RESUMO
Novel therapeutic strategies are needed to attenuate increased systemic and gut inflammation that contribute to morbidity and mortality in chronic HIV infection despite potent antiretroviral therapy (ART). The goal of this study is to use preclinical models of chronic treated HIV to determine whether the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory apoA-I mimetic peptides 6F and 4F attenuate systemic and gut inflammation in chronic HIV. We used two humanized murine models of HIV infection and gut explants from 10 uninfected and 10 HIV infected persons on potent ART, to determine the in vivo and ex vivo impact of apoA-I mimetics on systemic and intestinal inflammation in HIV. When compared to HIV infected humanized mice treated with ART alone, mice on oral apoA-I mimetic peptide 6F with ART had consistently reduced plasma and gut tissue cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6) and chemokines (CX3CL1) that are products of ADAM17 sheddase activity. Oral 6F attenuated gut protein levels of ADAM17 that were increased in HIV-1 infected mice on potent ART compared to uninfected mice. Adding oxidized lipoproteins and endotoxin (LPS) ex vivo to gut explants from HIV infected persons increased levels of ADAM17 in myeloid and intestinal cells, which increased TNF-α and CX3CL1. Both 4F and 6F attenuated these changes. Our preclinical data suggest that apoA-I mimetic peptides provide a novel therapeutic strategy that can target increased protein levels of ADAM17 and its sheddase activity that contribute to intestinal and systemic inflammation in treated HIV. The large repertoire of inflammatory mediators involved in ADAM17 sheddase activity places it as a pivotal orchestrator of several inflammatory pathways associated with morbidity in chronic treated HIV that make it an attractive therapeutic target.
Assuntos
Apolipoproteína A-I , Infecções por HIV/patologia , Inflamação/patologia , Intestinos/efeitos dos fármacos , Peptídeos/farmacologia , Proteína ADAM17/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Fármacos Anti-HIV/farmacologia , Humanos , CamundongosRESUMO
Studies of two SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines suggested that they yield â¼95% protection from symptomatic infection at least short-term, but important clinical questions remain. It is unclear how vaccine-induced antibody levels quantitatively compare to the wide spectrum induced by natural SARS-CoV-2 infection. Vaccine response kinetics and magnitudes in persons with prior COVID-19 compared to virus-naiÌve persons are not well-defined. The relative stability of vaccine-induced versus infection-induced antibody levels is unclear. We addressed these issues with longitudinal assessments of vaccinees with and without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection using quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) of anti-RBD antibodies. SARS-CoV-2-naiÌve individuals achieved levels similar to mild natural infection after the first vaccination; a second dose generated levels approaching severe natural infection. In persons with prior COVID-19, one dose boosted levels to the high end of severe natural infection even in those who never had robust responses from infection, increasing no further after the second dose. Antiviral neutralizing assessments using a spike-pseudovirus assay revealed that virus-naiÌve vaccinees did not develop physiologic neutralizing potency until the second dose, while previously infected persons exhibited maximal neutralization after one dose. Finally, antibodies from vaccination waned similarly to natural infection, resulting in an average of â¼90% loss within 90 days. In summary, our findings suggest that two doses are important for quantity and quality of humoral immunity in SARS-CoV-2-naiÌve persons, while a single dose has maximal effects in those with past infection. Antibodies from vaccination wane with kinetics very similar to that seen after mild natural infection; booster vaccinations will likely be required.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas Virais , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Formação de Anticorpos , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticorpos Antivirais , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , VacinaçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Despite antiretroviral therapy (ART), there is an unmet need for therapies to mitigate immune activation in HIV infection. The goal of this study is to determine whether the apoA-I mimetics 6F and 4F attenuate macrophage activation in chronic HIV. DESIGN: Preclinical assessment of the in-vivo impact of Tg6F and the ex-vivo impact of apoA-I mimetics on biomarkers of immune activation and gut barrier dysfunction in treated HIV. METHODS: We used two humanized murine models of HIV infection to determine the impact of oral Tg6F with ART (HIV+ART+Tg6F+) on innate immune activation (plasma human sCD14, sCD163) and gut barrier dysfunction [murine I-FABP, endotoxin (LPS), LPS-binding protein (LBP), murine sCD14]. We also used gut explants from 10 uninfected and 10 HIV-infected men on potent ART and no morbidity, to determine the impact of ex-vivo treatment with 4F for 72âh on secretion of sCD14, sCD163, and I-FABP from gut explants. RESULTS: When compared with mice treated with ART alone (HIV+ART+), HIV+ART+Tg6F+ mice attenuated macrophage activation (h-sCD14, h-sCD163), gut barrier dysfunction (m-IFABP, LPS, LBP, and m-sCD14), plasma and gut tissue oxidized lipoproteins. The results were consistent with independent mouse models and ART regimens. Both 4F and 6F attenuated shedding of I-FABP and sCD14 from gut explants from HIV-infected and uninfected participants. CONCLUSION: Given that gut barrier dysfunction and macrophage activation are contributors to comorbidities like cardiovascular disease in HIV, apoA-I mimetics should be tested as therapy for morbidity in chronic treated HIV.