Correlation of IL36RN and CARD14 mutations with clinical manifestations and laboratory findings in patients with generalised pustular psoriasis.

Background Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a chronic disease associated with genetic factors related to mutations of the interleukin 36 receptor antagonist gene (IL36RN) and the caspase recruitment domain 14 gene (CARD14). However, the relevance of these mutations to the clinical features and severity of GPP remains unclear. Aims Our objective was to correlate the presence of IL36RN and CARD14 mutations with the clinical and laboratory findings in patients with GPP. Methods This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in 64 subjects with GPP. Clinical manifestations were recorded and the severity was graded as mild, moderate, or severe. Routine laboratory tests were performed and blood samples were collected for Sanger sequencing. The clinical data of patients were compared among the different mutation groups. Results The two main variants of IL36RN were c.115+6T > C (p.Arg10ArgfsX1) and c.227C > T (p.Pro76Leu). The major CARD14 mutations were c.2458C > T (p.Arg820Trp), c.1641C > T (p.Arg547Ser), and c.1753G > A transitions. Provocative factors were uncommon in the group with both IL36RN and CARD14 mutations. Drugs (unspecified), especially herbals, were the most common triggers. A history of psoriasis was frequent in patients with only CARD14 mutations, but fever was uncommon. The c.1641C > T mutation was associated with leukocytosis > 15000/mm3 and the c.1753G > A mutation was associated with hypoalbuminemia <3.8g/dL. Both the c.115+6T > C and c.227C > T variants of IL36RN were associated with fever ≥38.5°C while the c.115+6T > C variant was also associated with geographic tongue. No gene mutations were associated with the total severity and severity grades. Limitations Four patients without the two major IL36RN mutations were excluded from the study. Conclusion The presence of IL36RN and CARD14 mutations were associated with a history of psoriasis, various provocative factors, fever, leukocytosis, hypoalbuminemia, and geographic tongue. Further studies to explore the role of these mutations in therapeutic efficacy and disease outcomes are necessary.

Bosentan versus nifedipine in the treatment of vasculopathy in systemic sclerosis patients: A randomized control trial.

BACKGROUND: Bosentan is effective agent in scleroderma vasculopathy. However, there are no studies evaluating effectiveness of bosentan in Vietnamese patients, where nifedipine is still the common treatment. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of bosentan versus nifedipine in scleroderma vasculopathy in Vietnamese patients. METHODS: We randomly assigned 70 patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral bosentan or oral nifedipine for 16 weeks, respectively. The primary outcomes were the change in Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS), appearance of new digital ulcers (DUs) and change in World Health Organization (WHO) functional class. Secondary outcomes were the change in the nailfold capillaries disease stage and systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) value. RESULTS: At week 16, patients in bosentan group had no RCS imprvement, the mean difference was 0.8 ± 0.2 (95% CI, 0.4 to 1.1, p < 0.001) and improved WHO functional class, a mean treatment effect of 35.6% in favor of bosentan (95% CI, 13.4 to 57.7%, p < 0.05). Bosentan treatment was associated with a 58% reduction in the number of new DUs compared with nifedipine (mean ± standard error: 0.22 ± 0.42 vs 0.52 ± 0.59 new DUs, p < 0.05). sPAP was decreased by 4.1 ± 3.8 mmHg (95% CI, 3.0 to 5.3, p < 0.001) in bosentan group, versus 1.0 ± 2.9 mmHg (95% CI, -0.2 to 2.1, p > 0.05) in nifedipine group. Headache was the most common adverse event in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bosentan significantly limited the occurrence of new DUs, reduced symptoms of pulmonary arterial hypertension and sPAP value and all were better than nifedipine.