A "chamber of errors" adaptation to assess pharmaceutical assistants' knowledge in chemotherapy preparation.

French preparation guidelines state that pharmacy staff who manipulate cytotoxic drugs have to follow specific training. In order to assess the pharmaceutical assistants' skills and knowledge, we developed a "Cytotoxic Preparation Centralized Unit (CPCU) of errors," derived from the Canadian concept of "Chamber of horrors." A table listing 20 mistakes to track down was created and each pharmaceutical assistant spent 20 min in the "CPCU of errors" with the pharmacist, who wrote down the spotted mistakes in real time. Among the 21 trained pharmaceutical assistants, 15 were evaluated. On average, 11.9 mistakes on 20 were detected. The lowest score was 7 spotted errors on 20 and the highest was 16 on 20. Those results should be qualified depending on pharmaceutical assistants' years of experience in the preparation of chemotherapy. Those results may be explained by the way the role-playing was conducted. The simulation was not conducted during an actual preparation using the usual equipment. One of the major obstacles was the difficulty to clear some time for this project because its realization required a full-time pharmacist and the referring pharmaceutical assistant in addition to the evaluated pharmaceutical assistants. Overall, the staff feedback was positive and the role-playing led to a reminder of theoretical knowledge and the good use of some devices. It would be interesting to develop this type of project through a regional oncology network to create a medium that can be used by other hospitals.

Adjuvant FOLFOX +/- cetuximab in full RAS and BRAF wildtype stage III colon cancer patients.

Background: RAS mutations have been shown to confer resistance to anti- epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment. We analysed the results of the PETACC8 trial (cetuximab + FOLFOX vs FOLFOX) in full RAS and BRAF wildtype (WT) patients (pts) with resected stage III colon cancer. Patients and methods: Exons 2, 3 and 4 of KRAS and NRAS, and BRAF exons 11 and 15, were sequenced using the Ampliseq colon-lung cancer panel version 2, in PETACC8 trial pts who consented to translational research. The impact of cetuximab on time to recurrence (TTR), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was investigated in pts with tumours harbouring RAS and BRAF WT, and RAS mutations. The prognostic value of each individual mutation was also tested. Results: Among the 2559 pts analysed, 745 pts (29%) were known to have KRAS exon 2 mutations and 163 pts (6.4%) the BRAF V600E mutation. Of the remaining 1651 pts, 1054 were assessed by NGS, showing that a further 227 pts (21%) had KRAS exon 2, 3, 4 or NRAS exon 2, 3, 4 mutations, and that 46 pts (4.4%) had a newly diagnosed BRAF mutation. Cetuximab added to FOLFOX did not significantly improve TTR, DFS or OS in pts with RAS WT or RAS and BRAF WT tumours (HR 0.77-1.03, all P > 0.05). Cetuximab addition was not either significantly deleterious in RAS mutant pts or in pts with rare RAS or BRAF mutations. In the overall trial population, NRAS and KRAS codon 61 mutations were the only rare mutations with the same pejorative prognostic value as KRAS exon 2 or BRAF V600E mutations. Conclusion: Though not significant, the clinically relevant 0.76 adjusted HR observed for DFS in favour of adding cetuximab to FOLFOX, in full RAS and BRAF WT stage III colon cancer pts, may justify a new randomized controlled trial testing EGFR inhibitors in this setting. Clinical trial number: This is an ancillary study of the PETACC8 trial: EUDRACT 2005-003463-23.

Predicting the warfarin maintenance dose in elderly inpatients at treatment initiation: accuracy of dosing algorithms incorporating or not VKORC1/CYP2C9 genotypes.

BACKGROUND: Initiating warfarin is challenging in frail elderly patients because of low-dose requirements and interindividual variability. OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether incorporating VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotype information in different models helped to predict the warfarin maintenance dose when added to clinical data and INR values at baseline (Day 0), and during warfarin induction. PATIENTS: We prospectively enrolled 187 elderly inpatients (mean age, 85.6 years), all starting on warfarin using the same 'geriatric dosing-algorithm' based on the INR value measured on the day after three 4-mg warfarin doses (INR(3)) and on INR(6 ± 1). RESULTS: On Day 0, the clinical model failed to accurately predict the maintenance dose (R(2) < 0.10). Adding the VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotypes to the model increased R(2) to 0.31. On Day 3, the INR(3) value was the strongest predictor, completely embedding the VKORC1 genotype, whereas the CYP2C9 genotype remained a significant predictor (model- R(2) 0.55). On Day 6 ± 1, none of the genotypes predicted the maintenance dose. Finally, the simple 'geriatric dosing-algorithm' was the most accurate algorithm on Day 3 (R(2) 0.77) and Day 6 (R(2) 0.81), under-estimating (≥ 1 mg) and over-estimating the dose (≥ 1 mg) in fewer than 10% and 2% of patients, respectively. Clinical models and the 'geriatric dosing-algorithm' were validated on an independent sample. CONCLUSIONS: Before starting warfarin therapy, the VKORC1 genotype is the best predictor of the maintenance dose. Once treatment is started using induction doses tailored for elderly patients, the contribution of VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotypes in dose refinement is negligible compared with two INR values measured during the first week of treatment.

UDP-glucuronosyltransferase UGT1A7 genetic polymorphisms in hepatocellular carcinoma: a differential impact according to seropositivity of HBV or HCV markers?

BACKGROUND: We conducted a case-control study to evaluate the role of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A7 (UGT1A7) polymorphisms in the onset of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: The study included 165 patients with HCC, 134 with cirrhosis and 142 controls without liver disease, matched for age and hospital. All were men younger than 75 years. HCC and cirrhosis patients were stratified according to time since cirrhosis diagnosis. RESULTS: We found a positive association between the UGT1A7*3/*3 genotype and HCC when the comparison was restricted to patients whose disease was of viral origin [OR = 3.4 (0.3-45)] but a negative association when it included only alcoholic patients [OR = 0.1 (0.02-0.6), p = 0.01]. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that UGT1A7 may play a role in hepatocellular carcinogenesis and that this role may differ according to the primary cause of the cirrhosis.