Study Protocol of a Prospective, Monocentric, Single-Arm Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of Local Ablation of Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids with US-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU).

Uterine fibroids are the most common benign tumors of the uterus. Approximately 20-50% of women with myomas experience a variety of symptoms such as vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, pelvic pain and pressure, and urological problems, possibly interfering with fertility and pregnancy. Although surgery remains the standard treatment option for fibroids, non-invasive therapeutic options, such as high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), have emerged over the last dec ade. During HIFU, ultrasound is focused on the target tissue causing coagulation necrosis. HIFU has, meanwhile, become an established method for treating uterine fibroids in many countries. Clinical data have shown that it effectively alleviates fibroid-related symptoms and reduces fibroid size with a very low rate of side effects. However, there is a lack of data on how this treatment affects laboratory parameters and structural features of uterine tissue. As our center is the only one in German-speaking countries where ultrasound-guided HIFU technology is currently established, the aim of this prospective, monocentric, single-arm trial is not only to evaluate the safety and efficacy of local US-guided HIFU in symptomatic uterine fibroid patients according to GCP standards but also to explore its effects on blood parameters and the structural integrity of uterine tissue using elastographic methods.

Improvement of fibroid-associated symptoms and quality of life after US-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) of uterine fibroids.

Uterine fibroids are the most common benign uterine tumors and can cause various severe symptoms as abnormal menstrual bleeding or pelvic pain. Therefore, the primary objective in the treatment of uterine fibroids is a sufficient symptom relief. Ultrasound (US)-guided High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is an effective non-invasive treatment strategy for ablation of uterine fibroids that can achieve a significant tumor volume reduction. The aim of the study is to evaluate if US-guided HIFU treatment can reduce fibroid-associated symptoms leading to an improvement of health-related quality of life. Fifty-five women with symptomatic uterine fibroids underwent US-guided HIFU ablation. Clinical evaluation was performed on the basis of the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (UFS-QOL) at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after HIFU. Imaging follow-up included contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced MRI. A significant reduction of the Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) was observed between 6 weeks and 12 months after HIFU (49.9 ± 19.4 at baseline vs. 42.2 ± 20.1 at 6 weeks and 23.6 ± 12.7 at 12 months after treatment, p < 0.001) correlating with a significant improvement (p < 0.001) of Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) (52.5 ± 22.7 at baseline vs. 59.8 ± 22 at 6 weeks and 77.9 ± 17.3 at 12 months after treatment). Significant postinterventional improvement was observed in every subscale of HRQL. In the majority of patients, only minor, short-lasting and self-limiting side effects were observed, e.g. soft tissue edema of the anterior lower abdominal wall in the acoustic pathway or transient moderate lower abdominal pain as during menstruation. One patient with a very large fibroid experienced strong short-lasting pain after the procedure; two patients experienced post-procedurally a transient sciatic nerve irritation. US-guided HIFU of uterine fibroids reduces disease-related symptoms and improves health-related quality of life.

Prognostic Impact of Weight Change During Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: Results From the ADEBAR Study.

BACKGROUND: In addition to established prognostic factors, individual lifestyle-associated factors, such as obesity, physical activity, and diet, seem to modulate the course of breast cancer. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the influence of weight changes during adjuvant chemotherapy on outcome in a large multicenter prospectively randomized trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The ADEBAR trial compares a sequential chemotherapy consisting of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel to an epirubicin/5-fluorouracil/cyclophosphamide regimen in patients with lymph node-positive early breast cancer. Body weight was measured before each cycle of chemotherapy. According to the relative weight change (≥ 5%) between the first and the last cycle, patients were categorized into the weight gain, weight loss, or stable weight group. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were assessed by univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Concise data from 1080 of 1493 participants who completed all cycles of chemotherapy were available for analysis. Of 307 patients (24.8%) whose weight changed by ≥ 5%, 120 patients (11.1%) lost and 187 (17.3%) gained weight. Multivariate analysis showed a significant independent effect of weight change on OS (P = .039), but not on disease-free survival (P = .111). Both weight change groups had a worse OS compared to patients with stable weight (weight gain: hazard ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.40; P = .047; weight loss: hazard ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.97-2.47; P = .067). CONCLUSION: Weight change of > 5% during adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk early breast cancer is associated with poor OS.

Breast Lesions during Pregnancy - a Diagnostic Challenge: Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Palpable masses of the breast often occur during pregnancy and should be further investigated. The standard diagnostic during pregnancy is an ultrasound combined, if needed, with a core needle biopsy. Most lesions are benign in younger women but, nevertheless, the incidence of pregnancy-associated breast cancer is 1 in 3,000 deliveries and rising. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 24-year-old patient diagnosed with a palpable breast lesion at 37 weeks of gestation. An ultrasound was performed and the lesion was rated BI-RADS 4. The initial core needle biopsy showed a ductal carcinoma in situ. After delivery and ablactating, a mammography, breast magnetic resonance imaging and a second ultrasound-guided biopsy was performed. Due to the inconclusive imaging and histological results, a wide excision was performed and a juvenile papillomatosis was confirmed. No further resection was necessary as the initial margins were sufficient. CONCLUSION: This case suggests that the diagnosis of masses of the breast during pregnancy and lactation can be quite difficult. Diagnosis should be confirmed by an excision biopsy and by histological examination through an experienced pathologist. As a significant proportion of papillomas contain malignant regions, an argument exists for the complete excision of all papillary tumours.