RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy and costs of newer rapid human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody tests in primary health care settings in rural Zambia. METHODS: Three rural hospitals participated in this study. During a baseline assessment period, HIV testing practices were recorded on 250 consecutive clients at each hospital. Baseline evaluation was compared with 250 subsequent consecutive clients tested using a testing algorithm consisting of an initial screening HIV Dipstick test (McDonald Scientific [PVT] Limited, Harare, Zimbabwe) followed by confirmatory testing of all reactive specimens using the HIV Capillus test (Cambridge Diagnostics, Galway, Ireland), in conformity with World Health Organization HIV testing recommendations. Quality control was performed at a national university teaching hospital laboratory. RESULTS: A total of 1,500 clients was entered, with an HIV seropositivity rate of 53.2%. Most HIV testing was performed on patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of HIV infection. Same-day results were provided for only 16%. The HIV Dipstick testing algorithm sensitivity was 96.9%, and specificity was 98.0%. Counselor dissatisfaction was greater with the Dipstick algorithm as a result of 5.3% discordant results. Use of the HIV Dipstick testing algorithm cost between US $3.00 and US $3.80 per client tested. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of HIV testing in unsophisticated rural laboratories in Zambia is acceptable. Although HIV Dipstick testing algorithm costs were relatively high for a developing country, this HIV testing procedure is currently the most economical method available in Zambia. Accurate, less costly HIV testing algorithms are still needed.
PIP: The Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH) HIV Dipstick antibody test was developed to make a low-cost tool available to primary health services, especially in rural areas where laboratory facilities are often inadequate. The accuracy and costs of this test were evaluated at three rural hospitals in Zambia in 1996. During a baseline assessment period, HIV testing practices were recorded for 250 consecutive patients at each hospital. The baseline evaluation was compared with 250 subsequent consecutive patients tested using an algorithm consisting of an initial screening HIV Dipstick test followed by confirmatory testing of all reactive specimens using the HIV Capillus test. The HIV seropositivity rate among the 1500 patients tested was 53.2%. The HIV Dipstick testing algorithm sensitivity was 96.9% and the specificity was 98.0%. Counselor dissatisfaction was greater with the Dipstick algorithm because of a 5.3% discordant result rate. The cost of the HIV Dipstick testing algorithm was US$3.00-3.80 per client tested. Despite this relatively high cost, the HIV Dipstick procedure is currently the most economical technology available in Zambia. Further study is needed to find more accurate, less costly HIV testing algorithms.
