Plasma Renin-guided Therapy in Patients of Primary Hypertension on Antihypertensives: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Most guidelines for hypertension overlook the underlying pathophysiologic basis in deciding antihypertensives. Based on renin levels, hypertension may be classified as high-renin hypertension (HRH), low-renin hypertension (LRH), and normal-renin hypertension (NRH). The study examined the renin levels in a hypertensive population and assessed the effect of renin-guided antihypertensive management on blood pressure (BP) control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a single-center prospective cohort study. Subjects with primary hypertension (aged 20-60 years) on antihypertensives were included in the study. Initial BP was recorded and subsequently, all antihypertensives were discontinued. After 2 weeks, second BP was recorded and plasma renin assay (PRA) sample was collected. All patients were restarted on the previous antihypertensives and further modification of medication was performed based on their PRA. Anti V drugs, such as diuretics and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) were used in LRH while beta-blockers and antirenin drugs (Anti R drugs) were used in HRH. RESULTS: The study included 918 patients with hypertension and 896 cases were finally analyzed. Of these patients, 287 (32.03%) had LRH (<0.51 ng/mL/hr), 412 (45.98%) had HRH (>2.64 ng/mL/hr), while 197 (21.99%) had NRH (0.51-2.64 ng/mL/hr). Renin-guided management caused significant BP reduction. In controlled BP group, the systolic BP (SBP)/diastolic BP (DBP) before and after modification were 133.83 ± 3.36/84.77 ± 3.12 and 123.87 ± 10.59/84.05 ± 1.84, respectively (p-value < 0.05). In uncontrolled BP group, the corresponding SBP/DBP were 152.17 ± 2.95/90.36 ± 5.02 and 138 ± 1.23/87.78 ± 0.84, respectively (p-value < 0.05). The number of hypertensives used in patients also reduced with reduction in patients on two, three, or four drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Renin-guided therapy is useful for improving BP control in both controlled and uncontrolled hypertensive patients and in reducing the number of antihypertensive drugs.

Renal Transplantation: Experience at a Single Centre.

BACKGROUND: Renal transplantation program in the Armed Forces commenced in Feb 1991 and till date 245 patients have undergone renal transplantation at INHS Asvini. We describe our protocols for donor and recipient evaluation and immunosuppression. METHODS: 245 patients received renal transplants during this period, 243 (99.2%) being from live donors. Most of them were started on triple immunosuppression comprising of cyclosporine, azathioprine and prednisolone. Newer drugs like mycophenolate, tacrolimus and sirolimus were administered in a select population. RESULT: 69 (28.1%) of them had at least one episode of acute rejection, most of which were steroid responsive and 13 (18.8%) of them required either anti CD3 monoclonal or anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG). Complete recovery with normal renal function occurred in 54 (78.2%) cases and 15 (21.7%) recovered with residual dysfunction with maximum serum creatinine being 2.1mg/dl. There were three (1.2%) cases of accelerated rejection during the first week of transplantation and one had graft rupture. All three lost their grafts. There were eight (3.2%) cases of acute tubular necrosis, who recovered completely within 8-14 days. Immediate infections included wound sepsis, lower respiratory tract infection, disseminated candidiasis and disseminated aspergillosis. Late infections included pulmonary tuberculosis, disseminated tuberculosis, cytomegalovirus infection and recurrent urinary tract infection. 28 (11.4%) patients developed post transplant diabetes mellitus. At the end of one year and five years, graft and patient survival were 97.2%, 93%, 80.9% and 85.7% respectively. CONCLUSION: Our outcomes show that the transplantation is a viable mode of renal replacement therapy in patients of end stage kidney disease with a near normal rehabilitation.

Role of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement in Diagnosis and Control of Hypertension.

Office blood pressure (BP) measurements by sphygmomanometer are not necessarily representative of patient's usual blood pressure. In contrast, ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) represent a large number of readings and may reflect the actual BP status of an individual. In this study, 150 individuals were studied in 2 groups. 110 patients (group A) had stage I & II, hypertension based on casual BP readings. 26 (23.6%) of them were found to be normontensive as per existing ABPM standard. There were 40 patients with poorly controlled hypertension on multiple drugs (group B). The trough/peak ratio of > 50% was seen in 12.5% of these patients at start of study. This increased to 84.8% after modification of drugs as per the profile on ABPM, thus indicating usefulness in achieving a smoother control.