Barriers and facilitators associated with implementing interventions to support oral anticancer agent adherence in academic and community cancer center settings.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study is to determine barriers and facilitators to the implementation of medication adherence interventions to support cancer patients taking novel, targeted oral anticancer agents (OAAs). METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews using a semi-structured guide from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We used purposive sampling to identify clinicians (physicians, pharmacists, nurse practitioners, nurses) and administrators (leadership from medicine, pharmacy, and nursing) who delivered care and/or oversee care delivery for patients with chronic leukemia prescribed an OAA. RESULTS: A total of 19 individuals participated in an interview (12 clinicians and 7 administrators), with 10 primarily employed by an academic cancer center; 5 employed by the community cancer center; and 4 employed by the integrated health-system specialty pharmacy. Barriers identified included low awareness of adherence interventions, difficulty in adherence measurement, complexity of designing and implementing a structured adherence intervention, and competing priorities. Facilitators identified included support of hospital administrators, value for pharmacists, and willingness to embrace change. Participants also made recommendations moving forward including standardizing workflow, designating champions, iterating implementation strategies, and improving communication between clinicians and with patients. CONCLUSION: Individual and system level factors were identified as determinants of implementation effectiveness of medication adherence interventions. A multidisciplinary advisory panel will be assembled to design comprehensive and actionable strategies to refine and implement a structured intervention to improve medication adherence in cancer patients.

Evaluation of an interdisciplinary venetoclax initiation process in minimizing risk of tumor lysis syndrome.

Venetoclax is a BCL-2 inhibitor approved for treatment of adult patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Due to significant risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) upon treatment initiation, a 5-week dose ramp-up is recommended. University of North Carolina Medical Center (UNCMC) utilizes a novel interdisciplinary model of care involving clinical pharmacists (CPs) who oversee the 5-week ramp-up to minimize treatment-related adverse events. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a pharmacist-led venetoclax initiation protocol on patient outcomes. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of venetoclax-induced TLS during dose ramp-up in patients managed by a CP. In this cohort (n = 39), there were no cases of TLS during the venetoclax ramp-up. Reduced TLS rates were observed in CP-managed real-world patients compared to previous real-world reports. This real-world analysis supports the utilization of CPs for intensive monitoring of patients initiated on venetoclax.

Impact of adherence to ibrutinib on clinical outcomes in real-world patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Ibrutinib is an oral Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Clinical trial data suggest that strict adherence is directly related to clinical outcomes. This retrospective, multicenter study aimed to evaluate ibrutinib adherence and its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with CLL/SLL treated in the real-world setting. The primary outcome was to quantify ibrutinib adherence rates in the real-world setting using the proportion of days covered (PDC) calculation. Secondary outcomes included the association of ibrutinib adherence with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). For the 100 patients in the primary analysis, the mean PDC was 95% (range: 65-100%). Patients who maintained PDC > 95% for each of the first 6 months experienced fewer PFS events (n = 1) compared to those with PDC ≤ 95% (n = 5; p=.03). The correlation between adherence and OS was not assessed due to a low number of events.

Utilizing multimodal analgesia to evaluate postoperative analgesic requirements in kidney transplant recipients.

The use of non-opioid analgesics following surgery has proven beneficial in managing pain and decreasing adverse outcomes following surgery. Data assessing outcomes related to opioid use is limited in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). We evaluated the effectiveness of implementing a reduced to no opioid use protocol in KTRs. This retrospective cohort study included adult KTRs between January 2017 and July 2019 with a multimodal analgesic protocol (MAP), focused on limiting opioids, implemented in August 2018. We compared analgesic requirements in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) during transplant admissions between the MAP cohort and traditional cohort. There were 217 KTRs who met the criteria. Inpatient opioid use was significantly reduced in the MAP cohort (16.5 ± 19.2 MME/day vs 24.7 ± 19.7 MME/day; P <.05) with no significant difference in pain scores. No use of opioids within six months of discharge was significantly increased in the MAP cohort (50% vs 7%; P <.001), and there were no reported deaths at six months in either cohort. The use of multimodal analgesia is beneficial in KTRs to provide adequate pain control with limited to no exposure of opioids during admission or at discharge.