Evaluation of dentin microroughness and composite bond strength after multiple uses of diamond burs / Evaluación de la micro rugosidad dentinaria y la resistencia adhesiva de composites tras múltiples usos de fresas de diamante

Abstract Using a bur multiple times to prepare dental structure may produce a smoother final surface on dentin than a new one. This superficial roughness may affect adhesion with resin-based materials by modifying the substrates' characteristics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of multiple uses of diamond burs on dentin's superficial microroughness and bond strength with resin composite when using a self-etch adhesive. Diamond dental burs were used to simulate a preparation (dentin flat surface) on extracted third molars. Samples were distributed into groups according to burs' number of previous uses as follows: 0, 1, 5 and 10. Scanning electron microscopy images at 70x, 350x, and 1000x were used to illustrate burs' deformation. Each specimen's dentin microroughness was measured three times to compare between experimental groups and the micro-shear bond strength test (n=15) was performed for the 0 and 10 uses groups using a universal adhesive in a self- etching mode. Diamond crystals wear and dislodgements were evident among groups where the burs were used more times. As the number of uses increased the mean microroughness of the dentin surface decreased with significant differences between the 0 and 10 uses groups. No statistical differences between experimental groups resulted from bond strength tests. When using a universal adhesive in a self-etching mode, the number of previous uses of a diamond bur seems to have no significant effect on dentin/resin composite bond strength.

Resumen El uso de una fresa múltiples veces para preparar la estructura dental puede producir una superficie final más lisa en la dentina que una fresa nueva. Esta rugosidad superficial modifica las características del sustrato y puede afectar la adhesión con materiales resinosos. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el efecto de los múltiples usos de las fresas de diamante sobre la micro rugosidad superficial de la dentina y la resistencia adhesiva con la resina compuesta cuando se utiliza un adhesivo de autograbado. Se utilizaron fresas dentales de diamante para simular una preparación (superficie plana de la dentina) en terceros molares extraídos. Las muestras se distribuyeron en grupos según el número de usos previos de las fresas de la siguiente manera: 0, 1, 5 y 10. Se utilizaron imágenes de microscopía electrónica de barrido a ×70, ×350 y ×1000 para ilustrar la deformación de las fresas. Se midió la micro rugosidad de la dentina de cada espécimen tres veces para comparar entre los grupos experimentales y se realizó la prueba de resistencia a la adhesión por micro cizallamiento (n=15) para los grupos de 0 y 10 usos utilizando un adhesivo universal en modo de autograbado. El desgaste de los cristales de diamante y los desprendimientos fueron evidentes entre los grupos en los que las fresas se utilizaron más veces. A medida que aumentaba el número de usos, la micro rugosidad media de la superficie de la dentina disminuyó, con diferencias significativas entre los grupos de 0 y 10 usos. En las pruebas de resistencia adhesiva no se observaron diferencias estadísticas entre los grupos experimentales. Cuando se utiliza un adhesivo universal en modo de autograbado, el número de usos previos de una fresa de diamante no parece tener un efecto significativo en la resistencia de la unión dentina/resina del composite.

Final irrigation protocols affect radicular dentin DMP1-CT expression, microhardness, and biochemical composition.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of several final irrigation protocols on radicular dentin microhardness, biochemical composition, and DMP1-CT expression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 140 single-rooted human teeth were prepared with WaveOne Gold files and randomly distributed into 7 groups (n = 20) according to the final irrigation protocol: distilled water (DW); sodium hypochlorite-EDTA (NaOCl-EDTA); EDTA (EDTA); EDTA-NaOCl (EDTA-NaOCl); EDTA-chlorhexidine (EDTA-CHX); passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI:NaOCl-EDTA); and PUI:NaOCl-EDTA-NaOCl. Dentin microhardness (n = 10) was evaluated in the root canal lumen using Vickers hardness tester. Immunohistochemical analysis (n = 5) was used to evaluate DMP1-CT expression. Dentin ultrastructure and biochemical composition were evaluated by using Raman and energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX) (n = 5) with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey test were performed (p˂0.05). RESULTS: Raman spectra of the organic content and DMP1-CT expression were lower at the lumen canal in EDTA-NaOCl, PUI:NaOCl-EDTA, and PUI:NaOCl-EDTA-NaOCl when compared to control (p < 0.05). EDAX showed reduced values for calcium and phosphorus in EDTA-NaOCl, PUI:NaOCl-EDTA, and PUI:NaOCl-EDTA-NaOCl. SEM microphotography's showed completely cleaned dentin, permeable tubules, and dentin erosion, mainly when PUI was used. NaOCl-EDTA presented significantly higher microhardness values than PUI:NaOCl-EDTA-NaOCl (p < 0.05). PUI:NaOCl-EDTA-NaOCl exhibited the lowest Vickers hardness values of all groups. CONCLUSION: The final irrigation protocols that used a final rinse with NaOCl and PUI showed a detrimental effect on radicular dentin DMP1-CT expression, biochemical composition, and microhardness. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The adequate irrigation protocol could be advantageous to preserve the radicular dentin ultrastructure, promote adequate adhesion, and sustain favorable conditions for biomineralization and regeneration.

Effect of universal adhesives and self-etch ceramic primers on bond strength to glass ceramics: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: To simplify dental procedures, multicomponent products such as universal adhesives and self-etch ceramic primers have been recommended for glass-ceramic bonding; however, studies have shown a wide range of results. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze the in vitro bond strength promoted by hydrofluoric acid+silane-containing universal adhesives and a self-etch ceramic primer to glass-ceramics and compare it with that of conventional treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, LILACS, and ISI Web of Science databases up to April 2021. In vitro studies assessing the resin-mediated bond to glass-ceramics by using a self-etch ceramic primer and hydrofluoric acid+silane-containing universal adhesives and/or compared with traditional hydrofluoric acid+glass-ceramic primers were included. Selection of studies, data extraction, and risk-of-bias analysis were performed. Statistical analysis was performed by using a review management software program using a random effects model (α=.05). RESULTS: A total of 33 studies were included in the qualitative analysis and 26 studies in the quantitative analysis. Bond strength to lithium disilicate ceramic was higher when a hydrofluoric acid+glass-ceramic primer was used than when using a hydrofluoric acid+silane-containing universal adhesive (P<.05), except when 9% to 10% acid concentration was used in combination with static aging (P=.100). A self-etch ceramic primer promoted bond strength values to lithium disilicate that were similar to those of the hydrofluoric acid+glass-ceramic primer (P>.100). CONCLUSIONS: Hydrofluoric acid+silane-containing universal adhesive was not as effective as the hydrofluoric acid+glass-ceramic primer in promoting bond strength to glass-ceramic. Bond strength values generated by a self-etch ceramic primer to glass-ceramic were similar to those generated by the conventional treatment.

Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Restorative Materials Treated with Different Surface Etching Protocols.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of different surface treatments on the surface morphology of CAD/CAM ceramics and on their bond strength to cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty cubic sections were cut from each of three materials (lithium disilicate glass-ceramic [DL], leucite-based glass-ceramic [LC], resin-matrix ceramic composite [RMCC]) and were treated as follows (n = 10): 1. no treatment (C); 2. 5% hydrofluoric acid applied for 20 s plus silane (HF5% 20 s); 3. 5% hydrofluoric acid applied for 60 s plus silane (HF5% 60 s); 4. 10% hydrofluoric acid applied for 20 s plus silane (HF10% 20 s); 5. 10% hydrofluoric acid applied for 60 s plus silane (HF10% 60 s); 6. Self-etching ceramic primer (MBEP). Ceramic cubes were bonded to pre-polymerized composite resin cubes with a composite cement. Each set was cut into stick-shaped specimens (1 ± 0.3 mm2). After 24-h water storage, microtensile bond strength (µTBS) was measured. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Failure pattern and surface morphology were assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: Both factors significantly influenced µTBS, while no interaction between factors was found. RMCC presented statistically higher µTBS values than LC and DL, while the surface treatments HF5% 20 s, HF5% 60 s, HF10% 20 s, HF10% 60 s and MBEP, did not show statistical differences between them, although they resulted in statistically significantly higher bond strengths than did C groups. A high number of pre-test failures were detected in the control groups for all materials. MBEP produced less extensive surface alterations than did all HF treatments. CONCLUSION: All of the hydrofluoric acid treatments tested showed similar cement-ceramic bonding efficacy. The self-etching ceramic primer produced less surface alterations and comparable bonding efficacy compared to separate hydrofluoric acid/silane primer application.

Physicochemical and morphological characterization of a glass ceramic treated with different ceramic primers and post-silanization protocols.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effect of different ceramic primers and post-silanization protocols on physicochemical and morphological characteristics of a lithium disilicate glass ceramic. METHODS: Lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e-max CAD) plaques (6 × 10 × 2 mm) were divided into 3 groups according to the ceramic primer used: (1) Silane (RelyX Ceramic Primer-RL); (2) Silane + MDP (Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus-CP); (3) Self-etching ceramic primer (Monobond Etch and Prime-MB). Specimens from each group were distributed into 5 sub-groups according to post-silanization protocols: (a) Treated as recommended by the manufacturer (MR), (b) MR + Additional drying with air at room temperature for 30 s (RTA), (c) MR + additional drying with hot air for 30 s (HT), (d) MR + Surface rinsing with water at room temperature for 10 s and drying with air at room temperature for 30 s (WT), and (e) Specimens were not silanized (NS). Surface free energy (SFE) was determined using static contact angles measurements with water and diiodomethane. SFE data were submitted to Friedman followed by Wilcoxon post-hoc test (α = 0.05). Morphology was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy. Elemental composition and chemical interactions were determined with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis. RESULTS: RL presented the highest SFE (62.4 mN/m) followed by CP (59.7 mN/m). Post-silanization protocols resulted in similar SFE, but WT and HT induced the highest water contact angles when using CP and RL. CP modified ceramics' surface morphology compared to the etched and RL treated groups. The presence of water was identified on CP treated specimen. All analyzed primers formed siloxane bonds with ceramic surface. SIGNIFICANCE: Ceramic primers resulted in different surface free energy and morphology, but siloxane bonds were identified for all tested solutions. HT and WT protocols should be used with RL and CP primers. MB was not influenced by the different silanization protocols.

Bonding effectiveness of tooth-colored materials to resin cement provided by self-etching silane primer after short- and long-term storage.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Glass-ceramic materials are typically treated with hydrofluoric acid (HF) and silane to improve their bond to composite resin; however, HF may be harmful to human tissues and the integrity of the material, and its application is a technique-sensitive procedure. A novel self-etching ceramic primer has been introduced with the claim that it can solve those problems. However, independent scientific evidence regarding its performance is scarce. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of self-etching silane primer on glass-ceramic surface roughness and on long-term bonding between glass-ceramic and composite resin cement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Plates of 3 materials (n=10), lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LDC) (IPS e.max CAD), leucite-based glass-ceramic (LEU) (IPS Empress CAD), and resin-modified ceramic (PIC) (VITA ENAMIC), were treated in the following ways: no treatment (C), HF (5%) applied during the recommended time for each material (HF), and self-etching ceramic primer (Monobond Etch & Prime [MBEP]). Surface roughness (Sa) was analyzed with a laser 3D profiler. Ceramic sticks were subjected to (n=20) no treatment (C); treatment with hydrofluoric acid plus silane (HF+S); and treatment with self-etching ceramic primer (MBEP) bonded to prepolymerized composite resin sticks with composite resin cement (Variolink II) and stored for 24 hours and 1 year (n=10). The assemblies were submitted to microtensile bond strength testing (µTBS). Data were analyzed using ANOVA and the Tukey pairwise, post hoc test (α=.05). Failure pattern and surface and interface morphology were assessed using scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: Only individual factors resulted in statistically significant differences for both variables (material: P<.001; surface treatment: P=.020), interaction (P=.570). HF group (0.49 ±0.11 µm) showed statistically higher roughness values (P≤.05) than control groups (0.44 ±0.97 µm), while MBEP (0.48 ±0.11 µm) was comparable with both. HF produced greater surface alterations than MBEP and C. PIC (0.60 ±0.051 µm) exhibited significantly higher roughness values (P≤.05) than LDC (0.37 ±0.07 µm) and LEU (0.45 ±0.04). Regarding µTBS, the general mean of PIC (24.6 ±10.1 MPa) was higher (P≤.05) than LEUs (14.7 ±6.7 MPa) and LDCs (13.1 ±4.8 MPa), while treatment groups HF+S (17.9 ±10.0 MPa) and MBEP (20.5 ±9.7 MPa) produced higher µTBS values than control groups (14.2 ±5.5 MPa). Adhesive failure was associated with low µTBS values and aged specimens, while cohesive failure within the composite resin-cement layer and mixed failures were associated with higher µTBS values. Interface debonding was detected in C groups for LDC and LEU. PIC exhibited better interface stability. CONCLUSIONS: MBEP produced smoother surfaces than HF. HF+S and MBEP significantly improved ceramic and composite resin cement bonding.

Effect of light absence or attenuation on biaxial flexural strength of dual-polymerized resin cements after short- and long-term storage.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether biaxial flexural strength (BFS) of dual resin cements is affected by light absence or attenuation, storage time, or cements' chemical nature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty disk-shaped specimens were made from each cement (non-self-adhesive cement and self-adhesive cement) using Teflon molds on a controlled temperature surface (35°C). Specimens were polymerized as follows (N = 30): self-cured, directly light-cured, light-cured at a distance of 6 mm between the light tip and the specimen, and through a 6-mm thick composite resin barrier (indirectly light-cured). Each group was divided (N = 10) for storage purposes (15 minutes, 24 hours, and 6 months). Specimens were placed into a biaxial-flexure jig and a vertical load was applied until failure. The BFS values were subjected to generalized linear models statistical analysis and Weibull distributions (α = 0.05). RESULTS: After 15 minutes aging, neither material achieved enough polymerization to perform the BFS test when polymerized using the self-curing mode. The self-adhesive product demonstrated much lower variation in strength with storage time than did the non-self-curing cement. CONCLUSIONS: Attenuated/light-curing reduced BFS values only for 15-minutes storage period for both materials. Flexural strength of the self-adhesive cement was less affected by light absence/attenuation and storage time. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Biaxial flexural strength of a self-adhesive resin cement is less sensitive to variation in light application and storage time than is a non-self-adhesive cement.

Depth of cure of bulk fill resin composites: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate scientific evidence regarding depth of cure of bulk-fill resin composites (BFRCs) and related factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science databases were accessed from October 2016 to May 2017. Investigations published in English language, assessing depth of cure of BFRCs by microhardness test and/or degree of conversion (DC) were included. Studies using exclusively ISO 4049, employing specimens deepness less than 4 mm, as well as those not reporting exposure time and/or irradiance from light curing units (LCUs) were excluded. RESULTS: In total, 742 studies were found from which 33 were included. From 21 studies evaluating BFRCs microhardness, 10 showed acceptable bottom/top ratios (≥0.8) for all tested materials. However, material-dependent results and non-satisfactory bottom/top microhardness ratios (<0.8) were reported in 9 and 2 investigations, respectively. From 19 studies that assessed DC, 11 showed acceptable results (≥50%) for all tested BFRCs, while 8 studies reported material-dependent outcomes. Overall, irradiance from LCUs ranged from 650 to 1330 mW/cm2 and exposure time from 5 to 60 seconds. Favorable depth of cure results were observed with the use of LCUs emitting irradiance ≥1000 mW/cm2 and exposure times ≥20 seconds. CONCLUSIONS: High depth of cure rates by BFRCs, depends on some factors as material, irradiance and exposure time. Polywave LCUs were useful but not essential on polymerizing alternative photoinitiator-containing BFRC. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: LED curing devices (polywave or monowave) displaying an irradiance ≥1000 mW/cm2 and 20 seconds of exposure time are imperative to accomplish successful polymerization of most BFRCs.

Effect of acid etching on tridimensional microstructure of etchable CAD/CAM materials.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate if etching protocols affect superficial/internal microstructural integrity of CAD/CAM ceramic materials. METHODS: Sixty blocks (3×3×3mm) of IPS/Empress-LEU, IPS/e.max-LDC (Ivoclar-Vivadent) and Enamic-PIC (VITA) were used. Lateral surfaces from each block were isolated with Teflon strip and petroleum jelly to keep them untouched. Specimens were distributed into 6 groups (n=10): 1. no treatment (C); 2. hydrofluoric acid (HF) 5%, 20s (HF5%20s); 3. HF5%60s; 4. HF10%20s; 5. HF10%60s; 6. Monobond Etch&Prime (MBEP). Surface roughness (Sa) and 3D profile were obtained using a confocal-laser-optical-microscope (LEXT OLS 4000, Olympus), while element ratios (Si/K for LEU and LDC; Si/C for PIC) were recorded using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). Superior (treated) and lateral (non-treated) surfaces were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (JSM 5600 LV, JEOL). Etching depth was measured on lateral surfaces. Data were submitted to ANOVA-One-Way and Tukey test (α=0.05). RESULTS: For LEU, only HF10% treatments produced statistically different roughness values and Si/K ratios compared to C group. Regarding LDC and PIC, groups HF5%60s and HF10% showed higher roughness values than C group. In the case of PIC, all treatments (except MBEP) produced lower Si/C ratios than C group. All treatments (except MBEP) produced higher etching depth values than C group for all materials, being HF10%60s the highest (LEU:403.2±11.4µm; LDC:617.4±75.7; PIC:291.6±6.5µm). HF10% produced more aggressive etching morphology patterns on superior and lateral surfaces (SEM). Treatments MBEP and HF5%20s, produced the least aggressive structural alterations. Acid etching produces superficial and internal alterations on ceramics' structural configuration. SIGNIFICANCE: Aggressive etching protocols of glass-ceramics may cause internal material loss, consequently, milder etching is recommended to treat those materials before adhesion procedures.

Effect of Different Silane Treatments on Long-Term Bonding Between Non-Etched Glass-Ceramic and Resin Cement

he present study evaluated the bond strength between glass-ceramic and resin cement, using different silane treatments, performing no previous hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching on ceramic surface, after short- and long- term storage. One hundred and eighty glass-ceramic plaques (IPS e.max CAD®) were polished and divided into six groups (n=30) to receive different silane treatments: (1) RCP-RelyX Ceramic Primer® (one-bottle silane), (2) RCP+SB-RelyX Ceramic Primer and Adper Singlebond2® (silane plus separated adhesive), (3) SBU-Scotchbond Universal® (silane-containing universal adhesive), (4) CP-Clearfil Ceramic Primer® (silane/MDP primer), (5) NC-no-silane (negative control) and (6) PC-Previous HF etching (5%, 20s) plus RelyX Ceramic Primer® (positive control). Two resin cement cylinders (Rely X Ultimate®) were built on each plaque. Each group was divided into two sub-groups to be stored for 24 hours (24h) or 6 months (6mo) in distilled water at 37°C (n=15). Then microshear (µSBS) testing was performed. Failure mode was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were statistically analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey´s test (α=0.05). Both factors and their interaction resulted statistically significant (p≤0.05). PC obtained the highest µSBS values (in MPa) at both storage times (24h: 28.11±2.44; 6mo: 19.10±3.85). After 24h storage, groups RCP+SB (10.86±3.62), SBU (8.37±4.33) and CP (8.05±3.62) were not statistically different from NC (8.00±2.51); only RCP (19.73±4.63) and PC obtained higher values. After 6 months, only PC showed higher values than NC (0.04±0.01). Cohesive failure in resin cement was more prevalent for RCP-24h and PC, while adhesive failure was more frequent among all other groups. Clinical relevance: None of the commercially available silane primers tested, improve long- term ceramic/cement bonding without performing HF etching on ceramic surface. Combination of HF acid and silane, remain as a gold standard treatment for glass-ceramic materials.

ste estudio evaluó la resistencia de unión entre cerámica vítrea y cemento resinoso, utilizando diferentes tratamientos de silano, sin realizar condicionamiento previo de la cerámica con ácido fluorhídrico (HF), después de almacenamiento en corto y largo plazo. Ciento ochenta placas de cerámica (IPS e.max CAD®) fueron pulidas y divididas en 6 grupos (n=30) para ser tratadas como sigue: (1) RCPRelyX Ceramic Primer® (silano de 1 frasco), (2) RCP+SB-RelyX Ceramic Primer y Adper Singlebond2® (silano más adhesivo separado), (3) SBU-Scotchbond Universal® (adhesivo universal conteniendo silano), (4) CP-Clearfil Ceramic Primer® (primer cerámico conteniendo silano y MDP), (5) NC-ningún silano (control negativo) y (6) PC-Condicionamiento con HF previo (5%, 20s) y silano (RelyX Ceramic Primer®) (control positivo). Dos cilindros de cemento resinoso (Rely X Ultimate®) fueron construidos en cada placa. Cada grupo fue dividido en 2 sub-grupos para ser almacenados por 24 horas (24h) y 6 meses (6mo) en agua destilada a 37°C (n=15). Luego fue realizada la prueba de microcizallamiento (µSBS). El tipo de fractura fue analizado con microscopio electrónico de barrido (SEM) y los datos analizados con las pruebas estadísticas ANOVA de dos factores y Tukey (α=0.05). Ambos factores y su interacción resultaron estadísticamente significativos (p≤0.05). PC presentó los valores más altos de µSBS (MPa) para ambos tiempos de almacenamiento (24h: 28.11±2.44; 6mo: 19.10±3.85). Luego de 24h, los grupos RCP+SB (10.86±3.62), SBU (8.37±4.33) y CP (8.05±3.62) no fueron estadísticamente diferentes del grupo control negativo (NC: 8.00±2.51); sólo RCP (19.73±4.63) y PC obtuvieron resultados mayores. Después de 6 meses de almacenaje, sólo el grupo PC obtuvo valores estadísticamente mayores que NC (0.04±0.01). Fractura cohesiva en el cemento fue más prevalente para RCP-24h y PC, mientras que el tipo adhesivo fue el más frecuente para todos los demás grupos. Relevancia Clínica: Ninguno de los tratamientos de silano evaluados, mejoró significativamente la adhesión a largo plazo entre cerámica vítrea no condicionada y cemento resinoso. La combinación de HF y silano, continúa siendo el tratamiento de preferencia para cerámica vítrea durante el proceso de cementación.