Assessing risk of major adverse cardiac events among patients with chest pain and cocaine use using the HEART score.

INTRODUCTION: Chest pain (CP), a common presentation in the emergency department (ED) setting, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality if emergency clinicians miss the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The HEART (History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk Factors, Troponin) score had been validated for risk-stratification patients who are at high risk for ACS and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). However, the use of cocaine as a risk factor of the HEART score was controversial. We hypothesized that patients with cocaine-positive (COP) would not be associated with higher risk of 30-day MACE than cocaine-negative (CON) patients. METHODS: This retrospective study included adult patients who presented to 13 EDs of a University's Medical System between August 7, 2017 to August 19, 2021. Patients who had CP and prospectively calculated HEART scores and urine toxicology tests as part of their clinical evaluation were eligible. Areas Under The Receiver Operating Curve (AUROC) were calculated for the performance of HEART score and 30-day MACE for each group. RESULTS: This study analyzed 46,210 patients' charts, 663 (1.4%) were COP patients. Mean age was statistically similar between groups but there were fewer females in the COP group (26.2% vs 53.2%, p < 0.001). Mean (+/- SD) HEART score was 3.7 (1.4) comparing to 3.1 (1.8, p < 0.001) between COP vs CON groups, respectively. Although more COP patients (54%) had moderate HEART scores (4-6) vs. CON group (35.2%, p < 0.001), rates of 30-day MACE were 1.1% for both groups. HEART score's AUROC was 0.72 for COP and 0.78 for CON groups. AUROC for the Risk Factor among COP patients, which includes cocaine, was poor (0.54). CONCLUSION: This study, which utilized prospective calculated HEART scores, demonstrated that overall performance of the HEART score was reasonable. Specifically, our analysis showed that the rate of 30-day MACE was not affected by cocaine use as a risk factor. We would recommend clinicians to consider the HEART score for this patient group.

Assessing risk of major adverse cardiac event among COVID-19 patients using HEART score.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is known to be associated with cardiovascular complications, but whether the current validated HEART score for chest pain is still applicable for these patients is unknown. This study aims to identify the impact and association of COVID-19 co-infection in patients presenting with chest pain and a calculated HEART score to the emergency departments (ED) with 30-day of major adverse cardiac event (MACE). This is a multicenter, retrospective observational study that included adult (age ≥ 18 years) patients visiting 13 different EDs with chest pain and evaluated using a HEART score. The primary outcome was the percentage of 30-day MACE, which included acute myocardial infarction, emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), or death among patients who presented with chest pain and had COVID-19 co-infection. The sensitivity and specificity of the HEART score among COVID-19 co-infection for MACE were assessed by the receiver operating curve (ROC). We analyzed records of 46,210 eligible patients, in which 327 (0.7%) patients were identified as infected with COVID-19. Patients with COVID-19 had higher mean total HEART score of 3.3 (1.7), compared to patients who did not have COVID-19 (3.1, SD 1.8, P = 0.048). The rate of MACE was similar between both groups. There were only 2 (0.6%) COVID-19 patients who had MACE, compared to 504 (1.1%) patients in control group. Total HEART score was associated with an area under the ROC (AUROC) of 0.99, while the control group's was 0.78. History was associated with high AUROC in both COVID-19 (0.74) and control groups (0.76). Older age in COVID-19 had higher AUROC (0.89) than control patients (0.63). Among patients presenting to the ED with chest pain and having COVID-19 infection, HEART score had predictive capability for MACE, similar to patients without COVID-19 infection. Further studies with more COVID-19 patients are still necessary to confirm our observation.

The Mydriatic Red Eye as the Initial Presentation of Syphilis.

BACKGROUND: Syphilis is a sexually transmitted infection that has been increasing in prevalence since the early 2000s. Ocular involvement occurs in a minority of patients and must be in the differential diagnosis for patients who present with red eye and uveitis. CASE REPORT: A 29-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with a painful, mydriatic red eye. Review of systems revealed a rash as well as a recent genital lesion and, on further questioning, she admitted to a history of intravenous drug use and high-risk sexual activity. Ophthalmology was consulted and the patient was diagnosed with bilateral uveitis. Serologic testing was positive for syphilis, and she was admitted and treated with intravenous penicillin, with resolution of her uveitis. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Red eye is a common ocular symptom in patients presenting to the emergency department. The differential diagnosis of the red eye is broad and can range from benign etiologies, such as conjunctivitis, to life- and sight-threatening conditions, such as endogenous endophthalmitis. Systemic diseases such as syphilis may present with primarily ocular symptoms, and ocular syphilis must be identified and managed appropriately to prevent devastating sequelae.

Abdominal Pain Mimics.

Abdominal pain is a common reason for emergency department visits, with many patients not receiving a definitive diagnosis for their symptoms. Non-gastrointestinal causes need to be considered in the workup of abdominal pain. A high index of suspicion is needed in order to develop a broad differential, and a thorough history and physical examination is paramount. This article will discuss some of these diagnoses, including can't miss diagnoses, common non-abdominal causes, and rare etiologies of abdominal pain.

19-year-old Woman with Intermittent Weakness.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic weakness is a common chief complaint of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). A well thought out approach to the assessment and workup of these patients is key to diagnostic accuracy and definitive therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: In this case, a 19-year-old female presented to the ED with generalized weakness and near syncope. She had global weakness in her extremities and multiple electrolyte abnormalities. DISCUSSION: This case takes the reader through the differential diagnosis and evaluation of a patient with weakness and profound electrolyte derangements. It includes a discussion of the diagnostic studies and calculations that ultimately led to the patient's diagnosis.