Comparison of prognosis of five scoring systems in emphysematous pyelonephritis patients requiring intensive care.

INTRODUCTION: Our study aimed to evaluate the performance of Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), National Early Warning Score (NEWS), Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), and Global Research in the Emphysematous Pyelonephritis group (GREMP) in predicting the need of admission in intensive care units (ICU) for emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) patient. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we reviewed 70 patients admitted to our department from January 2008 to October 2022. Data on clinical presentation and EPN management were noted. The five scoring systems were calculated by one investigator. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess predictive factors of severe sepsis and mortality. Statistical analysis was made using SPSS version 22. RESULTS: Mean age was 61.83 years with 65.7% diabetes. As per Huang and Tseng classification, 41 patients had class I EPN, 7 had class II EPN, 8 had class IIIa, 6 class IIIB EPN, and 8 had class IV EPN. Seventeen patients (24.28%) were admitted to ICU with an 18.57 mortality rate. Univariate analysis showed that ICU admission was significantly associated with higher respiration rate and heart rate, lower systolic blood pressure, confusion, CRP, lactate and creatinine serum (p = 0.0001, p = 0.0001, p = 0.001, p = 0.007, p = 0.004, p = 0.001, p = 0.001, respectively). All five scores and Huang and Tseng classification were significantly predictive of admission to ICU. All five scores showed good results under the area curves to predict ICU entry with 0.915, 0.895, 0.968, 0.887, and 0.846 for qSOFA, MEWS score, NEWS score, SIRS, and GREMP score, respectively. CONCLUSION: NEWS score seemed to be the best performing physiologic score among the five scoring systems studied and may help with biological and radiological findings to quickly identify EPN patients that need intensive care unit.

Functional outcomes of surgical treatment of ureteral injury following gynecological and obstetrical surgery.

Introduction: Iatrogenic ureteral lesions represent one of the serious complications that can follow obstetric and gynecological surgery. This condition has a fatal consequence on renal function if it's not promptly diagnosed and managed. Objective: The aim of our study was to report our experience in the management of this pathology. Materials & Methods: This is a retrospective study of 32 patients treated for an iatrogenic ureteral injury after gynecological or obstetrical surgery, collected in the urology department of the Rabta Hospital over a 15-year period (2005-2020). Clinical presentation, investigations, and operative and postoperative details were reviewed from the patients' charts. Results: The average age of the patients was 42.6 (21-61). Multiparity was observed in 90.6% of cases. Hysterectomy was the most common cause (71.87%), followed by cesarean operation (18.75%), mainly for patients with placenta percreta (12.5%), and lastly, cure of prolapse by the upper approach in 9.37% of cases. The symptoms were dominated by low back pain and urinary incontinence. Stenosis was the most frequent lesion in 25 cases, followed by a section in 4 cases. A ureterovaginal fistula was observed in 3 case s. The first-line treatment of the patients was drainage by a ureteral stent (15.6%) or by a percutaneous nephrostomy (84.4%). Ureterovesical reimplantation was performed in 26 cases (81.25%). However, one patient had an Ileal ureter replacement. During follow-up, treatment failure was noted in 7 patients. Four patients developed secondary hydronephrosis treated with a urethral stent while 3 patients required nephrectomy. The type of gynecological and obstetrical procedure (open hysterectomy), history of pelvic surgery, and malignant pathology were predictive factors of treatment failure. Conclusions: Injuries to the ureter during gynecological and obstetrical surgery are generally rare. The diversity of repair techniques and the contribution of endo-urological techniques most often allow renal preservation, knowing that the best treatment remains prevention.

Predictive factors for failure of conservative management in patients with emphysematous pyelonephritis.

Introduction: Emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) is a severe form of life-threatening renal infection. Conservative treatment represents the gold standard in the management of EPN, but nephrectomy remains appropriate in certain situations. Objective: The aim of our study was to report our experience in the conservative management of emphysematous pyelonephritis and to identify the predictive factors of failure of conservative treatment. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective study including all patients treated for emphysematous pyelonephritis in our department between January 2015 and December 2020. The first-line treatment was conservative based on antibiotic therapy and drainage in case of an obstructive cause. A nephrectomy was performed in case of failure of the conservative approach. Epidemiological, clinical, biological, therapeutic, and evolutionary data were collected from the patients' files. Statistical analysis was made using SPSS version 28. Results: 41 patients were included in our study. The mean age was 64.4 years old [28-91] with gender ratio of 0.46 (13H/28F). Diabetes mellitus was present in 75.6% of cases. The mean presentation delay was 3.28 days (Kaiser and Fournier, 2005; Kapoor et al., 2010; Aswathaman et al., 2008; Agha et al., 2020; Huang and Tseng, 2000; Falagas et al., 2007; Dutta et al., 2007; Dutta et al., 2007; Deoraj et al., 2018 Sep; Rahim et al., 2021 Mar; Maheshwari, 2021 Jul-Sep) [1-11]. In CT scan, 21 patients had class 1 EPN, 9 had class 2 EPN, 8 had class 3 EPN and 3 had class 4 EPN. The obstructive origin was found in 24 cases. Initially, 25 patients (60.9%) presented with severe sepsis and 7 patients (17.07%) developed a septic shock. Seven patients required nephrectomy with a mean delay of 2.12 days (Kapoor et al., 2010; Aswathaman et al., 2008; Agha et al., 2020; Huang and Tseng, 2000; Falagas et al., 2007) [2-6]. Five patients with septic shock refractory to conservative treatment and two patients whose evolution was marked by the occurrence of secondary septic shock. In the univariate analysis, thrombocytopenia, initially septic shock, and the need for hemodialysis were the predictive factors of failure of conservative management in patients with emphysematous pyelonephritis. Conclusion: Emphysematous pyelonephritis is a serious condition with significant mortality. The optimal management is based on conservative treatment in most cases. However, patients requiring hemodialysis and with thrombocytopenia and initially septic shock should be considered candidates for emergency nephrectomy.