difficult to eradicate and can complicate many infections by forming on tissues and medical devices. Phage+antibiotic combinations (PAC) may be more active on biofilms than either type of agent alone, but it is difficult to predict which PAC regimens will be reliably effective. To establish a method for screening PAC combinations against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms, we conducted biofilm time-kill analyses (TKA) using various combinations of phage Sb-1 with clinically relevant antibiotics. We determined the activity of PAC against biofilm versus planktonic bacteria and investigated the emergence of resistance during (24 h) exposure to PAC. As expected, fewer treatment regimens were effective against biofilm than planktonic bacteria. In experiments with isogenic strain pairs, we also saw less activity of PACs against DNS-VISA mutants versus their respective parentals. The most effective treatment against both biofilm and planktonic bacteria was the phage+daptomycin+ceftaroline regimen, which met our stringent definition of bactericidal activity (>3 log10 CFU/mL reduction). With the VISA-DNS strain 8015 and DNS strain 684, we detected anti-biofilm synergy between Sb-1 and DAP in the phage+daptomycin regimen (>2 log10 CFU/mL reduction versus best single agent). We did not observe any bacterial resensitization to antibiotics following treatment, but phage resistance was avoided after exposure to PAC regimens for all tested strains. The release of bacterial membrane vesicles tended to be either unaffected or reduced by the various treatment regimens. Interestingly, phage yields from certain biofilm experiments were greater than from similar planktonic experiments, suggesting that Sb-1 might be more efficiently propagated on biofilm. IMPORTANCE Biofilm-associated multidrug-resistant infections pose significant challenges for antibiotic therapy. The extracellular polymeric matrix of biofilms presents an impediment for antibiotic diffusion, facilitating the emergence of multidrug-resistant populations. Some bacteriophages (phages) can move across the biofilm matrix, degrade it, and support antibiotic penetration. However, little is known about how phages and their hosts interact in the biofilm environment or how different phage+antibiotic combinations (PACs) impact biofilms in comparison to the planktonic state of bacteria, though scattered data suggest that phage+antibiotic synergy occurs more readily under biofilm-like conditions. Our results demonstrated that phage Sb-1 can infect MRSA strains both in biofilm and planktonic states and suggested PAC regimens worthy of further investigation as adjuncts to antibiotics.
Assuntos
Bacteriófagos , Daptomicina , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Biofilmes , Daptomicina/farmacologiaRESUMO
Antimicrobial resistance is a global public health threat due to its associated increase in mortality, and the most appropriate treatment algorithms for resistant and persistent Gram-positive and Gram-negative infections have yet to be elucidated. Whilst combination therapy has been touted as a viable method to overcome prominent resistant mechanisms represented amongst these microbes, the optimal agents to utilize remains controversial. Beta-lactams have a safe profile and are bactericidal against most Gram-positive and Gram-negative microorganisms. Thus, the use of dual beta-lactam therapy to overcome multidrug-resistant pathogens is of supreme interest. This article reviews the mechanisms of beta-lactam resistance in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, discusses the rationale for dual beta-lactam use against multidrug-resistant infections (and other scenarios in which this strategy may be most utilized in clinical practice), explores the available in vitro, in vivo and clinical data, and provides considerations for the use of dual beta-lactam therapy against Enterococcus faecalis, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii pathogens.
RESUMO
Enterococcus faecium is a significant multidrug-resistant pathogen. Bacteriophage cocktails are being proposed to complement antibiotic therapy. After a screen of 8 E. faecium strains against 4 phages, 2 phages (113 and 9184) with the broadest host ranges were chosen for further experiments. Transmission electron microscopy, whole-genome sequencing, comparative genome analyses, and time-kill analyses were performed. Daptomycin (DAP) plus the phage cocktail (113 [myophage] and 9184 [siphopage]) showed bactericidal activity in most regimens, while DAP addition prevented phage 9184 resistance against daptomycin-nonsusceptible E. faecium.