Return to preinjury sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is predicted by five independent factors.

PURPOSE: To determine factors that predict return to the same frequency and type of sports participation with similar activity demands as before injury. METHODS: Individuals 1 to 5 years after primary ACL reconstruction completed a comprehensive survey related to sports participation and activity before injury and after surgery. Patient characteristics, injury variables, and surgical variables were extracted from the medical record. Return to preinjury sports (RTPS) was defined as: "Returning to the same or more demanding type of sports participation, at the same or greater frequency with the same or better Marx Activity Score as before injury." Variables were compared between individuals that achieved comprehensive RTPS and those that did not with univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: Two-hundred and fifty-one patients (mean age 26.1 years, SD 9.9) completed the survey at an average of 3.4 years (SD 1.3) after ACL reconstruction. The overall rate of RTPS was 48.6%. Patients were more likely to RTPS if they were younger than 19 years old (OR = 4.07; 95%CI 2.21-7.50; p < 0.01) or if they were competitive athletes (OR = 2.07; 95%CI 1.24-3.46; p = 0.01). Patients were less likely to RTPS if surgery occurred more than 3 months after injury (OR = 0.31, 95%CI 0.17-0.58; p < 0.01), if there was a concomitant cartilage lesion (OR = 0.38; 95%CI 0.21-0.70; p < 0.01), and if cartilage surgery was performed (OR = 0.17; 95%CI 0.04-0.80; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Five variables best predicted RTPS including age at time of surgery. Only time from injury to surgery is a potentially modifiable factor to improve RTPS; however, the reasons for which patients delayed surgery may also contribute to them not returning to sports. Regardless, younger patients, those that partake in sports on a competitive level, those that undergo surgery sooner, or do not have a cartilage injury or require cartilage surgery are more likely to return to pre-injury sports participation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Minimally Invasive Modified Lemaire Tenodesis.

Increasing emphasis in the literature is recently being put on controlling rotational stability in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament rupture by addressing the anterolateral complex during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Many different techniques for lateral extra-articular tenodesis have been described, with the (modified) Lemaire technique being widely favored. Recent literature does report that lateral extra-articular tenodesis leads to a reduction in persistent rotatory laxity and graft rupture rate, but also may be associated with increased pain, reduced quadriceps strength, reduced subjective functional recovery, and cosmetic complaints. Thus this article aims to describe our minimally invasive technique for a modified Lemaire tenodesis.

Increased survival rate for primary TKA with tibial short extension stems for severe varus deformities at a minimum of 2 years follow-up.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical results, radiographic loosening and early complications between patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty (TKA) with tibial short stem extension and those with standard stem for gross varus deformities at minimum two years after surgery. METHODS: From a prospective TKA database of 4216 patients, patients with a primary TKA with a tibial short stem extension (30 mm) for severe varus deformity (hip-kneeankle angle, HKA < 170°) and a minimum follow-up of 2 years, were reviewed and compared to a matched control group with tibial components with a standard stem, in a 1:3 ratio. Demographics, surgical parameters, pre- and postoperative alignment and outcome parameters were collected for all patients. The primary outcome was aseptic loosening of the tibial component. Secondary outcomes were knee society scores (KSS), postoperative HKA, general postoperative complications and implant survival rates. RESULTS: Forty-five patients with tibial short stem extensions (mean HKA 166.2°) were compared in a 1:3 ratio to a matched case-control group of 135 patients with standard stems (mean HKA 167.1°) at a mean follow-up of 57 and 64 months respectively after primary TKA. In the extension stem group, 4 patients encountered complications (8.9%) versus 12 patients in the standard stem group (8.9%). There were no cases of tibial component loosening in the short extension stem versus four cases in the standard stem group (3%). This difference was significant between groups, p = 0.04. CONCLUSION: In patients with varus deformities > 10°, undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty, prophylactic use of a tibial short extension stem may lead to less loosening of the tibial component. In this study, 3% of patient with big varus deformity without stemmed TKA had a tibial implant loosening versus 0% in the stemmed TKA group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control study.

Joint laxity and graft compliance increase during the first year following ACL reconstruction with short hamstring tendon grafts.

PURPOSE: Evaluating joint laxity and graft compliance after ACL surgery may be used to quantify biomechanical graft properties during the ligamentization process. This study aimed to analyse the evolvement of joint laxity and graft compliance of short hamstring tendon grafts after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: Forty-seven patients that underwent ACLR were retrospectively enrolled. Joint laxity was quantified with a GNRB® arthrometer before surgery, then at 15 days, at 1/3/6/9 months (M1-M9), at 1 year postoperatively and then again at the last mean follow-up (FU) of 14.7 ± 3.0 months. The side-to-side laxity difference (ΔL in mm) was measured at 30 and 60 N at every FU, additionally at 90 N from M3 on and at 134 N from M6 on. The side-to-side compliance difference (ΔC in µm/N) was calculated for each graft. RESULTS: Mean ΔL and ΔC decreased significantly between preoperative and M1 for all applied forces (at 30 N, ΔL: 0.8 mm, p < 0.0001; ΔC: 25.9 µm/N, p < 0.001). Between M1 and M9, ΔL increased significantly at 30 N (p = 0.02) and 60 N (p < 0.001), while ΔC increased by 15.2 µm/N at 30 N (p = 0.003) and 14.9 µm/N at 60 N (p = 0.001). Between M9 and the last FU, there were no significant differences for ΔL and ΔC. CONCLUSION: Joint laxity and graft compliance evolve during the first postoperative year with a phase between the first and ninth postoperative month of relative weakness. According to the established evolvement profile, return to pivoting or contact sports should be considered only after stabilization of joint laxity and graft compliance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, Level III.

Predictors of Revision Surgery After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery occurs in 5% to 15% of individuals undergoing ACL reconstruction. Identifying predictors for revision ACL surgery is of essence in the pursuit of creating adequate prevention programs and to identify individuals at risk for reinjury and revision. PURPOSE: To determine predictors of revision ACL surgery after failed primary ACL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A total of 251 participants (mean age ± SD, 26.1 ± 9.9 years) who had undergone primary ACL reconstruction 1 to 5 years earlier completed a comprehensive survey to determine predictors of revision ACL surgery at a mean 3.4 ± 1.3 years after the primary ACL reconstruction. Potential predictors that were assessed included subject characteristics (age at the time of surgery, time from injury to surgery, sex, body mass index, preinjury activity level, return to sport status), details of the initial injury (mechanism; concomitant injury to other ligaments, menisci, and cartilage), surgical details of the primary reconstruction (Lachman and pivot shift tests under anesthesia, graft type, femoral drilling technique, reconstruction technique), and postoperative course (length of rehabilitation, complications). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors that predicted the need for revision ACL surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 21 (8.4%) subjects underwent revision ACL surgery. Univariate analysis showed that younger age at the time of surgery (P = .003), participation in sports at a competitive level (P = .023), and double-bundle ACL reconstruction (P = .024) predicted increased risk of revision ACL surgery. Allograft reconstructions also demonstrated a trend toward greater risk of revision ACL surgery (P = .076). No other variables were significantly associated with revision ACL surgery. Multivariate analysis revealed that revision ACL surgery was only predicted by age at the time of surgery and graft type (autograft vs allograft). CONCLUSION: The overall revision ACL surgery rate after primary unilateral ACL reconstruction was 8.4%. Univariate predictors of revision ACL reconstruction included younger age at the time of surgery, competitive baseline activity level, and double-bundle ACL reconstruction. However, multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that age and reconstruction performed with allograft were the only independent predictors of revision ACL reconstruction.

Defining Thresholds for the Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the IKDC Subjective Knee Form and KOOS for Patients Who Underwent ACL Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: A clinically meaningful change in patient-reported outcome (PRO) may not be associated with an acceptable state that corresponds to "feeling well," also known as the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS). The PASS thresholds for the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) have not been determined for individuals after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. PURPOSE: To determine the PASS thresholds for the IKDC-SKF and KOOS in individuals at 1 to 5 years after ACL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis): Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Individuals 1 to 5 years after primary ACL reconstruction completed a survey that included the IKDC-SKF and KOOS. All subjects assessed satisfaction with their current state by answering the question, "Taking into account all the activity you have during your daily life, your level of pain, and also your activity limitations and participation restrictions, do you consider the current state of your knee satisfactory?" RESULTS: A total of 251 participants (mean age ± SD, 26.1 ± 9.9 years) completed the survey at an average of 3.4 ± 1.3 years after ACL reconstruction. Of these, 223 (89.2%) individuals indicated that they were in an acceptable symptom state (PASS-Y). Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve revealed that the IKDC-SKF and each of the KOOS subscales (pain, symptoms, activities of daily living [ADL], sport and recreation [sport/rec], and quality of life [QoL]) were significantly better identifiers of PASS than chance as indicated by the significance of the area under the curves. The PASS threshold (sensitivity, specificity) was 75.9 (0.83, 0.96) for the IKDC-SKF, 88.9 (0.82, 0.81) for the KOOS pain, 57.1 (0.78, 0.67) for the KOOS symptoms, 100.0 (0.70, 0.89) for the KOOS ADL, 75.0 (0.87, 0.88) for the KOOS sport/rec, and 62.5 (0.82, 0.85) for the KOOS QoL. In addition, the difference between PASS-Y and PASS-N was statistically significant (P < .001) for all PROs. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to identify the PASS thresholds for the IKDC-SKF and the KOOS subscales for individuals 1 to 5 years after ACL reconstruction. By identifying threshold values for the PASS, this study provides additional information to facilitate interpretation of the IKDC-SKF and KOOS in daily practice and clinical research related to ACL reconstruction.

Development of computer tablet software for clinical quantification of lateral knee compartment translation during the pivot shift test.

The pivot shift test is a commonly used clinical examination by orthopedic surgeons to evaluate knee function following injury. However, the test can only be graded subjectively by the examiner. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop software for a computer tablet to quantify anterior translation of the lateral knee compartment during the pivot shift test. Based on the simple image analysis method, software for a computer tablet was developed with the following primary design constraint - the software should be easy to use in a clinical setting and it should not slow down an outpatient visit. Translation of the lateral compartment of the intact knee was 2.0 ± 0.2 mm and for the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee was 8.9 ± 0.9 mm (p < 0.001). Intra-tester (ICC range = 0.913 to 0.999) and inter-tester (ICC = 0.949) reliability were excellent for the repeatability assessments. Overall, the average percent error of measuring simulated translation of the lateral knee compartment with the tablet parallel to the monitor increased from 2.8% at 50 cm distance to 7.7% at 200 cm. Deviation from the parallel position of the tablet did not have a significant effect until a tablet angle of 45°. Average percent error during anterior translation of the lateral knee compartment of 6mm was 2.2% compared to 6.2% for 2 mm of translation. The software provides reliable, objective, and quantitative data on translation of the lateral knee compartment during the pivot shift test and meets the design constraints posed by the clinical setting.

Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: reducing anterior tibial subluxation.

PURPOSE: To measure and compare the amount of anterior tibial subluxation (ATS) after anatomic ACL reconstruction for both acute and chronic ACL-deficient patients. METHODS: Fifty-two patients were clinically and radiographically evaluated after primary, unilateral, anatomic ACL reconstruction. Post-operative true lateral radiographs were obtained of both knees with the patient in supine position and knees in full passive extension with heels on a standardized bolster. ATS was measured on the radiographs by two independent and blinded observers. ATS was calculated as the side-to-side difference in tibial position relative to the femur. An independent t test was used to compare ATS between those undergoing anatomic reconstruction for an acute versus chronic ACL injury. Chronic ACL deficiency was defined as more than 12 weeks from injury to surgery. RESULTS: Patients averaged 26.4 ± 11.5 years (mean ± SD) of age, 43.6 % were female, and 48.1 % suffered an injury of the left knee. There were 30 and 22 patients in the acute and chronic groups, respectively. The median duration from injury to reconstruction for the acute group was 5 versus 31 weeks for the chronic group. After anatomic ACL reconstruction, the mean ATS was 1.0 ± 2.1 mm. There was no statistical difference in ATS between the acute and chronic groups (1.2 ± 2.0 vs. 0.6 ± 2.3 mm, n.s.). Assessment of inter-tester reliability for radiographic evaluation of ATS revealed an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.894. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic ACL reconstruction reduces ATS with a mean difference of 1.0 mm from the healthy contralateral limb. This study did not find a statistical difference in ATS between patients after anatomic ACL reconstruction in the acute or chronic phase. These observations suggest that anatomic ACL reconstruction, performed in either the acute or the chronic phase, approaches the normal AP relationship of the tibiofemoral joint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Does flexible tunnel drilling affect the femoral tunnel angle measurement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

PURPOSE: To quantify the mean difference in femoral tunnel angle (FTA) as measured on knee radiographs between rigid and flexible tunnel drilling after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients that underwent primary anatomic ACL reconstruction with a single femoral tunnel drilled with a flexible reamer were included in this study. The control group was comprised of 50 patients all of who underwent primary anatomic ACL reconstruction with a single femoral tunnel drilled with a rigid reamer. All femoral tunnels were drilled through a medial portal to ensure anatomic tunnel placement. The FTA was determined from post-operative anterior-to-posterior (AP) radiographs by two independent observers. A 5° difference between the two mean FTA was considered clinically significant. RESULTS: The average FTA, when drilled with a rigid reamer, was 42.0° ± 7.2°. Drilling with a flexible reamer resulted in a mean FTA of 44.7° ± 7.0°. The mean difference of 2.7° was not statistically significant. The intraclass correlation coefficient for inter-tester reliability was 0.895. CONCLUSIONS: The FTA can be reliably determined from post-operative AP radiographs and provides a useful and reproducible metric for characterizing femoral tunnel position after both rigid and flexible femoral tunnel drilling. This has implications for post-operative evaluation and preoperative treatment planning for ACL revision surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Progression of patellar tendinitis following treatment with platelet-rich plasma: case reports.

PURPOSE: The use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is becoming more attractive given its favourable side effect profile and autologous nature, leading to rapid clinical adoption in the absence of high-level evidence. We are presenting three patients who developed a progression of patellar tendinitis following treatment, which to our knowledge is the first report of worsening of patellar tendinitis following PRP therapy. METHODS: The records of three patients with symptom exacerbation of patellar tendinitis following treatment with PRP were reviewed. IRB exemption was obtained. Clinical and operative records, radiographs, and MR imaging were reviewed for all patients. RESULTS: Three patients reported to our clinic for a second opinion with symptoms of anterior knee pain consistent with patellar tendinitis. Each patient had previously been treated with PRP therapy due to prolonged symptoms. Clinical and radiological findings following treatment included patellar tendon thickening, worsening pain, discontinuation of athletic participation in all three patients, and osteolysis of the distal pole of the patella in one patient identified during surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Growing interest in the use of autologous products for the management of chronic tendinopathies has led to widespread clinical implementation with minimal scientific support. It is tempting to apply a new treatment for management of a difficult clinical entity, especially when the risk/benefit ratio appears favourable. However, caution must be exercised as unexpected results may be encountered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case reports, level V.

Strategies for revision surgery after primary double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article was to discuss pre- and intra-operative considerations as well as surgical strategies for different femoral and tibial tunnel scenarios in revision surgery following primary double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: Based on the current literature of ACL revision surgery and surgical experience, an algorithm for revision surgery after primary double-bundle ACL reconstruction was created. RESULTS: A guideline and flowchart were created using a case-based approached for revision surgery after primary double-bundle ACL reconstruction. CONCLUSION: Revision surgery after primary double-bundle ACL reconstruction can be a challenging procedure that requires flexibility and a repertoire of surgical techniques. The combination of pre-operative planning with 3D-CT reconstruction, in addition to careful intra-operative assessment, and the use of this flowchart can simplify the ACL revision procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Quantitative evaluation of the pivot shift by image analysis using the iPad.

PURPOSE: To enable comparison of test results, a widely available measurement system for the pivot shift test is needed. Simple image analysis of lateral knee joint translation is one such system that can be installed on a prevalent computer tablet (e.g. iPad). The purpose of this study was to test a novel iPad application to detect the pivot shift. It was hypothesized that the abnormal lateral translation in ACL deficient knees would be detected by the iPad application. METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive ACL deficient patients were tested. Three skin markers were attached on the following bony landmarks: (1) Gerdy's tubercle, (2) fibular head and (3) lateral epicondyle. A standardized pivot shift test was performed under anaesthesia, while the lateral side of the knee joint was monitored. The recorded movie was processed by the iPad application to measure the lateral translation of the knee joint. Lateral translation was compared between knees with different pivot shift grades. RESULTS: Valid data sets were obtained in 20 (59 %) ACL deficient knees. The remaining 14 data sets were invalid because of failure to detect translation or detection of excessive translation. ACL deficient knees had larger lateral translation than the contra-lateral knees (p < 0.01). In the 20 valid data sets, which were graded as either grade 1 (n = 10) or grade 2 (n = 10), lateral translation was significantly larger in the grade 2 pivot shift (3.6 ± 1.2 mm) than the grade 1 pivot shift (2.7 ± 0.6 mm, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although some technical corrections, such as testing manoeuvre and recording procedure, are needed to improve the image data sampling using the iPad application, the potential of the iPad application to classify the pivot shift was demonstrated.

Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Current Concepts and Future Perspective.

Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is common procedure performed by orthopedic surgeons, particularly in association with sports-related injuries. Whereas traditional reconstruction techniques used a single bundle graft that was typically placed in a non-anatomic position, a renewed interest in anatomy has facilitated the popularization of anatomic reconstruction techniques. Recently, a focus has been placed on individualizing ACL surgery based on each patient's native anatomical characteristics (e.g., insertion site size, notch size, and shape), thereby dictating the ultimate procedure of choice. As subjective outcome measurements have demonstrated varying outcomes with respect to single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction, investigators have turned to more objective techniques, such as in vivo kinematics, as a means of evaluating joint motion and cartilage contact mechanics. Further investigation in this area may yield important information with regard to the potential progression to osteoarthritis after ACL reconstruction, including factors affecting or preventing it.

Indications and contraindications for double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Over recent years, double-bundle reconstruction has gained popularity after studies showed significant advantages of adding a second bundle with regard to outcomes and biomechanics; in particular, it resulted in less rotational instability than after reconstruction with a traditional single-bundle technique. As the focus shifted further towards the restoration of the native anatomy, both single-bundle and double-bundle ACL reconstruction were performed in an anatomical fashion and yielded similar results. To date, no consensus has developed as to whether double-bundle reconstruction is better than single-bundle reconstruction or vice versa. However, after surgeons started to individualise their surgical approach to the patient, it has been found that both the anatomical single- and double-bundle techniques have their own set of indications and contraindications. Reconstruction of the ligament should focus on restoration of the native functional and anatomical properties and should take the size, shape and orientation of the ACL into account. When indications and contraindications for the technique used are based on native anatomical characteristics, either a single-bundle or a double-bundle procedure can be performed according to the same double-bundle concept.

ACL graft healing and biologics.

Operative reconstruction of a torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has become the most broadly accepted treatment. An important, but underreported, outcome of ACL reconstruction is graft failure, which poses a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. An understanding of the tendon-bone healing and the intra-articular ligamentization process is crucial for orthopedic surgeons to make appropriate graft choices and to be able to initiate optimal rehabilitation protocols after surgical ACL reconstruction. This article focuses on the current understanding of the tendon-to-bone healing process for both autografts and allografts and discusses strategies to biologically augment healing.

Comparison of three non-invasive quantitative measurement systems for the pivot shift test.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate three different non-invasive measuring devices for the pivot shift phenomenon with reference to direct bony movement measured by an electromagnetic device rigidly attached to the tibia and femur. METHODS: A lower body cadaveric specimen was prepared to create a positive pivot shift in both knees. Twelve expert knee surgeons from worldwide performed their preferred pivot shift technique three times in each knee. After watching an instructional video, the examiners used a standardized technique to perform three additional pivot shift maneuvers in each knee. An electromagnetic tracking system, rigidly attached to femur and tibia, was used to provide reference measurements during the pivot shift test. Three different devices were correlated to the reference method and evaluated in this study: (1) Electromagnetic tracking system with skin sensors; (2) Triaxial accelerometer system; (3) Simple image analysis. RESULTS: When results from both pivot shift techniques (preferred and standardized) were combined, the electromagnetic tracking system with skin sensors showed positive correlation with the reference measurement for acceleration and translation parameters (r = 0.88 and r = 0.67, respectively; both P < 0.01); The triaxial accelerometer system demonstrated good correlation with the reference measurement for acceleration (r = 0.75; P < 0.001). The image analysis system was poorly correlated to the translation of the reference measurement (r = 0.24; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The electromagnetic tracking system with skin sensors provided the best correlation with the reference method. The triaxial accelerometer showed also a good correlation and the image analysis system showed a positive, but poor correlation with the reference method. More research is needed in order to validate simple and non-invasive devices for clinical application.

Evaluation of the effects of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy involved in the healing of sports-related soft tissue injuries.

Musculoskeletal injuries are the most common cause of severe long-term pain and physical disability, and affect hundreds of millions of people around the world. One of the most popular methods used to biologically enhance healing in the fields of orthopaedic surgery and sports medicine includes the use of autologous blood products, namely, platelet rich plasma (PRP). PRP is an autologous concentration of human platelets to supra-physiologic levels. At baseline levels, platelets function as a natural reservoir for growth factors including platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-ß1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I). PRP is commonly used in orthopaedic practice to augment healing in sports-related injuries of skeletal muscle, tendons, and ligaments. Despite its pervasive use, the clinical efficacy of PrP therapy and varying mechanisms of action have yet to be established. Basic science research has revealed that PRP exerts is effects through many downstream events secondary to release of growth factors and other bioactive factors from its alpha granules. These effects may vary depending on the location of injury and the concentration of important growth factors involved in various soft tissue healing responses. This review focuses on the effects of PrP and its associated bioactive factors as elucidated in basic science research. Current findings in PRP basic science research, which have shed light on its proposed mechanisms of action, have opened doors for future areas of PrP research.

Individualized anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is a technique that continues to evolve. Good results have been established with respect to reducing anteroposterior laxity. However, these results have come into question because nonanatomic techniques have been ineffective at restoring knee kinematics and raised concerns that abnormal kinematics may impact long-term knee health. Anatomic ACL-R attempts to closely reproduce the patient's individual anatomic characteristics. Measurements of the patient's anatomy help determine graft choice and whether anatomic reconstruction should be performed with a single- or double-bundle technique. The bony landmarks and insertions of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are preserved to assist with anatomic placement of both tibial and femoral tunnels. An anatomic single- or double-bundle reconstruction is performed with a goal of reproducing the characteristics of the native ACL. Long-term outcomes for anatomic ACL reconstruction are unknown. By individualizing ACL-R, we strive to reproduce the patient's native anatomy and restore knee kinematics to improve patient outcomes.