Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol ; 7(4): 988-993, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36000056

RESUMO

Background: The incidence of p16+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has been increasing. The notion that p16+ OPSCC has a propensity for atypical and disseminating metastasis has gained traction. We compared treatment failure patterns in p16+ and p16- OPSCC and evaluated survival impact. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with recurrent/metastatic OPSCC disease between 1/2009 and 12/2019. Results: Thirty-eight p16+ and 36 p16- patients were identified. Three distinct failure patterns (distant vs. locoregional, atypical vs. typical, and disseminating vs. non-disseminating) were studied. No significant differences were found between p16+ and p16- patients. Multivariate analysis showed p16 status was an independent prognostic biomarker; p16+ patients have a favorable overall survival compared to p16- patients (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.16-0.77; P = .005). Conclusions: We challenge the view that p16+ OPSCC exhibits a distinctive treatment failure pattern and showed that p16 status impacts patient survival independent of disease progression.

2.
Head Neck ; 44(5): 1164-1171, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35212072

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Synchronous primary tumors (SPTs) are detected via triple endoscopy or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Patients with human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+ OPSCC) lack risk factors for SPTs. METHODS: We performed a single institution retrospective review of the efficacy of triple endoscopy and PET/CT in HPV+ OPSCC patients. RESULTS: Sixty-five HPV+ OPSCC patients underwent triple endoscopy and PET/CT. Patients were white (n = 48, 72.7%), male (n = 53, 81.5%), mean 58.7 ± 8.1 years old. SPT was detected in 1 (1.5%) patient via PET/CT. No SPTs were detected on triple endoscopy. PET/CT had 100% and 95.3% sensitivity and specificity, respectively. PET/CT positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 25.0% and 100%, respectively. Triple endoscopy specificity and NPV was 90.2% and 93.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT is superior to triple endoscopy in ruling out SPTs. With negative PET/CT, only direct laryngoscopy with biopsy may be necessary.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Endoscopia , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/complicações , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/patologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Infecções por Papillomavirus/patologia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/complicações , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço/diagnóstico por imagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...