[Water birthing: retrospective review of 2625 water births. Contamination of birth pool water and risk of microbial cross-infection]. / Partorire in acqua: esperienza dopo 2.625 parti in acqua. Contaminazione dell'acqua nella vasca da parto e rischio di infezione con diversi microrganismi.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to document the practice of 2625 water births at Vipiteno over the period 1997-2009 and compare outcome and safety with normal vaginal delivery. The microbial load of the birth pool water was analyzed, and neonatal infection rates after water birth and after land delivery were compared. Methods. The variables analyzed in the 1152 primiparae were: length of labor; incidence of episiotomies and tears; arterial cord blood pH and base excess values; percentage of pH<7.10 and base excess values >/=12 mmol/L. In all 2625 water births, the variables were: analgesic requirements; shoulder dystocia/ neonatal complications; and deliveries after a previous caesarean section. Bacterial cultures of water samples obtained from the bath after filling (sample A) and after delivery (sample B) were analyzed in 300 cases. The pediatricians recorded signs of suspected neonatal infection after water birth and after conventional vaginal delivery. RESULTS: There was a marked reduction in labor duration in the primiparae who birthed in water; the episiotomy rate was 0.46%. Owing to the pain relieving effect of the warm birth pool water, pain relievers (opiates) were required in only 12.9% of water births. Arterial cord blood pH and base excess values were comparable in both groups. Shoulder dystocia/neonatal complications were managed in 4 water births; 105 women with a previous caesarean section had a water birth. In sample A, the isolated micro-organisms were Legionella spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa; in sample B, there was elevated colonization of birth pool water by total coliform bacilli and Escherichia coli. Despite microbial contamination of birth pool water during delivery, antibiotic prophylaxis, as indicated by clinical and laboratory suspicion of infection, was administered to only 0.98% of babies after water birth versus 1.64% of those after land delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest clear medical advantages of water birthing: significantly shorter labor duration among the primiparae; a net reduction in episiotomy rates; and a marked drop in requests for pain relievers. During expulsion of the fetus at delivery, fecal matter is released into the birth pool water, contaminating it with micro-organisms. Despite this, water birthing was found to be safe for the neonate and did not carry a higher risk of neonatal infection when compared with conventional vaginal delivery.

Epilepsy in patients with propionic acidemia.

Propionic acidemia (PA) is an autosomal recessively inherited defect of propionyl-CoA carboxylase with an incidence of approximately 1:50 000. There are few reports on the occurrence of EEG findings and development of epilepsy in patients with PA. Retrospectively, the data of 17 patients with PA from one Italian and four Austrian centers were evaluated concerning EEG findings and the development of epilepsy. Nine patients showed a disturbance of background activity, as well as epileptiform discharges. All nine patients with pathological EEG discharges developed seizures compatible with the definition of symptomatic epilepsy. Five of these nine patients showed fever induced seizures at the beginning. Two of them suffered from symptomatic absence epilepsy. Six of the nine patients with seizures were treated with antiepileptic drugs (AED), which were tolerated without side-effects. Four patients showed photosensitivity, which so far has never been reported in PA. We hypothesize that patients with PA are prone to cortical dysfunction caused by one or several pathological metabolites - leading to changes in background and epileptiform activity with a high manifestation rate of clinical seizures.