Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 74
Filtrar
1.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 102(6): 468-476, 2020 Mar 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31934894

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with knee osteoarthritis may undergo total knee replacement too early or may delay or underuse this procedure. We quantified these categories of total knee replacement utilization in 2 cohorts of participants with knee osteoarthritis and investigated factors associated with each category. METHODS: Data were pooled from 2 multicenter cohort studies that collected demographic, patient-reported, radiographic, clinical examination, and total knee replacement utilization information longitudinally on 8,002 participants who had or were at risk for knee osteoarthritis and were followed for up to 8 years. Validated total knee replacement appropriateness criteria were longitudinally applied to classify participants as either potentially appropriate or likely inappropriate for total knee replacement. Participants were further classified on the basis of total knee replacement utilization into 3 categories: timely (indicating that the patient had total knee replacement within 2 years after the procedure had become potentially appropriate), potentially appropriate but knee not replaced (indicating that the knee had remained unreplaced for >2 years after the procedure had become potentially appropriate), and premature (indicating that the procedure was likely inappropriate but had been performed). Utilization rates were calculated, and factors associated with each category were identified. RESULTS: Among 8,002 participants, 3,417 knees fulfilled our inclusion and exclusion criteria and were classified into 1 of 3 utilization categories as follows: 290 knees (8% of the total and 9% of the knees for which replacement was potentially appropriate) were classified as "timely", 2,833 knees (83% of the total and 91% of those for which replacement was potentially appropriate) were classified as "potentially appropriate but not replaced", and 294 knees (comprising 9% of the total and 26% of the 1,114 total knee replacements performed) were considered to be "likely inappropriate" yet underwent total knee replacement and were classified as "premature". Of the knees that were potentially appropriate but were not replaced, 1,204 (42.5%) had severe symptoms. Compared with the patients who underwent timely total knee replacement, the likelihood of being classified as potentially appropriate but not undergoing total knee replacement was greater for black participants and the likelihood of having premature total knee replacement was lower among participants with a body mass index of >25 kg/m and those with depression. CONCLUSIONS: In 2 multicenter cohorts of patients with knee osteoarthritis, we observed substantial numbers of patients who had premature total knee replacement as well as of patients for whom total knee replacement was potentially appropriate but had not been performed >2 years after it had become potentially appropriate. Further understanding of these observations is needed, especially among the latter group. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Undergoing total knee replacement too early may result in little or no benefit while exposing the patient to the risks of a major operation, whereas waiting too long may cause limitations in physical activity that in turn increase the risk of additional disability and chronic disease; however, little is known about timing of this surgery. We quantified the extent of premature, timely, and delayed use, and found a high prevalence of both premature and delayed use.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Osteoartrite do Joelho/cirurgia , Tempo para o Tratamento , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Estados Unidos
2.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 35(9): 1714-20, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24812015

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Delayed cerebral ischemia and vasospasm are significant complications following SAH leading to cerebral infarction, functional disability, and death. In recent years, CTA and CTP have been used to increase the detection of delayed cerebral ischemia and vasospasm. Our aim was to perform comparative-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analyses evaluating CTA and CTP for delayed cerebral ischemia and vasospasm in aneurysmal SAH from a health care payer perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a decision model comparing CTA and CTP with transcranial Doppler sonography for detection of vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia in SAH. The clinical pathways were based on the "Guidelines for the Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association" (2012). Outcome health states represented mortality and morbidity according to functional outcomes. Input probabilities of symptoms and serial test results from CTA and CTP, transcranial Doppler ultrasound, and digital subtraction angiography were directly derived from an SAH cohort by using a multinomial logistic regression model. Expected benefits, measured as quality-adjusted life years, and costs, measured in 2012 US dollars, were calculated for each imaging strategy. Univariable, multivariable, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the independent and combined effect of input parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: The transcranial Doppler ultrasound strategy yielded 13.62 quality-adjusted life years at a cost of $154,719. The CTA and CTP strategy generated 13.89 quality-adjusted life years at a cost of $147,097, resulting in a gain of 0.27 quality-adjusted life years and cost savings of $7622 over the transcranial Doppler ultrasound strategy. Univariable and multivariable sensitivity analyses indicated that results were robust to plausible input parameter uncertainty. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis results yielded 96.8% of iterations in the right lower quadrant, representing higher benefits and lower costs. CONCLUSIONS: Our model results suggest that CTA and CTP are the preferred imaging strategy in SAH, compared with transcranial Doppler ultrasound, leading to improved clinical outcomes and lower health care costs.


Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Angiografia Cerebral/economia , Imagem de Perfusão/economia , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/complicações , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/diagnóstico , Vasoespasmo Intracraniano/diagnóstico , Angiografia Digital , Isquemia Encefálica/etiologia , Angiografia Cerebral/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Imagem de Perfusão/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Ultrassonografia Doppler Transcraniana/economia , Ultrassonografia Doppler Transcraniana/métodos , Estados Unidos , Vasoespasmo Intracraniano/etiologia
3.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 35(3): 459-65, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24200901

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In recent years CTP has been used as a complementary diagnostic tool in the evaluation of delayed cerebral ischemia and vasospasm. Our aim was to determine the test characteristics of CTP for detecting delayed cerebral ischemia and vasospasm in SAH, and then to apply Bayesian analysis to identify subgroups for its appropriate use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our retrospective cohort comprised consecutive patients with SAH and CTP performed between days 6 and 8 following aneurysm rupture. Delayed cerebral ischemia was determined according to primary outcome measures of infarction and/or permanent neurologic deficits. Vasospasm was determined by using DSA. The test characteristics of CTP and its 95% CIs were calculated. Graphs of conditional probabilities were constructed by using Bayesian techniques. Local treatment thresholds (posttest probability of delayed cerebral ischemia needed to initiate induced hypertension, hypervolemia, and hemodilution or intra-arterial therapy) were determined via a survey of 6 independent neurologists. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients with SAH were included in the study; 39% (38/97) developed delayed cerebral ischemia. Qualitative CTP deficits were seen in 49% (48/97), occurring in 84% (32/38) with delayed cerebral ischemia and 27% (16/59) without. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (95% CI) for CTP were 0.84 (0.73-0.96), 0.73 (0.62-0.84), 0.67 (0.51-0.79), and 0.88 (0.74-0.94), respectively. A subgroup of 57 patients underwent DSA; 63% (36/57) developed vasospasm. Qualitative CTP deficits were seen in 70% (40/57), occurring in 97% (35/36) with vasospasm and 23% (5/21) without. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (95% CI) for CTP were 0.97 (0.92-1.0), 0.76 (0.58-0.94), 0.88 (0.72-0.95), and 0.94 (0.69-0.99), respectively. Treatment thresholds were determined as 30% for induced hypertension, hypervolemia, and hemodilution and 70% for intra-arterial therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Positive CTP findings identify patients who should be carefully considered for induced hypertension, hypervolemia, and hemodilution and/or intra-arterial therapy while negative CTP findings are useful in guiding a no-treatment decision.


Assuntos
Angiografia Cerebral/métodos , Circulação Cerebrovascular , Aneurisma Intracraniano/diagnóstico por imagem , Neuroimagem/métodos , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Teorema de Bayes , Feminino , Humanos , Aneurisma Intracraniano/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/fisiopatologia
4.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 34(2): 292-8, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22859289

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: DCI is a serious complication following aneurysmal SAH and remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to evaluate CTP in aneurysmal SAH by using outcome measures of DCI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients with SAH enrolled in a prospective institutional review board-approved clinical accuracy trial. Qualitative CTP deficits were determined by 2 neuroradiologists blinded to clinical and imaging data. Quantitative CTP was performed by using a standardized protocol with region-of-interest placement sampling of the cortex. Primary outcome measures were permanent neurologic deficits and infarction. The secondary outcome measure was DCI, defined as clinical deterioration. CTP test characteristics (95% CI) were determined for each outcome measure. Statistical significance was calculated by using the Fisher exact and Student t tests. ROC curves were generated to determine accuracy and threshold analysis. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were included. Permanent neurologic deficits developed in 33% (32/96). CTP deficits were seen in 78% (25/32) of those who developed permanent neurologic deficits and 34% (22/64) of those without (P < .0001). CTP deficits had 78% (61%-89%) sensitivity, 66% (53%-76%) specificity, and 53% (39%-67%) positive and 86% (73%-93%) negative predictive values. Infarction occurred in 18% (17/96). CTP deficits were seen in 88% (15/17) of those who developed infarction and 41% (32/79) of those without (P = .0004). CTP deficits had an 88% (66%-97%) sensitivity, 59% (48%-70%) specificity, and 32% (20%-46%) positive and 96% (86%-99%) negative predictive values. DCI was diagnosed in 50% (48/96). CTP deficits were seen in 81% (39/48) of patients with DCI and in 17% (8/48) of those without (P < .0001). CTP deficits had 81% (68%-90%) sensitivity, 83% (70%-91%) specificity, and 83% (70%-91%) positive and 82% (69%-90%) negative predictive values. Quantitative CTP revealed significantly reduced CBF and prolonged MTT for DCI, permanent neurologic deficits, and infarction. ROC analysis showed that CBF and MTT had the highest accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: CTP may add prognostic information regarding DCI and poor outcomes in aneurysmal SAH.


Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Encefálica/mortalidade , Imagem de Perfusão/métodos , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/mortalidade , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Infarto Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Infarto Cerebral/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Imagem de Perfusão/normas , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Curva ROC , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/normas
5.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 32(11): 2047-53, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21960495

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: DCI is a serious complication following aneurysmal SAH leading to permanent neurologic deficits, infarction, and death. Our aim was to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CTP and to determine a quantitative threshold for DCI in aneurysmal SAH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with SAH were prospectively enrolled in a protocol approved by the institutional review board. CTP was performed during the typical time period for DCI, between days 6 and 8 following SAH. Quantitative CBF, CBV, and MTT values were obtained by using standard region-of-interest placement sampling of gray matter. The reference standard for DCI is controversial and consisted of clinical and imaging criteria in this study. In a subanalysis of vasospasm, DSA was used as the reference standard. ROC curves determined the diagnostic accuracy by using AUC. Optimal threshold values were calculated by using the patient population utility method. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients were included; 41% (40/97) had DCI. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 93% for CBF, 88% for MTT, and 72% for CBV. Optimal threshold values were 35 mL/100 g/min (90% sensitivity, 68% specificity) for CBF and 5.5 seconds (73% sensitivity, 79% specificity) for MTT. In the subanalysis (n = 57), 63% (36/57) had vasospasm. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 94% for CBF, 85% for MTT, and 72% for CBV. Optimal threshold values were 36.5 mL/100 g/min (95% sensitivity, 70% specificity) for CBF and 5.4 seconds (78% sensitivity, 70% specificity) for MTT. CONCLUSIONS: CBF and MTT have the highest overall diagnostic accuracy. Threshold values of 35 mL/100 g/min for CBF and 5.5-second MTT are suggested for DCI on the basis of the patient population utility method. Absolute threshold values may not be generalizable due to differences in scanner equipment and postprocessing methods.


Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia Encefálica/etiologia , Angiografia Cerebral/métodos , Imagem de Perfusão/métodos , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/complicações , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Diagnóstico Tardio , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica/métodos , Interpretação de Imagem Radiográfica Assistida por Computador/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
6.
Lancet ; 358(9290): 1353-5, 2001 Oct 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11684235

RESUMO

We review the principles underlying cost-effectiveness analysis of diagnostic tests and procedures. We use two clinical examples, diagnostic testing for early multiple sclerosis and for Helicobacter pylori to illustrate the methods of analysis and to show how the results can be useful for physicians or payers of health services in making decisions about provision and use of diagnostic services. Economic assessments of diagnostic tests are inherently more difficult than assessments of therapeutic interventions, mainly because of uncertainty about the relation between diagnosis and end results (outcomes) of care. Nonetheless, because of the increasing importance of diagnostic technology in medicine and healthcare, only with such assessments will the most value be gained from restricted medical resources.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/economia , Infecções por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Helicobacter pylori , Esclerose Múltipla/diagnóstico , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida
7.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv ; 27(1): 20-7, 2001 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11147237

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Increasing competition in health care markets and ongoing pressures to contain costs raise concerns about possible deterioration in the quality of medical care. Publicly disseminated quality report cards are designed to inform consumers' choice of providers and health plans, thus counteracting incentives to provide low-quality care and improving the functioning of health care markets. METHODS: This article reviews and evaluates the published evidence on the impact of quality report cards on patients' choice of health care providers and health plans. RESULTS: Studies found only minimal effect of quality report cards on patient referral choices. These findings can be explained by several study design issues and by the economic forces governing health care markets. They cannot be construed to imply that quality report cards are not effective. DISCUSSION: Whether report cards are effective or not is still an unanswered question. Further efforts to improve the information contained in report cards and to make them more understandable could increase their effectiveness.


Assuntos
Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde/normas , Hospitais/normas , Serviços de Informação , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Médicos/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Comportamento de Escolha , Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Satisfação do Paciente , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
8.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 16(5): 335-8, 2000 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11063362

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends oral rehydration therapy (ORT) for management of uncomplicated childhood gastroenteritis with mild-moderate dehydration. However, ORT is widely underused relative to their recommendations. We compared ORT use by directors of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (PEM) fellowship training programs with AAP recommendations, and sought to identify their barriers to ORT. METHODS: Mail/fax survey of the directors of U.S. and Canadian PEM fellowship programs. The survey included 10 scenarios of mild or moderately dehydrated children with gastroenteritis, a personal innovativeness scale, self-assessment of ORT experience and knowledge, and open-ended questions regarding perceived barriers to ORT use. RESULTS: 60/67 (89.6%) PEM fellowship program directors responded. All reported experience with and knowledge about ORT. Only 10/58 (17.2%) believe ORT is usually better than intravenous (i.v.) rehydration in all 10 clinical scenarios, and only 4/58 (6.7%) usually use ORT in all 10 scenarios. 18/58 (31%) usually use ORT for all mildly but no moderately dehydrated children. ORT use did not correlate with personal innovativeness scores. Important barriers cited by respondents include additional time requirements for ORT relative to i.v. rehydration (76.7%) and expectation of i.v. rehydration by parents (41.7%) or primary care physicians (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Relative to AAP recommendations, PEM fellowship directors underuse ORT, especially for moderately dehydrated children. Physician innovativeness does not influence ORT use. Further study of effectiveness, length of stay, staff requirements, and ORT acceptance in the emergency department setting, especially in children with moderate dehydration, may influence ORT use.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Comportamento de Escolha , Desidratação/terapia , Medicina de Emergência/métodos , Tratamento de Emergência/métodos , Bolsas de Estudo , Hidratação/métodos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Infusões Intravenosas/métodos , Pediatria/métodos , Diretores Médicos/psicologia , Padrões de Prática Médica , Canadá , Desidratação/etiologia , Medicina de Emergência/educação , Medicina de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Tratamento de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Hidratação/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastroenterite/complicações , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas/estatística & dados numéricos , Pediatria/educação , Pediatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Diretores Médicos/educação , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos
9.
Health Serv Res ; 35(1 Pt 2): 319-32, 2000 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10778818

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To answer two related questions: (1) Do managed care organizations (MCOs) in New York State (NYS) consider quality when they choose cardiac surgeons? (2) Do they use information about risk-adjusted mortality rates (RAMR) provided in the New York State Cardiac Surgery Reports? DATA SOURCES: (1) Telephone interviews with and contracting data from the majority of MCOs licensed in NYS; (2) RAMR, quality outlier designation, and procedure volume for all cardiac surgeons, as reported in the Cardiac Surgery Reports. STUDY DESIGN: Interview data were analyzed in conjunction with patterns revealed by contracting data. Null hypotheses that MCOs' contracting choices were random with respect to the information published in the Cardiac Surgery Reports were tested. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Sixty percent of MCOs ranked the quality of surgeons as most important in their contracting considerations. Although 64 percent of MCOs indicated some knowledge of the NYS Cardiac Surgery Reports, only 20 percent indicated that the reports were a major factor in their contracting decision. Analyses of actual contracting patterns show that in aggregate, the hypothesis of random choice could be rejected with respect to high-quality outlier status and high procedure volume but not for RAMR or poor-quality outlier status. The panel composition of the majority of MCOs (80.2 percent) was within two standard deviations of the expected mean under the null hypothesis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a professed preference for high-quality surgeons, the use of publicly available quality reports by MCOs is currently low, and contracting practices for the majority of MCOs do not indicate a systematic selection either for or against surgeons based on their reported mortality scores. This study suggests that policy initiatives to increase the effective use of report cards should be encouraged.


Assuntos
Serviços Contratados/normas , Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Contratados/estatística & dados numéricos , Tomada de Decisões Gerenciais , Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Associações de Prática Independente/normas , Associações de Prática Independente/estatística & dados numéricos , Entrevistas como Assunto , New York , Organizações de Prestadores Preferenciais/normas , Organizações de Prestadores Preferenciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Risco Ajustado/normas , Risco Ajustado/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
Crit Care Med ; 27(9): 1991-8, 1999 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10507630

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of collaboration between intensive care unit (ICU) physicians and nurses and patient outcome. DESIGN: Prospective, descriptive, correlational study using self-report instruments. SETTINGS: A community teaching hospital medical ICU, a university teaching hospital surgical ICU, and a community non-teaching hospital mixed ICU, all in upstate New York. SUBJECTS: Ninety-seven attending physicians, 63 resident physicians, and 162 staff nurses. PROCEDURE: When patients were ready for transfer from the ICU to an area of less intensive care, questionnaires were used to assess care providers' reports of collaboration in making the transfer decision. After controlling for severity of illness, the association between interprofessional collaboration and patient outcome was assessed. Unit-level organizational collaboration and patient outcomes were ranked. MEASURES: Healthcare providers' reported levels of collaboration, patient severity of illness and individual risk, patient outcomes of death or readmission to the ICU, unit-level collaboration, and unit patient risk of negative outcome. MAIN RESULTS: Medical ICU nurses' reports of collaboration were associated positively with patient outcomes. No other associations between individual reports of collaboration and patient outcome were found. There was a perfect rank order correlation between unit-level organizational collaboration and patient outcomes across the three units. CONCLUSIONS: The study offered some support for the importance of physician-nurse collaboration in ICU care delivery, a variable susceptible to intervention and further study.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Transferência de Pacientes , Relações Médico-Enfermeiro , Assistência Progressiva ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , APACHE , Adulto , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Comportamento Cooperativo , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New York , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Med Care ; 36(7): 945-54, 1998 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9674613

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Quality report cards are becoming increasingly more common and receive much publicity. They can have significant impact on competition among providers, costs, and quality of health care. The authors test the hypotheses that hospitals and surgeons with better outcomes reported in the NYS Cardiac Surgery Reports experience a relative increase in their market share and prices. METHODS: Information from the New York State Cardiac Surgery Reports was linked with physicians' claims submitted to Medicare and was used to calculate market shares and average prices for hospitals and physicians performing CABG surgeries. Regression models were estimated to test hypotheses. All 30 hospitals offering coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) were studied as well as a majority of surgeons (114 or approximately 80%) performing CABG surgery in New York State during the 1990-1993 period. RESULTS: Findings indicate that hospitals and physicians with better outcomes experienced higher rates of growth in market shares. Physicians with better outcomes also had higher rates of growth in charges for this procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients (and referring physicians) seem to respond to information about quality of individual surgeons and hospitals as expected. The magnitude of the association between reported mortality and market shares varies geographically, potentially reflecting differences in sociodemographic characteristics. The association tends to decline over time, suggesting that it is primarily due to "new" information.


Assuntos
Participação da Comunidade/economia , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/mortalidade , Cirurgia Geral/normas , Setor de Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Serviços de Informação , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/normas , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/economia , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/estatística & dados numéricos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/tendências , Honorários Médicos/tendências , Cirurgia Geral/economia , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Formulário de Reclamação de Seguro/economia , Medicare/economia , New York/epidemiologia , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Análise de Regressão , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/economia , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
14.
Circulation ; 97(21): 2129-35, 1998 Jun 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9626173

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The recently reported Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) showed improved survival in selected asymptomatic patients with coronary disease and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. The economic consequences of defibrillator management in this patient population are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were followed up to quantify their use of healthcare services, including hospitalizations, physician visits, medications, laboratory tests, and procedures, during the trial. The costs of these services, including the costs of the defibrillator, were determined in patients randomized to defibrillator and nondefibrillator therapy. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated by relating these costs to the increased survival associated with the use of the defibrillator. The average survival for the defibrillator group over a 4-year period was 3.66 years compared with 2.80 years for conventionally treated patients. Accumulated net costs were $97,560 for the defibrillator group compared with $75,980 for individuals treated with medications alone. The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $27,000 per life-year saved compares favorably with other cardiac interventions. Sensitivity analyses showed that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio would be reduced to approximately $23,000 per life-year saved if transvenous defibrillators were used instead of the older devices, which required thoracic surgery for implantation. CONCLUSIONS: An implanted cardiac defibrillator is cost-effective in selected individuals at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos
15.
Am J Prev Med ; 14(2): 143-53, 1998 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9631167

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the accuracy of mammographic screening. DESIGN: A meta-analysis of published literature. DATA SOURCES: Published English-language randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, and demonstration projects involving screening mammography were identified using recent review articles. We found additional references using MEDLINE searches combining the MeSH terms "mammography," "screening," and/or study authors and locations. STUDY SELECTION: We included all studies that provided information to calculate the true-positive rate (TPR) and the false-positive rate (FPR) for breast cancer screening. DATA EXTRACTION: Reported data were reviewed independently by the authors; calculations were compared and discrepancies resolved. We calculated the sensitivity as the number of breast cancers detected during the first round of screening (true positives) divided by the sum of the true positives and the false negatives (defined as cancer discovered within 1 year of screening). False-positives were determined by biopsy. DATA SYNTHESIS: TPR and FPR values from each study were plotted in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) space. Tests of homogeneity were performed to assess the validity of using summary ROC curves or a single point to summarize the data. The reported TPR and FPR of mammography ranged from 83% to 95% and 0.9% to 6.5%, respectively. The sensitivity of mammography is higher in women over the age of 50 years. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of mammography should be recognized and included in discussions about policies for screening for breast cancer. This meta-analysis, by quantifying the expected TPR/FPR, should assist program planners, physicians, and women to understand better the cost and clinical implications of such screening programs.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Mamografia/normas , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Mamografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
16.
Obstet Gynecol ; 91(4): 519-28, 1998 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9540934

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of routine antenatal varicella serologic screening of pregnant women with negative or indeterminate varicella histories. METHODS: Routine antenatal varicella screening was evaluated using a decision analytic model. Outcomes were varicella cases, deaths, and life-years. Probabilities were derived from the literature, and sensitivity analysis was performed when data were imprecise or subject to variation. The analysis was repeated to include the effect of a policy of routine screening and vaccination of all adults. RESULTS: Routine antenatal varicella screening of history-negative women was not cost-effective unless the cost of screening was decreased six-fold, varicella exposure rates were greater than 6%, or there was a greater than three-fold decrease in varicella exposure in women testing nonimmune compared with unscreened women. These results were not sensitive to alterations in varicella-zoster immunoglobulin (Ig) effectiveness, varicella communicability, rates and timing of contact reporting, costs (per case, pneumonia, and death), or serologic test performance. If performed as part of a policy of universal screening of all history-negative adults (with vaccination of the majority of those testing nonimmune), routine antenatal varicella testing became cost-effective. CONCLUSION: Routine antenatal varicella screening of all pregnant women with negative or indeterminate varicella histories is not cost-effective. It could be cost-effective in groups of women with increased exposure risk, or if part of a policy of screening and vaccination of all adults.


Assuntos
Varicela/prevenção & controle , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais/análise , Varicela/economia , Varicela/imunologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Herpesvirus Humano 3/imunologia , Humanos , Imunoglobulinas , Gravidez , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/economia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/imunologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
17.
Arch Neurol ; 55(1): 25-32, 1998 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9443708

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the patterns of inpatient care and patient characteristics have changed for patients undergoing a carotid endarterectomy across a group of academic medical centers from 1990 through 1995. If changes occurred, we investigated whether they had an impact on patient outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of patients undergoing a carotid endarterectomy using a hospital discharge data set compiled by the Academic Medical Center Consortium. SETTING: Ten academic medical centers. PATIENTS: A total of 7019 hospital admissions for patients who had 1 carotid endarterectomy performed as a principal procedure from January 1990 to December 1995. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Trends in patient demographics, comorbidities, length of stay, days in the intensive care unit, and inpatient cerebral arteriogram use were determined. Patient outcomes included inpatient mortality, discharge to an institution, 30-day readmission rate, and selected diagnoses (postoperative hemorrhage, infection, or seizure; acute myocardial infarction; or cranial nerve palsy) and postprocedure diagnostic tests (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the head and electroencephalogram) indicative of complications. RESULTS: Over the 6-year study period, the number of carotid endarterectomies performed more than doubled and the percentage of hospital admissions for patients 65 years or older increased from 65% to 75%. The mean and median length of stay halved and the percentage of admissions with transfers to the intensive care unit decreased from 56% to 26% of cases. In addition, the percentage of cases with a cerebral arteriogram during the same admission but prior to the day of the carotid endarterectomy decreased from 52% to 27%. There were no trends in inpatient mortality, discharge to an institution, or 30-day readmission rate. There were no significant trends indicative of poorer quality of care as measured by the frequency of secondary diagnoses or postprocedure diagnostic test use. CONCLUSIONS: Despite dramatic changes that have occurred in patient characteristics and in hospital management practices for patients undergoing a carotid endarterectomy from 1990 to 1995, we were unable to detect any measurable impact on patient outcomes. These data have implications for monitoring and evaluating the impact of systemwide change on the overall quality of care for patients undergoing a carotid endarterectomy.


Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Angiografia Cerebral , Comorbidade , Demografia , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/mortalidade , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
20.
Am J Crit Care ; 6(5): 393-9, 1997 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9283677

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare levels of nurse-physician collaboration and satisfaction with the decision-making process as reported by critical care nurses, resident physicians (residents), and attending physicians (attendings) in making decisions to transfer individual patients out of the critical care unit, and to assess if satisfaction predicts nurse retention. DESIGN: Longitudinal descriptive correlational study using self-reporting instruments. SETTINGS: A university hospital's surgical ICU, a community teaching hospital's medical ICU, and a community hospital's mixed ICU. SUBJECTS: Eighty-one nurses, 23 residents, and 37 attendings from the surgical ICU; 44 nurses and 51 residents from the medical ICU; 25 nurses and 45 attendings from the community hospital's ICU, reporting on the transfers of 473, 465, and 494 patients, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Healthcare providers' reported levels of collaboration and satisfaction with the decision-making process, the correlations between collaboration and satisfaction, and nurse retention. RESULTS: Nurses and physicians within sites (except attendings from the surgical ICU) reported similarly moderate amounts of collaboration, but nurses reported less satisfaction with decision making than did physicians in all sites. Collaboration was related to satisfaction with decision making for all providers, but more strongly for nurses. The strength of the relationship for nurses was similar in all sites. Nurses' satisfaction with decision making did not predict their retention. CONCLUSIONS: Collaboration between nurses and physicians is a more important component of satisfaction with decision making for nurses than for physicians. Any interventions to change the amount of collaboration in practice must take account of this difference.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos , Tomada de Decisões , Relações Médico-Enfermeiro , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...