Bovine papillomavirus type 1 in brains of cattle with a neurological syndrome: pathological and molecular study

Bovine papillomavirus (BPV) infection is endemic in Brazilian herds. Papillomaviruses are oncogenic, with a trophic response in squamous epithelial and mucosal tissues, and are associated with asymptomatic infections, proliferative benign skin lesions (papillomas), and malignant epithelial lesions (carcinomas). The presence and expression of BPV in the blood of healthy and papillomatosis-affected cattle has been demonstrated. Experimental inoculation of Bovine papillomavirus (BPV) into calf meninges can result in meningiomas and papillomatosis, but it´s not known if its natural infection causes neoplasia and neurological syndrome in cattle. We assessed the frequency of BPV in 300 Central Nervous System (CNS) samples from cattle with neurological syndrome from several Brazilian regions obtained from surveillance of neurological syndrome. Samples were negative for rabies, Neospora caninum, BoHV-1 and BoHV-5, bovine leukemia virus, and catarrhal malignant fever (PCR). Samples were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and submitted to macroscopic examination. For histological analysis, slides were submitted to a staining protocol using hematoxylin and eosin. PCR for BPV detection was applied in CNS frozen samples using generic primers FAP59 and FAP64 (L1 gene). Thirteen (4.3%) samples were positive for BPV by PCR, with 11 of these showing no pathological changes in microscopy, and two exhibiting nonspecific non-purulent meningoencephalitis. No CNS samples showed neoplasia. Nine of the 13 BPV positive samples (69.2%) came from females and four (30.8%) from males. The 13 positive animals were age 5 to 168 months with seven over 36 months (53.8%). Five were dairy cattle, four crossbred, and three beef cattle. Only one of the 13 positive samples provided sufficient BPV DNA for sequencing, which emonstrated 99% identity to samples of BPV-1 obtained from cutaneous papillomas in cattle in Brazil. The small quantity of BPV DNA in the CNS and the low number of PCR-positive samples may be associated with low neurotropism, unspecific inflammation, or BPV-infected lymphocytes in CNS tissues or bloodstream. Natural BPV-1 infection was not associated with cerebral neoplasia or neurological syndrome.(AU)

[Critical evaluation of the diagnostic nomenclatures of cervical cytopathological exams used in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS)]. / Avaliação crítica das nomenclaturas diagnósticas dos exames citopatológicos cervicais utilizadas no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS).

PURPOSE: to identify the nomenclature for reporting cervical cytological diagnoses used by laboratories which render services to the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) and which participate in External Quality Monitoring (MEQ). To evaluate the information acquired from gynecologists of the SUS regarding the various diagnostic classifications that they receive in the cervical cytology diagnostic reports. METHODS: we evaluated 94 cytology reports issued by laboratories which participate in the MEQ in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, and 126 questionnaires applied to gynecologists who work for the SUS. RESULTS: out of the 94 laboratories, 81 (86.2%) use one diagnostic classification: 79 (97.6%) use the Brazilian Nomenclature for Cytological Reports (NBLC), 1 (1.2%) uses the Papanicolaou classification and 1 (1.2%) uses the Richart diagnostic classification. Of the 13 (13.8%) laboratories that use more than one classification, 5 use 2 types and 8 use 3 to 4 types, with 9 including the Papanicolau diagnostic classification. The study showed that 52 (55.3%) laboratories presented more than one descriptive diagnosis in the same report. Out of the 126 gynecologists who filled out a questionnaire evaluating the cytopathology reports, 78 (61.9 %) stated that they received laboratory reports with only one diagnostic classification, 48 (38.1%) received reports with more than one classification and 2 received reports with all 4 classifications. Among the 93 (73.8%) gynecologists who prefer only one classification, 56 (60.2%) claimed that the NBLC contributes to clinical practice, 13 (14.0%) opted for the Richart classification, 8 (8.6%) for the Reagan classification and 16 (17.2%) for the Papanicolaou classification. Out of 33 (26.2%) gynecologists who prefer more than one classification, 5 opted for the 4 classifications. CONCLUSIONS: these data suggest that there is still resistance on the part of pathologists about using the official nomenclature in cytology reports for SUS. There is discrepancy between the information that gynecologists would like to see in the reports and the information provided by the pathologists. Greater efforts should be made to stimulate the use of the official nomenclature.

Avaliação crítica das nomenclaturas diagnósticas dos exames citopatológicos cervicais utilizadas no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) / Critical evaluation of the diagnostic nomenclatures of cervical cytopathological exams used in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS)

OBJETIVO: identificar as nomenclaturas diagnósticas dos exames citopatológicos cervicais utilizadas pelos laboratórios que atendem o Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) e participantes do Monitoramento Externo de Qualidade (MEQ). Avaliar as informações adquiridas de profissionais ginecologistas que atuam no SUS sobre os tipos de classificação diagnóstica que recebem nos laudos citopatológicos cervicais. MÉTODOS: foram avaliados 94 laudos citopatológicos liberados pelos laboratórios participantes do MEQ no Estado de São Paulo e 126 questionários aplicados aos ginecologistas que atenderam o SUS. RESULTADOS: dos 94 laboratórios, 81 (86,2 por cento) utilizam uma única nomenclatura diagnóstica: 79 (97,6 por cento) utilizam a Nomenclatura Brasileira para Laudos Citopatológicos (NBLC), 1 (1,2 por cento) utiliza a classificação de Papanicolaou e 1 (1,2 por cento) utiliza a de Richart. Dos 13 (13,8 por cento) laboratórios que utilizam mais de uma nomenclatura, 5 apresentam 2 tipos, e 8, de 3 a 4, 9 dos quais incluem a classificação de Papanicolaou. O estudo demonstrou que 52 (55,3 por cento) laboratórios apresentaram mais de um diagnóstico descritivo num mesmo laudo. Dos 126 ginecologistas que responderam ao questionário de avaliação dos laudos citopatológicos, 78 (61,9 por cento) disseram receber laudos dos laboratórios com apenas uma classificação diagnóstica, 48 (38,1 por cento), laudos com mais de uma classificação, e 2 receberam as 4 classificações. Entre os 93 (73,8 por cento) ginecologistas que preferem uma classificação, 56 (60,2 por cento) alegaram que a NBLC contribui para a conduta clínica, 13 (14,0 por cento) optaram pela nomenclatura de Richart, 8 (8,6 por cento), de Reagan e 16 (17,2 por cento), a de Papanicolaou. De 33 (26,2 por cento) ginecologistas que preferem mais de uma nomenclatura, 5 optaram pelas 4 classificações...

PURPOSE: to identify the nomenclature for reporting cervical cytological diagnoses used by laboratories which render services to the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) and which participate in External Quality Monitoring (MEQ). To evaluate the information acquired from gynecologists of the SUS regarding the various diagnostic classifications that they receive in the cervical cytology diagnostic reports. METHODS: we evaluated 94 cytology reports issued by laboratories which participate in the MEQ in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, and 126 questionnaires applied to gynecologists who work for the SUS. RESULTS: out of the 94 laboratories, 81 (86.2 percent) use one diagnostic classification: 79 (97.6 percent) use the Brazilian Nomenclature for Cytological Reports (NBLC), 1 (1.2 percent) uses the Papanicolaou classification and 1 (1.2 percent) uses the Richart diagnostic classification. Of the 13 (13.8 percent) laboratories that use more than one classification, 5 use 2 types and 8 use 3 to 4 types, with 9 including the Papanicolau diagnostic classification. The study showed that 52 (55.3 percent) laboratories presented more than one descriptive diagnosis in the same report. Out of the 126 gynecologists who filled out a questionnaire evaluating the cytopathology reports, 78 (61.9 percent) stated that they received laboratory reports with only one diagnostic classification, 48 (38.1 percent) received reports with more than one classification and 2 received reports with all 4 classifications. Among the 93 (73.8 percent) gynecologists who prefer only one classification, 56 (60.2 percent) claimed that the NBLC contributes to clinical practice, 13 (14.0 percent) opted for the Richart classification, 8 (8.6 percent) for the Reagan classification and 16 (17.2 percent) for the Papanicolaou classification. Out of 33 (26.2 percent) gynecologists who prefer more than one classification, 5 opted for the 4 classifications...