Analysis of milk-based infant formula. Phase IV. Iodide, linoleic acid, and vitamins D and K: U.S. Food and Drug Administration-Infant Formula Council: collaborative study.

In 1982, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the Infant Formula Council and its member companies, contract laboratories, and other government laboratories began a study of analytical methods for the nutrients listed in the Infant Formula Act of 1980. Phases I, II, III, and V have been completed. The present report provides data on Phase IV, in which 13 laboratories collaboratively studied an ion-selective electrode method for analyzing iodide, a gas chromatographic method for linoleic acid, and 2 liquid chromatographic (LC) methods each for vitamins D and K. Data were insufficient to evaluate one each of the LC methods studied for vitamins K and D. The relative standard deviations (RSD) are sufficient for the nutrient levels found in infant formula. RSDs (%) for repeatability (RSDr) and reproducibility (RSDR), respectively, were as follows: iodide, 4.0-11.4 and 13.5-18.2; linoleic acid, 1.0-1.6 and 3.5-5.1; vitamin K1, 3.2-16.0 and 6.2-19.4; and vitamin D3, 4.2 and 35.0. The recommendation to adopt the method for vitamin D was supported by the results of a ministudy. All laboratories were capable of using these methods with little training. The methods for determination of iodide, linoleic acid, and vitamins D and K in ready-to-feed milk-based infant formula have been adopted first action by AOAC International.

Infant formulas: evidence of the absence of pesticide residues.

Concern about the effect of potential pesticide residues on the safety of the U.S. food supply has led to extensive modeling and projections of worst-case scenarios. Many risk assessment models project risk based on an assumption of the presence of pesticide residues at the tolerance level or at a level equivalent to the limit of analytical detectability. Often, actual residue data, and the variability of analytical detection limits, are ignored in favor of simpler models. Data presented here demonstrate the absence of detectable levels of pesticides in infant formula. The range of detection limits of analytical methodology employed also are presented. A rationale for the absence of pesticide residues in infant formulas derived from plant and animal sources is presented which obviates worst-case scenario calculations of risk based on pesticide residue tolerance levels or method detection limits.

Analysis of milk-based infant formula. Phase V. Vitamins A and E, folic acid, and pantothenic acid: Food and Drug Administration-Infant Formula Council: collaborative study.

In 1982, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the Infant Formula Council and its member companies, contract laboratories, and other government laboratories began a study of analytical methods for the nutrients listed in the Infant Formula Act of 1980 (P.L. 96-359). Four phases of the study have been completed and are discussed in earlier reports. The present report provides data on Phase V, in which 13 laboratories collaboratively studied individual methods for folic acid, pantothenic acid, and vitamin E, in addition to 2 methods for vitamin A. Vitamins A and E are determined by liquid chromatography. Folic acid and pantothenic acid are determined by microbiological methods using acidimetric and/or turbidimetric assays as the determinative step. In most cases, relative standard deviations for repeatability, RSDr, and reproducibility, RSDR, are as good as those that would be predicted from other collaborative studies. RSDr and RSDR values obtained for the 5 methods are 9.35 and 25.44% for folic acid, 4.59 and 10.23% for pantothenic acid, 8.46 and 11.69% for vitamin E, 3.62 and 9.72% for vitamin A (retinol isomers), and 4.9 and 10.5% for vitamin A (retinol). The 5 methods have been adopted first action by AOAC International.