Impact of Geriatric Consult Evaluations on Hospital Admission Rates for Older Adults.

Introduction: We examined the impact of a geriatric consult program in the emergency department (ED) and an ED observation geriatric care unit (GCU) setting on hospital admission rates for older ED patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective case control study from June 1-August 31, 2019 (pre-program) to September 24, 2019-January 31, 2020 (post-program). Post-program geriatric consults were readily available in the ED and required in the GCU setting. Hospital admission rates (outcome) are reported for patients who received a geriatric consult evaluation (intervention). We analyzed probability of admission using a mixed-effects logistic regression model that included age, gender, recent ED visit, Charlson Comorbidity Index, referral to ED observation, and geriatric consult evaluation as predictor variables. Results: A total of 9,663 geriatric ED encounters occurred, 4,042 pre-program and 5,621 post-program. Overall, ED admission rates for geriatric patients were similar pre- and post-program (44.8% vs 43.9%, P = 0.39). Of 243 geriatric consults, 149 (61.3%) occurred in the GCU. Overall admission rates post-program for patients receiving geriatric intervention were significantly lower compared to pre-program (23.4% vs 44.9%, P < 0.001). Post-program GCU hospital admission rates were significantly lower than pre-program ED observation unit admission rates (14/149, 9.4%, vs 111/477, 23.3%, P < 0.001). In the logistic regression model, admissions post-program were lower when a geriatric consult evaluation occurred (odds ratio [OR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.83). Hospital admissions for older ED observation patients were also significantly decreased when a geriatric consult was obtained (GCU vs pre-program ED observation unit; OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.14-0.50). Conclusion: Geriatric consult evaluations were associated with significantly lower rates of hospital admission and persisted when controlled for age, gender, comorbidities, and ED observation unit placement. This model may allow healthcare systems to decrease potentially avoidable hospital admission rates in older ED patients.

Emergency department evaluation of nurse triage questions about safe-at-home and abuse or neglect in traumatic ocular injuries.

OBJECTIVES: Approximately 10 million Americans experience acts of physical violence by an intimate partner (IPV). Ocular injuries can present as a symptom of IPV in the emergency department, but IPV remains underreported in the literature. Understanding the incidence and trends in IPV-associated ocular injuries in the emergency department could increase the detection of at-risk patients otherwise overlooked. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. PARTICIPANTS: Emergency department patients evaluated for traumatic ocular injuries between January 2018 and April 2023 at a large tertiary care health system. METHODS: The study population was identified by ICD-10 code and their responses to being screened at triage for home safety and any nursing concerns for abuse or neglect. Patient screening consisted of a 2-part questionnaire inquiring first about whether the patient feels safe at home ("Yes" or "No") and second regarding nurses' concerns for abuse, neglect, domestic violence, sexual assault, or human trafficking. RESULTS: There were 2,653,993 emergency department visits and 16,737 traumatic ocular injuries in the study period. Of them, 1.1% of patients (154 of 14,457) responded "No" to feeling safe at home. In only 0.6% of patients (82 of 14,457), a nursing concern was documented. Patients responding "No" to feeling safe at home presented with more severe ocular injuries such as maxillary fractures. On regression analysis, married, divorced, and widowed patients as well as patients on private insurance were less likely to report feeling unsafe at home than single patients on public insurance (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Traumatic ocular injuries in emergency departments should raise concerns about IPV. Opportunity exists to improve education, screening, and management of these patients.

A Real-World Experience: Retrospective Review of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Utilization and Quality in Community Emergency Departments.

INTRODUCTION: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is commonly used in the emergency department (ED) as a rapid diagnostic tool. Emergency medicine (EM) has been an early adopter of POCUS with indications expanding over the last 10 years. While the literature describes widespread use among academic sites, there is little data on clinical POCUS utilization at non-academic EDs. We sought to describe community emergency physician (EP) use of POCUS by quantifying the number and type of studies performed, characteristics of the performing physician, and quality metrics. METHODS: Prior to the study period, all EPs underwent a standardized training and credentialing program. A retrospective review of all POCUS studies across 11 non-academic EDs from October 1, 2018-September 30, 2020 was performed by fellowship-trained physicians, who identified physician, exam type, and residency graduation year. The studies were then cross-referenced with quality review reports that assessed image acquisition, image interpretation, and image labeling. We performed descriptive statistics. RESULTS: During the study period, 5,099 POCUS studies were performed by 170 EPs. Exams most frequently performed were cardiac (24%), focused assessment of sonography in trauma (21.7%), and pregnancy (16.2%). Recent EM residency graduates (<10 years) were higher utilizers of POCUS with a group mean of 1.3 exams per 100 patients. Of the studies done, 86% had no quality issues. CONCLUSION: Community POCUS demonstrates a heavy focus on core exams performed by recent EM residency graduates with minimal quality issues after a standardized training program. This study is the first to quantify actual community POCUS use in multiple EDs and may impact credentialing and skills maintenance requirements.

Universal suicide screening in emergency departments across a large healthcare system.

BACKGROUND: Suicidal ideation is a common complaint in Emergency Departments (EDs) across the United States (US) and is an important preventable cause of death. Consequently, current Joint Commission guidelines require screening high-risk patients and those with behavioral health needs for suicide. Accordingly, we implemented universal suicide screening for all patients presenting to EDs in our healthcare system and sought to describe the characteristics of the identified "high-risk" patients. We also sought to determine whether universal suicide screening was feasible and what its impact was on ED length of stay (LOS). METHODS: All ED encounters in the healthcare system were assessed. Data were collected from February 1, 2020, through June 30, 2022. All patients aged 18 and over were screened using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) and categorized as no risk, low risk, moderate risk, and high risk. Encounters were then grouped into 'high risk" and "not high risk," defined as no, low, and moderate risk patients. Data collected included gender, discharge disposition, LOS, and insurance status. RESULTS: A total of 1,058,735 patient encounter records were analyzed. The "high risk" group (n = 11,359; 10.7%) was found to have a higher proportion of male patients (50.9 vs 43.7%) and government payors (71.6 vs. 67.1%) and a higher ED LOS [medians 380 min vs. 198 min] than the not high-risk group (p ≤0.001). Those with suicidal ideation comprised 0.73-1.58% of ED encounters in a given month. A secondary analysis of 2,255,616 ED encounter records from January 2019 - June 30, 2022, revealed that 40,854 (1.81%) encounters required 1:1 observation. The proportion of 1:1 observations in 2019, the year before implementation, was 1.91%. Using a non-inferiority margin of 25%, we found that the proportion of 1:1 patients in 2020, the year following implementation, was non-inferior to (no worse than) the previous year at 2.09% and decreased from 2021 to 2022 (1.69% and 1.57% respectively). CONCLUSION: Implementing universal suicide screening in all EDs within a healthcare system is feasible. The percentage of patients who screened high risk was under 5% of the overall ED population. While the median LOS was longer for "high-risk" patients than for the general ED population, it was not excessively so. Adequate staffing to properly maintain the safety of these patients is paramount.

Agitation Management in the Emergency Department with Physical Restraints: Where Do These Patients End Up?

INTRODUCTION: Agitation is frequently encountered in the emergency department (ED) and can range from psychomotor restlessness to overt aggression and violent behavior. Among all ED patients, 2.6% present with agitation or become agitated during their ED visit. We aimed to determine ED disposition for patients requiring agitation management with physical restraints. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort of all adult patients who presented to one of 19 EDs in a large integrated healthcare system and received agitation management with physical restraints between January 1, 2018-December 31, 2020. Categorical variables are presented as frequency and percentages, and continuous variables are presented as medians and interquartile range. RESULTS: There were 3,539 patients who had agitation management with physical restraints included in this study. In total 2,076 (58.8%) were admitted to the hospital (95% CI [confidence interval] 0.572-0.605), and of those 81.4% were admitted to a primary medical floor and 18.6% were medically cleared and admitted to a psychiatric unit. Overall, 41.2% were able to be medically cleared and discharged from the ED. Mean age was 40.9 years, 2,140 were male (59.1%), 1,736 were White (50.3%), and 1,527 (43%) were Black. We found 26% had abnormal ethanol, (95% CI 0.245-0.274) and 54.6% had an abnormal toxicology screen (95% CI 0.529-0.562). A significant number were administered a benzodiazepine or antipsychotic in the ED (88.44%) (95% CI 0.874-0.895). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients who had agitation management with physical restraints were admitted to the hospital; of those patients, 81.4% were admitted to a primary medical floor and 18.6% were admitted to a psychiatric unit.

Use of the electronic medical record to screen for high-risk geriatric patients in the emergency department.

Older adults with multimorbidities have the highest rate of emergency department (ED) usage. These patients are typically on numerous medications, may have underlying dementia, and often present with falls and delirium. Identifying these high-risk older adults for possible intervention is challenging in the ED setting since available screening methods are manual and resource-intensive. The objective is to study the electronic medical record (EMR) use for identifying high-risk older adults in ED. This feasibility study is conducted in an academic ED with 67 000 total and 24% geriatric (age ≥ 65 years) annual visits, American College of Emergency Physician (ACEP) accredited Level 1 Geriatric Emergency Department with an ED-based geriatric consultation program by incorporating criteria from existing manual geriatric screening instruments and the 4M framework into an automated EMR screen to identify high-risk geriatric patients. ED providers are then alerted by an EMR Best Practice Alert (BPA) if high-risk status is identified. Initial development and impact on geriatric ED consults are reported. During the study period, 7450 patient encounters occurred; 1836 (24.6%) encounters involved patients who were 65 years or older. A total of 1398 (76.1%) high-risk ED encounters resulted in BPA alerts using the EMR automated screen. BPA alerts resulted in 82 (5.9%) geriatric evaluations. We conclude that using the EMR to automate screening for older adults for high-risk geriatric conditions in the ED is feasible. An automated EMR screen with a BPA to ED providers identified a well-defined cohort of older patients appropriate for further ED geriatric evaluation.

Emergency Department Co-testing for Human Immunodeficiency Virus When Testing for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia: A Readily Available, Missed Opportunity for Targeted HIV Testing in Emergency Departments.

OBJECTIVES: Conducting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing in emergency departments (EDs) can be an effective approach to testing and reaching populations at highest risk of contracting HIV. METHODS: All gonorrhea and chlamydia (G/C) and HIV tests ordered in the Cleveland Clinic Health System's 14 EDs were included in the analysis. Data were collected from electronic health records. Descriptive statistics, with medians and means, were computed. RESULTS: From January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021, we reviewed ED visits for the purpose of sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening, with an emphasis on G/C screening. In October 2019, both HIV rapid testing and G/C testing began across all 14 Cleveland Clinic EDs. The overall rate of co-testing for HIV when obtaining a G/C test for STI evaluation increased overall to around 30% for our health system EDs, with some individual EDs approaching 60%. CONCLUSIONS: The approach the Cleveland Clinic implemented is an effective way to test for HIV in the ED. Local health departments and stakeholders in HIV communities should support and collaborate with EDs in their jurisdictions to accelerate HIV testing initiatives by using an HIV plus G/C co-testing metric.

Emergency Department Patients Who Leave Before Treatment Is Complete.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency department (ED) patients who leave before treatment is complete (LBTC) represent medicolegal risk and lost revenue. We sought to examine LBTC return visits characteristics and potential revenue effects for a large healthcare system. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study examined all encounters from January 1-December 31, 2019 at 18 EDs. The LBTC patients were divided into left without being seen (LWBS), defined as leaving prior to completed medical screening exam (MSE), and left subsequent to being seen (LSBS), defined as leaving after MSE was complete but before disposition. We recorded 30-day returns by facility type including median return hours, admission rate, and return to index ED. Expected realization rate and potential charges were calculated for each patient visit. RESULTS: During the study period 626,548 ED visits occurred; 20,158 (3.2%) LBTC index encounters occurred, and 6745 (33.5%) returned within 30 days. The majority (41.7%) returned in <24 hours with 76.1% returning in 10 days and 66.4% returning to index ED. Median return time was 43.3 hours, and 23.2% were admitted. Urban community EDs had the highest 30-day return rate (37.8%, 95% confidence interval, 36.41-39.1). Patients categorized as LSBS had longer median return hours (66.0) and higher admission rates (29.8%) than the LWBS cohort. There was a net potential realization rate of $9.5 million to the healthcare system. CONCLUSION: In our system, LSBS patients had longer return times and higher admission rates than LWBS patients. There was significant potential financial impact for the system. Further studies should examine how healthcare systems can reduce risk and financial impacts of LBTC patients.

Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation for Emergency Medicine Physicians in a Large Health Care System.

OBJECTIVE: Ongoing professional practice evaluation (OPPE) is designed to identify professional practice trends that affect quality and safety of practicing physicians. Focused professional practice evaluation (FPPE) is employed when physician nonconformance is identified. The goal of this novel OPPE initiative was threefold: (1) meet The Joint Commission's accreditation standards, (2) assess documentation for compliance and risk, and (3) maintain procedural competency to provide optimal patient care. METHODS: A quality assurance project with OPPE program development was initiated in 18 emergency departments across a large health care system. First, a monthly comprehensive peer review meeting assessed cases across the system for medicolegal risk. Physicians with reasonable practice concerns were identified and referred to FPPE. Second, a standardized OPPE chart review was performed biannually by a quality assurance committee assessing all physician charts for clinical care, medicolegal risk, and quality. Last, completion of a procedure lab every three years was required to maintain competency. OUTCOMES: For systemwide peer review in 2019, 47 cases were referred and 12.8% had quality concerns. For standardized OPPE chart review, 221 physicians were reviewed on 1,219 charts on the following metrics: insufficient medical decision making, diagnoses not medical/legally supported, and charts with red flags. Nine physicians (4.1%) and 17 charts (1.4%) were deficient in all three measures, and 8 physicians (3.6%) had deficiencies in ≥ 50% of their charts. For procedure lab competency, 19.0% of physicians completed the lab in 2019 with no quality concerns. CONCLUSION: A structured OPPE algorithm can aid large health care systems in identifying deviations from practice standards for which additional FPPE can be beneficial.

The impact of hospital boarding on the emergency department waiting room.

BACKGROUND: Patient boarding in the emergency department (ED) is a significant issue leading to increased morbidity/mortality, longer lengths of stay, and higher hospital costs. We examined the impact of boarding patients on the ED waiting room. Additionally, we determined whether facility type, patient acuity, time of day, or hospital occupancy impacted waiting rooms in 18 EDs across a large healthcare system. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study that included all ED encounters between January 1, 2018, and September 30, 2019. Encounters with missing Emergency Severity Index (ESI) level were excluded. ESI levels were defined as high (ESI 1,2), middle (ESI 3), and low (ESI 4,5). Spearman correlation coefficients measured the relationship between boarded patients and number of patients in ED waiting room. A multivariable mixed effects model identified drivers of this relationship. RESULTS: A total of 1,134,178 encounters were included. Spearman correlation coefficient was significant between number of patients in the ED waiting room and patient boarding (0.54). For every additional patient boarded/hour, the number of patients waiting/hour in the waiting room increased by 8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08-1.09). The number of patients waiting for a room/hour was 2.28 times higher for middle than for high acuity. The number of patients in waiting room slightly decreased as hospital occupancy increased (95% CI = 0.997-0.997). CONCLUSION: Number of patients in ED waiting room are directly related to boarding times and hospital occupancy. ED waiting room times should be considered as not just an ED operational issue, but an aspect of hospital throughput.

Same provider, different location: Variation in patient satisfaction scores between freestanding and hospital-based emergency departments.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction scores have become quality benchmarks for hospitals, are publicly reported, and are often tied to financial incentives. We determined whether patient satisfaction scores for individual emergency medicine providers varied according to the clinical setting. METHODS: We obtained patient satisfaction survey results from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 for patients treated at 6 freestanding (FED) and 11 hospital-based emergency departments (HBED). Differences in mean score by ED facility were tested for significance. Mean score differences with 95% confidence intervals are presented. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to predict the odds of receiving different scores by type of ED facility and adjusted for patient and provider demographics and ED length of stay. RESULTS: Sixty-six providers with 3743 total surveys were analyzed: FED (n = 1974) and HBED (n = 1769). Overall satisfaction scores were higher for FED compared to HBED surveys 1.13 [95% CI, 1.0-1.3]. In multivariable logistic regression, we found patients seen at the FEDs were 42% more likely to rate providers courtesy as "very good" compared to patients seen at a HBED [OR: 1.42, 95% CI (0.94-2.15)]. Similarly, patients from FEDs showed increased likelihood to rate providers as "very good" for keeping patients informed about treatment [OR: 1.70, 95% CI (1.21-2.39)], took time to listen to patients [OR: 1.66, 95% CI (0.72-1.60)] and concerned for patient's comfort [OR: 1.54, 95% CI (1.12-2.12)]. CONCLUSION: Individual providers, who practice at both types of facilities, consistently received higher satisfaction ratings from patients at FEDs compared to HBEDs.

Procedural frequency: Results from 18 academic, community and freestanding emergency departments.

BACKGROUND: Emergency physicians must maintain procedural skills, but clinical opportunities may be insufficient. We sought to determine how often practicing emergency physicians in academic, community and freestanding emergency departments (EDs) perform 4 procedures: central venous catheterization (CVC), tube thoracostomy, tracheal intubation, and lumbar puncture (LP). METHODS: This was a retrospective study evaluating emergency physician procedural performance over a 12-month period. We collected data from the electronic records of 18 EDs in one healthcare system. The study EDs included higher and lower volume, academic, community and freestanding, and trauma and non-trauma centers. The main outcome measures were median number of procedures performed. We examined differences in procedural performance by physician years in practice, facility type, and trauma status. RESULTS: Over 12 months, 182 emergency physicians performed 1582 of 2805 procedures (56%) and supervised (resident, nurse practitioner or physician assistant) an additional 1223 of the procedures they did not perform (43%). Median (interquartile range) physician performance for each procedure was CVC 0 [0, 2], tube thoracostomy 0 [0, 0], tracheal intubation 3 [0.25, 8], and LP 0 [0, 2]. The percentage of emergency physicians who did not perform at least one of each procedure during the 1-year time frame ranged from 25.3% (tracheal intubation) to 76.4% (tube thoracostomy). Physicians who work at high-volume EDs (>50,000 visits per year) performed nearly twice as many tracheal intubations, CVCs, and LPs than those at low-volume EDs or freestanding EDs when normalized per 1000 visits. Years out of training were inversely related to total number of procedures performed. Emergency physicians at trauma centers performed almost 3 times as many tracheal intubations and almost 4 times as many CVCs compared to non-trauma centers. CONCLUSION: In a large healthcare system, regardless of ED type, emergency physicians infrequently performed the 4 procedures studied. Physicians in high-volume EDs, trauma centers, and recent graduates performed more procedures. Our study adds to a growing body of research that suggests clinical frequency alone may be insufficient for all emergency physicians to maintain competency.

Electronic medical record-based interventions to encourage opioid prescribing best practices in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: Overdose from opioids has reached epidemic proportions. Large healthcare systems can utilize existing technology to encourage responsible opioid prescribing practices. Our study measured the effects of using the electronic medical record (EMR) with direct clinician feedback to standardize opioid prescribing practices within a large healthcare system. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study compared a 12 month pre- and post-intervention in 14 emergency departments after four interventions utilizing the EMR were implemented: (1) deleting clinician preference lists, (2) defaulting dose, frequency, and quantity, (3) standardizing formulary to encourage best practices, and (4) creating dashboards for clinician review with current opioid prescribing practices. Outlying clinicians received feedback through email and direct counseling. Total number of opioid prescriptions per 100 discharges pre- and post-intervention were recorded as primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included number of prescriptions per 100 discharges/clinician exceeding 3-day supply (defined as 12 tablets), number exceeding 30 morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD)/day, and number of non-formulary prescriptions. RESULTS: There were >700,000 discharges during pre- and post-intervention periods. Percentage of total number opioid prescriptions per 100 discharges decreased from 14.4% to 7.4%, a 7.0% absolute reduction, (95% CI,6.9%-7.2%). There was a 5.9% to 0.7% reduction in prescriptions exceeding 3-days, (95% CI, 5.1%-5.3%), a 4.3% to 0.3% reduction in prescriptions exceeding 30 MEDD, (95% CI, 3.9%-4.0%), and a 0.3% to 0.1% reduction in non-formulary prescriptions, (95% CI, 0.2%-0.3%). CONCLUSIONS: A multi modal approach using EMR interventions which provide real time data and direct feedback to clinicians can facilitate appropriate opioid prescribing.

Differences in patient population and length of stay between freestanding and hospital-based emergency departments.

BACKGROUND: Freestanding emergency departments (FEDs) represent over 10% of emergency departments (EDs) in the United States. Little is known about differences in encounter characteristics. We compared ED length of stay (LOS) clinical demographics, method of arrival, acuity level, and patient disposition for encounters to FEDs vs. hospital-based EDs (HBEDs). METHODS: A multi-center retrospective analysis was performed. Study sites included 6 FEDs and 13 HBEDs from 10/1/2017 to 9/30/2018. Data was abstracted from ED records and discharge summary within the electronic health record. Descriptive statistics were reported with prevalence (95% Confidence Interval [CI]) for categorical variables and mean (standard deviation [SD]) for continuous variables. Multivariable linear regression assessed the relationship between ED facility (FEDs vs. HBEDs) and ED length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: 1,263,297 encounters were analyzed. Mean ED LOS was shorter at FEDs (146.62 min (±97.04)) vs. HBED (249.70 min (+287.50)). Nine percent of FED encounters arrived via EMS vs. 21% at the HBEDs. FEDs saw 5.47% emergency severity index (ESI) level 2 vs. 13.76% at the HBEDs. Medicaid and Medicare patients were more prevalent in HBEDs (64.2%) than in FEDs (50.6%). FEDs admitted 13% of patients and HBEDs 27%. All results were significant (p < 0.001). After adjusting for potential confounding variables, patients utilizing FEDs had 16.2% shorter ED LOS vs. HBEDs (ß = -0.18 [95% CI: -0.18 to -0.17]). CONCLUSION: Overall ED LOS was significantly less for FED vs. HBED patients. Acuity level, insurance status, method of arrival, and patient disposition were significantly different at FEDs vs. HBEDs.

Impact of an individual plan of care for frequent and high utilizers in a large healthcare system.

INTRODUCTION: "Frequent or High Utilizers" are significant stressors to Emergency Departments (EDs) and Inpatient Units across the United States (US). These patients incur higher healthcare costs with ED visits and inpatient admissions. Our aims were to determine whether implementation of individualized care plans (ICPs) could 1) reduce costs, 2) reduce inpatient length of stay (LOS), and 3) reduce ED encounters throughout a large healthcare system. METHODS: 13 EDs were included including academic, community, Free-standing and pediatric EDs. Data was collected from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2017. ICPs were created for high ED utilizers, as recommended by staff input through multidisciplinary care committees at each site. The ICP consisted of 1) specific symptom-related information with approaches in management, 2) recent assessment from specialists, 3) social work summary, and 4) psychiatry summary. A Best Practice Alert was placed in the electronic medical record that could be seen at all hospitals within the system. ICP's were updated annually. RESULTS: 626 ICPs were written; 452 initial ICPs and 174 updates. The 452 ICP patients accounted for 23,705 encounters during the four-year period; on average, an ICP patient visited the ED 52 times (14.75 encounters/year). Overall indirect and direct costs decreased 42% over first 6 months, inpatient LOS improved from 1.9 to 0.97 days/month, and ED encounters decreased from 1.96 to 1.14. All cost and LOS data significantly improved at 24 months post-ICP inception. CONCLUSION: Implementation of individualized care plan can reduce cost, inpatient LOS, and ED encounters for high utilizers.