Endovascular Transvenous versus Open Femoropopliteal Bypass.

Background and Objectives: Lower extremity arterial disease is one of the most prevalent manifestations of atherosclerosis. The results from numerous studies regarding the best revascularization method of an occluded superficial femoral artery have been conflicting. The aim of this study was to compare the patency of transvenous endovascular with open femoropopliteal bypass, both with vein and prosthetic grafts. To our knowledge, a direct patency comparison between transvenous endovascular and open femoropopliteal bypass has not been published. This could help elucidate which method is preferable and in which cases. Materials and Methods: Patients with complex TASC-C and D SFA lesions were offered endovascular transvenous or open bypass. A total of 384 consecutive patients with PAD requiring surgical treatment were evaluated for inclusion in this study. Three-year follow-up data were collected for 52 endovascular procedures, 80 prosthetic grafts, and 44 venous bypass surgeries. Bypass patency was investigated by Duplex US every 6 months. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to analyze primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency for endovascular transvenous, autovenous, and prosthetic bypasses. Results: Primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency in venous group at 3 years was 70.5%, 77.3%, and 77.3%, respectively. In the endovascular transvenous group, primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency at 3 years was 46.2%, 69.2%, and 76.9%, respectively. The lowest patency rates at 3 years were noted in the prosthetic graft group with 22.5% primary, 26.6% primary-assisted, and 28.2% secondary patency. Conclusions: The saphenous vein is the best graft to perform in above-the-knee femoropopliteal bypass. Transvenous endovascular bypass is a viable option with comparable primary-assisted and secondary patency. Primary patency is substantially lower for endovascular transvenous compared to venous bypass. Patients treated with endovascular transvenous bypass will require a significant number of secondary procedures to provide optimal patency. Prosthetic grafts should only be used if no other option for bypass is available.

Three-Year Patency Results following Endovascular Transvenous Femoropopliteal Bypass.

Background and Objectives: Peripheral artery disease is one of the most common vascular pathologies. There is an ongoing debate among specialists on whether open or endovascular revascularization is preferred in cases of complex superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions. The purpose of this study was to assess patency results of a relatively new transvenous endovascular bypass device. This could add to existing evidence and aid in comparison between open and endovascular bypass. Materials and Methods: Patients with complex TASC-C and D SFA lesions who had indications for revascularization were identified. Prospective analysis of stent graft patency from 54 transvenous femoropopliteal bypass procedures was performed. Patency was assessed by Duplex ultrasound every six months. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency of transvenous bypass. Results: Following endovascular transvenous femoropopliteal bypass, 3-year graft primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency was 43.8%, 66.3%, and 73.9%, respectively. Conclusions: Transvenous endovascular femoropopliteal bypass is a viable option for selected patients who lack adequate saphenous vein or have comorbidities that increase the risk of open femoropopliteal bypass. Strict post-operative follow-up is necessary to improve patency rates.

Long term clinical and functional venous outcomes after endovascular transvenous femoro-popliteal bypass.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral artery disease is widespread in Western societies affecting around 13% of the population above 50 years of age. Despite recent improvements of endovascular treatment, open surgical bypass is still recommended as the treatment of choice for long segment TASC D lesions. The DETOUR procedure was introduced as an endovascular alternative in cases of long-segment superficial femoral artery occlusion. This unconventional technique raises several questions regarding the effect of the bypass graft on femoral venous physiology. METHODS: We conducted a 3-year follow-up study of subjects enrolled and treated in the prospective, multicenter DETOUR study at the Pauls Stradins clinical university hospital, Riga, Latvia. In total, 52 consecutive patients (54 procedures) were enrolled in this study from 2015 until 2019. We performed Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and Villalta (VS) Score assessments, Duplex ultrasound measuring femoral and popliteal vein diameters, venous occlusion plethysmography and digital photoplethysmography to assess and compare venous physiology at baseline and at follow-up visits every 6 months. RESULTS: At baseline mean femoral vein diameter was 11.1 mm (SD=1.5). At 36-months following intraluminal stent-graft placement, mean femoral vein diameter was 11.1 mm (SD=1.7) with no evidence of enlargement of the femoral vein (P=0.2). Popliteal vein diameter was not significantly changed during 24-months of follow-up (P=0.12) but showed a small (0.02 mm) statistically significant decrease in diameter at 36-months compared to baseline. During the study period, only one patient (1.9%) developed clinically significant ipsilateral DVT 1-month after surgery. Clinically silent femoral venous thrombosis was documented in 8 legs during 36-month follow-up. In one case the thrombus was occlusive and in 7 cases the thrombus was non-occlusive. At baseline, 48 of 52 patients (92%) had no or minor venous symptoms ([VCSS 0-2] with clinically significant venous symptoms in only 4 patients [VCSS≥3]). At one-month follow-up, the venous clinical severity score increased in all patients compared to baseline. At 6-month follow-up, the VCSS had returned to baseline in the majority of patients with no significant changes during the 3-year follow-up period. At baseline, all patients had a VS of 0-2 indicating minor or no venous symptoms (mean 0.4 [SD 0.7]). At the 1-month follow-up visit 3 patients (5.8%) had a VS≥3 (two patients had a score of 3 and one patient a score of 4), indicating significant venous symptoms. At the 6-month visit and thereafter, all the VS in all patients had returned to baseline. Transvenous endovascular procedure did not significantly alter venous physiology in treated leg. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous transvenous femoropopliteal bypass provided safe and effective lower-extremity revascularization with minimal effect on long-term venous function. The femoral and popliteal vein remained patent with no compensatory enlargement in response to the presence of the bypass graft within the femoral vein. During 3-year follow-up there were no significant changes in venous symptom scores or physiologic function.