Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 21(5): 687-691, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30284234

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This study analyzes the prevalence of malnutrition, depression, anxiety, and somatization and which factor has the biggest effect on quality of life (QoL) in individuals with resected cancer. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted among 747 participants. Participants completed the EORTC-QLQ30, MST, and BSI-18 questionnaires. RESULTS: Prevalence for risk of malnutrition, depression, anxiety, and somatization were 36.4%, 35.5%, 35.2%, and 48.8%, respectively. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed that malnutrition risk, somatization, depression, and anxiety accounted for 50.8% of the variance in functional scale, 45.3% in symptom scale, and 52.2% in global health. Malnutrition, somatization, depression, and anxiety displayed high explanatory power on all health-related QoL (HRQoL) scales. CONCLUSION: The risk of malnutrition and psychological symptoms is strongly associated with HRQoL in cancer patients; thus, medical oncologists should develop effective interventions that contribute to lowering the risk of malnutrition and psychological distress, thereby improving subjects' HRQoL before initiating adjuvant chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Desnutrição/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ansiedade/etiologia , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/etiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Desnutrição/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Espanha/epidemiologia , Estresse Psicológico/etiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 20(11): 1392-1399, nov. 2018. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-173729

RESUMO

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze differences in physician and patient satisfaction in shared decision-making (SDM); patients’ emotional distress, and coping in subjects with resected, non-metastatic cancer. Methods: 602 patients from 14 hospitals in Spain were surveyed. Information was collected regarding physician and patient satisfaction with SDM, participants’ emotional distress and coping, as well as patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics by means of specific, validated questionnaires. Results: Overall, 11% of physicians and 19% of patients were dissatisfied with SDM; 22% of patients presented hopelessness or anxious preoccupation as coping strategies, and 56% presented emotional distress. By gender, female patients showed a higher prevalence of dissatisfaction with SDM (23 vs 14%), anxious preoccupation (26 vs 17%), and emotional distress (63 vs 44%) than males. Hopelessness was more prevalent in individuals with stage III disease than those with stages I-II (28 vs 18%). Conclusion: Physicians must be mindful of the importance of emotional support and individual characteristics when communicating treatment options, benefits, and adverse effects of each alternative to oncological patients


No disponible


Assuntos
Humanos , Relações Médico-Paciente , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/psicologia , Neoplasias/psicologia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Participação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 20(11): 1392-1399, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29611043

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze differences in physician and patient satisfaction in shared decision-making (SDM); patients' emotional distress, and coping in subjects with resected, non-metastatic cancer. METHODS: 602 patients from 14 hospitals in Spain were surveyed. Information was collected regarding physician and patient satisfaction with SDM, participants' emotional distress and coping, as well as patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics by means of specific, validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Overall, 11% of physicians and 19% of patients were dissatisfied with SDM; 22% of patients presented hopelessness or anxious preoccupation as coping strategies, and 56% presented emotional distress. By gender, female patients showed a higher prevalence of dissatisfaction with SDM (23 vs 14%), anxious preoccupation (26 vs 17%), and emotional distress (63 vs 44%) than males. Hopelessness was more prevalent in individuals with stage III disease than those with stages I-II (28 vs 18%). CONCLUSION: Physicians must be mindful of the importance of emotional support and individual characteristics when communicating treatment options, benefits, and adverse effects of each alternative to oncological patients.


Assuntos
Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Tomada de Decisões , Satisfação no Emprego , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/psicologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Oncologia/métodos , Oncologia/normas , Oncologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/psicologia , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA