Out of pocket costs and time/productivity losses for pediatric sepsis in Uganda: a mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis disproportionately affects children from socioeconomically disadvantaged families in low-resource settings, where care seeking may consume scarce family resources and lead to financial hardships. Those financial hardships may, in turn, contribute to late presentation or failure to seek care and result in high mortality during hospitalization and during the post discharge period, a period of increasingly recognized vulnerability. The purpose of this study is to explore the out-of-pocket costs related to sepsis hospitalizations and post-discharge care among children admitted with sepsis in Uganda. METHODS: This mixed-methods study was comprised of focus group discussions (FGD) with caregivers of children admitted for sepsis, which then informed a quantitative cross-sectional household survey to measure out-of-pocket costs of sepsis care both during initial admission and during the post-discharge period. All participants were families of children enrolled in a concurrent sepsis study. RESULTS: Three FGD with mothers (n = 20) and one FGD with fathers (n = 7) were conducted. Three primary themes that emerged included (1) financial losses, (2) time and productivity losses and (3) coping with costs. A subsequently developed cross-sectional survey was completed for 153 households of children discharged following admission for sepsis. The survey revealed a high cost of care for families attending both private and public facilities, although out-of-pocket cost were higher at private facilities. Half of those surveyed reported loss of income during hospitalization and a third sold household assets, most often livestock, to cover costs. Total mean out-of-pocket costs of hospital care and post-discharge care were 124.50 USD and 44.60 USD respectively for those seeking initial care at private facilities and 62.10 USD and 14.60 USD at public facilities, a high sum in a country with widespread poverty. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that families incur a substantial economic burden in accessing care for children with sepsis.

Mass vaccination with a two-dose oral cholera vaccine in a refugee camp.

In refugee settings, the use of cholera vaccines is controversial since a mass vaccination campaign might disrupt other priority interventions. We therefore conducted a study to assess the feasibility of such a campaign using a two-dose oral cholera vaccine in a refugee camp. The campaign, using killed whole-cell/recombinant B-subunit cholera vaccine, was carried out in October 1997 among 44,000 south Sudanese refugees in Uganda. Outcome variables included the number of doses administered, the drop-out rate between the two rounds, the proportion of vaccine wasted, the speed of administration, the cost of the campaign, and the vaccine coverage. Overall, 63,220 doses of vaccine were administered. At best, 200 vaccine doses were administered per vaccination site and per hour. The direct cost of the campaign amounted to US$ 14,655, not including the vaccine itself. Vaccine coverage, based on vaccination cards, was 83.0% and 75.9% for the first and second rounds, respectively. Mass vaccination of a large refugee population with an oral cholera vaccine therefore proved to be feasible. A pre-emptive vaccination strategy could be considered in stable refugee settings and in urban slums in high-risk areas. However, the potential cost of the vaccine and the absence of quickly accessible stockpiles are major drawbacks for its large-scale use.

PIP: This study was undertaken to assess the feasibility of mass vaccination using a two-dose oral cholera vaccine in a refugee setting in Uganda. A total of 44,000 south Sudanese refugees were involved in the study. The campaign was conducted using killed whole-cell/recombinant B-subunit cholera vaccine. Measured outcomes include the total number of doses administered, the dropout rate between the two rounds, the amount of vaccine wasted, the cost of the campaign, and the vaccine coverage. Given the results of the study, the mass vaccination of a refugee population with a two-dose oral cholera vaccine proved to be feasible. A total of 63,220 vaccines were administered, with 200 vaccine doses given per vaccination area per hour. The campaign cost was US$14,655, excluding the cost of the vaccine. Vaccine coverage was 83% for the first round and 75.9% for the second round. A presumptive vaccination strategy could be taken into account in stable refugee settings and in urban slums in high-risk sites. However, the potential amount of the vaccine and the absence of immediately accessible stockpiles are major constraints for its large-scale implementation.