RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In Kenya, there is a lack of data on the number of people with dementia. In this article, we aim to estimate the number of community-dwelling older adults (aged 60 years and above) that are potentially living with dementia in rural Kenya. METHODS: Recruitment of older adults occurred through adopting a convenience approach based on the catchment areas served by trained ten Community Health Workers (CHWs). Screening was conducted using the Brief Community Screening Instrument for Dementia (CSI-D), in which prevalence ratios were reported. Regression analyses were run to understand the association between screening outcome and wellbeing, social isolation, and employment status (adjusted for age, sex, literacy, geography, and social status). RESULTS: Of the 3,546 older adults who were screened for dementia, 652 screened positive (PR = 0.18, 95%CIs 0.17 to 0.20). Back estimating screen positives based on established sensitivity and specificity of the tool against a gold standard (clinical diagnosis), yielded a prevalence of 9.4% (0.09, 95%CIs 0.08 to 0.11). Screening positive for dementia was associated with poorer quality of life (B =-0.17, p<0.001) and loneliness (B= 0.28, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: There is potentially 258,000 older adults living with dementia in Kenya, who likely have poorer outcomes. We need to encourage a timely diagnosis and develop better ways to support people living with dementia in Kenya and other resource-limited settings.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In Kenya, there is lack of evidence on existing dementia care pathways, with minimal or no presentation for dementia-related symptoms in health care settings. Understanding the services available for people with dementia as well as how communities access the services could offer a practical pattern for policy makers to identify strategies that encourage early detection, care and support for people with dementia and their families. OBJECTIVES: To elucidate initial responses of individuals and their families to dementia and challenges encountered in help seeking through care pathways to inform dementia care-related policies and practice. METHODS: The Strengthening Responses to dementia in Developing Countries (STRiDE) Kenya team adapted case vignettes (brief hypothetical stories meant to elicit responses on how the characters would behave) developed by the entire STRiDE team. A total of 29 stakeholders were then asked to provide feedback on the completed vignettes and summarize a common pathway to dementia care in Kenya while using the proposed case vignettes. FINDINGS: We found four initial responses to dementia suspicion in Kenya where individuals:(i) Perceive symptoms as normal part of ageing, (ii) Consult a spiritual or traditional healer, (iii) Visit a private clinic or primary health care facilities, or (iv) No action taken. These were the first points within the care pathways which determined the care trajectory the person with dementia would follow. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of dementia care pathways could form a basis for improving the way communities perceive dementia etiology and establish standard pathways to care whilst ensuring that some pathways do not further pose an impediment to care and treatment for dementia.
