Accuracy of positioning three types of self-ligating brackets compared with a conventionally ligating bracket.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether the morphology of three different self-ligating brackets affects the accuracy of their positioning when compared with a conventionally ligating bracket. DESIGN: An ex vivo prospective comparison of the accuracy of positioning self-ligating brackets with conventionally ligating brackets. SETTING: Orthodontic Department, Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five clinicians with 2 or more years experience of bracket placement bonded four identical typodont malocclusions with Damon MX(TM), In-Ovation System R(TM) and SmartClip(TM) self-ligating brackets and also Victory Series(TM) conventionally ligating brackets. Four hundred brackets of each type were positioned. Vertical, horizontal and angular bracket position errors were assessed by reference to the FA point and FACC respectively, using digital images and image analysis software. RESULTS: Method error analysis showed no evidence of bias and minimal random error. The Victory Series brackets were the most accurately positioned. Although the amount of positioning error for all the self-ligating brackets was small, a greater number were positioned outside vertical and horizontal tolerance limits compared to the conventionally ligated brackets (P<0·001). The Damon MX bracket type was nearly 10 times more likely to be inaccurately placed relative to the FA point compared with the Victory Series bracket. The differences relating to angular positioning error were not statistically significant (P>0·05). CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that the positioning of three types of self-ligating brackets was less accurate than the conventional pre-adjusted edgewise bracket, when using a direct bonding technique. This may have implications for their clinical application.

Advances in orthodontics.

There has been tremendous progress in orthodontics since Edward Angle first popularised the fixed orthodontic appliance at the turn of the century. Recent years have seen an increased demand for orthodontic treatment from both adolescents and adults and, in addition, patient and clinician expectations of treatment outcomes continue to rise. A desire for more aesthetic materials has resulted in both smaller and 'tooth-coloured' appliances. Improvements in technology, often outside orthodontics, have also led to the development of new materials. The best example of this was the development of nickel titanium alloy by the NASA space programme, which was subsequently adapted for use in nickel titanium archwires. Other technological advances adopted for use in orthodontics include magnets, computerised imaging systems and distraction osteogenesis. This review paper looks at some of the innovations in the fields of materials as well as in techniques and appliance systems.