Improving motion management in radiation therapy: findings from a workshop and survey in Australia and New Zealand.

Motion management has become an integral part of radiation therapy. Multiple approaches to motion management have been reported in the literature. To allow the sharing of experiences on current practice and emerging technology, the University of Sydney and the New South Wales/Australian Capital Territory branch of the Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine (ACPSEM) held a two-day motion management workshop. To inform the workshop program, participants were invited to complete a survey prior to the workshop on current use of motion management techniques and their opinion on the effectiveness of each approach. A post-workshop survey was also conducted, designed to capture changes in opinion as a result of workshop participation. The online workshop was the most well attended ever hosted by the ACPSEM, with over 300 participants and a response to the pre-workshop survey was received from at least 60% of the radiation therapy centres in Australia and New Zealand. Motion management is extensively used in the region with use of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) reported by 98% of centres for left-sided breast treatments and 91% for at least some right-sided breast treatments. Surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) was the most popular session at the workshop and survey results showed that the use of SGRT is likely to increase. The workshop provided an excellent opportunity for the exchange of knowledge and experience, with most survey respondents indicating that their participation would lead to improvements in the quality of delivery of treatments at their centres.

Technical note: Cryostat transmission characterization for MR linac - temporal stability, clinical impact and change implementation.

BACKGROUND: In the Unity MR linac (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), the radiation beam traverses the cryostat and the coil support structure. The resulting beam attenuation must be considered for output calibration and its variation with gantry angle must be characterized in the treatment planning system (TPS). PURPOSE: The aim of this work was to investigate the impact of a change of the cryostat transmission characterization (CTC) curve, due to the helium level modification, on clinical treatment plan dosimetry and to report on the experience with the CTC curve update. METHODS: Twenty stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans: 10 prostate and 10 oligo-metastatic cancer plans, prepared with a beam model incorporating the CTC curve acquired at installation time, were re-calculated using the model implementing CTC curve post helium top-up. To account for the CTC change as well as to align our system to the recent reference conditions recommendations, the new model was commissioned with the emphasis on the specifics associated with the treatment plan adaptation and the existence of the offline and online TPS components. RESULTS: Average CTV mean dose reduction by 0.45% in prostate cases and average GTV mean dose reduction by 0.22% in oligo-metastatic cases was observed. Updated model validation showcased good agreement between measurements and TPS calculations. CONCLUSIONS: The agreement between CTC measurements demonstrates its temporal constancy and robustness of the measurement method employed. A helium fill level change was shown to affect the CTC and led to a small but systematic dose calculation inaccuracy. Finally, model validation and end-to-end testing results presented, underscore the minimal impact of transitioning to the new beam model and new reference conditions.

Magnetic resonance guided adaptive post prostatectomy radiotherapy: Accumulated dose comparison of different workflows.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the use of magnetic resonance guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) in the post-prostatectomy setting; comparing dose accumulation for our initial seven patients treated with fully adaptive workflow on the Unity MR-Linac (MRL) and with non-adaptive plans generated offline. Additionally, we analyzed toxicity in patients receiving treatment. METHODS: Seven patients were treated with MRgART. The prescription was 70-72 Gy in 35-36 fractions. Patients were treated with an adapt to shape (ATS) technique. For each clinically delivered plan, a non-adaptive plan based upon the reference plan was generated and compared to the associated clinically delivered plan. A total of 468 plans were analyzed. Concordance Index of target and Organs at Risk (OARs) for each fraction with reference contours was analyzed. Acute toxicity was then assessed at six-months following completion of treatment with Common Terminology for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Toxicity Criteria. RESULTS: A total of 246 fractions were clinically delivered to seven patients; 234 fractions were delivered via MRgART and 12 fractions delivered via a traditional linear accelerator due to machine issues. Pre-treatment reference plans met CTV and OAR criteria. PTV coverage satisfaction was higher in the clinically delivered adaptive plans than non-adaptive comparison plans; 42.93% versus 7.27% respectively. Six-month CTCAE genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity was absent in most patients, and mild-to-moderate in a minority of patients (Grade 1 GU toxicity in one patient and Grade 2 GI toxicity in one patient). CONCLUSIONS: Daily MRgART treatment consistently met planning criteria. Target volume variability in prostate bed treatment can be mitigated by using MRgART and deliver satisfactory coverage of CTV whilst minimizing dose to adjacent OARs and reducing toxicity.

ACPSEM position paper: dosimetry for magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerators.

Consistency and clear guidelines on dosimetry are essential for accurate and precise dosimetry, to ensure the best patient outcomes and to allow direct dose comparison across different centres. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Linac (MRI-linac) systems have recently been introduced to Australasian clinics. This report provides recommendations on reference dosimetry measurements for MRI-linacs on behalf of the Australiasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine (ACPSEM) MRI-linac working group. There are two configurations considered for MRI-linacs, perpendicular and parallel, referring to the relative direction of the magnetic field and radiation beam, with different impacts on dose deposition in a medium. These recommendations focus on ion chambers which are most commonly used in the clinic for reference dosimetry. Water phantoms must be MR safe or conditional and practical limitations on phantom set-up must be considered. Solid phantoms are not advised for reference dosimetry. For reference dosimetry, IAEA TRS-398 recommendations cannot be followed completely due to physical differences between conventional linac and MRI-linac systems. Manufacturers' advice on reference conditions should be followed. Beam quality specification of TPR20,10 is recommended. The configuration of the central axis of the ion chamber relative to the magnetic field and radiation beam impacts the chamber response and must be considered carefully. Recommended corrections to delivered dose are [Formula: see text], a correction for beam quality and [Formula: see text], for the impact of the magnetic field on dosimeter response in the magnetic field. Literature based values for [Formula: see text] are given. It is important to note that this is a developing field and these recommendations should be used together with a review of current literature.

Old dogs, new tricks: MR-Linac training and credentialing of radiation oncologists, radiation therapists and medical physicists.

The introduction of magnetic resonance (MR) linear accelerators (MR-Linacs) into radiotherapy departments has increased in recent years owing to its unique advantages including the ability to deliver online adaptive radiotherapy. However, most radiation oncology professionals are not accustomed to working with MR technology. The integration of an MR-Linac into routine practice requires many considerations including MR safety, MR image acquisition and optimisation, image interpretation and adaptive radiotherapy strategies. This article provides an overview of training and credentialing requirements for radiation oncology professionals to develop competency and efficiency in delivering treatment safely on an MR-Linac.

Introduction of radiation therapist-led adaptive treatments on a 1.5 T MR-Linac.

The introduction of magnetic resonance (MR) linear accelerators (MR-Linac) marks the beginning of a new era in radiotherapy. MR-Linac systems are currently being operated by teams of radiation therapists (RTs), radiation oncology medical physicists (ROMPs) and radiation oncologists (ROs) due to the diverse and complex tasks required to deliver treatment. This is resource-intensive and logistically challenging. RT-led service delivery at the treatment console is paramount to simplify the process and make the best use of this technology for suitable patients with commonly treated anatomical sites. This article will discuss the experiences of our department in developing and implementing an RT-led workflow on the 1.5 T MR-Linac.

Current status of intra-cranial stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery in Australia and New Zealand: key considerations from a workshop and surveys.

Recently, there has been increased interest worldwide in the use of conventional linear accelerator (linac)-based systems for delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) contrasting with historical delivery in specialised clinics with dedicated equipment. In order to gain an understanding and define the current status of SRS/SRT delivery in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) we conducted surveys and provided a single-day workshop. Prior to the workshop ANZ medical physicists were invited to complete two surveys: a departmental survey regarding SRS/SRT practises and equipment; and an individual survey regarding opinions on current and future SRS/SRT practices. At the workshop conclusion, attendees completed a second opinion-based survey. Workshop discussion and survey data were utilised to identify areas of consensus, and areas where a community consensus was unclear. The workshop was held on the 8th Sept 2020 virtually due to pandemic-related travel restrictions and was attended by 238 radiation oncology medical physicists from 39 departments. The departmental survey received 32 responses; a further 89 and 142 responses were received to the pre-workshop and post-workshop surveys respectively. Workshop discussion indicated a consensus that for a department to offer an SRS/SRT service, a minimum case load should be considered depending on availability of training, peer-review, resources and equipment. It was suggested this service may be limited to brain metastases only, with less common indications reserved for departments with comprehensive SRS/SRT programs. Whilst most centres showed consensus with treatment delivery techniques and image guidance, opinions varied on the minimum target diameter and treatment margin that should be applied.

Early experience with MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy using a 1.5 T MR-Linac: First 6 months of operation using adapt to shape workflow.

INTRODUCTION: The magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MRL) offers improved soft tissue visualization to guide daily adaptive radiotherapy treatment. This manuscript aims to report initial experience using a 1.5 T MRL in the first 6 months of operation, including training, workflows, timings and dosimetric accuracy. METHODS: All staff received training in MRI safety and MRL workflows. Initial sites chosen for treatment were stereotactic and hypofractionated prostate, thoraco-abdomino-pelvic metastasis, prostate bed and bladder. The Adapt To Shape (ATS) workflow was chosen to be the focus of treatment as it is the most robust solution for daily adaptive radiotherapy. A workflow was created addressing patient suitability, simulation, planning, treatment and peer review. Treatment times were recorded breaking down into the various stages of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients were treated and 317 fractions delivered (of which 313 were delivered using an ATS workflow) in our initial 6 months. Average treatment times over the entire period were 50 and 38 min for stereotactic and non-stereotactic treatments respectively. Average treatment times reduced each month. The average difference between reference planned and ionization chamber measured dose was 0.0 ± 1.4%. CONCLUSION: The MRL was successfully established in an Australian setting. A focus on training and creating a detailed workflow from patient selection, review and treatment are paramount to establishing new treatment programmes.

Comparison of CT-based volumetric dosimetry with traditional prescription points in the treatment of cervical cancer with PDR brachytherapy.

INTRODUCTION: The traditional use of two-dimensional geometric prescription points in intracavitary brachytherapy planning for locally advanced cervical cancer is increasingly being replaced by three-dimensional (3D) planning. This study aimed to directly compare the two planning methods to validate that CT planning provides superior dosimetry for both tumour and organs at risk (OARs) in our department. METHODS: The CT planning data of 10 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer was audited. For each CT dataset, two new brachytherapy plans were created, comparing the dosimetry of conventional American Brachytherapy Society points and 3D-optimised volumes created for the high-risk clinical target volume (HR CTV) and OARs. Total biologically equivalent doses for these structures were calculated using the modified EQD2 formula and comparative dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis performed. RESULTS: DVH analysis revealed that for the 3D-optimised plans, the prescription aim of D90 ≥ 100% was achieved for the HR CTV in all 10 patients. However, when prescribing to point A, only 50% of the plans achieved the minimum required dose to the HR CTV. Rectal and bladder dose constraints were met for all 3D-optimised plans but exceeded in two and one of the conventional plans, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that the regionally relevant practice of CT-based 3D-optimised planning results in improved tumour dose coverage compared with traditional points-based planning methods and also improves dose to the rectum and bladder.

First experiences in using a dose control system on a TomoTherapy Hi·Art II.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of a dose control system (DCS) servo installed on two fully commissioned TomoTherapy Hi·Art II treatment units. This servo is designed to actively adjust machine parameters to control the output variation of a tomotherapy unit to within ± 0.5% of the nominal dose rate. Machine output, dose rate, and patient-specific quality assurance data were retrospectively analyzed for periods prior to and following the installation of the servo system. Quality assurance tests indicate a reduction in the rotational variation of the output during a procedure, where the peak-to-peak amplitude of the variation was ± 1.30 prior to DCS and equal to ± 0.4 with DCS. Comparing two tomotherapy unit static outputs over four years the percentage error was 1.05% ± 0.7% and -0.4% ± 0.66% and, once DCS was installed, was reduced to -0.22% ± 0.29% and -0.08% ± 0.16%. The results of the quality assurance tests indicate that the dose control system reduced the output variation of each machine for both static and rotational delivery, leading to an improvement in the overall performance of the machine and providing greater certainty in treatment delivery.

A unique approach to high-dose-rate vaginal mold brachytherapy of gynecologic malignancies.

PURPOSE: Patients with cervical and vaginal cancer sometimes have a less straightforward approach for choice of brachytherapy treatment owing to the tumor's location and clinical presentation. The staff at Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital in Queensland, Australia, is trying to solve this problem by the use of an old technique in a new approach called vaginal molds. With a patient-specific vaginal mold, the appearance of the applicator and the dose distribution can be customized to provide an optimal treatment for each patient. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The technique used at the Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital uses a flexible two-part putty, moulded to the shape of the vagina, in which standard catheters (flexible implant tubes) are incorporated, in a pattern designed to permit a dose distribution more conformal to the target volume. RESULTS: The presented technique is efficient and improves the accuracy of a homogeneous target cover and sparing of organs at risk for vaginal mold brachytherapy treatments at our institution. CONCLUSION: This technique offers a customizable option when traditional cylindrical- or dome-type applicators cannot be used, or provide inadequate dose coverage. Molds to match the patient anatomy can be created quickly, while allowing flexibility in positioning of catheters to achieve the desired dose distribution.