Diabetes and Ramadan: review of the literature.

During the month of Ramadan, Muslims fast every day from dawn to sunset. In the healthy subject, this fasting does not have any harmful consequences on health. However, it can induce several complications for patients with diabetes. The aim of this review twofold: first, it seeks to give some clues about methodological aspect of research during Ramadan and to show the impact of various diabetes monitoring and treatment, including biochemical and clinical parameters, diet and caloric intake, drug intake when fasting. Second, it intends to determine whether or not Ramadan fasting induces complications in patients with types 1 and 2 diabetes and ultimately to elaborate some advice as to the management of fasting patients. Several studies have shown that Ramadan fasting did not alter biochemical parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, other studies have shown that there is either an increase or a decrease in biochemical parameters during Ramadan. Ramadan fasting would be acceptable for patients with well-balanced type 2 diabetes who are conscious of their disease and compliant with their diet and drug intake. If patients with type 1 diabetes wish to fast, it is necessary to advise them to undertake control of their glycaemia several times a day. Patients with type 1 diabetes who will fast during Ramadan may be better managed with fast absorption insulin.

Correlations between free plasma estradiol and estrogens determined by bioluminescence in saliva, plasma, and urine during spontaneous and FSH stimulated cycles in women.

Estrone and estradiol (E1 + E2) concentrations in saliva were compared with four other parameters of estrogen status in five normal ovulatory women and ten FSH stimulated women selected for an in vitro fertilization program. E1 + E2 in saliva, plasma, and urine were assessed by a rapid, specific and sensitive enzymatic assay using bioluminescence. The free fraction of plasma estradiol was determined by equilibrium dialysis and total plasma estradiol by conventional radioimmunoassay. The pattern of E1 + E2 variation in saliva was similar to that of free plasma estradiol and the two parameters were correlated in both spontaneous and stimulated cycles. However, the lower correlation coefficient (r = 0.52, P less than 0.001) in spontaneous cycles compared with the high (r = 0.96, P less than 0.001) in the stimulated cycles shows that salivary E1 + E2 could be representative of plasma free estradiol in stimulated cycles but not in normal cycles. The free fraction of plasma estradiol reproduced the variation of total plasma estradiol in spontaneous as well as in FSH stimulated cycles and both parameters were strongly correlated (r = 0.91, P less than 0.001 and r = 0.90, P less than 0.001), respectively. The data show that salivary E1 + E2 concentrations are highly representative of the free fraction of E2 in plasma and at a lesser extend (r = 0.72, P less than 0.001) of total plasma E2 in FSH stimulated cycles.