Prelamination of the Radial Forearm Free Flap Using Free Full-Thickness Eyelid Skin Grafts: A New Approach for Intraoral Defect Reconstruction.

ABSTRACT: Free flap transfer for reconstruction of intraoral defects is a common procedure in oral and maxillofacial surgery. For tumor-related defects, the radial forearm flap is widely used for soft tissue restoration. However, transfer of free skin grafts to the donor site region is often required for wound closure after free flap harvesting, resulting in esthetic disturbances due to shrinkage of the grafted skin, attendant scarring, or mismatches in skin texture or color. Furthermore, free flap transfer may result in hair follicle transfer into the oral cavity, causing unfavorable intraoral hair growth in adult men in particular. Free flap prelamination can help reduce the potential disadvantages of free flaps, in terms of both flap design and size and donor site morbidity. For surgical treatment of oral cancer in middle-aged and elderly patients, eyelid dermatochalasis may present as a comorbidity leading to esthetic impairments or, in cases involving the upper eyelid, even a reduced field of view. In these cases, bilateral blepharoplasty can reduce the excess eyelid skin. The present study is the first to attempt to use excised skin after bilateral blepharoplasty as full-thickness skin grafts for radial forearm free flap prelamination. This approach combined surgical therapy of eyelid dermatochalasis with free flap prelamination, thereby avoiding the need to harvest free skin grafts from other anatomically healthy regions to close the donor site defect and preventing the accompanying disadvantages. The reconstruction results and clinical outcomes of patients revealed that radial forearm free flap prelamination using bilateral free full-thickness eyelid skin grafts was an easy and feasible method for intraoral defect reconstruction. In particular, this approach could avoid intraoral hair growth and additional skin grafting from other healthy anatomical regions, yielding good esthetic and functional results at the flap's recipient and donor sites.

Quantitative ultrasonographic diagnostics for midface and mandible fractures.

The aim of this study was to examine whether ultrasonography and three-dimensional radiological procedures produce significantly different measurement results with respect to fracture dislocation. This was a retrospective study of patients who were admitted to the department for oral and maxillofacial surgery of the Medical Highschool Hannover with facial skull fracture and underwent high-resolution computed tomography and ultrasonography imaging during a period from 1 January 2019 to 31 August 2019. A 10 mHz transducer was used for fracture imaging, and the largest dislocation of each fracture was measured. A paired t-test for dependent samples was used for statistical evaluation of the measured differences, and the p-value was set at 0.05. A total of 16 patients with 29 fractures were included. The fractures were characterized as follows: zygomatic arch (n = 7), lateroorbital region (n = 4), maxilla/zygomatic bone (n = 15), mandible (n = 2), and frontal sinus (n = 1). Regardless of the fracture location, we found no statistical difference in fracture measurements between the ultrasonography and the computed tomography (p = 0.17 (fractures of the zygomatic arch) to p = 0.85 (all fractures)). The study findings suggest that ultrasonography not only allows basic detection but also a quantification of the dislocation in facial skull fractures. The ultrasonography results are not significantly different from those of the computed tomography. In everyday clinical practice, ultrasonography of facial fractures can be considered an adequate imaging procedure. If used correctly, additional radiation exposure to the patient can be avoided, thus representing a diagnostic alternative to computed tomography.