RESUMO
To determine whether quantitative computed tomography (qCT)-derived metrics of pulmonary vascular volume distribution could distinguish chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) subjects with associated pulmonary hypertension (PH) from those without and to characterize associations of these measurements with clinical and physiological characteristics and outcomes. We collected retrospective CT, pulmonary hemodynamic, clinical, and outcomes data from subjects with COPD and right-heart catheterization-confirmed PH (PH-COPD) and control subjects with COPD but without PH. We measured the volumes of pulmonary vessels < 5 and >10 mm2 in cross-sectional area as a percentage of total pulmonary vascular volume (qCT-derived volume of pulmonary vessels < 5 mm2 in cross-sectional area as a volume fraction of total pulmonary blood volume [BV5%] and qCT-derived volume of pulmonary vessels > 10 mm2 in cross-sectional area [BV10] as a volume fraction of total pulmonary blood volume [BV10%], respectively) using Functional Respiratory Imaging (FRI), an automated qCT platform, and compared them between PH and control arms and between subjects with mild-moderate PH and those with severe disease. Correlations of hemodynamics with pulmonary function and associations with survival were tested. Forty-five PH-COPD and 42 control subjects were studied. BV5% was lower in PH subjects (32.2% vs. 37.7%, p = 0.003), and BV10% was higher (50.2% vs. 43.5, p = 0.001). Subjects with severe PH did not differ from those with mild-moderate PH in qCT. Pulmonary vascular volumes were not associated with pulmonary function. BV10 was associated with mean pulmonary artery pressure (r = 0.3, p = 0.05). Associations with survival were observed for BV5% (hazard ratio 0.63, p = 0.02) and BV10% (hazard ratio 1.43, p = 0.03) in the PH-COPD arm, but not for controls. qCT-derived measures of pulmonary vascular volume may have diagnostic and prognostic significance in PH-COPD and should be investigated further as screening and risk stratification tools.
RESUMO
We compared the performance and levofloxacin (Quinsair) lung deposition of three nebulisers commonly used in CF (I-Neb Advance, eFlow rapid, and LC Plus) with the approved nebuliser Zirela. The delivered dose, delivery rate, and aerosol particle size distribution (APSD) for each device were determined using the methods described in the Pharmacopeia. High-resolution computed tomography scans obtained from seven adult patients with mild CF were used to generate computer-aided, three-dimensional models of their airway tree to assess lung deposition using functional respiratory imaging (FRI). The eFlow rapid and the LC Plus showed poor delivery efficiencies due to their high residual volumes. The I-Neb, which only delivers aerosols during the inspiratory phase, achieved the highest aerosol delivery efficiency. However, the I-Neb showed the largest particle size and lowest delivery rate (2.9 mg/min), which were respectively associated with a high extrathoracic deposition and extremely long nebulisation times (>20 min). Zirela showed the best performance considering delivery efficiency (159.6 mg out of a nominal dose of 240 mg), delivery rate (43.5 mg/min), and lung deposition (20% of the nominal dose), requiring less than 5 min to deliver a full dose of levofloxacin. The present study supports the use of drug-specific nebulisers and discourages the off-label use of general-purpose devices with the present levofloxacin formulation since subtherapeutic lung doses and long nebulisation times may compromise treatment efficacy and adherence.
