Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1: a dichotomous role in cardiac remodeling following acute myocardial infarction in man?

INTRODUCTION: Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) is elevated after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and potentiates left ventricular (LV) remodeling in murine models of AMI. We examined the relationships between serum MCP-1, change in LV function and biomarkers related to remodeling in a cohort of AMI patients. METHODS: Serum MCP-1 concentrations were measured in 100 patients (age 58.9+/-12.0 years, 77% male) admitted with AMI and LV dysfunction, at baseline (mean 46 h), 12 and 24 weeks; cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and measurement of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), MMP-3 and MMP-9 occurred at each time-point. RESULTS: MCP-1 increased significantly from 697 [483, 997]pg/mL at baseline to 878 [678, 1130]pg/mL at 24 weeks (p<0.001). MMP-3 concentration increased while MMP-9 decreased significantly over time; MMP-2 concentration did not change significantly. BASELINE MCP-1 correlated with change in (Delta) LV end-systolic volume index (DeltaLVESVI; r= -0.48, p=0.01) and with DeltaLV ejection fraction (DeltaLVEF; r=0.50, p=0.02). However, DeltaMCP-1 correlated positively with DeltaLVESVI (r=0.40, p=0.006) and negatively with DeltaLVEF (r= -0.36, p=0.004). MCP-1 had no relationship with any MMP. CONCLUSIONS: MCP-1 may have a dichotomous role following AMI, aiding early infarct healing but potentiating later remodeling, which merits further study before any therapeutic trials of MCP-1 modulation in humans.

Microvascular obstruction remains a portent of adverse remodeling in optimally treated patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Microvascular obstruction (MO) is associated with large acute myocardial infarction and lower left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction and predicts greater remodeling, but whether this effect is abolished by contemporary antiremodeling therapies is subject to debate. We examined the influence of several infarct characteristics, including MO, on LV remodeling in an optimally treated post-acute myocardial infarction cohort, using contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred patients (mean age, 58.9+/-12 years, 77%men) underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance at baseline (approximately 4 days) and at 12 and 24 weeks. The effects on LV remodeling (ie, change in LV end-systolic volume index [DeltaLVESVi]) of infarct site, transmurality, endocardial extent, and the presence of early and late MO were analyzed. Mean baseline infarct volume index decreased from 34.0 (21.2) mL/m(2) to 20.9 (12.9) mL/m(2) at 24 weeks (P<0.001). Infarct site had no influence on remodeling, but greater baseline infarct transmurality (r=0.47, P<0.001) and endocardial extent (r=0.26, P<0.01) were associated with higher DeltaLVESVi. Early MO was seen in 69 patients (69%) and persisted as late MO in 56 patients (56%). Patients with late MO underwent significantly greater remodeling than those without MO (DeltaLVESVi, +4.1 [13.4] versus -7.0 [12.7] mL/m(2), respectively, P=0.001); those with early MO only displayed an intermediate DeltaLVESVi (-4.9 [13.0] mL/m(2)). Importantly, late MO was seen frequently despite optimal coronary blood flow having been restored at angiography. CONCLUSIONS: Late MO on predischarge contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance remains an ominous predictor of adverse LV remodeling despite powerful antiremodeling therapy and may be useful in the risk stratification of survivors of acute myocardial infarction.

Comparison of serial measurements of infarct size and left ventricular ejection fraction by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and electrocardiographic QRS scoring in reperfused anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a powerful prognostic marker after acute myocardial infarction and is dependent on infarct magnitude. Contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (ceCMR) represents the current criterion standard means of LVEF and infarct size measurement. Infarct size and LVEF can be estimated from the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) using the Selvester QRS score. We examined for the first time the relationship between serial measures of LVEF and infarct size by ceCMR and ECG in patients with reperfused anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and depressed LVEF. METHODS: Thirty-four patients (mean +/- SD age, 59 +/- 11.8 years; 70.6% male) underwent ceCMR and simultaneous ECG at mean 93 hours after admission and at 12 and 24 weeks. The QRS score was calculated on each ECG, from which infarct size and LVEF were estimated and compared with the equivalent ceCMR measurements. RESULTS: Infarct size on ceCMR was higher than that by QRS score at each time-point (P < .001) with modest correlation (r = 0.56-0.78, P < .001). Left ventricular ejection fraction was consistently significantly higher on CMR than on ECG, with weak correlation (r = 0.37-0.51, P < .05). We derived a novel equation relating QRS score to CMR-measured LVEF in the subacute phase of infarction: LVEF = 61 - (1.7 x QRS score) (%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with reperfused anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction and depressed LVEF, ceCMR is moderately correlated with the QRS in the serial measurement of infarct size and LVEF. Infarct size (measured by ceCMR) and LVEF are consistently higher than those calculated on the QRS score in the acute and subacute phases of infarction.