Factors Affecting Non-Histologically Proven Invasive Cancer of the Uterine Cervix that Had an Abnormal Pap Smear: Results of the CCS Program.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer (CC) ranks fourth among cancers diagnosed around the world, but early detection and treatment can reduce invasive cervical cancer and mortality. Screening programs (CCSP), such as the one covering Thailand's 75 provinces, use histology to confirm cases. The study determined the incidence rate (IR) and investigated the factors associated with non-histologically proven invasive cancer of the uterine cervix (non-HPICUC) with an abnormal pap smear from the CCSP at Mahasarakham Hospital, Thailand. METHODS: The CCSP was used to analyse a retrospective cohort of 288 women between 30 and 60 years of age. All abnormal pap smears were followed up until April 30, 2022. We estimated the IR and assessed the relationship between various independent variables and non-HPICUC using the generalised linear model (GLM) for testing association data. We reported the adjusted RR and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). RESULTS: 260 non-HPICUC cases had abnormal CCSP pap smears for an overall IR of 90.0 (95% CI: 86.3 - 93.2). After adjusting the model for all variables, age at recruitment and pregnancy had a statistically significant association with non-HPICUC (p-value < 0.05). We found that the risk of non-HPICUC increased 1.02 times for every 20-year increment in age compared to below that age (adjusted RR=1.02, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.04). Pregnancy at risk for non-HPICUC was 0.89 times compared to non-pregnancy (adjusted RR=0.89, 95% CI: 0.80 - 0.99). Pathological vaginal discharge (PVD) did not have a statistically significant association with non-HPICUC (p-value = 0.094); notwithstanding, women with PVD had 1.08 times the risk of non-HPICUC compared to women without PVD (adjusted RR=1.08, 95% CI: 0.97 - 1.20). CONCLUSIONS: Based on an abnormal pap smear from the CCS Program at Mahasarakham Hospital Thailand, age and pregnancy are associated with an increased risk of non-HPICUC. High-risk groups with abnormal pap smears should be targeted for CC campaigns.

Outcomes of Treatment, Survival Rates, and Factors related to Survival of Stage III Lung Cancer Patients Treated at Srinagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of death worldwide. Stage III lung cancer (Stage III-LC) is characterized by local metastasis. The treatments for LC differ at each stage, while for stage IIIA and IIIB treatment various approaches have been tried with uncertain results. We determined the survival time of Stage III-LC patient and compared survival among multiple factors. METHODS: Data were collected from the Srinagarind Hospital-Based Cancer Registry (2014 - 2019). 324 patients from Srinagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand, were followed up until December 31, 2021. The survival rate was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and the Log-rank test. In addition, hazard ratios (HR) and the 95% CI were estimated using Cox regression. RESULTS: Of the 324 Stage III-LC patients, the total follow-up time was 447.3 person-years, and 288 cases died during the study, for a mortality rate of 64.4 per 100 person-years (95% CI: 57.40-72.27). The respective 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate was 44.1% (95% CI: 38.67-49.45), 16.2 (95% CI: 12.34-20.51), and 9.3 (95% CI: 6.14-13.31). The median survival time was 0.84 years (10.1 months) (95% CI: 0.73-1.00). After adjusting for sex and stage of disease, sequential chemoradiotherapy (SC) represented the most independent predictor of the risk of death (adjusted HR= 1.58; 95% CI: 1.41-2.18). Females had a mortality risk of 0.74-fold compared to males (adjusted HR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57-0.95). Stage of disease and stages IIIB and III (unknown and undefined) had a respective 1.33-fold (adjusted HR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.00-1.84) and 1.48-fold (adjusted HR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.09-2.00) risk of death compared to stage IIIA. CONCLUSION: Sex, stage of disease, and SC were related to stage III-LC survival, so physicians should emphasize combination therapy. Further research should focus on combination therapy and survival among Stage III-LC patients.

Lung Cancer Survival with Current Therapies and New Targeted Treatments: A Comprehensive Update from the Srinagarind Hospital-Based Cancer Registry from (2013 to 2017).

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer (LC) is a common malignancy and leading cause of cancer death worldwide and in Thailand. An update on LC survival factors after diagnosis at Srinagarind Hospital is needed. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study, and the data were sourced from the Srinagarind Hospital-Based Cancer Registry. All LC cases were diagnosed between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2017, and followed up until November 30, 2019. Cases of LC (ICD-O-3) numbered 2,149, but only those with coding C34.0-C34.9 were included. The survival rate was estimated using Kaplan-Meier, while the Log-rank test was used to estimate survival. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS: The 2,149 patients had a total follow-up of 269.6 person-years. Overall, 1,867 patients died during the study, for a corresponding case-fatality mortality rate of 86.0 per 100 person-years. The respective 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate was 31.2 % (95% CI; 29.21 to 33.15%), 12.9 % (95%CI: 11.49 to 14.45), and 10.2% (95%CI: 8.74 to 11.70). After patient diagnosis, the median survival time was 0.46 years (5.51 months) (95% CI: 0.42 to 0.50). Targeted therapy was associated with longer survival than non-targeted therapy (p-value < 0.001). After adjusting for sex, TNM stage, and histologic type, multivariable analysis of the entire cohort identified chemotherapy as an independent predictor of improved survival (adjusted HR= 0.48; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.55; P < 0.001), and that sex, TNM stage, and histologic type were associated with survival. CONCLUSION: The study confirmed that sex, stage of disease, histology, and chemotherapy are associated with survival of LC. Primary prevention and screening for early detection improve survival. Further investigations into factors affecting survival of LC in Northeast Thailand should focus on targeted therapy.
.