Single vs. multiple fraction non-inferiority trial of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligo-metastases/progression: SIMPLIFY-SABR-COMET.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy delivery regimens can vary between a single fraction (SF) and multiple fractions (MF) given daily for up to several weeks depending on the location of the cancer or metastases. With limited evidence comparing fractionation regimens for oligometastases, there is support to explore toxicity levels to nearby organs at risk as a primary outcome while using SF and MF stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) as well as explore differences in patient-reported quality of life and experience. METHODS: This study will randomize 598 patients in a 1:1 ratio between the standard arm (MF SABR) and the experimental arm (SF SABR). This trial is designed as two randomized controlled trials within one patient population for resource efficiency. The primary objective of the first randomization is to determine if SF SABR is non-inferior to MF SABR, with respect to healthcare provider (HCP)-reported grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) that are related to SABR. Primary endpoint is toxicity while secondary endpoints include lesional control rate (LCR), and progression-free survival (PFS). The second randomization (BC Cancer sites only) will allocate participants to either complete quality of life (QoL) questionnaires only; or QoL questionnaires and a symptom-specific survey with symptom-guided HCP intervention. The primary objective of the second randomization is to determine if radiation-related symptom questionnaire-guided HCP intervention results in improved reported QoL as measured by the EuroQoL-5-dimensions-5levels (EQ-5D-5L) instrument. The primary endpoint is patient-reported QoL and secondary endpoints include: persistence/resolution of symptom reporting, QoL, intervention cost effectiveness, resource utilization, and overall survival. DISCUSSION: This study will compare SF and MF SABR in the treatment of oligometastases and oligoprogression to determine if there is non-inferior toxicity for SF SABR in selected participants with 1-5 oligometastatic lesions. This study will also compare patient-reported QoL between participants who receive radiation-related symptom-guided HCP intervention and those who complete questionnaires alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05784428. Date of Registration: 23 March 2023.

Radiomic analysis for early differentiation of lung cancer recurrence from fibrosis in patients treated with lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.

Objective. The development of radiation-induced fibrosis after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) can obscure follow-up images and delay detection of a local recurrence in early-stage lung cancer patients. The objective of this study was to develop a radiomics model for computer-assisted detection of local recurrence and fibrosis for an earlier timepoint (<1 year) after the SABR treatment.Approach. This retrospective clinical study included CT images (n= 107) of 66 patients treated with SABR. A z-score normalization technique was used for radiomic feature standardization across scanner protocols. The training set for the radiomics model consisted of CT images (66 patients; 22 recurrences and 44 fibrosis) obtained at 24 months (median) follow-up. The test set included CT-images of 41 patients acquired at 5-12 months follow-up. Combinations of four widely used machine learning techniques (support vector machines, gradient boosting, random forests (RF), and logistic regression) and feature selection methods (Relief feature scoring, maximum relevance minimum redundancy, mutual information maximization, forward feature selection, and LASSO) were investigated. Pyradiomics was used to extract 106 radiomic features from the CT-images for feature selection and classification.Main results. An RF + LASSO model scored the highest in terms of AUC (0.87) and obtained a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 88% in identifying a local recurrence in the test set. In the training set, 86% accuracy was achieved using five-fold cross-validation. Delong's test indicated that AUC achieved by the RF+LASSO is significantly better than 11 other machine learning models presented here. The top three radiomic features: interquartile range (first order), Cluster Prominence (GLCM), and Autocorrelation (GLCM), were revealed as differentiating a recurrence from fibrosis with this model.Significance. The radiomics model selected, out of multiple machine learning and feature selection algorithms, was able to differentiate a recurrence from fibrosis in earlier follow-up CT-images with a high specificity rate and satisfactory sensitivity performance.

Recurrent Extraneural Metastatic Medulloblastoma in an Adult Presenting With a Superscan and Treated With Radium-223.

A 32-year-old man with medulloblastoma was initially treated with subtotal resection and craniospinal irradiation. He developed recurrent metastatic disease three years later with extensive bone-only metastases. Biopsy of the bone lesions confirmed metastatic medulloblastoma and restaging investigations demonstrated a superscan with no evidence of recurrence in the craniospinal axis. Extraneural metastatic medulloblastoma is rare, and the presentation with diffuse bone-only metastases with a superscan on imaging is unique. The patient had diffusely painful bone metastases requiring multiple hospitalizations for poor pain control. He declined chemotherapy and was treated with radium-223, an alpha particle emitting radionuclide therapy typically used in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. The patient received three out of a planned six cycles of radium-223 before it was discontinued due to myelosuppression requiring multiple blood transfusions, and restaging demonstrated local recurrence in the posterior fossa. This is the first report to our knowledge describing the use of radium-223 in a patient with extraneural bone-only metastatic medulloblastoma. Further research into the effect of radium-223 in patients with diffuse bone-only metastases from non-prostate cancer primary tumors is warranted.

Should organs at risk (OARs) be prioritized over target volume coverage in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastases? a secondary analysis of the population-based phase II SABR-5 trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastases may improve survival, however concerns about safety remain. To mitigate risk of toxicity, target coverage was sacrificed to prioritize organs-at-risk (OARs) during SABR planning in the population-based SABR-5 trial. This study evaluated the effect of this practice on dosimetry, local recurrence (LR), and progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS: This single-arm phase II trial included patients with up to 5 oligometastases between November 2016 and July 2020. Theprotocol-specified planning objective was to cover 95 % of the planning target volume (PTV) with 100 % of the prescribed dose, however PTV coverage was reduced as needed to meet OAR constraints. This trade-off was measured using the coverage compromise index (CCI), computed as minimum dose received by the hottest 99 % of the PTV (D99) divided by the prescription dose. Under-coverage was defined as CCI < 0.90. The potential association between CCI and outcomes was evaluated. RESULTS: 549 lesions from 381 patients were assessed. Mean CCI was 0.88 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.86-0.89), and 196 (36 %) lesions were under-covered. The highest mean CCI (0.95; 95 %CI, 0.93-0.97) was in non-spine bone lesions (n = 116), while the lowest mean CCI (0.71; 95 % CI, 0.69-0.73) was in spine lesions (n = 104). On multivariable analysis, under-coverage did not predict for worse LR (HR 0.48, p = 0.37) or PFS (HR 1.24, p = 0.38). Largest lesion diameter, colorectal and 'other' (non-prostate, breast, or lung) primary predicted for worse LR. Largest lesion diameter, synchronous tumor treatment, short disease free interval, state of oligoprogression, initiation or change in systemic treatment, and a high PTV Dmax were significantly associated with PFS. CONCLUSION: PTV under-coverage was not associated with worse LR or PFS in this large, population-based phase II trial. Combined with low toxicity rates, this study supports the practice of prioritizing OAR constraints during oligometastatic SABR planning.

Treatment With Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Up to 5 Oligometastases in Patients With Cancer: Primary Toxic Effect Results of the Nonrandomized Phase 2 SABR-5 Clinical Trial.

Importance: After the publication of the landmark SABR-COMET trial, concerns arose regarding high-grade toxic effects of treatment with stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastases. Objective: To document toxic effects of treatment with SABR in a large cohort from a population-based, provincial cancer program. Design, Setting, and Participants: From November 2016 to July 2020, 381 patients across all 6 cancer centers in British Columbia were treated in this single-arm, phase 2 trial of treatment with SABR for patients with oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease. During this period, patients were only eligible to receive treatment with SABR in these settings in trials within British Columbia; therefore, this analysis is population based, with resultant minimal selection bias compared with previously published SABR series. Interventions: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy to up to 5 metastases. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rate of grade 2, 3, 4, and 5 toxic effects associated with SABR. Findings: Among 381 participants (122 women [32%]), the mean (SD; range) age was 68 (11.1; 30-97) years, and the median (range) follow-up was 25 (1-54) months. The most common histological findings were prostate cancer (123 [32%]), colorectal cancer (63 [17%]), breast cancer (42 [11%]), and lung cancer (33 [9%]). The number of SABR-treated sites were 1 (263 [69%]), 2 (82 [22%]), and 3 or more (36 [10%]). The most common sites of SABR were lung (188 [34%]), nonspine bone (136 [25%]), spine (85 [16%]), lymph nodes (78 [14%]), liver (29 [5%]), and adrenal (15 [3%]). Rates of grade 2, 3, 4, and 5 toxic effects associated with SABR (based on the highest-grade toxic effect per patient) were 14.2%; (95% CI, 10.7%-17.7%), 4.2% (95% CI, 2.2%-6.2%), 0%, and 0.3% (95% CI, 0%-0.8%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade 2 or higher toxic effects associated with SABR at year 2 by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 8%, and for grade 3 or higher, 4%. Conclusions and Relevance: This single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial found that the incidence of grade 3 or higher SABR toxic effects in this population-based study was less than 5%. Furthermore, the rates of grade 2 or higher toxic effects (18.6%) were lower than previously published for SABR-COMET (29%). These results suggest that SABR treatment for oligometastases has acceptable rates of toxic effects and potentially support further enrollment in randomized phase 3 clinical trials. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02933242.

Predictors of Early Polymetastatic Relapse After SABR for up to 5 Oligometastases: A Secondary Analysis of the Phase II SABR-5 Trial.

PURPOSE: A subset of patients with oligometastatic cancer experience early widespread cancer dissemination and do not benefit from metastasis-directed therapy such as SABR. This study aimed to identify factors associated with early polymetastatic relapse (PMR). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The SABR-5 trial was a single arm phase 2 study conducted at all 6 regional cancer centers across British Columbia (BC), Canada. SABR for oligometastases was only offered on trial. Patients with up to 5 oligometastatic lesions (total, progressing, or induced) received SABR to all lesions. Patients were 18 years of age or older, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 to 2 and life expectancy ≥6 months. This secondary analysis evaluated factors associated with early PMR, defined as disease recurrence within 6 months of SABR, which is not amenable to further local treatment. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed using binary logistic regression. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests assessed PMR-free survival and differences between risk groups, respectively. RESULTS: Between November 2016 and July 2020, 381 patients underwent treatment on SABR-5. A total of 16% of patients experienced PMR. Worse performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 1-2 vs 0; hazard ratio [HR] = 2.01, P = .018), nonprostate/breast histology (HR = 3.64, P <.001), and oligoprogression (HR = 3.84, P <.001) were independent predictors for early PMR. Risk groups were identified with median PMR-free survival ranging from 5 months to not yet reached at the time of analysis. Rates of 3-year overall survival were 0%, 53% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48-58), 77% (95% CI, 73-81), and 93% (95% CI, 90-96) in groups 1 to 4, respectively (P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Four distinct risk groups for early PMR are identified, which differ significantly in PMR-free survival and overall survival. The group with all 3 risk factors had a median PMR-free survival of 5 months and may not benefit from local ablative therapy alone. This model should be externally validated with data from other prospective trials.

Progression-Free Survival and Local Control After SABR for up to 5 Oligometastases: An Analysis From the Population-Based Phase 2 SABR-5 Trial.

PURPOSE: Despite increasing utilization of SABR for oligometastatic cancer, prospective outcomes are lacking. The purpose of this study was to determine progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC), and prognostic factors from the population-based phase 2 SABR-5 trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The SABR-5 trial was a single-arm phase 2 study with the primary endpoint of toxicity, conducted at the 6 regional cancer centers across British Columbia (BC), Canada, during which time SABR for oligometastases was only offered on trial. Patients with up to 5 oligometastases (total or not controlled by prior treatment and including induced oligometastatic disease) underwent SABR to all lesions. Patients were 18 years of age or older, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0 to 2, and had life expectancy ≥ 6 months. The secondary outcomes of PFS and LC are presented here. RESULTS: Between November 2016 and July 2020, 381 patients underwent SABR on trial. Median follow-up was 27 months (interquartile range, 18-36). Median PFS was 15 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 12-18). LC at 1 and 3 years were 93% (95% CI, 91-95) and 87% (95% CI, 84-90), respectively. On multivariable analysis, increasing tumor diameter (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; P < .001), declining performance status (HR, 2.13; P < .001), disease-free interval <18 months (HR, 1.52; P = .003), 4 or more metastases at SABR (HR, 1.48; P = .048), initiation or change in systemic treatment (HR, 0.50; P < .001), and oligoprogression (HR, 1.56; P = .008) were significant independent predictors of PFS. Tumor diameter (sub-hazard ratio [SHR], 1.28; P < .001), colorectal histology (SHR, 4.33; P = .002), and "other" histology (SHR, 3.90; P < .001) were associated with worse LC. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based cohort including patients with genuine oligometastatic, oligoprogressive, and induced oligometastatic disease, the median PFS was 15 months and LC at 3 years was 87%. This supports ongoing efforts to randomize patients in phase 3 trials, even outside the original 1 to 5 metachronous oligometastatic paradigm.

Assessment of intrafraction motion for spine and non-spine bone metastases treated with image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy without 6 degrees-of-freedom couch correction.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) planning target volume (PTV) margins are influenced by multiple factors. Data is limited on intrafraction motion in bone SBRT, particularly non-spine lesions. We analyzed intrafraction motion in bone SBRT patients treated on a standard treatment couch without 6 degrees-of-freedom (6-DOF) correction. Extracranial bone SBRT patients were included. Patients were treated using two volumetric-modulated arcs and targets were localized using daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) prior to each arc. Alignments between the first and second CBCT images yielded intrafraction positional shift values used to compute translational 3-dimensional vector shifts. 125 fractions from 43 patients were reviewed. Median vector shift for all SABR fractions was 0.7 mm (range 0-6.6 mm); spine 0.7 mm (range:0-2.3 mm) and non-spine 0.9 mm (range:0-6.6 mm). Of the 125 fractions, 95% had IFM vectors within the prescribed PTV margin. Intrafraction motion is small for bone SBRT patients treated on a standard couch without 6-DOF correction capabilities. Intrafraction motion was slightly larger for non-spine sites and may require treatment with larger PTV margins than spine cases.

Two Cases of Primary Spinal Glioblastoma in Adults Treated With Multimodality Therapy.

Primary spinal glioblastoma (GBM) is a rare disease entity with no established standard treatment. We present two cases of primary spinal GBM initially presenting with motor-sensory deficits and back pain. Management varied in that the first patient received subtotal resection followed by radiation therapy, while the second patient underwent gross total resection followed by radiation therapy and temozolomide. The first patient died from hypoxemia secondary to disease progression affecting diaphragmatic motion three months after diagnosis. The second patient progressed intracranially and died 7.4 months after diagnosis. There is no standard of care for primary spinal GBM, so treatment should follow a multidisciplinary discussion focused on patient-specific goals. These cases highlight the poor prognosis of primary spinal GBM despite different treatment approaches, necessitating accurate reporting of all similar cases to help improve knowledge and management of this rare malignancy.

Implementation of Single-Fraction Lung Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in a Multicenter Provincial Cancer Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background During the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, cancer centers considered shortened courses of radiotherapy to minimize the risk of infectious exposure of patients and staff members. Amidst a pandemic, the process of implementing new treatment approaches can be particularly challenging in larger institutions with multiple treatment centers. We describe the implementation of single-fraction (SF) lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in a multicenter provincial cancer program. Materials and Methods British Columbia, Canada has a provincial cancer program with six geographically distributed radiotherapy centers serving a population of 5.1 million, over 944,735 square kilometers. In March 2020, provincial mitigation strategies were developed in case of reduced access to radiotherapy due to the COVID-19 pandemic. SF lung SABR was identified by the provincial lung radiation oncology group as a mitigation measure supported by high-quality randomized evidence that could provide comparable outcomes and toxicity to existing fractionated SABR protocols. A working group consisting of radiation oncologists and medical physicists reviewed the medical literature and drafted consensus guidelines that were reviewed by a group of center representatives as a component of provincial lung radiotherapy mitigation strategic planning. Individual centers were encouraged to implement SF lung SABR as their resources and staffing would allow. Centers were then surveyed about barriers to implementation. Results On March 24, 2020, a working group was created and consensus guidelines for SF lung SABR were drafted. The final version was approved and distributed by the working group on March 26, 2020. The provincial lung radiotherapy mitigation strategy group adopted the guidelines for implementation on April 1, 2020. Implementation was completed at the first center on April 27, 2020. Barriers to implementation were identified at five of six centers. Two centers in regions with disproportionately high COVID-19 cases described inadequate staffing as a barrier to implementation. One center encountered delays due to pre-scheduled commissioning of new treatment techniques. Three centers cited competing priorities as reasons for delay. As of May 2021, two centers had active SF lung SABR programs in place, three centers were in the process of implementation, and one center had no immediate plans for implementation due to ongoing resource issues. Conclusion SF lung SABR was adopted by a provincial cancer program within weeks of conception through rapid communication during the development of COVID-19 pandemic mitigation strategies for radiotherapy. Although consensus guidelines were written and approved in an expedited timeframe, the completion of implementation by individual centers was variable due to differences in resource allocation and staffing among the centers. Strong organizational structures and early identification of potential barriers may improve the efficiency of implementing new treatment initiatives in large multicenter radiotherapy programs.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of 1-3 Oligometastatic tumors (SABR-COMET-3): study protocol for a randomized phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: A recent randomized phase II trial evaluated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in a group of patients with a small burden of oligometastatic disease (mostly with 1-3 metastatic lesions), and found that SABR was associated with a significant improvement in progression-free survival and a trend to an overall survival benefit, supporting progression to phase III randomized trials. METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-seven patients will be randomized in a 1:2 ratio between the control arm (consisting of standard of care [SOC] palliative-intent treatments), and the SABR arm (consisting of SOC treatment + SABR to all sites of known disease). Randomization will be stratified by two factors: histology (prostate, breast, or renal vs. all others), and disease-free interval (defined as time from diagnosis of primary tumor until first detection of the metastases being treated on this trial; divided as ≤2 vs. > 2 years). The primary endpoint is overall survival, and secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, cost effectiveness, time to development of new metastatic lesions, quality of life (QoL), and toxicity. Translational endpoints include assessment of circulating tumor cells, cell-free DNA, and tumor tissue as prognostic and predictive markers, including assessment of immunological predictors of response and long-term survival. DISCUSSION: This study will provide an assessment of the impact of SABR on survival, QoL, and cost effectiveness to determine if long-term survival can be achieved for selected patients with 1-3 oligometastatic lesions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03862911. Date of registration: March 5, 2019.

SUPR-3D: A randomized phase iii trial comparing simple unplanned palliative radiotherapy versus 3d conformal radiotherapy for patients with bone metastases: study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Bone metastases in the lower spine and pelvis are effectively palliated with radiotherapy (RT), though this can come with side effects such as radiation induced nausea and vomiting (RINV). We hypothesize that high rates of RINV occur in part because of the widespread use of inexpensive simple unplanned palliative radiotherapy (SUPR), over more complex and resource intensive 3D conformal RT, such as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). METHODS: This is a randomized, multi-centre phase III trial of SUPR versus VMAT. We will accrue 250 patients to assess the difference in patient-reported RINV. This study is powered to detect a difference in quality of life between patients treated with VMAT vs. SUPR. DISCUSSION: This trial will determine if VMAT reduces early toxicity compared to SUPR and may provide justification for this more resource-intensive and costly form of RT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03694015 . Date of registration: October 3, 2018.

Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Safety Profile of SBRT for Centrally Located NSCLC.

PURPOSE: Previous studies suggest that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is associated with higher toxicity rates for central lung tumors relative to peripheral tumors when using 3 fraction SBRT. The initial results from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study 0813 suggest a safe toxicity profile of SBRT administered in 5 fractions for central non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We reviewed our institutional data to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SBRT for central NSCLC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed our prospectively collected SBRT database for patients with central NSCLC who received SBRT between 2008 and 2014. The most frequent dose and fractionations were 50 Gy in 5 fractions (59%) and 48 Gy in 4 fraction (30%). Local control (LC), regional control, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminal Criteria for Adverse Events were used for toxicity grading. RESULTS: A total of 110 central lung tumors in 103 patients were included. The median age was 74 years (range, 40-95 years), and the median follow-up time of living patients was 50 months. The mean tumor size was 20 mm (range, 5-70 mm). The 5 year rate of LC, regional control, and distant control was 89%, 77%, and 82%, respectively. The median and 5-year overall survival were 3.5 years and 35%, respectively. No treatment variables were associated with tumor control or other clinical outcomes. A single patient experienced grade 3 radiation pneumonitis (0.97%). The rate of late toxicity grade ≥3 was 9.7% (grade 3, 7.7%; grade 4, 0.97%; grade 5, 0.97%) and included pneumonitis (3.9%), bronchial necrosis (2.9%), myocardial dysfunction (1.9%), and worsening heart failure (0.97%). CONCLUSIONS: SBRT for central NSCLC provides high rates of LC. Despite excellent LC, patients remain at risk for regional and distant failure. The rate of grade 3 pneumonitis was consistent with that of prior reports. We observed low rates of grade 4-5 toxicity potentially attributable to SBRT. Our results contribute to the growing body of data in support of the safety of SBRT for central NSCLC.

Seroma Visualization and Implant Accuracy in Permanent Breast Seed Implant Brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between seroma visualization and seed placement accuracy in permanent breast seed implant brachytherapy (PBSI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: At the time of planning computed tomography (CT), 10 patients receiving PBSI were imaged with spatially co-registered 3-dimensional ultrasound (US). Seromas were independently contoured by 3 radiation oncologists on CT and US scans. Intra- and interuser conformity indices (CIs) were used as a surrogate for seroma visualization. Intermodality visualization differences were assessed by defining consensus contours, clinical target volume (CTV)CT and CTVUS, and evaluating the CI and the centroid position and volume differences. Seed placement accuracy was represented by the differences between the planned and implanted seed positions (displacements). Correlations among total, systematic, and random seed displacements and seroma visualization metrics were assessed. RESULTS: The median (range) intra-user CI of CT seroma contouring was 0.60 (0.46-0.72), and the median interuser CIs were 0.46 (0.38-0.58) and 0.50 (0.29-0.67) on CT and US, respectively. The CTVUS was a mean 68% ± 12% smaller than CTVCT and differed in centroid position by 8 ± 3 mm. Seeds were placed, on average, 10 ± 5 mm from their planned positions, and intrapatient systematic displacements were observed. The mean seed displacements for the implants were shown to correlate with interuser CI on CT (r = .74; P = .01) and volume differences between CTVCT and CTVUS (r = .65; P = .04), but not with intrauser CI, intermodality CI or centroid differences. Systematic displacements were correlated with interuser CT CI (r = .67; P = .03) and intermodality volume difference (r = .64; P = .04), but random seed displacements were independent of all evaluated metrics. CONCLUSIONS: Consistency in seroma delineation in treatment planning and differences between seroma visualized on CT and US scans are associated with seed placement accuracy in PBSI. Efforts to enhance seroma visualization in treatment planning and implant guidance may have a positive impact on treatment quality and should be pursued to facilitate the widespread implementation of this technique.

Population-based phase II trial of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for up to 5 oligometastases: SABR-5.

BACKGROUND: Oligometastases refer to a state of disease where cancer has spread beyond the primary site, but is not yet widely metastatic, often defined as 1-3 or 1-5 metastases in number. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is an emerging radiotherapy technique to treat oligometastases that require further prospective population-based toxicity estimates. METHODS: This is a non-randomized phase II trial where all participants will receive experimental SABR treatment to all sites of newly diagnosed or progressing oligometastatic disease. We will accrue 200 patients to assess toxicity associated with this experimental treatment. The study was powered to give a 95% confidence on the risk of late grade 4 toxicity, anticipating a < 5% rate of grade 4 toxicity. DISCUSSION: SABR treatment of oligometastases is occurring off-trial at a high rate, without sufficient evidence of its efficacy or toxicity. This trial will provide necessary toxicity data in a population-based cohort, using standardized doses and organ at risk constraints, while we await data on efficacy from randomized phase III trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered through clinicaltrials.gov NCT02933242 on October 14, 2016 prospectively before patient accrual.

Feasibility and full-course dosimetry of an intraoperatively placed multichannel brachytherapy catheter for accelerated partial breast irradiation.

PURPOSE: Determine feasibility and resultant dosimetry of an intraoperatively placed multichannel intracavitary brachytherapy catheter for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). METHODS: Patients with breast cancer underwent intraoperative brachytherapy catheter placement based on frozen section analysis with immediate postoperative APBI. The planning target volume evaluation (PTVEval) and organs at risk were contoured on daily pretreatment CT scans for each patient, and the original treatment plan was applied to assess full-course dosimetry. RESULTS: Of the first 21 patients consented for intraoperative catheter placement, 20 (95%) were able to proceed with treatment as planned. The mean volume of PTVEval receiving 90% of prescription dose (V90%) and mean percentage of prescription dose to 90% of the PTVEval (D90%) on initial planning were 96.7 (±1.1%) and 100.2 (±2.1%), respectively. Full-course dose coverage remained excellent with a mean PTVEval V90% and D90% of 95.0 (±4.4%) and 100.2 (±9.6%), respectively. Mean full-course maximum dose constraints for chest wall and skin were met by 70% and 95% of patients, respectively. Air accumulation >1 cc during treatment increased the risk of a daily fraction with PTVEval coverage below goal (odds ratio, 9.8; p = 0.05), whereas those with applicators <0.5 cm from the chest wall at planning were at risk of exceeding that organ's maximum dose constraint on a daily fraction (odds ratio, 45; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative catheter placement and early initiation of APBI based on frozen section pathology is feasible, yields acceptable dosimetry, and is an option for completing breast conserving therapy in less than 10 days.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary and metastatic liver tumors - the Mayo Clinic experience.

INTRODUCTION: To better understand the efficacy of liver SBRT we reviewed our prospectively collected institutional SBRT database. METHODS: Between May 2008 and March 2013, 80 patients with 104 liver lesions received SBRT. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated local control (LC), overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards regression models identified factors associated with LC and OS. RESULTS: The median follow-up for living patients was 38.6 months. Patients had primary (n=17) or metastatic (n=63) tumors. The median tumor size was 2.7 cm (range, 0.6-14.0). The 1 and 4 year rates of LC were 89.4% and 88%, respectively. Colorectal (CRC) metastasis was associated with lower rates of LC (p=0.013). OS at 1 and 4 years was 78% and 25%, respectively. Patients with CRC metastases had higher rates of OS (p=0.03). The occurrence of severe acute and late toxicity was 3.8% and 6.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT should be studied in prospective clinical trials compared with other liver-directed treatment modalities.

Feasibility of proton transmission-beam stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus photon stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for lung tumors: a dosimetric and feasibility study.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy is being increasingly adopted in the treatment of lung tumors. The use of proton beam therapy can further reduce dose to normal structures. However, uncertainty exists in proton-based treatment plans, including range uncertainties, large sensitivity to position uncertainty, and calculation of dose deposition in heterogeneous areas. This study investigated the feasibility of proton transmission beams, i.e. without the Bragg peak, to treat lung tumors with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. We compared three representative treatment plans using proton transmission beams versus conformal static-gantry photon beams. It was found that proton treatment plans using transmission beams passing through the patient were feasible and demonstrated lower dose to normal structures and markedly reduced treatment times than photon plans. This is the first study to demonstrate the feasibility of proton-based stereotactic ablative radiotherapy planning for lung tumors using proton transmission beams alone. Further research using this novel approach for proton-based planning is warranted.

Utilization of preoperative radiation therapy in the management of rectal cancer: A population-based analysis.

PURPOSE: Preoperative radiation therapy (RT) improves local control in resectable rectal cancer compared with postoperative RT or surgery alone. Although clinical practice guidelines exist, adherence to recommendations for preoperative RT is unclear. This population-based study examines preoperative RT utilization rates for rectal cancer patients in a Canadian province and investigates factors influencing its usage. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2004 and 2009, all stage II and III rectal cancer patients treated with definitive surgery were identified using the Manitoba Cancer Registry. Patients not receiving resection of the primary tumor, as determined by administrative procedure codes, were excluded. Factors potentially influencing preoperative RT utilization, including age, gender, stage, year of diagnosis, and geographic distance from RT facility, were analyzed using logistic regression analyses. Overall survival outcomes were also examined. RESULTS: The registry identified 776 patients meeting the study inclusion criteria. Preoperative RT utilization increased from 3% in 2004 to 41% in 2009. Postoperative RT utilization decreased from 48% to 17% during the same period. Rates of surgery alone remained stable at 40%-50%. Factors influencing preoperative RT utilization were younger age (P < .0001), stage III disease (P = .02), and later year of diagnosis (P < .0001). Elderly patients age 70 years and over were predominantly treated with surgery alone. Actuarial 5-year overall survival for patients receiving preoperative RT postoperative RT, and surgery alone were 80%, 73%, and 58%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Steadily increasing utilization of preoperative compared with postoperative RT is evident; however, rates of surgery alone remained unchanged. Strategies to improve preoperative RT utilization, particularly among elderly patients, are needed.