[Familial left ventricular noncompaction: phenotypes and clinical course. Results of the multicenter registry].

AIM: To analyze and demonstrate various phenotypes in patients with familial left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2013 was created a multicenter registry of LVNC patients. On its basis 30 families with a familial LVNC were selected. RESULTS: 30 LVNC families were selected from the register. From a total of 115 people (probands and relatives) in 71 (61.7%) LVNC was diagnosed (30 probands and 41 relatives with non-compact myocardial criteria). The most common type of remodeling in patients was the dilated type (DT) (n=30), the isolated LVNC with preserved ejection fraction (EF) was slightly less common (n=23), and the hypertrophic type (GT) was detected in 8 patients. 4 patients were diagnosed with the isolated LVNC with a reduced EF. 3 patients were with a combination of non-compact myocardium with congenital heart disease and with a combination of DT and GT (DT+GT). During the analysis of cases a combination of different phenotypes in the same family was observed. The largest number of families was diagnosed with a combination of DT and the isolated LVNC with preserved EF. The development of cardiovascular complications was associated with DT. CONCLUSION: Family cases of LVNC had different types of myocardial remodeling and variants of clinical course. In one family a combination of different types of left ventricular remodeling is possible. DT is associated with the most severe clinical manifestations. The clinical picture of the isolated LVNC with preserved EF, is the most favorable, but in rare cases, serious clinical manifestations were observed.

[Telemonitoring in patients with chronic heart failure].

Actuality. High risk of hospitalisation and death in patients with heart failure highlight the importance of developing methods to moni­ tor weight, diuresis, heart rate and other parameters and provide the physicians with an ability to change the therapy immediately if needed. The aim of this work is an analysis of clinical trials which investigate telemonitoring in patients with heart failure. Discussion. The Cochrane meta-analysis is also discussed in this work. Main conclusions. Our analysis showed that there is no consistency among trials. Not all trials have demonstrated that telemonitoring can reduce the risk of death and heart failure hospitalisations. Potentials explanations are lack of compliance with systems which didn't include the direct contact between the patient and the caregivers, using parameters with low sensitivity in some of the methods and including of stable patients in some of the studies. It is also seeming that effect of telemonitoring is low in regions with existing programs to treat heart failure.

[Diagnostic Value of Biochemical Markers in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced, Borderline and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction].

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The study of the diagnostic value of biochemical markers of myocardial stress and inflammation in chronic heart failure (CHF) with different values of the ejection fraction (EF) of the left ventricle (LV). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The cross-sectional study included 105 patients aged 24 to 84 years (mean 58+/-14 years) with stable chronic heart failure I-II NYHA functional class classification. The causes of CHF were ischemic heart disease (IHD) in 33% of patients and arterial hypertension (AH) - 67%. All patients received medical treatment: angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) - 76%, -blockers - 72%, diuretics - 100%, statins - 80%. The control group consisted of 35 healthy volunteers. All subjects identified blood natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP, ANP), adiponectin, galectin-3, pentraxins-3 and growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) by enzyme immunoassay (ELISA). All surveyed performed transthoracic echocardiography (Echo). RESULTS: The blood NT-proBNP, ANP, galectin-3, pentraxins and GDF-3-15 in patients with chronic heart failure was significantly higher than in the control group (p<0.001 in all cases). In contrast, the level of adiponectin was significantly higher than in healthy individuals - 11.90 (11.39; 12.65) vs 7.73 (3.58; 8.86) ng/ml in patients with chronic heart failure (p<0.001). LVEF ranged from 30 to 55%, in 33% of patients it was >50%. Correlation analysis Spearman found strong correlations (p<0.001 for all markers) between LVEF and the content of all the biomarkers, while between the PV and the level of adiponectin is a positive correlation was found (r=0.862), and between the PV and the other biomarkers - reverse (r from -0.858 to -0.901). Multivariate linear regression analysis found the strongest correlation with the value of LVEF at pentraxin 3 and adiponectin. Subsequent ROC-analysis confirmed the diagnostic value of adiponectin in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Thus, the level of adiponectin more than 8.3 ng/ml served as a prognostic factor for the presence of heart failure in patients with LVEF >50% with a sensitivity of 94.3% and a specificity of 92.9% (area under the curve 0.977; 95% confidence interval from 0.954 to 0.999; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among the 6 studied biomarkers of myocardial stress and inflammation only adiponectin has diagnostic significance in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.