CenteringPregnancy: A Review of Implementation and Outcomes.

Importance: CenteringPregnancy (CP) is a model for group prenatal care associated with improved perinatal outcomes for preterm birth and low birthweight, increased rates of breastfeeding, and higher rates of patient and clinician satisfaction. Objective: The study aims to review the literature related to perinatal outcomes associated with CP, benefits and barriers to implementation, and utility of the model. Evidence: An electronic-based search was performed in PubMed using the search terms "CenteringPregnancy" OR "Centering Pregnancy," revealing 221 articles. Results: The CP model improves patient centeredness, efficiency, and equality in prenatal care. Challenges include administrative buy-in, limited resources, and financial support. Multisite retrospective studies of CP demonstrate improved maternal, neonatal, postpartum, and well-being outcomes, especially for participants from minority backgrounds; however, prospective studies had mixed results. CenteringPregnancy is feasibly implemented with high tenet fidelity in several low- and middle-income settings with improved perinatal outcomes compared with traditional care. Conclusions: CenteringPregnancy is feasible to implement, largely accepted by communities, and shows positive qualitative and quantitative health outcomes. This body of literature supports CP as a potential tool for decreasing racial inequalities in prenatal access, quality of care, and maternal mortality. Further investigation is necessary to inform obstetric clinicians about the potential outcome differences that exist between group and traditional prenatal care.

Understanding the spectrum of malignant bowel obstructions in gynecologic cancers and the application of the Henry score.

OBJECTIVE: Malignancy-associated bowel obstruction (MBO) is a potential sequela of advanced gynecologic cancers, adversely impacting both quality of life and prognosis. The Henry score (HS) was developed in a gastrointestinal cancer-predominant population to predict 30-day mortality. We aim to characterize MBO in gynecologic cancers and assess the utility of the HS in this population. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients with gynecologic cancer and MBO admitted to a single academic institution from 2016 to 2021. The primary outcome is to characterize malignant small and large bowel obstructions in primary and recurrent gynecologic cancer using readmission and mortality rates. Secondary outcomes are to assess the Henry score and inpatient MBO management. RESULTS: 179 patients totaling 269 were admissions identified, most commonly affecting patients with ovarian cancer. The majority (89.4%) were managed non-operatively while 10.6% were managed surgically. No significant differences were observed in survival for medical versus surgical management. Thirty-day mortality increased with increasing HS (0%, 0-1; 14.3%, 2-3; 40.9%, 4-5). Over 1/3 (34.1%) of patients were readmitted for recurrent or persistent MBO. Goals of care conversations were documented for 56.8% of patients with HS 4-5. Mortality rates across the entire cohort were high-20.1% and 60.9% had died by 1 and 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Survival rates following an initial MBO admission are poor. The HS has utility in gynecologic cancers for assessing 30-day mortality and may be a useful tool to aid in the management and counseling of patients with gynecologic cancer and MBO.

Prospective Observational Study of N-terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels in Obese and Nonobese Women during Pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), a marker of ventricular dysfunction, varies by body mass index (BMI) outside of pregnancy. This study aimed to determine whether obesity affects NT-proBNP levels in pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study of healthy pregnant people in the third trimester (3TM) and postpartum (PP). Patients were excluded if they had significant medical comorbidities or if their fetuses had anomalies, growth restriction or aneuploidy. NT-proBNP was measured at 28 weeks (3TM), predelivery (PD), 1 to 2 days PP (immediate postpartum [IPP]), and 4 to 6 weeks PP (delayed postpartum [DPP]). LogNT-proBNP levels were analyzed using linear mixed effects models, including BMI < or ≥30, time, and time-by-BMI interactions. RESULTS: Fifty-five people (28 [51%] with BMI ≥ 30 and 27 [49%] with BMI < 30) were enrolled. A greater proportion of obese than nonobese subjects developed hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (50 vs. 15%, p = 0.010) and obese patients had higher systolic blood pressures at all time points (p < 0.05). NT-proBNP levels (median [interquartile range] in pg/mL) were 18 (6-28) versus 26 (17-48) at 3TM, 16 (3-38) versus 43 (21-60) at PD, 58 (20-102) versus 63 (38-155) at IPP, and 33 (27-56) versus 23 (8-42) at DPP for obese compared with nonobese patients. In linear mixed effects models, logNT-proBNP was lower in obese patients at 3TM (ß = -0.89 [95% confidence interval, CI: -1.51, -0.26]) and PD (ß = -1.05 [95% CI: -1.72, -0.38]). The logNT-proBNP trends over time differed by BMI category, with higher values in obese patients at both PP time points compared with the 3TM (IPP ß = 1.24 [95% CI: 0.75, 1.73]; DPP ß = 1.08 [95% CI: 0.52, 1.63]), but only IPP for nonobese patients (ß = 0.87 [95% CI: 0.36, 1.38]). CONCLUSION: Obese patients had lower NT-proBNP levels than nonobese patients during pregnancy but not PP. The prolonged PP elevation in NT-proBNP in obese patients suggests that their PP cardiac recovery may be more prolonged. KEY POINTS: · NT-proBNP levels are lower in obese than nonobese patients during pregnancy.. · Levels remain elevated in obese, but not nonobese, patients up to 4 to 6 weeks' postpartum.. · A lower threshold for concern regarding NT-proBNP levels may be needed in obese pregnant people..

Cost-effectiveness of management strategies for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer and inoperable malignant bowel obstruction.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer often present with inoperable malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) from a large burden of abdominal disease. Interventions such as total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and chemotherapy may be used in this setting. We aim to describe the relative cost-effectiveness of these interventions to inform clinical decision making. METHODS: Four strategies for management of platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer with inoperable MBO were compared from a societal perspective using a Monte Carlo simulation: (1) hospice, (2) TPN, (3) chemotherapy, and (4) TPN + chemotherapy. Survival, hospitalization rates, end-of-life (EOL) setting, and MBO-related utilities were obtained from literature review: hospice (survival 38 days, 6% hospitalization), chemotherapy (42 days, 29%), TPN (55 days, 25%), TPN + chemotherapy (74 days, 47%). Outcomes were the average cost per strategy and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in US dollars per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: In the base case scenario, TPN + chemotherapy was the most costly strategy (mean; 95% CI) ($49,741; $49,329-$50,162) and provided the highest QALYs (0.089; 0.089-0.090). The lowest cost strategy was hospice ($14,591; $14,527-$14,654). The TPN alone and chemotherapy alone strategies were dominated by a combination of hospice and TPN + chemotherapy. The ICER of TPN + chemotherapy was $918,538/QALY compared to hospice. With a societal willingness to pay threshold of $150,000/QALY, hospice was the strategy of choice in 71.6% of cases, chemotherapy alone in 28.4%, and TPN-containing strategies in 0%. CONCLUSIONS: TPN with or without chemotherapy is not cost-effective in management of inoperable malignant bowel obstruction and platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.