Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 75
Filtrar
3.
Br J Dermatol ; 2024 Sep 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39236226

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common inflammatory skin condition which affects all ages. New therapies, including the monoclonal antibody therapy dupilumab, offer excellent efficacy. However, in clinical trials, and emphasised in real-world observations, the unexpected increased frequency of ocular adverse effects became apparent. The effectiveness of dupilumab and the unpredictability of ocular adverse effects mean that clinicians need guidance on counselling patients prior to treatment and on managing them if they arise. OBJECTIVES: The British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) and Royal College of Ophthalmologists collaborated on this consensus guidance on managing dupilumab-related ocular surface disorders (DROSD). METHODS: A multidisciplinary group was formed of adult and paediatric dermatologists and ophthalmologists with DROSD expertise, patient representation, and BAD Clinical Standards Unit. A literature search was conducted, and the results reviewed. All recommendations were reviewed, discussed and voted on. RESULTS: The recommendations pertain to dermatology and ophthalmology management, and apply to all ages, unless otherwise stated. Importantly, initiation of dupilumab for AD should not be delayed for most eye disorders except acute new problems, e.g. infections, or potentially severe conditions, e.g. a history of corneal transplant (ophthalmology advice should be sought first). There is insufficient evidence to recommend lubricant drops prophylactically. Dermatologists should assess eye complaints to diagnose DROSD; a severity grading system is provided. DROSD management differs slightly in those aged <7 years as ocular complications may affect neuro-ocular development; therefore, irrespective of DROSD severity, this population should be referred for ophthalmology advice. In those aged ≥7 years, dermatologists should feel confident to trial treatment and reserve ophthalmology advice for severe or non-responding cases. Discussion about dupilumab withdrawal should be prompted by a significant impact on quality of life, threat to sight, or other complications. CONCLUSIONS: Although dupilumab is a highly effective agent for treating AD, the risk of ocular adverse effects should not inhibit clinicians or patients from using it, but clinicians should be aware of them. If a patient develops DROSD, there are clear pathways to assess severity and offer initial management; where ineffective, dermatologists should assess the urgency and seek advice from or initiate referral to ophthalmology. While the evidence reviewed for these guidelines reflects the extensive literature on dupilumab, we believe our advice has relevance for ocular surface disorders in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients treated with tralokinumab and lebrikizumab.

4.
Data Brief ; 53: 110079, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38328282

RESUMO

Butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea L.) is a horticultural crop also known as underutilized crop. All parts of the butterfly pea can be used into various products including flowers that can be used as natural dyes and traditional medicines. Besides that, the plant parts can be used as fodder and cover crop. The development of butterfly pea in Indonesia is still very low both in cultivation and utilization. Therefore, a breeding program is required to increase usefulness of butterfly pea can be done for the development. To assemble superior varieties of butterfly pea, it is necessary to determine the genetic diversity of both in agronomy and morphology. Genetic diversity and relationships are needed to evaluate plant germplasm. Raw data analysis was conducted after standardization using Principal Componet Analysis (PCA) and Hierarchical Clustering Analysis (HCA) to determine phenotypic diversity and relationship among the newly collected genetic resources. The data in this article showed broad phenotypic diversity with weight of fresh flower per plant, seed color, weight of total seed, pod width, calix length, flower color, petal number, number of total pods, plant height, number of seed per pod, weight total fresh flower, seed width, weight of fresh flower per plant, and seed length as distinguishing traits among the accessions. PCA based on agromorphogical traits showed eigenvalue ranged from 1.13 to 9.47 with a cumulative contribution of 93.02%. HCA showed butterfly pea accessions divided into two cluster with euclidean distance 0.27-4.65.

5.
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc ; 311: 123977, 2024 Apr 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38310743

RESUMO

A rapid, simple, sensitive, and selective point-of-care diagnosis tool kit is vital for detecting the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) based on the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) strain. Currently, the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the best technique to detect the disease. Although a good sensitivity has been observed in RT-PCR, the isolation and screening process for high sample volume is limited due to the time-consuming and laborious work. This study introduced a nucleic acid-based surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) sensor to detect the nucleocapsid gene (N-gene) of SARS-CoV-2. The Raman scattering signal was amplified using gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) possessing a rod-like morphology to improve the SERS effect, which was approximately 12-15 nm in diameter and 40-50 nm in length. These nanoparticles were functionalised with the single-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (ssDNA) complemented with the N-gene. Furthermore, the study demonstrates method selectivity by strategically testing the same virus genome at different locations. This focused approach showcases the method's capability to discern specific genetic variations, ensuring accuracy in viral detection. A multivariate statistical analysis technique was then applied to analyse the raw SERS spectra data using the principal component analysis (PCA). An acceptable variance amount was demonstrated by the overall variance (82.4 %) for PC1 and PC2, which exceeded the desired value of 80 %. These results successfully revealed the hidden information in the raw SERS spectra data. The outcome suggested a more significant thymine base detection than other nitrogenous bases at wavenumbers 613, 779, 1219, 1345, and 1382 cm-1. Adenine was also less observed at 734 cm-1, and ssDNA-RNA hybridisations were presented in the ketone with amino base SERS bands in 1746, 1815, 1871, and 1971 cm-1 of the fingerprint. Overall, the N-gene could be detected as low as 0.1 nM within 10 mins of incubation time. This approach could be developed as an alternative point-of-care diagnosis tool kit to detect and monitor the COVID-19 disease.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Nanopartículas Metálicas , Nanotubos , Ácidos Nucleicos , Humanos , Análise Espectral Raman/métodos , Ouro , Análise de Componente Principal , SARS-CoV-2/genética , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Nucleocapsídeo
6.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 49(8): 810-816, 2024 Jul 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38245826

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: UK guidelines for managing adults with Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN), published by the British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) in 2016, outline a set of audit standards. OBJECTIVES: To audit current management of SJS/TEN in adults against standards in the BAD guidelines. METHODS: BAD members were invited to submit data on five consecutive adults with SJS/TEN per department over an 8-week period in 2022. RESULTS: Thirty-nine dermatology centres in the UK (29%) participated, and data for 147 adults with SJS/TEN were collected. Within 24 h of the diagnosis being made or suspected, the following were documented, per 147 submitted cases: Severity-of-Illness Score for Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (SCORTEN) for 76 (52%), list of medications for 113 (77%) and timelines for commencement/alterations of medications for 104 (71%). The initial assessment was documented of the eyes by an ophthalmologist in 71 (48%), of the mouth in 130 (88%), of the genital skin in 103 (70%) and of the urinary tract in 93 (63%). During the first 10 days after a suspected or confirmed diagnosis of SJS/TEN, daily assessments of the mouth were documented in 26 of 147 cases (18%), of the eyes in 12 (8%), and of the urinary tract and genital skin in 14 (10%). At discharge, a drug was declared to be the cause of SJS/TEN for 130 of 147 cases (88%), while 9 (6%) were thought to be secondary to infection. Eleven of 147 (8%) had no response to this question. Documentation regarding advice was present on avoidance of the culprit drug in 76 of 130 declared SJS/TEN cases (58%), and on requesting a MedicAlert® bracelet/amulet in 9 of the 147 cases (6%). CONCLUSIONS: This audit suggests that a clinical review checklist might be needed to enable colleagues to maintain standards outlined in the guidelines, including documentation of SCORTEN, daily assessments of mucosal areas, and advice to avoid culprit drug(s) and to request a MedicAlert® bracelet/amulet.


Assuntos
Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/terapia , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/diagnóstico , Humanos , Adulto , Reino Unido , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Auditoria Clínica , Idoso , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto Jovem , Dermatologia/normas , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
9.
Br J Dermatol ; 188(3): 311-312, 2023 02 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36640124
10.
Br J Dermatol ; 187(4): 472-480, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35582951

RESUMO

The overall objective of the guideline is to provide up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for the management of delusional infestation (DI) in adults. Linked Comment: I. Coulson. Br J Dermatol 2022; 187:457.


Assuntos
Delírio de Parasitose , Dermatologistas , Adulto , Delírio de Parasitose/diagnóstico , Delírio de Parasitose/terapia , Humanos
13.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 47(4): 684-691, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34854104

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) develops and produces patient information leaflets (PILs) for British clinicians and the general public, and its website provides access to all the PILs. Health literacy across the UK remains variable. Readability instruments assess the comprehensibility of text, predominately using a composite of sentence length and/or word-syllable number. Instruments usually report text readability categorized by United States (US) grades; ideally, health literature should be rated at US grade ≤ 6 (UK Year 7; age 11-12 years). METHODS: In collaboration with the BAD, PILs on the BAD website (n = 203) were downloaded for readability assessment. PILs were processed prior to analysis using Readability Studio software (Oleander Software, Vandalia, OH, USA). Established readability metrics were used: Flesch-Kincaid (FK), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Gunning fog index (GFI), Fry, FORCAST and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE). RESULTS: The mean (95% CI) US grade levels for all BAD PILs were: 9.8 (9.7-10.0) for FK, 12.1 (12.0-12.3) for SMOG, 11.8 (11.6-11.9) for GFI, 11.5 (11.1-11.8) for Fry and 10.7 (10.6-10.8) for FORCAST. For FRE, the level is reported from a normal spectrum of 0-100, and was found to be 52.2 (95% CI 34.0-78.0) in this study. In the UK context, the mean readability levels of the BAD PILs were rated as Year 10 (age 14-15 years) for FK and Year 13 (aged 17-18 years) for SMOG. For FK, outputs, only 1.0% of PILs (2 of 203) were the recommended US grade ≤ 6 according to FK, and for SMOG rating, none was rated at this level. DISCUSSION: The majority of BAD PILs have been written at a level that will be challenging for some patients to read. Reducing sentence length and aiming for shorter words will improve accessibility.


Assuntos
Compreensão , Letramento em Saúde , Adolescente , Criança , Dermatologistas , Humanos , Internet , Publicações , Leitura , Estados Unidos , Redação
19.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 46(6): 1023-1027, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33577133

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The first UK guidelines for the management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) were published by the British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) in 2018. The guidelines contained a set of audit criteria. AIM: To evaluate current HS management against the audit standards in the BAD guidelines. METHODS: BAD members were invited to complete audit questionnaires between January and May 2020 for five consecutive patients with HS per department. RESULTS: In total, 88 centres participated, providing data for 406 patients. Disease staging using the Hurley system and disease severity using a validated tool during follow-ups was documented in 75% and 56% of cases, respectively, while quality of life and pain were documented in 49% and 50% of cases, respectively. Screening for cardiovascular disease risk factors was as follows: smoking 75%, body mass index 27% and others such as lipids and diabetes 57%. Screening for depression and anxiety was performed in 40% and 25% of cases, respectively. Support for smokers or obese patients was documented in 35% and 23% of cases. In total, 182 patients were on adalimumab, of whom 68% had documentation of baseline disease severity, and 76% were reported as having inadequate response or contraindications to systemic treatments; 44% of patients continued on adalimumab despite having < 25% improvement in lesion count. CONCLUSION: UK dermatologists performed well against several audit standards, including documenting disease staging at baseline and smoking status. However, improvements are needed, particularly with regard to screening and management of comorbidities that could reduce the long-term complications associated with HS. A re-audit is required to evaluate changes in practice in the future.


Assuntos
Auditoria Clínica , Hidradenite Supurativa/diagnóstico , Hidradenite Supurativa/tratamento farmacológico , Adalimumab/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Índice de Massa Corporal , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Hidradenite Supurativa/complicações , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Tetraciclinas/uso terapêutico , Reino Unido
20.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 46(1): 147-152, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32790078

RESUMO

This study summarizes the use, since its inception, of the Cutaneous Lupus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) as an outcome measure in clinical studies. We systematically searched the MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases for papers including the term 'cutaneous lupus disease area and severity index' and its abbreviations up to August 2017, identifying 205 abstracts. Following shortlisting, two independent physicians critically reviewed 71 papers for data extraction. We found that a limited number of high-quality studies used the CLASI scoring as an outcome measure. We concluded that further validation is necessary to identify the effectiveness of the CLASI in the assessment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus subtypes. The use of standardized core patient- and physician-reported outcome measures may reduce heterogeneity and allow comparisons between patients enrolled in clinical trials. This would improve the relevance within clinical practice, where the use of CLASI is currently limited.


Assuntos
Lúpus Eritematoso Cutâneo , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA