Augmentation of Recipient Adaptive Alloimmunity by Donor Passenger Lymphocytes within the Transplant.

Chronic rejection of solid organ allografts remains the major cause of transplant failure. Donor-derived tissue-resident lymphocytes are transferred to the recipient during transplantation, but their impact on alloimmunity is unknown. Using mouse cardiac transplant models, we show that graft-versus-host recognition by passenger donor CD4 T cells markedly augments recipient cellular and humoral alloimmunity, resulting in more severe allograft vasculopathy and early graft failure. This augmentation is enhanced when donors were pre-sensitized to the recipient, is dependent upon avoidance of host NK cell recognition, and is partly due to provision of cognate help for allo-specific B cells from donor CD4 T cells recognizing B cell MHC class II in a peptide-degenerate manner. Passenger donor lymphocytes may therefore influence recipient alloimmune responses and represent a therapeutic target in solid organ transplantation.

Comparison of survival by allocation to medical therapy, surgery, or heart transplantation for ischemic advanced heart failure.

BACKGROUND: To ascertain survival of ischemic advanced heart failure patients by treatment allocation, we examined the outcome of transplant assessment patients allocated to medical therapy, high-risk conventional surgery, or transplantation. METHODS: Patients were identified from the Papworth transplant database and excluded if primary etiology was not ischemic. Grouping was undertaken according to treatment allocation at initial assessment, and analysis was performed by intention to treat. Survival was computed from the time of assessment and Cox regression used to stratify patients according risk with the Heart Failure Survival Score. RESULTS: From May 1993 to September 2001, a total of 755 patients were admitted for transplant assessment, with 348 (46.1%) identified as having heart failure of ischemic origin. Variables required for calculation of the Heart Failure Survival Score was available in 273 patients (78.4%), and 20 patients (7.3%) were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 253 patients, 89 (35.2%) were allocated to medical therapy, 32 (12.6%) to surgery, and 132 (52.2%) to transplantation. The relative risk (95% confidence limit) of death compared with medical therapy was 0.62 (0.28, 1.40) for surgery and 0.38 (0.24, 0.61) for transplantation in medium- to high-risk patients. For low-risk patients, the relative risks for death compared with medical therapy were 1.87 (0.63, 5.60) for surgery and 1.97 (0.79, 4.96) for transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Transplantation improved survival of medium- and high-risk patients compared with medical therapy. In the low-risk group, this was not evident. However, repeated assessment of risk is required because the hazard for death rises steadily after the third year in these patients.

Allogenic blood transfusion does not predispose to infection after cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Many retrospective studies report increased postoperative infection after allogenic blood transfusion. To investigate this phenomenon, we prospectively studied 232 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: Patients were screened daily for evidence of culture positive infections. Wounds were examined daily and defined on the ASEPSIS score. Chest radiographs and white cell counts and differentials were recorded on days 1, 2, and 4. The use of blood products was monitored blindly and independently. Patients were grouped according to transfusion status and compared using chi2 or Fisher's test. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of transfusion and infection. RESULTS: Of 232 patients, 116 (50%) received blood product transfusion. Patients receiving blood had lower preoperative hemoglobin, were older, with a greater proportion of urgent/emergency or revision surgery, and were higher risk. Despite this, there were no differences in the frequency of chest infection (20% versus 15%, p = 0.38), urinary infection (3.5% versus 5.3%, p = 0 0.75), wound infection (3.5% versus 8.0%, p = 0.16), or overall infection (28% versus 30%, p = 0.89) comparing the transfused versus untransfused groups. There was no evidence to suggest that administration of blood products was associated with infection (odds ratio 0.92, p = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of blood per se did not lead to increased postoperative infection. Clinicians should reconsider withholding blood transfusion in patients solely owing to concerns of predisposition to infection.

Pyrexia after cardiac surgery: natural history and association with infection.

BACKGROUND: Pyrexia is common after major surgery, and infection is often an important consideration. To investigate the natural history and association with infection, we performed a prospective observational study. METHODS: From November 2000 to January 2001, we studied 219 patients undergoing cardiac surgery screening daily for wound, respiratory, urinary tract, and other infections. Pyrexia was defined as temperature above 37.5 degrees C. RESULTS: Of 219 patients, 7 intraoperative deaths occurred and 1 patient was excluded because of preoperative endocarditis, leaving 211. The mean age (SD) was 64 (10) years, consisting of 172 male patients (81.5%). The proportion pyrexial on days 1, 2, and 5 was 30.0%, 25.8%, and 10.3%, respectively. More patients undergoing urgent or emergency procedures (17.7% versus 7.8%; P =.03) subsequently developed pyrexia. However, there were no differences in wound infection (3.4% versus 8.3%; P =.13), positive cultures for respiratory (14.7% versus 11.4%; P =.16), urinary tract (5.2% versus 2.0%; P =.09), or other infection (8.6% versus 7.3%; P =.71) in patients experiencing postoperative pyrexia compared with those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Pyrexia is common after cardiac surgery and resolves in the majority of patients by day 5. Because there is no association between early pyrexia and infection, diagnosis of early postoperative infection by pyrexia alone is insufficient and is better established by clinical assessment with microbiological evidence.