Mannose is an insulin-regulated metabolite reflecting whole-body insulin sensitivity in man.

Mannose is a glucose-associated serum metabolite mainly released by the liver. Recent studies have shown several unexpected pleiotropic effects of mannose including increased regulatory T cells (Tregs), prevention of auto-immune disease and ability to reduce growth of human cancer cells. We have previously shown in large cohorts that elevated serum mannose levels are associated with future development of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease. However, potential direct effects of mannose on insulin sensitivity in vivo or in vitro are unknown. We here show that administration of mannose (0.1 g/kg BW twice daily) for one week in man did not elicit negative effects on meal-modified glucose tolerance, markers of inflammation or insulin levels. Tregs number and insulin signaling in human liver cells were unchanged. These data suggest that mannose is a marker, and not a mediator, of insulin resistance. To verify this, we examined serum mannose levels during long-term euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamps in non-diabetic and T2D individuals. Mannose was reduced by insulin infusion in proportion to whole-body insulin sensitivity. Thus, mannose is a biomarker of insulin resistance which may be useful for the early identification of diabetic individuals with insulin resistance and increased risk of its complications.

The amino acid response to a mixed meal in patients with type 2 diabetes: effect of sitagliptin treatment.

AIMS: Amino acid (AA) metabolism is altered in type 2 diabetes (T2D), and fasting levels of α-hydroxybutyrate (α-HB), a biomarker for insulin resistance, have been suggested to track AA metabolism. We investigated the changes in AA and α-HB induced by a mixed-meal tolerance test (MTT) and the effects of sitagliptin treatment. METHODS: Forty-seven T2D patients [56 ± 7 years, body mass index (BMI) 29.9 ± 4.2 kg/m(2) ] were randomized to sitagliptin (100 mg/day, 6 weeks) or placebo. Seven age- and BMI-matched non-diabetic subjects served as control (CT). RESULTS: During a 5-h MTT, branched-chain AA (BCAA) peaked earlier in T2D than CT [75(25) vs. 62(3) mmol/l · h over 2 h, median(interquartile range), p = 0.05], and rose higher [5-h increment: 31(23) vs. 19(24) mmol/l · h, p = 0.05]. Fasting α-HB was higher [7.5(2.7) vs. 5.9(1.3) µg/ml, p = 0.04 T2D vs. CT], and its meal-induced increments were larger [24(99) vs. -41(86) µg/ml · h, p = 0.006]. Plasma non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) declined during MTT, but their increments were greater in patients (53 ± 16 vs. 35 ± 10 mEq/l · h, p = 0.005). Compared to placebo, both BCAA [-6.4(21.1) vs. 0.0(48.0) mmol/l · h, p = 0.01] and α-HB increments [-114(250) vs. 114(428) µg/ml · h, p = 0.002] decreased with sitagliptin, and meal-induced NEFA suppression was improved. Changes in BCAA and α-HB were reciprocally related to changes in insulin sensitivity (ρ = -0.37 and -0.43, p ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: T2D is associated with a hyperaminoacidaemic response to MTT, which circulating α-HB levels track. Sitagliptin-induced glycaemic improvement was associated with reductions in BCAA and α-HB excursions and better NEFA suppression, in parallel with improved insulin sensitivity, confirming that α-HB is a readout of metabolic overload.

Direct effect of GLP-1 infusion on endogenous glucose production in humans.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) lowers glucose levels by potentiating glucose-induced insulin secretion and inhibiting glucagon release. The question of whether GLP-1 exerts direct effects on the liver, independently of the hormonal changes, is controversial. We tested whether an exogenous GLP-1 infusion, designed to achieve physiological postprandial levels, directly affects endogenous glucose production (EGP) under conditions mimicking the fasting state in diabetes. METHODS: In 14 healthy volunteers, we applied the pancreatic clamp technique, whereby plasma insulin and glucagon levels are clamped using somatostatin and hormone replacement. The clamp was applied in paired, 4 h experiments, during which saline (control) or GLP-1(7-37)amide (0.4 pmol min⁻¹ kg⁻¹) was infused. RESULTS: During the control study, plasma insulin and glucagon were maintained at basal levels and plasma C-peptide was suppressed, such that plasma glucose rose to a plateau of ~10.5 mmol/l and tracer-determined EGP increased by ~60%. During GLP-1 infusion at matched plasma glucose levels, the rise of EGP from baseline was fully prevented. Lipolysis (as indexed by NEFA concentrations and tracer-determined glycerol rate of appearance) and substrate utilisation (by indirect calorimetry) were similar between control and GLP-1 infusion. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: GLP-1 inhibits EGP under conditions where plasma insulin and glucagon are not allowed to change and glucose concentrations are matched, indicating either a direct effect on hepatocytes or neurally mediated inhibition.

Early and longer term effects of gastric bypass surgery on tissue-specific insulin sensitivity and beta cell function in morbidly obese patients with and without type 2 diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Bariatric surgery consistently induces remission of type 2 diabetes. We tested whether there are diabetes-specific mechanisms in addition to weight loss. METHODS: We studied 25 morbidly obese patients (BMI 51.7 ± 1.5 kg/m(2) [mean ± SEM]), 13 with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (HbA(1c) 7.1 ± 0.5% [54 ± 5 mmol/mol]), before and at 2 weeks and 1 year after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Lean (n = 8, BMI 23.0 ± 0.5 kg/m(2)) and obese (n = 14) volunteers who were BMI-matched (36.0 ± 1.2) to RYGB patients at 1 year after surgery served as controls. We measured insulin-stimulated glucose disposal (M) and substrate utilisation (euglycaemic clamp/indirect calorimetry), endogenous glucose production (EGP) by 6,6-[(2)H(2)]glucose, lipolysis (rate of appearance of [(2)H(5)]glycerol) and beta cell function (acute insulin response to i.v. glucose [AIR] as determined by C-peptide deconvolution). RESULTS: At baseline, all obese groups showed typical metabolic abnormalities, with M, glucose oxidation and non-oxidative disposal impaired, and EGP, lipolysis, lipid oxidation and energy expenditure increased. Early after RYGB plasma glucose and insulin levels, and energy expenditure had decreased, while lipid oxidation increased, with M, EGP and AIR unchanged. At 1 year post-RYGB (BMI 34.4 ± 1.1 kg/m(2)), all diabetic patients were off glucose-lowering treatment and mean HbA(1c) was 5.4 ± 0.14% (36 ± 2 mmol/mol) (p = 0.03 vs baseline); AIR also improved significantly. In all RYGB patients, M, substrate oxidation, EGP, energy expenditure and lipolysis improved in proportion to weight loss, and were therefore similar to values in obese controls, but still different from those in lean controls. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In morbidly obese patients, RYGB has metabolic effects on liver, adipose tissue, muscle insulin sensitivity and pattern of substrate utilisation; these effects can be explained by energy intake restriction and weight loss, the former prevailing early after surgery, the latter being dominant in the longer term.

Natural history and physiological determinants of changes in glucose tolerance in a non-diabetic population: the RISC Study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The natural history and physiological determinants of glucose intolerance in subjects living in Europe have not been investigated. The aim of this study was to increase our understanding of this area. METHODS: We analysed the data from a population-based cohort of 1,048 non-diabetic, normotensive men and women (aged 30-60 years) in whom insulin sensitivity was measured by the glucose clamp technique (M/I index; average glucose infusion rate/steady-state insulin concentration) and beta cell function was estimated by mathematical modelling of the oral glucose tolerance test at baseline and 3 years later. RESULTS: Seventy-seven per cent of the participants had normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and 5% were glucose intolerant both at baseline and follow up; glucose tolerance worsened in 13% (progressors) and improved in 6% (regressors). The metabolic phenotype of the latter three groups was similar (higher prevalence of familial diabetes, older age, higher waist-to-hip ratio, higher fasting and 2 h plasma glucose, higher fasting and 2 h plasma insulin, lower insulin sensitivity and reduced beta cell glucose sensitivity with increased absolute insulin secretion). Adjusting for these factors in a logistic model, progression was predicted by insulin resistance (bottom M/I quartile, OR 2.52 [95% CI 1.51-4.21]) and beta cell glucose insensitivity (bottom quartile, OR 2.39 [95% CI 1.6-3.93]) independently of waist-to-hip ratio (OR 1.44 [95% CI 1.13-1.84] for one SD). At follow up, insulin sensitivity and beta cell glucose sensitivity were unchanged in the stable NGT and stable non-NGT groups, worsened in progressors and improved in regressors. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Glucose tolerance deteriorates over time in young, healthy Europids. Progressors, regressors and glucose-intolerant participants share a common baseline phenotype. Insulin sensitivity and beta cell glucose sensitivity predict and track changes in glucose tolerance independently of sex, age and obesity.

Metabolic normality in overweight and obese subjects. Which parameters? Which risks?

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to define metabolic normality and to investigate the cardiometabolic profile of metabolically normal obese. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study conducted at 21 research centers in Europe. SUBJECTS: Normal body weight (nbw, n=382) and overweight or obese (ow/ob, n=185) subjects free from metabolic syndrome and with normal glucose tolerance, were selected among the Relationship between Insulin Sensitivity and Cardiovascular Disease study participants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Insulin sensitivity was assessed by the clamp technique. On the basis of quartiles in nbw subjects, the limits of normal insulin sensitivity and of normal fasting insulinemia were established. Subjects with normal insulin sensitivity and fasting insulin were defined as metabolically normal. RESULTS: Among ow/ob subjects, 11% were metabolically normal vs 37% among nbw, P<0.0001. Ow/ob subjects showed increased fasting insulin (P=0.0009), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-cholesterol) (P=0.004), systolic (P=0.0007) and diastolic (P=0.001) blood pressure, as compared with nbw. When evaluating the contribution of body mass index (BMI), hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance, BMI showed an isolated effect on high-density lipoprotein (P=0.007), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (P<0.0001), systolic (P=0.002) and diastolic (P=0.008) blood pressures. BMI shared its influence with insulinemia on total cholesterol (P=0.04 and 0.003, respectively), LDL-cholesterol (P=0.003 and 0.006, respectively) and triglycerides (P=0.02 and 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: In obese subjects, fasting insulin should be taken into account in the definition of metabolic normality. Even when metabolically normal, obese subjects could be at increased risk for cardiometabolic diseases. Increased BMI, alone or with fasting insulin, is the major responsible for the less favorable cardio-metabolic profile.

Short-term acute hyperinsulinemia and prothrombotic factors in subjects with normal glucose tolerance.

Some cytokines and proinflammatory mediators are considered markers of increased atherothrombotic risk. Few information is available on the effects of acute glucose and insulin variations on these markers of atherosclerosis. We assessed the acute effect of glucose and insulin on soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L), IL-6, and P-selectin levels, evaluating their relationship with insulin sensitivity in normal glucose tolerance subjects (NGT). Twenty-four NGT subjects underwent a 3-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with measurements of sCD40L, IL-6, and P-selectin levels at 0, 90 and 180 min. Insulin sensitivity was assessed by the Oral Glucose Sensitivity Index (OGIS). To distinguish the role of glucose and insulin, eight subjects had the plasma glucose profile of the OGTT reproduced by a variable IV glucose infusion (ISO-G study) and nine underwent a euglycemic clamp. Lastly, a 3-h time-control (TC) study was performed in eleven subjects. A significant reduction of sCD40L was observed during OGTT and ISO-G study. This reduction was not due to time-related changes, since it was not observed in TC study. During the clamp, insulin induced a marked drop in sCD40L (from 4.89+/-1.34 to 1.60+/-0.29 ng/ml, p<0.05). In the pooled data from all studies, fasting sCD40L was indirectly related to LDL-cholesterol (r=-0.38; p=0.04), while IL-6 was directly related with BMI, fat mass, waist circumference, and P-selectin (p<0.05). sCD40L levels are downregulated during a short-term period of acute hyperinsulinemia, whether induced by oral or intravenous glucose administration or by insulin infusion, while it does not seem to affect P-selectin and IL-6.

Effects of glucose tolerance on the changes provoked by glucose ingestion in microvascular function.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Hyperglycaemia and hyperinsulinaemia have opposite effects on endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in microcirculation, but the net effect elicited by glucose ingestion and the separate influence of glucose tolerance are unknown. METHODS: In participants with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or diabetic glucose tolerance, multiple plasma markers of both oxidative stress and endothelial activation, and forearm vascular responses (plethysmography) to intra-arterial acetylcholine (ACh) and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) infusions were measured before and after glucose ingestion. In another IGT group, we evaluated the time-course of the skin vascular responses (laser Doppler) to ACh and SNP (by iontophoresis) 1, 2 and 3 h into the OGTT; the plasma glucose profile was then reproduced by means of a variable intravenous glucose infusion and the vascular measurements repeated. RESULTS: Following oral glucose, plasma antioxidants were reduced by 5% to 10% (p < 0.01) in all patient groups. The response to acetylcholine was not affected by glucose ingestion in any group, while the response to SNP was attenuated, particularly in the IGT group. The ACh:SNP ratio was slightly improved therefore in all groups, even in diabetic participants, in whom it was impaired basally. A time-dependent improvement in ACh:SNP ratio was also observed in skin microcirculation following oral glucose; this improvement was blunted when matched hyperglycaemia was coupled with lower hyperinsulinaemia (intravenous glucose). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Regardless of glucose tolerance, oral glucose does not impair endothelium-dependent vasodilatation either in resistance arteries or in the microcirculation, despite causing increased oxidative stress; the endogenous insulin response is probably responsible for countering any inhibitory effect on vascular function.

Association of fasting glucagon and proinsulin concentrations with insulin resistance.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Hyperproinsulinaemia and relative hyperglucagonaemia are features of type 2 diabetes. We hypothesised that raised fasting glucagon and proinsulin concentrations may be associated with insulin resistance (IR) in non-diabetic individuals. METHODS: We measured IR [by a euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic (240 pmol min(-1) m(-2)) clamp technique] in 1,296 non-diabetic (on a 75 g OGTT) individuals [716 women and 579 men, mean age 44 years, BMI 26 kg/m(2) (range 18-44 kg/m(2))] recruited at 19 centres in 14 European countries. IR was related to fasting proinsulin or pancreatic glucagon concentrations in univariate and multivariate analyses. Given its known relationship to IR, serum adiponectin was used as a positive control. RESULTS: In either sex, both glucagon and proinsulin were directly related to IR, while adiponectin was negatively associated with it (all p < 0.0001). In multivariate models, controlling for known determinants of insulin sensitivity (i.e. sex, age, BMI and glucose tolerance) as well as factors potentially affecting glucagon and proinsulin (i.e. fasting plasma glucose and C-peptide concentrations), glucagon and proinsulin were still positively associated, and adiponectin was negatively associated, with IR. Finally, when these associations were tested as the probability that individuals in the top IR quartile would have hormone levels in the top quartile of their distribution independently of covariates, the odds ratio was approximately 2 for both glucagon (p = 0.05) and proinsulin (p = 0.02) and 0.36 for adiponectin (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Whole-body IR is independently associated with raised fasting plasma glucagon and proinsulin concentrations, possibly as a result of IR at the level of alpha cells and beta cells in pancreatic islets.

Restored insulin inhibition on insulin secretion in nondiabetic severely obese patients after weight loss induced by bariatric surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of important weight loss on insulin inhibition of its own secretion during experimentally induced hyperinsulinemia under euglycemic conditions. DESIGN: Longitudinal, clinical intervention study--bariatric surgery (vertical banded gastroplasty--gastric bypass--Capella technique), re-evaluation after 4 and 14 months. SUBJECTS: Nine obese patients class III (BMI=54.6+/-2.6 kg/m2) and nine lean subjects (BMI=22.7+/-0.7 kg/m2). MEASUREMENTS: Euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp (insulin infusion: 40 mU/min m2), C-peptide plasma levels, electrical bioimpedance methodology, and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). RESULTS: BMI was reduced in the follow-up: 44.5+/-2.2 and 33.9+/-1.5 kg/m2 at 4 and 14 months. Insulin-induced glucose uptake was markedly reduced in obese patients (19.5+/-1.9 micromol/min kg FFM) and improved with weight loss, but in the third study, it was still lower than that observed in controls (35.9+/-4.0 vs 52.9+/-2.2 micromol/min kg FFM). Insulin-induced inhibition of its own secretion was blunted in obese patients (19.9+/-5.7%, relative to fasting values), and completely reversed to values similar to that of lean ones in the second and third studies (-60.8+/-4.2 and -54.0+/-6.1%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Weight loss in severe obesity improved insulin-induced glucose uptake, and completely normalized the insulin inhibition on its own secretion.

Lack of insulin inhibition on insulin secretion in non-diabetic morbidly obese patients.

OBJECTIVE: Insulin inhibition of insulin secretion has been described in normal lean subjects. In this study, we examined whether this phenomenon also occurs in the morbidly obese who often have severe peripheral insulin resistance. SUBJECTS: Twelve obese patients, normotolerant to glucose (8 F/4 M, body mass index (BMI)=54.8+/-2.5 kg/m(2), 39 y) and 16 lean control subjects (10 F/6 M, BMI=22.0+/-0.5 kg/m(2), 31 y). DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: An experimental study using various parameters, including an euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp (280 pmol/min/m(2) of body surface), an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), electrical bioimpedance and indirect calorimetry. RESULTS: The obese subjects were insulin resistant (M=19.8+/-1.6 vs 48.7+/-2.6 micromol/min kg FFM, P<0.0001) and hyperinsulinemic in the fasted state and after glucose ingestion. Fasting plasma C-peptide levels (obese 1425+/-131 pmol/l vs lean 550+/-63 pmol/l; P<0.0001) decreased less during the clamp in the obese groups (-16.9+/-6.9% vs -43.0+/-5.6% relative to fasting values; P=0.007). In the lean group, the C-peptide decrease during the clamp (percentage variation) was related to insulin sensitivity, M/FFM (r=0.56, P=0.03), even after adjustment for the clamp glucose variation. CONCLUSION: We conclude that, in lean subjects, insulin inhibits its own secretion, and this may be related to insulin sensibility. This response is blunted in morbidly obese patients and may have a role in the pathogenesis of fasting hyperinsulinemia in these patients.

Hyperinsulinemia and autonomic nervous system dysfunction in obesity: effects of weight loss.

BACKGROUND: Because hyperinsulinemia acutely stimulates adrenergic activity, it has been postulated that chronic hyperinsulinemia may lead to enhanced sympathetic tone and cardiovascular risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 21 obese (body mass index, 35+/-1 kg/m(2)) and 17 lean subjects, we measured resting cardiac output (by 2-dimensional echocardiography), plasma concentrations and timed (diurnal versus nocturnal) urinary excretion of catecholamines, and 24-hour heart rate variability (by spectral analysis of ECG). In the obese versus lean subjects, cardiac output was increased by 22% (P:<0.03), and the nocturnal drop in urinary norepinephrine output was blunted (P:=0.01). Spectral power in the low-frequency range was depressed throughout 24 hours (P:<0.04). During the afternoon and early night, ie, the postprandial phase, high-frequency power was lower, heart rate was higher; and the ratio of low to high frequency, an index of sympathovagal balance, was increased in direct proportion to the degree of hyperinsulinemia independent of body mass index (partial r=0.43, P:=0.01). In 9 obese subjects who lost 10% to 18% of their body weight, cardiac output decreased and low-frequency power returned toward normal (P:<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In free-living subjects with uncomplicated obesity, chronic hyperinsulinemia is associated with a high-output, low-resistance hemodynamic state, persistent baroreflex downregulation, and episodic (postprandial) sympathetic dominance. Reversal of these changes by weight loss suggests a causal role for insulin.

Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia: No independent relation to left ventricular mass in humans.

BACKGROUND: Hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance may contribute to the development of cardiac hypertrophy. In humans, however, the evidence is inconclusive. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 50 nondiabetic subjects covering a wide range of age (20 to 65 years), body mass index (BMI, 19 to 40 kg x m(-2)), and mean blood pressure (72 to 132 mm Hg). Plasma insulin concentrations and secretory rates were measured at baseline and during an oral glucose tolerance test; insulin sensitivity was measured by the insulin clamp technique. Left ventricular mass (LVM) (by 2D M-mode echocardiography) was distributed normally and was higher in obese (BMI >/=27 kg x m(-2), n=16) or hypertensive patients (blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg, n=21) (50+/-8 and 55+/-10 g x m(-2.7), respectively) than in 13 nonobese, normotensive subjects (40+/-8 g x m(-2.7), P:=0.0004). In a multivariate model adjusting for sex, age, BMI, and blood pressure, neither insulin concentrations (fasting or postglucose) nor insulin sensitivity or secretory rates were significant correlates of LVM. Systolic blood pressure (P:=0.003) and BMI (P:=0.01) were the only independent correlates of LVM. From the regression, the impact of hypertension (as a systolic pressure of 180 versus 140 mm Hg=+20%) was twice as large as that of obesity (as a BMI of 35 versus 25 kg x m(-2)=+11%), the two factors being additive. CONCLUSIONS: When adequate account is taken of body mass and blood pressure, insulin, as concentration, secretion, or action, is not an independent determinant of LVM in nondiabetic subjects.

Autonomic and hemodynamic responses to insulin in lean and obese humans.

To study the acute effects of insulin on autonomic control of cardiac function, we performed spectral analysis of heart rate variability and measured cardiac dynamics (by two-dimensional echocardiography) in 18 obese (BMI = 35 +/- 1 kg.m-2) and 14 lean (BMI = 24 +/- 1 kg.m-2) subjects in the basal state and in response to physiological hyperinsulinemia (1 mU.min-1.kg-1 insulin clamp). In the lean group, insulin promptly (within 20 min) and consistently depressed spectral powers, both in the low-frequency and high-frequency range. These changes were twice as large as accounted for by the concomitant changes in heart rate (68 +/- 2 to 70 +/- 2 beats/min). At the end of the 2-h clamp, stroke volume (67 +/- 4 to 76 +/- 9 ml.min-1) and cardiac output (4.45 +/- 0.21 to 5.06 +/- 0.55 l.min-1) rose, whereas peripheral vascular resistance fell. The low-to-high frequency ratio increased from 1.7 +/- 0.2 to 2.3 +/- 0.3 (P < 0.01), indicating sympathetic shift of autonomic balance. In the obese group, all basal spectral powers were significantly lower (by 40% on average) than in the lean group, and were further reduced by insulin administration. The low-to-high frequency ratio was higher than in controls at baseline (2.4 +/- 0.4, P < 0.03), and failed to increase after insulin (2.2 +/- 0.3, P = ns). Furthermore, obesity was associated with higher resting stroke volume (89 +/- 5 vs. 67 +/- 4 ml.min-1, P < 0.01) and cardiac output (6.01 +/- 0.31 vs. 4.45 +/- 0.21 l.min-1, P = 0.001) but lower peripheral vascular resistance (15.1 +/- 0.8 vs. 19.2 +/- 1.1 mmHg.min.L-1, P = 0.002), whereas mean arterial blood pressure was similar to control (90 +/- 2 vs. 86 +/- 2 mmHg, P = not significant). We conclude that physiological hyperinsulinemia causes acute desensitization of sinus node activity to both sympathetic and para-sympathetic stimuli, sympathetic shift of autonomic balance, and a high-output, low-resistance hemodynamic state. In the obese, these changes are already present in the basal state, and may therefore be linked with chronic hyperinsulinemia.

Influence of duration of obesity on the insulin resistance of obese non-diabetic patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether duration of obesity has an independent impact on insulin resistance. DESIGN: Case-control study. SUBJECTS: 30 non-diabetic obese subjects (age, 34+/-12 y, body mass index (BMI), 33.5+/-0.8 kg x m[-2]) with a range (1-35 y) of self-reported duration of obesity, and 12 age- and gender-matched non-obese controls (BMI, 22.1+/-0.6 kg x m[-2]). MEASUREMENTS: Oral glucose tolerance (40 g x m[-2]), insulin sensitivity (by the euglycaemic insulin clamp technique), and insulin secretion (as the product of post-hepatic insulin clearance and plasma insulin concentration). RESULTS: The obese group presented hyperinsulinaemia in the basal state and after glucose loading (insulin area = 58+/-5 vs 33+/-3 nmol x I[-1] x 2 h, P = 0.005), insulin resistance (M value = 37.4+/-4.8 vs 50.6+/-2.6 micromol x min[-1] x kg FFM[-1], P = 0.002), and insulin hypersecretion (61.9+/-6.0 vs 33.9 +/- 4.0 nmol x 2 h, P = 0.007); endogenous glucose production was similar in the two groups. In the whole dataset, insulin resistance was directly related to BMI, the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), endogenous glucose production, insulin secretion, and fasting serum triglycerides and uric acid concentrations. When the obese subjects were stratified by duration of obesity, insulin resistance was progressively lower with longer obesity duration (P = 0.04). When simultaneously adjusting by age, gender and BMI, obesity duration was independently associated with greater insulin sensitivity (P = 0.003), lower plasma insulin response to oral glucose (P = 0.001), and lower fasting and glucose-stimulated insulin release (P = 0.01 for both). CONCLUSIONS: In obese subjects with preserved glucose tolerance, duration of obesity is associated with better insulin sensitivity irrespective of the degree of overweight.

Metabolic and cardiovascular assessment in moderate obesity: effect of weight loss.

Metabolic and hemodynamic abnormalities have been separately described in obesity, and weight reduction is known to lead to some improvement in each. Our aim was to simultaneously assess metabolic and cardiovascular function in normotensive, normotolerant patients with moderate obesity (body mass index = 32.6 +/- 1.1 kg/m2) before and after weight loss. The obese were insulin resistant [37.4 +/- 4.8 mumol/min.kg FFM; P < 0.02 vs. 12 lean controls (50.6 +/- 2.6), on a euglycemic insulin clamp], secreted more insulin both in the fasting state and after oral glucose (70 +/- 10 vs. 48 +/- 6 nmol/mmol.L plasma glucose; P < 0.05), and had higher resting energy expenditure (4.62 +/- 0.18 vs. 4.00 +/- 0.23 kJ/min), systolic and mean blood pressure, stroke volume (87 +/- 8 vs. 67 +/- 4 mL/min; P = 0.05), and cardiac output. There was, however, no relationship between the metabolic and hemodynamic abnormalities. After a weight loss of 11 +/- 1 kg (approximately 15%), insulin sensitivity improved in proportion to the weight reduction, whereas insulin hypersecretion and high energy expenditure persisted. In contrast, all hemodynamic changes reverted to normal. We conclude that in moderate obesity, the metabolic and cardiovascular abnormalities are largely independent of one another; accordingly, weight loss affects them differentially. Partial weight normalization may provide sufficient cardiovascular protection.

Reciprocal association between insulin sensitivity and the haematocrit in man.

In epidemiological studies, a high haematocrit has been associated both with increased cardiovascular risk and with hyperinsulinaemia, a surrogate of insulin resistance. To examine directly the relationship between the haematocrit and insulin sensitivity, we studied 12 healthy volunteers and 12 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) with the use of a 4-hour hyperinsulinaemic [1 mU min-1 kg-1] isoglycaemic clamp. In the whole group, insulin sensitivity (as the ratio of insulin-mediated glucose clearance to steady-state plasma insulin concentrations) was inversely related to the haematocrit (r = 0.50, P < 0.01). To test whether acute changes in the haematocrit affect insulin sensitivity, in two NIDDM patients and three healthy subjects the clamp study was repeated after lowering (-18%) the haematocrit by erythro-apheresis. In all five subjects, the lower haematocrit was associated with slightly reduced (-7% on average, P = NS) rather than increased insulin sensitivity. We conclude that insulin sensitivity is inversely related to the haematocrit independently of the glucose tolerance status. The association does not result from acute haemodynamic effects on insulin sensitivity, and may therefore reflect an action of insulin resistance/ hyperinsulinaemia on blood viscosity, or the presence of a common determinant.

Effect of insulin on systemic and renal handling of albumin in nondiabetic and NIDDM subjects.

Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia cluster with microalbuminuria in both diabetic and nondiabetic subjects, but the mechanism underlying this association is unknown. To test the hypothesis that insulin influences protein permeability, we measured the albumin transcapillary escape rate (TER) by the (131)I-labeled albumin technique in 12 healthy volunteers and 12 normoalbuminuric NIDDM patients (fasting plasma glucose, 10.9 +/- 1.3 mmol/l) during 4 h of isoglycemia with high (1.1 mU x min(-1) x kg(-1)) or, on a different day, low (0.1 mU x min(-1) x kg(-1)) insulin infusion. In both patients and control subjects, high insulin was associated with a 7% decrease in blood volume (P = 0.006) and a 6% decrease in diastolic blood pressure (P < 0.02), these two changes being related to one another (r = 0.56, P < 0.01). Basal albumin TER was similar in patients (8.4 +/- 0.5% x h(-1)) and control subjects (7.7 +/- 0.7% x h(-1)) and was not significantly changed by high insulin in either group (patients vs. control subjects, 7.3 +/- 0.9 vs. 6.2 +/- 0.4% x h(-1); NS vs. low insulin). In contrast, high insulin increased renal albumin excretion (from 3.6 +/- 0.8 to 5.4 +/- 1.1 microg/min, P < 0.01) and clearance rate (0.09 +/- 0.02 to 0.13 +/- 0.03 microl/min, P < 0.001) in patients but not in control subjects. To localize the effect of insulin along the nephron, we measured the urinary excretion of N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (beta-NAG), released by the proximal tubule; retinol-binding protein (RBP), reabsorbed by the proximal tubule; and Tamm-Horsfall protein (THP) and epidermal growth factor (EGF), both secreted by the distal tubule. For both beta-NAG and RBP, but not EGF or THP, insulin enhanced urinary excretion (diabetics vs. controls: beta-NAG, 0.48 vs. -0.15 microU/min [P = 0.03]; RBP, 78 vs. -32 ng/min [P = 0.05]). In conclusion, physiological hyperinsulinemia does not affect systemic albumin permeability in healthy subjects or normoalbuminuric NIDDM patients. In contrast, in NIDDM patients, but not in healthy subjects, insulin increases the urinary excretion of albumin and protein markers of proximal tubular function. The significance of this finding for the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy remains to be established.

Acute insulin administration does not affect plasma leptin levels in lean or obese subjects.

Whether leptin levels are related to insulin sensitivity or subject to acute regulation by insulin is not known. In 12 obese [body mass index (BMI) = 34.0 +/- 1.5 kg m-2] and 12 lean (BMI = 22.2 +/- 0.6 kg m-2) non-diabetic subjects, plasma leptin concentrations were measured in the fasting state and during 2 hours of euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemia (approximately 600 pmol L-1). Fasting plasma leptin was significantly higher in obese (26.6 +/- 3.2) than in lean subjects (6.4 +/- 1.2 ng mL-1, P = 0.0001), and in women (21.1 +/- 3.3) than in men (7.3 +/- 2.3 ng mL-1, P = 0.01). In univariate analysis, fasting plasma leptin was strongly related to all anthropometric measures (body weight, fat mass, percent fat mass, waist and hip circumferences). In multiple regression, per cent adiposity, hip circumference and duration of obesity explained 90% of the variability in fasting leptin concentrations. Fasting and stimulated (OGTT) insulin levels, insulin sensitivity (22.6 +/- 1.9 vs 36.7 +/- 2.0 mumol min-1 kg-1 in lean and obese subjects, respectively, P < 0.0001), glucose area, and serum triglycerides were positively related to fasting plasma leptin concentrations; none of these associations, however, was statistically significant after adjusting for BMI. During the clamp, plasma leptin concentrations remained constant in both lean and obese subjects. We conclude that neither insulin levels nor sensitivity relate to leptin levels independently of fat mass, and that leptin is not subject to acute (2 hours) regulation by insulin in lean or obese humans.