Histological findings associated with treatment response in cutaneous leishmaniasis: a clinicopathological correlation study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment responses to cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) observed in Sri Lanka show variability, ranging from quick healing to delayed or failed responses to routine medication. The determinants of these differences in treatment response are not well defined. This study aimed to identify predictive features of treatment response and outcome in localized CL caused by Leishmania donovani, focusing on both clinical and histopathological findings in the patients. METHODS: Tissue sections (n = 103) derived from 3 mm punch biopsies of parasitologically confirmed patients were assessed. Patients were followed up weekly until complete healing of skin lesions and were reviewed at the end of 6 months and 1 year. RESULTS: Healing required 7-21 weekly doses of intralesional sodium stibogluconate (IL-SSG) (mean = 12.2 ± 0.622). Twenty-nine (28.1%) patients were identified as delayed responders. None had recurred at the end of 1 year. The demographic or clinical features (age, gender, lesion type, size, location, and lesion duration) did not significantly influence the treatment response. A heavy parasite load and acanthosis were significant predictors of a delayed response to treatment (P < 0.001). Higher parasite loads were associated with inflammation of the entire dermis (P = 0.008), more intense infiltration of macrophages (p = 0.001), and epidermal atrophy (P = 0.033). Well-formed granulomas were inversely proportional to parasite loads. CONCLUSIONS: Histology findings proved to be better prognostic markers than clinical features for delayed responders to treatment and will aid in targeted patient management when tissue biopsies are performed in the initial diagnosis of CL.

Therapeutic Response to Thermotherapy in Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Treatment Failures for Sodium Stibogluconate: A Randomized Controlled Proof of Principle Clinical Trial.

Treatment failure to intralesional sodium stibogluconate (IL-SSG) is a health challenge for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in Sri Lanka. A randomized controlled proof of principle clinical trial, with two arms (viz., radio frequency-induced heat therapy [RFHT] by a ThermoMed™ device (Model 1.8, Thermosurgery Technologies, Inc., Phoenix, AZ) and thermotherapy by a handheld exothermic crystallization thermotherapy for CL [HECT-CL] device) was conducted on 40 CL treatment failures to IL-SSG, from three hospitals in Tangalle, Hambantota, and Anuradhapura, from January 2017 to January 2018, followed up for 180 days post-thermotherapy with a final follow-up in February 2020. Intention-to-treat cure rates were calculated at day 90 (initial cure rate) and at day 180 (final cure rate) posttreatment. Radio frequency-induced heat therapy group: the initial cure rate was 100% (20/20) and the final cure rate was 95% (19/20), with one patient relapsing. The HECT-CL group: both the initial and final cure rates were 80% (16/20), with no relapses and one excluded from the trial. In February 2020 (1.6-3 years posttreatment), 27 traceable patients (RFHT = 16, HECT-CL = 11) remained healed. Second-degree burns were observed with RFHT in 65% (13/20), with HECT-CL in 15% (3/20), which completely resolved subsequently. The cure rates between the two treatment groups were comparable (P = 0.15). Radio frequency-induced heat therapy consumed less time and required only a single hospital visit. Handheld exothermic crystallization thermotherapy for CL is potentially usable at community settings with both being less costly than IL-SSG. This study is the first proof that thermotherapy is an efficacious and safe treatment for CL patients in Sri Lanka, complicated by treatment failure to IL-SSG.

What Should General Practice Trainees Learn about Atopic Eczema?

Effective atopic eczema (AE) control not only improves quality of life but may also prevent the atopic march. The Royal College of General Practitioners' (RCGP) curriculum does not currently provide specific learning outcomes on AE management. We aimed to gain consensus on learning outcomes to inform curriculum development. A modified Delphi method was used with questionnaires distributed to gather the views of a range of health care professionals (HCPs) including general practitioners (GPs), dermatologists, dermatology nurses and parents of children with AE attending a dedicated paediatric dermatology clinic. Ninety-one questionnaires were distributed to 61 HCPs and 30 parents; 81 were returned. All agreed that learning should focus on the common clinical features, complications and management of AE and the need to appreciate its psychosocial impact. Areas of divergence included knowledge of alternative therapies. Parents felt GPs should better understand how to identify, manage and refer severe AD and recognized the value of the specialist eczema nurse. Dermatologists and parents highlighted inconsistencies in advice regarding topical steroids. This study identifies important areas for inclusion as learning outcomes on AE management in the RCGP curriculum and highlights the importance of patients and parents as a valuable resource in the development of medical education.