Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Posthospital Brain Injury Rehabilitation Providers.

Rehabilitation after significant acquired brain injury (ABI) to address complex independent activities of daily living and return to family and community life is offered primarily after initial hospitalization in outpatient day treatment, group home, skilled nursing, and residential settings and in the home and community of the person served. The coronavirus 2019 pandemic threatened access to care and the health and safety of staff, persons served, and families in these settings. This article describes steps taken to contain this threat by 7 leading posthospital ABI rehabilitation organizations. Outpatient and day treatment facilities were temporarily suspended. In other settings, procedures for isolation, transportation, cleaning, exposure control, infection control, and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) were reinforced with staff. Visitation and community activities were restricted. Staff and others required to enter facilities were screened with symptom checklists and temperature checks. Individuals showing symptoms of infection were quarantined and tested, as possible. New admissions were carefully screened for infection and often initially quarantined. Telehealth played a major role in reducing direct interpersonal contact while continuing to provide services both to outpatients and within facilities. Salary, benefits, training, and managerial support were enhanced for staff. Despite early outbreaks, these procedures were generally effective, with preliminary initial infections rates of only 1.1% for persons served and 2.1% for staff. Reductions in admissions, services, and unanticipated expenses (eg, PPE, more frequent and thorough cleaning) had a major negative financial effect. Providers continue to be challenged to adapt rehabilitative approaches and to reopen services.

Long-term health implications of individuals with TBI: a rehabilitation perspective.

Individuals with acquired brain injuries often present with lifelong health challenges. Trauma to the body directly related to the injury, physical and medical sequelae resulting from the brain injury itself, and an increase in the observed onset of physical aging are among the problems which require consideration throughout their lives. For many rehabilitation professionals, issues related to medical stability and health maintenance are unfamiliar and intimidating. As both hospital stays shorten and an existing population of individuals with brain injuries' survival and life expectancy rates increase, rehabilitation professionals have been increasingly challenged by medical issues. Rehabilitation nurses are positioned to best navigate these issues and facilitate needed care coordination, early intervention, and ongoing education for individuals, their families, and other caregivers. This article describes common medical complications related to the initial and related disability and aging in individuals with brain injury including chronic and late emerging complications involving all body systems including spasticity and changing mobility, aspiration and dysphagia, incontinence, diabetes, and acute and chronic pain. Strategies for successful management of these issues in a home or community setting are also discussed. Special attention is paid to falls and fall prevention, issues specific to aging women, and nutrition and weight control. Ways to promote positive health behaviors to preserve function are also explored. Additionally, patient and family education as part of a lifetime management plan is discussed.

Progress assessed with the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory in 604 participants in 4 types of post-inpatient rehabilitation brain injury programs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare progress in 4 types of post-inpatient rehabilitation brain injury programs. DESIGN: Quasiexperimental observational cohort study. SETTING: Community and residential. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=604) with acquired brain injury. INTERVENTIONS: Four program types within the Pennsylvania Association of Rehabilitation Facilities were compared: intensive outpatient and community-based rehabilitation (IRC; n=235), intensive residential rehabilitation (IRR; n=78), long-term residential supported living (SLR; n=246), and long-term community-based supported living (SLC; n=45). With the use of a commercial web-based data management system developed with federal grant support, progress was examined on 2 consecutive assessments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4). RESULTS: Program types differed in participant age (F=10.69, P<.001), sex (χ(2)=22.38, P<.001), time from first to second assessment (F=20.71, P<.001), initial MPAI-4 score (F=6.89, P<.001), and chronicity (F=13.43, P<.001). However, only initial MPAI-4 score and chronicity were significantly associated with the second MPAI-4 rating. On average, SLR participants were 9.1 years postinjury compared with 5.1 years for IRR, 6.0 years for IRC, and 6.8 years for SLC programs. IRR participants were more severely disabled per MPAI-4 total score on admission than the other groups. Controlling for these variables, program types varied significantly on second MPAI-4 total score (F=5.14, P=.002). Both the IRR and IRC programs resulted in significant functional improvement across assessments. In contrast, both the SLR and SLC programs demonstrated relatively stable MPAI-4 scores. CONCLUSIONS: Results are consistent with stated goals of the programs; that is, intensive programs resulted in functional improvements, whereas supported living programs produced stable functioning. Further studies using data from this large, multiprovider measurement collaboration will potentially provide the foundation for developing outcome expectations for various types of postacute brain injury programs.