The Burden of Pruritus Associated With CKD: A Mixed Methods Analysis Among Patients Undergoing Dialysis.

Rationale & Objective: Despite its prevalence and distress to patients, chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is poorly characterized, which may contribute to the condition's underdiagnosis and inadequate management. This study aimed to understand the symptom experience of patients with CKD-aP and the extent to which pruritus impacts their lives. Study Design: Mixed methods study including one-on-one qualitative interviews and completion of the Skindex-10 Questionnaire (measuring itch-related quality of life). Setting & Participants: A total of 23 patients undergoing hemodialysis and reporting pruritus at 4 dialysis centers in the United States. Analytical Approach: Interviews followed a semistructured guide that included targeted and follow-up questions to elicit discussion of patients' symptoms of pruritus, including frequency and variability, impact on activities of daily living, and emotional and social functioning. Interviews were digitally audio-recorded. A coding dictionary was developed from transcripts to analyze themes and concepts. Results: Participants described their itch with various terms, including "numbness," "pain," and "tingling" on their skin. Itch affected multiple areas but especially the back, usually occurred daily, and was often worse at night. For some, itching was a constant experience. Patients relieved their itch through scratching and various off-label treatments; some reported skin damage from excessive scratching and most indicated treatments provided limited relief. Pruritus considerably disrupted physical function, including sleep, daily activities, social functioning and relationships, and emotional and psychological wellbeing. All participants reported being bothered by their itching during the past week on the Skindex-10 Questionnaire. Limitations: All participants were from the United States, so the findings may not be generalizable to other countries. Conclusions: Although symptom experience varies considerably, CKD-aP causes severe distress for many patients undergoing hemodialysis and can profoundly impair their quality of life. The results of this study show the impact of itch from patients' perspectives and highlight the need for greater awareness and better management of this condition. Plain-Language Summary: Patients with chronic kidney disease often experience itching, or pruritus, but its importance to patients is regularly overlooked. This study used one-on-one interviews to investigate patients' experiences of chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus and how it impacts their lives. We found that participants experienced itch on various body areas and used different words to describe their itch (eg, "numbness" and "pain"). Some reported skin damage from excessive scratching, and many used off-label treatments and other interventions (eg, rubbing alcohol and multiple showers daily), which provided limited relief. For many, itching was experienced daily and severely disrupted sleep, daily activities, interactions with others, and mental wellbeing. These findings reveal chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus severely impacts patients and highlights the need for improved management of this condition.

Oral difelikefalin reduces moderate to severe pruritus and expression of pruritic and inflammatory biomarkers in subjects with atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Pruritus is the most common and burdensome symptom of atopic dermatitis (AD). Pruritus-targeted treatments in AD are lacking, particularly for patients with milder skin disease. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the impact of the selective κ-opioid receptor agonist difelikefalin (DFK) on pruritus intensity and pruritus- and immune-related biomarkers in subjects with moderate to severe AD-related pruritus. METHODS: A phase 2 clinical trial investigated the efficacy and safety of oral DFK 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg in subjects with moderate to severe AD-related pruritus. A biomarker substudy evaluated the effects of DFK on the expression of pruritus, TH2-associated genes, and skin barrier-related genes. RESULTS: In the clinical trial (N = 401), all DFK doses reduced itch versus placebo; however, the results were not statistically significant at week 12. In a subgroup of subjects in the trial with mild to moderate skin inflammation and moderate to severe itch (itch-dominant AD phenotype), DFK reduced itch at week 12 versus placebo. In the biomarker substudy, DFK downregulated the expression of key pruritus-related genes (eg, IL-31 and TRPV1) and the AD phenotype (eg, CCL17). Gene set variation analysis confirmed that DFK, but not placebo, downregulated pruritus-related genes and TH2 pathways. DFK improved skin barrier integrity markers and upregulated the expression of claudins and lipid metabolism-associated genes (eg, SEC14L6, ELOVL3, CYP1A2, and AKR1D1). CONCLUSIONS: DFK treatment reduced itch in subjects with moderate to severe AD-related pruritus, particularly those with an "itch-dominant" AD phenotype, and had an impact on the expression of pruritus, TH2-associated genes, and skin barrier-related genes. DFK is a promising therapy for AD-related pruritus; further clinical studies are warranted.

Assessment of the physical dependence potential of difelikefalin: Randomized placebo-controlled study in patients receiving hemodialysis.

Difelikefalin is a selective kappa opioid receptor agonist approved for treating moderate-to-severe pruritus in adults undergoing hemodialysis (HD). Difelikefalin is not a controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act. This study assessed the potential for developing physical dependence on difelikefalin in patients undergoing HD. Eligible patients received open-label difelikefalin after each dialysis session for 3 weeks before entering a 2-week double-blind phase, when they were randomized to either continue difelikefalin or to switch to receiving placebo. Signs of physical withdrawal were assessed using the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS), several patient-reported scales, and physiological measures. The primary end point was the between-group difference in mean maximum COWS total scores during the double-blind phase; the mean difference (placebo - difelikefalin) was compared against a predefined noninferiority limit (+4). Thirty-five patients (57.1% male; 91.4% Black or African American; median [range] age 58 [28-77] years) were included, of which 30 were randomized (placebo, n = 14; difelikefalin, n = 16). The least squares mean difference in maximum COWS total scores was 0.52 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.56, 1.59). The upper CI limit (1.59) was below +4, indicating that patients who discontinued difelikefalin (placebo group) had similar withdrawal scores to patients who continued difelikefalin. Additional assessments supported the COWS results, showing no meaningful differences between groups in physiological measures or in patient-reported measures of sleep or physical withdrawal. These results demonstrate that abruptly discontinuing chronic difelikefalin treatment in patients undergoing HD does not produce signs or symptoms of physical withdrawal.

A phase 2 study of oral difelikefalin in subjects with chronic kidney disease and moderate-to-severe pruritus.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Chronic pruritus is burdensome for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). OBJECTIVE: We evaluated difelikefalin efficacy and safety in reducing itch in subjects with non-dialysis-dependent CKD and those undergoing hemodialysis (HD). METHODS: This phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study enrolled non-dialysis-dependent CKD (stage 3-5) and HD subjects with moderate-to-severe pruritus. Subjects were equally randomized to oral difelikefalin (0.25, 0.5, or 1.0 mg) or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. The primary end point was the change in the weekly mean Worst Itching Intensity Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) score at week 12. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-nine subjects were randomized (mean [SD] baseline WI-NRS: 7.1 [1.2]). Difelikefalin 1.0 mg significantly reduced weekly mean WI-NRS scores versus placebo at week 12 (P = .018), with numerical reductions observed with difelikefalin 0.25 and 0.5 mg. At week 12, 38.6% of subjects receiving difelikefalin 1.0 mg achieved a complete response (WI-NRS 0-1) versus 14.4% receiving placebo. Difelikefalin resulted in ∼20% improvement in itch-related quality-of-life measures. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were dizziness, fall, constipation, diarrhea, gastroesophageal reflux disease, fatigue, hyperkalemia, hypertension, and urinary tract infection. LIMITATIONS: Study duration was 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Oral difelikefalin significantly reduced itch intensity in stage 3-5 CKD subjects with moderate-to-severe pruritus, supporting continued development for this condition.

Phase 2 Trial of Difelikefalin in Notalgia Paresthetica.

BACKGROUND: Notalgia paresthetica is a neuropathic disorder characterized by pruritus in a circumscribed region of the upper back. Difelikefalin, a selective kappa opioid receptor agonist, has shown efficacy in other chronic pruritic conditions and is being investigated for the treatment of notalgia paresthetica. METHODS: In this phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with moderate-to-severe pruritus caused by notalgia paresthetica to receive 2 mg of oral difelikefalin or placebo twice daily for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the change from baseline at week 8 in the weekly mean score on the daily Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS; scores range from 0 [no itch] to 10 [worst itch imaginable]). The secondary clinical outcomes were itch-related quality-of-life and itch-related sleep measures. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were enrolled; 62 patients were assigned to receive difelikefalin, and 63 were assigned to receive placebo. One patient who had been assigned to receive difelikefalin withdrew consent before the first dose and is not included in the main analyses. The mean baseline WI-NRS score was 7.6 (indicating severe itch) in each group. The change from baseline in the weekly mean WI-NRS score at week 8 was -4.0 points in the difelikefalin group and -2.4 points in the placebo group (difference in change, -1.6 points; 95% confidence interval, -2.6 to -0.6; P = 0.001). The results for the secondary outcomes generally did not support those of the primary analysis. Headache, dizziness, constipation, and increased urine output occurred more frequently in the difelikefalin group than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with notalgia paresthetica, oral treatment with difelikefalin resulted in modestly greater reductions in itch intensity scores than placebo over a period of 8 weeks but was associated with adverse events. Larger and longer trials are needed to assess the efficacy and safety of difelikefalin treatment in this disorder. (Funded by Cara Therapeutics; KOMFORT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04706975.).

Safety and Effectiveness of Difelikefalin in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Pruritus Undergoing Hemodialysis: An Open-Label, Multicenter Study.

Rationale & Objective: Individuals with chronic kidney disease frequently suffer from chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP), impacting sleep quality and quality of life (QoL) and increasing the likelihood of depression. Difelikefalin is a kappa-opioid receptor agonist recently approved in the United States for the treatment of moderate-to-severe CKD-aP in hemodialysis patients. Study 3105 was conducted to further assess the safety of difelikefalin and the effects on pruritus and QoL. Study Design: Open-label, multicenter, single-arm intervention trial. Setting & Participants: Maintenance hemodialysis patients with moderate-to-severe CKD-aP at enrollment. Intervention: Intravenous difelikefalin 0.5 µg/kg after each hemodialysis session for 12 weeks. Outcomes: The primary outcome was safety of difelikefalin. Secondary outcomes included: effectiveness of reducing itch intensity, assessed by the Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS); improving itch-related QoL, assessed with 5-D itch and Skindex-10 scales; and improvement of sleep, assessed with the Sleep Quality Numerial Rating Scale. Clinically meaningful thresholds for improvement in itch and QoL were previously established in this population. Results: Among 222 participants with baseline WI-NRS ≥5, mean [standard deviation] WI-NRS was 7.6 [1.3], mean age 58 years, 55% were male, and mean dialysis duration was 5.9 years; 197 participants (89%) completed treatment. Treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 16 participants (7.2%); those most commonly reported were somnolence (1.8%), hypoesthesia (1.4%), nausea (0.9%), and dizziness (0.9%). No deaths or serious treatment-emergent adverse events were considered treatment-related. Clinically meaningful reduction in itch intensity (≥3-point improvement) was reported by 74% of participants, with 70% and 63% also reporting a clinically relevant improvement in QoL as measured by 5-D itch and Skindex-10. Sleep quality improvement (≥3-point reduction on the Numerical Rating Scale) was reported in 66% of participants. Limitations: No placebo control group. Conclusions: Difelikefalin was well tolerated, and treatment was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in itch intensity and itch-related QoL measures as well as improvements in sleep quality among individuals receiving hemodialysis who had moderate-to-severe CKD-aP, providing important insights into expected real-world effectiveness. Funding: Cara Therapeutics. Trial Registration: NCT03998163.

Safety and Tolerability of Difelikefalin for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Pruritus in Hemodialysis Patients: Pooled Analysis From the Phase 3 Clinical Trial Program.

Rationale & Objective: We report a pooled safety analysis of intravenous difelikefalin in participants with moderate to severe chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) treated by hemodialysis in 4 phase 3 clinical studies. Study Design: KALM-1 and KALM-2 were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pivotal phase 3 studies; CLIN3101 (52 weeks) and CLIN3105 (12 weeks) were open-label studies. Setting & Participants: Adults with moderate to severe CKD-aP treated by hemodialysis in North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region. Intervention: At least 1 intravenous placebo or difelikefalin dose of 0.5 mcg/kg for up to 64 weeks. Outcomes: Safety. Results: Safety analyses were conducted with 848 participants in the placebo-controlled cohort (424 participants each in the difelikefalin and placebo groups) and in 1,306 participants in the all-difelikefalin-exposure cohort. In the placebo-controlled cohort, the most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), occurring in ≥2% of participants receiving difelikefalin and with a ≥1% higher incidence than placebo, were diarrhea (9.0% and 5.7%, respectively); dizziness (6.8% and 3.8%, respectively); nausea (6.6% and 4.5%, respectively); gait disturbances, including falls (6.6% and 5.4%, respectively), hyperkalemia (4.7% and 3.5%, respectively); headache (4.5% and 2.6%, respectively); somnolence (4.2% and 2.4%, respectively); and mental status changes (3.3% and 1.4%, respectively). These were mostly mild or moderate, with few leading to discontinuation. Incidence rates of TEAEs, serious TEAEs, and discontinuations because of TEAEs did not increase with long-term exposure. Three participants (0.7%) in the difelikefalin group and 5 participants (1.2%) in the placebo group died during the study. Limitations: Pooled data from studies with different designs. Conclusions: Intravenous difelikefalin demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, was generally well tolerated with long-term use, and may address the unmet treatment need for patients with CKD-aP treated by hemodialysis. Funding: Cara Therapeutics, Inc. Trial Registration: KALM-1 is registered as NCT03422653, KALM-2 as NCT03636269, CLIN3101 as NCT03281538, and CLIN3105 as NCT03998163.

Efficacy of Difelikefalin for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Pruritus in Hemodialysis Patients: Pooled Analysis of KALM-1 and KALM-2 Phase 3 Studies.

Rationale & Objective: Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) in patients treated by hemodialysis (HD) impairs quality of life (QoL). Difelikefalin, a selective κ-opioid receptor agonist, decreased the intensity of CKD-aP in patients undergoing HD. This pooled analysis evaluated difelikefalin's efficacy and the itch-related QoL overall and in subgroups defined by demographics or disease characteristics. Study Design: In KALM-1 and KALM-2, participants were randomized (1:1) to receive intravenous difelikefalin or placebo 3 times/wk for 12 weeks, followed by a 52-week open-label extension. Setting & Participants: Adults with moderate to severe CKD-aP treated by HD in North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region. Intervention: Intravenous difelikefalin at 0.5 mcg/kg or placebo. Outcomes: Itch intensity (Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale [WI-NRS]) and itch-related QoL (Skindex-10 and 5-D Itch questionnaires). Results: 851 participants were randomized (difelikefalin, n = 426; placebo, n = 425). This pooled analysis demonstrated early     (week 1), sustained difelikefalin efficacy, with significantly greater achievement of ≥3-point WI-NRS reduction with difelikefalin (51.1%) versus placebo (35.2%; P < 0.001). Achievement of a ≥4-point WI-NRS reduction was significantly greater with difelikefalin (38.7%) versus placebo (23.4%; P < 0.001). Difelikefalin reduced itch intensity in subgroups based on age, sex, anti-itch medication use, the presence of specific medical conditions, and gabapentin or pregabalin use. More participants receiving difelikefalin versus placebo achieved clinically meaningful decreases of ≥15 points on the Skindex-10 scale (55.5% vs 40.5%, respectively; P < 0.001) and ≥5 points on the 5-D Itch scale (52.1% vs 42.3%, respectively; P = 0.01), with sustained 5-D Itch effects up to 64 weeks. Limitations: Subgroup samples were small. The WI-NRS, Skindex-10, and 5-D Itch are not used in routine clinical care of dialysis patients; therefore, findings may not reflect the real-world effectiveness of difelikefalin. Conclusions: Difelikefalin demonstrated rapid, sustained efficacy, with consistent results in diverse populations of patients treated by HD. Funding: Cara Therapeutics, Inc. Trial Registration: The KALM-1 trial is registered as NCT03422653 and the KALM-2 trial is registered as NCT03636269.

Understanding the patient experience of living with notalgia paresthetica: A qualitative interview study.

Background: Notalgia paresthetica (NP) is a chronic sensory neuropathy that causes intense pruritus, typically affecting the upper portion of the back and lasting for months to years. The impacts of pruritus and the full symptom experience are not well documented. Objective: To describe patients' NP symptom experience and the impacts of living with NP-related itch. Methods: Semistructured, one-to-one qualitative telephone interviews were conducted in adults living with NP. The worst itch severity during the previous 24 hours was assessed using an 11-point numerical rating scale. Results: Thirty participants (23 females; aged 41-80 years) completed interviews. Seventeen NP-related symptoms were described, with daily itch being the most common. Participants' itch ranged from severe to very severe (50%) and was experienced for a median of 2.8 years. Most (73%) participants were not receiving treatment for NP at the time of the study. Other reported symptoms included skin pain or sensitivity and secondary symptoms from itching (skin discoloration, lumps or bumps, bleeding or scabbing). NP-related itch was frequently reported to affect mood, interfere with sleep, and disrupt self-care. Limitations: Only English-speaking participants living in the United States were included. Conclusion: This study highlights the patient experience of living with NP and findings reveal that there remains an unmet need for effective therapeutic options to address NP-related itch.

Evaluation of the abuse potential of difelikefalin, a selective kappa-opioid receptor agonist, in recreational polydrug users.

Difelikefalin, a selective kappa-opioid receptor agonist with limited central nervous system penetration, is being developed for the treatment of chronic pruritic conditions. This randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled, four-way crossover study was designed to evaluate the abuse potential of difelikefalin in healthy recreational polydrug users. Using a 4 × 4 Williams design, nondependent adult users of opioids and hallucinogens (N = 44) were randomized to receive single intravenous (i.v.) injections of difelikefalin at supratherapeutic doses (5 and 15 mcg/kg); pentazocine (0.5 mg/kg), a schedule IV mu-opioid partial agonist and kappa-opioid receptor agonist; and placebo. The abuse potential of difelikefalin was compared with pentazocine and placebo using the maximal score (maximum effect [Emax ]) of the Drug Liking visual analog scale (VAS; primary end point), along with multiple secondary end points of subject-rated measures and pupillometry. Difelikefalin produced significantly lower Drug Liking VAS Emax , and lower peak positive, sedative, and perceptual effects compared with pentazocine. These effects of difelikefalin were small, brief, and not dose-dependent, although marginally greater than those observed with placebo. Neither dose of difelikefalin elicited significant negative or hallucinogenic effects. On end-of-session measures of overall drug liking and willingness to take the drug again, difelikefalin did not differ from placebo, indicating subjects neither liked nor disliked the effects overall and did not feel motivated to take the drug again. Consistent with its lack of mu agonist activity, difelikefalin did not induce miosis compared with pentazocine. All treatments were generally well-tolerated. This study indicates that difelikefalin presents a low potential for abuse.

Psychometric validation and meaningful change thresholds of the Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale for assessing itch in patients with chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is characterized by persistent itch that often leads to substantially impaired quality of life. The Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS) is a single-item patient-reported outcome measure in which patients indicate the intensity of the worst itching they experienced over the past 24 h. Here, we evaluated the content validity and psychometric properties of the WI-NRS and confirmed the threshold of meaningful change in hemodialysis patients with moderate-to-severe CKD-aP. METHODS: Content validity interviews were conducted in 23 patients. Psychometric properties of the WI-NRS were assessed using data from one phase 2 (N = 174) and two phase 3 (N = 848) clinical trials investigating an anti-pruritic treatment. Anchor-based methods were used to confirm meaningful within-patient change score thresholds in the phase 3 trial patients and mixed-method exit interviews (N = 70) contributed further insight. RESULTS: Content validity interviews indicated patients considered the WI-NRS to be straightforward, comprehensive, and relevant. Test-retest reliability was strong in both trial cohorts (intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.75). Construct validity analyses indicated high correlation between the WI-NRS and other measures of itch. Anchor-based analyses showed a reduction of ≥ 3 points from baseline score represented an appropriate clinically meaningful within-patient change on the WI-NRS. In the exit interviews, all patients with a reduction ≥ 3 points considered the change meaningful. CONCLUSIONS: The WI-NRS is a reliable, valid, and responsive measure of itch intensity for patients with moderate-to-severe CKD-aP. These results support its use to assess treatment efficacy and in clinical evaluation and management of pruritus in hemodialysis patients.

Itching is a distressing medical condition common in patients with chronic kidney disease, especially those undergoing hemodialysis. The itch often leads to skin damage due to a continuous and uncontrollable urge to scratch. It affects about 60% of hemodialysis patients and can be severe enough to seriously affect quality of life. At present, there are no approved therapies. To evaluate whether new treatments for itch are effective, clinicians need to assess if the intensity of itch decreases over time. However, because itch intensity can only be measured accurately by the person experiencing it, a measure is required that can be easily understood and used by patients. This study evaluated a scale in which patients mark a number between '0' (corresponding to no itch) and '10' (the worst itching imaginable), to describe the worst itch intensity they experienced over the last 24 hours. Using data from three clinical trials of a novel treatment for itch in patients undergoing hemodialysis with moderate-to-severe pruritus, we found that the scale was reliable in repeat-testing experiments, and mirrored other methods of measuring changes in itch. In interviews, patients said they found the scale straightforward and easy to complete. Our analysis and patients' opinions showed a 3-point reduction in itch intensity on the scale represented a meaningful improvement. These findings support the use of this scale to assess the efficacy of new treatments and in clinical evaluation and management of pruritus in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Effect of difelikefalin, a selective kappa opioid receptor agonist, on respiratory depression: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Difelikefalin, a selective kappa opioid receptor agonist designed to limit central nervous system (CNS) penetration, is under development for the treatment of pruritus. Its hydrophilic, small-peptidic structure limits CNS entry, minimizing potential CNS-mediated adverse events (AEs). This study assessed the effect of difelikefalin on key relevant measures of respiratory depression in healthy volunteers. This single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study enrolled healthy, nonsmoking volunteers. Subjects were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment sequences of difelikefalin (1.0 or 5.0 mcg/kg i.v.) or placebo on sequential days with an intervening 24 (±2) h washout period. The primary end points included incidence of increased end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2 ) greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg versus baseline or a level greater than 50 mm Hg sustained greater than or equal to 30 seconds, and incidence of reduction in saturation of peripheral oxygen (SpO2 ) to less than 92% sustained greater than or equal to 30 seconds. Secondary end points included incidence of reduced respiratory rate and other safety assessments. Fifteen subjects were randomized and completed the study. No subject on placebo or difelikefalin met the increased ETCO2 or reduced SpO2 primary end point criteria for respiratory depression. All respiratory measures in each group remained near baseline values during 4-h postdose observations. No subject met the reduced respiratory rate criterion or experienced clinically significant changes in ETCO2 , SpO2 , or respiratory rate. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs; ≥20% of subjects) were paresthesia, hypoesthesia, and somnolence in the difelikefalin arms. All TEAEs were mild and resolved without intervention. Difelikefalin 1.0 and 5.0 mcg/kg i.v. did not produce respiratory depression.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Difelikefalin for Chronic Pruritus in Hemodialysis Patients.

INTRODUCTION: There is an unmet medical need for pruritus associated with chronic kidney disease, a distressing complication characterized by generalized and persistent itch affecting 20% to 40% of patients undergoing hemodialysis. Here we report the results of a phase 2 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of a novel peripherally restricted kappa opioid receptor agonist, difelikefalin, in adult patients undergoing hemodialysis with pruritus. METHODS: In this study, 174 hemodialysis patients with moderate-to-severe pruritus were randomly assigned to receive difelikefalin (0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 µg/kg) or placebo intravenously thrice weekly after each hemodialysis session for 8 weeks in a double-blind, controlled trial. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline at week 8 in the weekly mean of the 24-hour Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale score. The secondary efficacy endpoint was the change in itch-related quality of life measured by the Skindex-10 questionnaire. Other endpoints included safety, sleep quality, and additional measures including the 5-D itch scale. RESULTS: A significant reduction from baseline in itch intensity scores at week 8 favored all difelikefalin doses combined versus placebo (P = 0.002). Difelikefalin also showed improvement over placebo in Skindex-10, 5-D itch, and sleep disturbance scores (P ≤ 0.005). Overall, 78% of patients receiving difelikefalin reported treatment-emergent adverse events versus 42% of patients given placebo, with diarrhea, dizziness, nausea, somnolence, and fall being the most frequent (≥5%). CONCLUSION: In this trial, difelikefalin effectively reduced itching intensity and improved sleep and itch-related quality of life.

A Phase 3 Trial of Difelikefalin in Hemodialysis Patients with Pruritus.

BACKGROUND: Difelikefalin is a peripherally restricted and selective agonist of kappa opioid receptors that are considered to be important in modulating pruritus in conditions such as chronic kidney disease. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients undergoing hemodialysis who had moderate-to-severe pruritus to receive either intravenous difelikefalin (at a dose of 0.5 µg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo three times per week for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with an improvement (decrease) of at least 3 points from baseline at week 12 in the weekly mean score on the 24-hour Worst Itching Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS; scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater itch intensity). The secondary outcomes included the change from baseline in itch-related quality-of-life measures, the percentage of patients with an improvement of at least 4 points in the WI-NRS score at week 12, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 378 patients underwent randomization. A total of 82 of 158 patients (51.9%) in the difelikefalin group had a decrease of at least 3 points in the WI-NRS score (primary outcome), as compared with 51 of 165 (30.9%) in the placebo group. The imputed percentage of patients with a decrease of at least 3 points in the WI-NRS score was 49.1% in the difelikefalin group, as compared with 27.9% in the placebo group (P<0.001). Difelikefalin also resulted in a significant improvement from baseline to week 12 in itch-related quality of life as measured by the 5-D itch scale and the Skindex-10 scale. The imputed percentage of patients with a decrease of at least 4 points in the WI-NRS score at week 12 was significantly greater in the difelikefalin group than in the placebo group (37.1% [observed data: 64 of 158 patients] vs. 17.9% [observed data: 35 of 165 patients], P<0.001). Diarrhea, dizziness, and vomiting were more common in the difelikefalin group than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with difelikefalin had a significant reduction in itch intensity and improved itch-related quality of life as compared with those who received placebo. (Funded by Cara Therapeutics; KALM-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03422653.).

Identifying optimal dosage regimes under safety constraints: An application to long term opioid treatment of chronic pain.

There is growing interest and investment in precision medicine as a means to provide the best possible health care. A treatment regime formalizes precision medicine as a sequence of decision rules, one per clinical intervention period, that specify if, when and how current treatment should be adjusted in response to a patient's evolving health status. It is standard to define a regime as optimal if, when applied to a population of interest, it maximizes the mean of some desirable clinical outcome, such as efficacy. However, in many clinical settings, a high-quality treatment regime must balance multiple competing outcomes; eg, when a high dose is associated with substantial symptom reduction but a greater risk of an adverse event. We consider the problem of estimating the most efficacious treatment regime subject to constraints on the risk of adverse events. We combine nonparametric Q-learning with policy-search to estimate a high-quality yet parsimonious treatment regime. This estimator applies to both observational and randomized data, as well as settings with variable, outcome-dependent follow-up, mixed treatment types, and multiple time points. This work is motivated by and framed in the context of dosing for chronic pain; however, the proposed framework can be applied generally to estimate a treatment regime which maximizes the mean of one primary outcome subject to constraints on one or more secondary outcomes. We illustrate the proposed method using data pooled from 5 open-label flexible dosing clinical trials for chronic pain.

Dose-Dependent Flux of Buprenorphine Following Transdermal Administration in Healthy Subjects.

Buprenorphine transdermal delivery system (BTDS) applied once every 7 days is indicated for the management of pain that is severe enough to require daily, around-the-clock, long-term opioid treatment and for which alternative treatment options are inadequate. The 7-day flux of buprenorphine from BTDS to systemic circulation was investigated in a phase 1, 2-period crossover study with 3 randomized groups of healthy subjects receiving BTDS containing buprenorphine 5, 10, or 20 mg for 7 days preceded or followed by intravenous buprenorphine infusion (25 µg/h for 24 hours). Residual and absolute bioavailability methods were used to estimate 7-day flux of buprenorphine. Following BTDS administration, mean area under the curve of buprenorphine increased proportionally (12.6, 24.3, and 51.1 ng/[mL · h]), maximum mean plasma concentration rose with increasing dose (176, 191, and 471 pg/mL), and absolute bioavailability was 14% to 16%. Mean residual amount of buprenorphine in the BTDS after 7-day application was 4.50, 8.57, and 17.1 mg. Flux of buprenorphine was approximately 5, 10, and 20 µg/h for BTDS containing 5, 10, and 20 mg buprenorphine, respectively. BTDS was safe and well tolerated following a single 7-day application in healthy subjects. The results of this study demonstrated dose-dependent flux of buprenorphine delivered via transdermal system.

A Subgroup Analysis Found no Diminished Response to Buprenorphine Transdermal System Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain Patients Classified with Depression.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain (CP) patients with depression typically exhibit worse post-treatment outcomes than nondepressed CP patients. The cause is often assumed to reflect a differential response to treatment, neglecting other potential explanations, such as the continuation of differences in pretreatment outcomes. This post hoc analysis examines whether worse post-treatment outcomes for depressed patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) are driven by reduced treatment efficacy. METHODS: Data were from opioid-naïve adult patients with moderate-to-severe CLBP who participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of Butrans(®) (buprenorphine) Transdermal System (BTDS) for pain relief. Depression screening was based on baseline SF-36v2 Mental Health subscale scores. Patient-reported measures of pain severity, pain interference, quality of life, sleep problems, and functional disability were administered at screening and during the study. Differential treatment efficacy for each outcome was examined using analysis of covariance models that included interaction terms between treatment arm and depression status. RESULTS: At baseline, patients classified as depressed showed greater pain interference, lower quality of life, more sleep problems, and greater functional disability than nondepressed patients; the two groups did not differ in pain severity. No statistically significant interactions between treatment arm and depression status were observed. The direction of improvement post-treatment favored the depressed group on nine of seventeen outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Results do not support a differential response to BTDS treatment between depressed and nondepressed CLBP patients across a variety of patient-reported outcomes. These findings raise the question of whether depressed mood actually moderates the effectiveness of treatment in CP patients.

Buprenorphine transdermal system compared with placebo reduces interference in functioning for chronic low back pain.

OBJECTIVE: This study examines the efficacy of the buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) for reducing the interference of pain on physical and emotional functioning associated with chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS: A post-hoc analysis used data from a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of patients with moderate-to-severe CLBP. The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) measured pain interference at screening, following a run-in period, and during the 12-week double-blind treatment phase. Statistical analyses examined treatment arm differences (BTDS vs placebo) for the following: BPI Interference subscale items and subscale scores at the trial end point (week 12); patterns of change in the Interference subscale scores over time; proportions of patients indicating mild or no interference following treatment; and proportions of patients showing improvement (30%, 50%, 2-point, or 4-point change in score from screening to week 12) for each item and subscale. RESULTS: Mean scores for BPI Interference items and Interference subscale were significantly lower (ie, indicated less interference) for BTDS than for placebo (all P < 0.001). Treatment arm differences in Interference subscale scores emerged within 4 weeks of treatment. The BTDS patients were significantly more likely to indicate mild/no interference on 5 of 7 Interference subscale items following treatment (P < 0.05). For most comparisons, BTDS patients were significantly more likely to show criterion-level improvements in Interference item and subscale scores (P < 0.05 for differences). DISCUSSION: Results indicate the efficacy of BTDS treatment, compared with placebo, for reducing the interference of pain on physical and emotional functioning in patients with moderate-to-severe CLBP. The advantage of BTDS was observed within 4 weeks of treatment, and was maintained throughout the 12-week treatment phase.

Application site adverse events associated with the buprenorphine transdermal system: a pooled analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the profile of application site reactions (ASRs) for patients treated with the buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) in chronic pain studies. METHODS: The incidences of ASRs during treatment with BTDS were examined using (a) integrated data from 16 controlled and uncontrolled Phase III chronic pain studies (N = 6566), (b) a subset of integrated data that focused on the double-blind phases of five enriched, placebo-controlled studies (n = 1806) and (c) data from an international postmarketing drug safety database. These data were compared with the ASR data reported in the full prescribing information of other transdermal patches marketed in the US. RESULTS: Among the 6566 patients, the overall incidence of ASRs was 23.4%, of which 98.3% were mild to moderate in intensity, none were serious and 4.4% led to treatment discontinuation. Rates of severe and inflammatory ASRs were low. Among the 1806 patients, ASR rates were higher with BTDS (16.6%) than placebo transdermal system (12.7%). Among the 6566 patients, the 1806 patients, and the postmarketing data, the most common ASRs seen were pruritus, erythema and rash. Incidences of most ASRs for other selected transdermal products were 17% or lower. CONCLUSION: Incidence rates of ASRs in patients treated with BTDS were low and infrequently led to discontinuation. Severe and inflammatory-type ASRs were not common. The ASR profile of BTDS was comparable with those of other transdermal patches.