Cancer Pathology Turnaround Time at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, the Largest Referral Center in Malawi for Oncology Patients.

Purpose In all settings, a need exists for expedited pathology processing for patients with a suspected cancer diagnosis. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with limited resources, processing pathology samples is particularly challenging, so the measurement of turnaround times (TATs) for pathology results is an important quality metric. We explored the pathology TAT for suspected cancer patients at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital in Malawi to determine whether a difference exists when patients paid an out-of-pocket fee (paid for [PF] v nonpaid for [NPF]) to facilitate sample processing. Methods and Population This retrospective descriptive study included all patients with suspected cancer (N = 544) who underwent incisional and excisional biopsy in 2010 at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, a teaching hospital in Malawi. Data were abstracted from patient charts and administrative forms to build a database and determine the TAT for PF and NPF samples. Results The median TAT for the 544 patients was 71 days (interquartile range [IQR], 31 to 118 days). The median pathology processing time was 31 days (IQR, 15 to 52 days) and was shorter for PF versus NPF samples. The median TAT was 43 days for PF samples (IQR, 27 to 69 days) versus 101 days for NPF samples (IQR, 31 to 118 days), which was significantly different by the Wilcoxon rank sum test ( P < .01). Conclusion The TAT for pathology samples among patients with suspected cancer was longer than reported for other African countries during the study period, was longer than considered acceptable in high-income countries, and differed between PF and NPF samples.

Cervical cancer in southern Malawi: A prospective analysis of presentation, management, and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Malawi has the highest age standardised rate of cervical cancer in the world. This study describes the presentation, management and short-term outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed cervical cancer at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (QECH), in Southern Malawi. METHODS: All patients with a new diagnosis of cervical cancer presenting to QECH between 1st January-1st July 2015 had demographic data, referral pathway, stage, histology and management prospectively recorded at presentation, and at two months after initial presentation. RESULTS: 310 women presented with cervical cancer to QECH and 300 were included (mean age 44.9 years; HIV 47%), representing 8% of the estimated annual number of new presentations in Malawi. Mean age of patients with HIV was 6.9 years younger compared to those without HIV (p<0.05). 132 (44%) patients had stage 1 cervical cancer and 168 (56%) presented with more advanced disease (stage II-IV). There was a mean delay of 23.1 weeks between onset of symptoms and being seen by a clinician and a further 19 weeks before attending QECH. Most common management plans at initial consultation were: same day biopsy (n=112, 37.3%);, booking for curative surgery (n=76, 25.3%);, and referral to palliative care (n=93, 31%). At 2 months, 64 (57%) biopsies were reported, 31 (40.8%) operations were completed and 27 (29%) patients had attended the palliative clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with cervical cancer to QECH were young, with a high prevalence of HIV, and late stage disease. The lack of pathological and surgical capacity and the absence of radiotherapy severely limited the possibility of curative treatment. Access to quality palliative care remains an important component of management in low resource settings. Improving awareness of cervical cancer in the community, and better recognition and management within the health service, are important in reducing the cancer burden for women in Malawi.