Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genetic polymorphisms and toxicity to 5-FU-based chemoradiation in rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: There is a large degree of variation in tumour response and host toxicities associated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer patients. We performed a complimentary pharmacogenetic study to investigate germline polymorphisms of genes involved in 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and irinotecan pathways and their potential association with clinical outcomes and toxicities from neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with rectal cancer treated in a prospective genotype-directed study. METHODS: The germline DNA of 131 patients was genotyped for 10 variants in TYMS, MTHFR, DPYD, UGT1A1, ABCC1 and SLCO1B1 genes. Ninety-six patients were treated with 5-FU/radiotherapy (RT) and 35 received 5-FU/RT/irinotecan. Relationships between genetic variants and adverse events, tumour response, overall and disease-free survivals were assessed. RESULTS: MTHFR 1298A>C and MTHFR diplotypes (for 677C>T and 1298A>C) were associated with chemoradiation-related toxicity when 5-FU was used alone. MTHFR haplotypes (677C-1298C) and diplotypes (CA-TA and TA-TA) showed, respectively, a protective and a negative effect on the incidence of severe diarrhoea or mucositis. No association was observed between genetic markers and drug response. CONCLUSION: MTHFR polymorphisms can potentially predict toxicity in patients treated with 5-FU as a single chemotherapeutic drug.

Conservative alternatives to extirpative surgery for rectal cancer.

Selected cases of favourable rectal cancer can be treated with less than radical surgery. Published studies show that excellent local control can be achieved using either local excision or carefully confined high-dose radiation to treat the primary tumour site. For many patients treated conservatively there is also a role for external beam radiation to the pelvis -- this treats subclinical disease in regional nodes and around the tumour bed. The locoregional control for T1 lesions is excellent. There are recent data that indicate that the overall no evidence of disease survival may exceed 95% for T1 lesions treated with external and endocavitary radiotherapy combined with a limited local excision. For T2 lesions, about 25% of patients can experience recurrence after conservative treatment. This risk may be substantially less if external beam radiation, local excision and endocavitary radiation are combined. Close follow-up of these patients is important, as local failures after conservative treatment are more amenable to salvage surgery than failures after standard radical surgery. Careful selection of cases, combining physical findings with endorectal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging is important.

The effects of 41 degrees C hyperthermia on the DNA repair protein, MRE11, correlate with radiosensitization in four human tumor cell lines.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine if reduced availability of the DNA repair protein, MRE11, for the repair of damaged DNA is a basis for thermal radiosensitization induced by moderate hyperthermia. To test this hypothesis, we measured the total amount of MRE11 DNA repair protein and its heat-induced alterations in four human tumor cell lines requiring different heating times at 41 degrees C to induce measurable radiosensitization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human colon adenocarcinoma cell lines (NSY42129, HT29 and HCT15) and HeLa cells were used as the test system. Cells were irradiated immediately after completion of hyperthermia. MRE11 levels in whole cell extract, nuclear extract and cytoplasmic extracts were measured by Western blotting. The nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts were separated by TX100 solubility. The subcellular localization of MRE11 was determined by immunofluorescence staining. RESULTS: The results show that for the human tumor cell lines studied, the larger the endogenous amount of MRE11 protein per cell, the longer the heating time at 41 degrees C required for inducing measurable radiosensitization in that cell line. Further, the residual nuclear MRE11 protein level, measured in the nuclear extract and in the cytoplasmic extract as a function of heating time, both correlated with the thermal enhancement ratio (TER). CONCLUSIONS: These observations are consistent with the possibility that delocalization of MRE11 from the nucleus is a critical step in the radiosensitization by moderate hyperthermia.

Experience with a small animal hyperthermia ultrasound system (SAHUS): report on 83 tumours.

An external local ultrasound (US) system was developed to induce controlled hyperthermia of subcutaneously implanted tumours in small animals (e.g., mice and rats). It was designed to be compatible with a small animal positron emission tomography scanner (microPET) to facilitate studies of hyperthermia-induced tumour re-oxygenation using a PET radiopharmaceutical, but it is applicable for any small animal study requiring controlled heating. The system consists of an acrylic applicator bed with up to four independent 5 MHz planar disc US transducers of 1 cm in diameter, a four-channel radiofrequency (RF) generator, a multiple thermocouple thermometry unit, and a personal computer with custom monitoring and controlling software. Although the system presented here was developed to target tumours of up to 1 cm in diameter, the applicator design allows for different piezoelectric transducers to be exchanged and operated within the 3.5-6.5 MHz band to target different tumour sizes. Temperature feedback control software was developed on the basis of a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) approach when the measured temperatures were within a selectable temperature band about the target temperature. Outside this band, an on/off control action was applied. Perfused tissue-mimicking phantom experiments were performed to determine optimum controller gain constants, which were later employed successfully in animal experiments. The performance of the SAHUS (small animal hyperthermia ultrasound system) was tested using several tumour types grown in thighs of female nude (nu/nu) mice. To date, the system has successfully treated 83 tumours to target temperatures in the range of 41-43 degrees C for periods of 65 min on average.

Transfection of human tumour cells with Mre11 siRNA and the increase in radiation sensitivity and the reduction in heat-induced radiosensitization.

Double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) are potentially lethal DNA lesions induced by ionizing radiation. In eukaryotes, DSBs can be repaired by homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). DNA repair protein Mre11 participates in both the NHEJ and HR DNA repair pathways. Hyperthermia has been used clinically as a radiosensitizer. However, the mechanisms by which radiosensitization is induced by hyperthermia, especially moderate hyperthermia (41 degrees C) are not fully understood. Previous studies suggest that 41 degrees C reduces the nuclear Mre11 protein level in a manner that correlates with heat-induced changes in radiation sensitivity. Therefore, siRNA technology was used in the present study to reduce Mre11 gene expression to determine if reduced Mre11 protein levels induced radiosensitization and if such radiosensitization is similar to that induced by moderate hyperthermia. The results show that (1) the cellular level of the Mre11 protein was reduced about 60 +/- 18% by a 24-h treatment with siRNA. Results from the Mre11 protein turnover assay showed a half-life of 11.6 +/- 0.5 h for the Mre11 protein, which is consistent with reduction in protein level in 24 h after Mre11 siRNA treatment assuming a delay of 4-8 h to reduce RNA levels. After 48 h in siRNA, cellular Mre11 protein levels increased to approximately pretreatment levels. NSY cells were sensitized to ionizing radiation after 24 h of treatment with Mre11 siRNA. Two hours at 41 degrees C did not increase the radiation sensitivity of cells with a reduced Mre11 protein level following a 24-h siRNA treatment. These data support the conclusion that the DSB repair protein, Mre11, appears to be a target for radiosensitization by moderate hyperthermia.

Modelling heat-induced radiosensitization: clinical implications.

Clinically achievable minimum tumour temperatures are in the order of about 41 degrees C. Therefore, it is important to evaluate mechanisms by which temperatures in this range might enhance cytotoxicity. Previous in vitro studies have demonstrated that 1-4 h (depending on the sequencing of modalities) of heating at 41 degrees C produces substantial heat-induced radiosensitization with little or no cell killing by heat alone. The increased radiation sensitivity is best modelled as a change in the single hit, alpha, parameter (with no significant effect on the two-hit parameter, beta) of the cell survival curve. The implications of heat-induced radiosensitization being mediated by a change in alpha on the traditional thermal enhancement ratio (for various radiation doses/fraction and alpha/beta) are reviewed. Response rates for a cohort of 60 patients enrolled on a prospective thermal dose escalation study are modelled assuming that the thermal dose dependence of heat-induced radiosensitization is modulated by a heat-induced delta alpha. The clinical data are fitted with delta alpha about 0.05-0.1 Gy-1. Randomized trials reported in the literature and the implication for the design of future prospective trials are reviewed in light of these observations.

MicroPET-compatible, small animal hyperthermia ultrasound system (SAHUS) for sustainable, collimated and controlled hyperthermia of subcutaneously implanted tumours.

An external ultrasound system was developed for the heating of subcutaneously implanted tumours in small animals. This small animal hyperthermia ultrasound system (SAHUS) was designed to be compatible with a microPET (small animal positron emission tomography) scanner to facilitate studies of hyperthermia effects on tumour hypoxia. Collimation and localization of energy deposition, a specific goal for the new device to avoid regional and/or systemic heating of small animals, was demonstrated using thermoradiography following high-power short-time heating of a layered gel phantom. The in vivo heating capabilities of the SAHUS were tested using PC3 cell line tumours (2000-2700 mm(3)) grown in the lateral proximal thighs of Nu-/Nu- nuBR nude mice. Intratumour temperatures were recorded during heating trials with deep and superficial interstitial thermocouples. The experimental data showed that the SAHUS could produce hyperthermia in 8 +/- 2 mm diameter tumours in small animals to a target temperature of 41.5 degrees C and maintain it within a narrow temperature range (+/- 0.3 degrees C) for up to 4 h without raising the core temperature of the animals. PET imaging studies, data to be published separately, were conducted before and during SAHUS-induced hyperthermia. Both devices performed as expected and there was no significant decrease in image quality. In this paper, the new SAHUS is described and data from phantom and in vivo experiments presented.

Radiosensitization of heat resistant human tumour cells by 1 hour at 41.1 degrees C and its effect on DNA repair.

The present study was undertaken to determine if short duration (1-2 h), moderate hyperthermia (41.1 degrees C) could radiosensitize human tumour cells. It was found that moderate hyperthermia (41.1 degrees C), for as little as 1 h, can radiosensitize heat resistant human adenocarcinoma cells, NSY42129 (NSY), provided the cells are irradiated 15 min prior to the end of the heat exposure. Analysis of the survival data showed a 2.5-3-fold increase in the alpha parameter with no significant change in the beta parameter of the survival curve, implying that the cells had become more susceptible to killing by single radiation energy deposition events as opposed to lethal events that require an interaction between two separate energy deposition events. 41.1 degrees C hyperthermia did not affect the induction or repair of alkaline labile DNA damage in a way that correlated with radiosensitivity. In contrast, heat-induced changes in the induction of micronuclei by radiation correlated with changes in cell killing. Therefore, the effect of 41.1 degrees C hyperthermia on the intracellular localization of the DNA double strand break repair protein, Mre11, was measured using in situ immunofluorescence and immunoblotting of soluble and insoluble cellular fractions. The results showed that Mre11 delocalizes from the nucleus as a function of time at 41.1 degrees C. It was then determined if 41.1 degrees C hyperthermia altered the association of Mre11 with its functional partner, Rad50. A significant decrease in the amount of Rad50 recovered with Mre11 occurred under the experimental conditions that produced significant radiosensitization. These results are consistent with the possibility that the heat-induced perturbation in Mre11 localization and its radiation-induced association with Rad50 contributes to an increase in radiosensitivity.

Neoadjuvant external beam radiation and proctectomy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the survival rate, local failure, and perioperative morbidity in patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum undergoing curative proctectomy who were felt to have transmural disease on preoperative assessment. Eighty-nine percent of these patients were treated with preoperative external beam radiotherapy. METHODS: The records of 191 consecutive patients undergoing abdominal surgical procedures for primary treatment of rectal cancer were reviewed. The product-limit method (Kaplan-Meier) was used to analyze survival rate and tumor recurrence. RESULTS: One patient was excluded from survival analysis because of incomplete record of tumor stage. The study population comprised 109 males and 81 females, median age 64 (range, 33-91) years. Curative resection was performed in 152 of these 190 patients (80 percent), including low anterior resection with coloproctostomy or coloanal anastomosis (n = 103), abdominoperineal resection (n = 44), Hartmann's procedure (n = 4), and pelvic exenteration (n = 1). Mean follow-up of patients undergoing curative resection was 96 +/- 48 months. Palliative procedures were performed in 38 of 190 patients (20 percent). Perioperative mortality was 0.5 percent (1/190). Complications occurred in 64 patients (34 percent). The anastomotic leak rate was 4 percent (5/128). Disease-free five-year survival rate by pathologic stage was as follows: Stage I, 90 percent; Stage II, 85 percent; Stage III, 54 percent; Stage IV, 0 percent; and no residual tumor, 90 percent. Of the 152 patients treated with curative resection, disease-free survival rate was 80 percent at five years. Preoperative external beam radiation was administered to 135 of these 152 patients (89 percent). Tumor recurred in 32 of 152 patients (21 percent) treated with curative resection. The predominant pattern of recurrence was distant failure only. Kaplan-Meier overall local recurrence (local and local plus distant) at five years was 6.6 percent. The local recurrence rate paralleled tumor stage: Stage I, 0 percent; Stage II, 6 percent; Stage III, 20 percent; and no residual tumor, 0 percent. CONCLUSION: Preoperative external beam radiotherapy and attention to mesorectal dissection can achieve low local recurrence and excellent long-term survival rate in patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Moreover, these goals can be obtained with low morbidity and mortality.

Radiation therapy for epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal, clinical and treatment factors associated with outcome.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In recent years, treatment with combined chemotherapy and radiation has become the standard of care for epidermoid carcinoma of the anus. However, optimal radiotherapy techniques and doses are not well established. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the period 1975-1997, 106 patients with epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal underwent radiation therapy. Treatment policies evolved from radiation therapy alone or with surgery, to combined chemotherapy and radiation followed by surgery, to combined chemotherapy and radiation. RESULTS: Overall 74% of patients were NED (no evidence of disease) at last follow-up. The most important clinical correlate with ultimate freedom from disease (includes the contribution of salvage surgery) was extent of disease. The 5-year ultimate freedom from disease was 87+/-5% for T1/T2N0, 78+/-10% for T3N0 (15% salvaged by surgery), and 43+/-10% for either T4N0 or any N+ lesions (P<0.001, Tarone-Ware). There was no difference between planned vs. expectant surgery (5-year ultimate NED: 67+/-11% planned surgery vs. 73+/-5% expectant surgery). The most important correlate with late toxicity was a history of major pelvic surgery (surgical vs. non-surgical group: P=0.013, Fisher's exact test, two-tailed summation). Thirty-three additional malignancies have been seen in 26 patients. The most common additional malignancies were gynecologic (nine cases), head and neck (six cases), and lung cancer (five cases). CONCLUSIONS: For T1/T2N0 disease, moderate doses of radiation combined with chemotherapy provided adequate treatment. T4N0 and N+ lesions are the most appropriate candidates for investigational protocols evaluating dose intensification. T3N0 tumors may also be appropriate for investigation; however, dose intensification may ultimately prove counterproductive if the cure rate is not improved and salvage surgery is rendered more difficult. The volume of irradiated small bowel should be minimized for patients who have a past history of major pelvic surgery or who (because of locally advanced tumors) may need salvage surgery in the future. Because of the occurrence of additional malignancy, patients with anal cancer should receive general oncologic screening in long-term follow-up.

Treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma with endocavitary and external beam radiotherapy: results for 199 patients with localized tumors.

PURPOSE: Endocavitary radiation (RT) provides a conservative alternative to proctectomy. Although most suitable for small, mobile lesions, patients with less favorable tumors are often referred if they are poor surgical candidates. Knowing the extent to which radiation can control such tumors can be an important factor in making clinical decisions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred ninety-nine patients, who received endocavitary RT with or without external beam RT (EBRT) during 1981 through 1995, were followed for disease status for a median of 70 months, including deaths from intercurrent causes. In the early years of the study, 21 patients were treated with endocavitary RT alone, the remainder of the patients received pelvic EBRT (usually 45 Gy in 25 fractions) 5-7 weeks before endocavitary RT. RESULTS: Overall, 141 patients (71%) had local control with RT alone. Salvage surgery rendered an additional 20 patients disease free, for an ultimate local control rate of 81%. On multivariate analysis for local control (excluding surgical salvage), the most significant factors were mobility to palpation, use of EBRT, and whether pretreatment debulking of all macroscopic disease had been done (generally a piecemeal, nontransmural procedure). Of 77 cases staged by transrectal ultrasonography, the local control rate with RT alone was 100% for uT1 lesions, 85% (90% with no evidence of disease after salvage) for freely mobile uT2 lesions, and 56% (67% with no evidence of disease after salvage) for uT3 lesions and uT2 lesions that were not freely mobile. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with small mobile tumors that are either uT1 or have only a scar after debulking achieve excellent local control with endocavitary RT. About 15% of mobile uT2 tumors fail RT; therefore, careful follow-up is critical. Small uT3 tumors are appropriate for this treatment only if substantial contraindications to proctectomy are present.

A phase I/II trial of three-dimensionally planned concurrent boost radiotherapy and protracted venous infusion of 5-FU chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Improving the response to preoperative therapy may increase the likelihood of successful resection of locally advanced rectal cancers. Historically, the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate has been < approximately 10% with preoperative radiation therapy alone and < approximately 20% with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-seven patients were enrolled on a prospective Phase I/II protocol conducted jointly at Washington University, St. Louis and the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome evaluating a three-dimensionally (3D) planned boost as part of the preoperative treatment of patients with unresectable or recurrent rectal cancer. Preoperative treatment consisted of 4500 cGy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks to the pelvis, with a 3D planned 90 cGy per fraction boost delivered once or twice a week concurrently (no time delay) with the pelvic radiation. Thus, on days when the boost was treated, the tumor received a dose of 270 cGy in one fraction while the remainder of the pelvis received 180 cGy. When indicated, nonaxial beams were used for the boost. The boost treatment was twice a week (total boost dose 900 cGy) if small bowel could be excluded from the boost volume, otherwise the boost was delivered once a week (total boost dose 450 cGy). Patients also received continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (1500 mg/m(2)-week) concurrently with the radiation as well as postoperative 5-FU/leucovorin. RESULTS: All 37 patients completed preoperative radiotherapy as planned within 32--39 elapsed days. Twenty-seven underwent proctectomy; reasons for unresectability included persistent locally advanced disease (6 cases) and progressive distant metastatic disease with stable or smaller local disease (4 cases). Actuarial 3-year survival was 82% for the group as a whole. Among resected cases the 3-year local control and freedom from disease relapse were 86% and 69%, respectively.Twenty-four of the lesions (65%) achieved an objective clinical response by size criteria, including 9 (24%) with pCR at the primary site (documented T0 at surgery). The most important factor for pCR was tumor volume: small lesions with planning target volume (PTV) < 200 cc showed a 50% pCR rate (p = 0.02). There were no treatment associated fatalities. Nine of the 37 patients (24%) experienced Grade 3 or 4 toxicities (usually proctitis) during preoperative treatment. There were an additional 7 perioperative and 2 late toxicities. The most important factors for small bowel toxicity (acute or late) were small bowel volume (> or = 150 cc at doses exceeding 4000 cGy) and large tumor (PTV > or = 800 cc). For rectal toxicity the threshold is PTV > or = 500 cc. CONCLUSION: 3D planned boost therapy is feasible. In addition to permitting the use of nonaxial beams for improved dose distributions, 3D planning provides tumor and normal tissue dose-volume information that is important in interpreting outcome. Every effort should be made to limit the treated small bowel to less than 150 cc. Tumor size is the most important predictor of response, with small lesions of PTV < 200 cc most likely to develop complete responses.

Pretreatment clinical findings predict outcome for patients receiving preoperative radiation for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: As a sole modality, preoperative radiation for rectal carcinoma achieves a local control comparable to that of postoperative radiation plus chemotherapy. Although the addition of chemotherapy to preoperative treatment improves the pathologic complete response rate, there is also a substantial increase in acute and perioperative morbidity. Identification of subsets of patients who are at low or high risk for recurrence can help to optimize treatment. METHODS: During the period 1977-95, 384 patients received preoperative radiation therapy for localized adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Ages ranged from 19 to 97 years (mean 64.4), and there were 171 females. Preoperative treatment consisted of conventionally fractionated radiation to 3600-5040 cGy (median 4500 cGy) 6-8 weeks before surgery in 293 cases or low doses of <3000 cGy (median 2000 cGy) immediately before surgery in 91 cases. Concurrent preoperative chemotherapy was given to only 14 cases in this study period. Postoperative chemotherapy was delivered to 55 cases. RESULTS: Overall 93 patients have experienced recurrence (including 36 local failures). Local failures were scored if they occurred at any time, not just as first site of failure. For the group as a whole, the actuarial (Kaplan-Meier) freedom from relapse (FFR) and local control (LC) were 74% and 90% respectively at 5 years. Univariate analysis of clinical characteristics demonstrated a significant (p < 0.05) adverse effect on both LC and FFR for the following four clinical factors: (1) location <5 cm from the verge, (2) circumferential lesion, (3) near obstruction, (4) tethered or fixed tumor. Size, grade, age, gender, ultrasound stage, CEA, radiation dose, and the use of chemotherapy were not associated with outcome. Background of the surgeon was significantly associated with outcome, colorectal specialists achieving better results than nonspecialist surgeons. We assigned a clinical score of 0 to 2 on the basis of how many of the above four adverse clinical factors were present: 0 for none, 1 for one or two, 2 for three or four. This sorted outcome highly significantly (p < or = 0.002, Tarone Ware), with 5-year LC/FFR of 98%/85% (score 0), 90%/72% (score 1), and 74%/58% (score 2). The scoring system sorts the data for both subgroups of surgeons; however, there are substantial differences in LC on the basis of the surgeon's experience. For colorectal specialists (251 cases), the 5-year LC is 100%, 94%, and 78% for scores of 0, 1, and 2, respectively (p = 0.004). For the more mixed group of nonspecialist surgeons (133 cases), LC is 98%, 80%, and 65% for scores of 0, 1, and 2 (p = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, the clinical score and surgeon's background retained independent predictive value, even when pathologic stage was included. CONCLUSIONS: For many patients with rectal cancer, adjuvant treatment can be administered in a well-tolerated sequential fashion-moderate doses of preoperative radiation followed by surgery followed by postoperative chemotherapy to address the risk of occult metastatic disease. A clinical scoring system has been presented here that would suggest that the local control is excellent for lesions with a score of 0 or (if the surgeon is experienced) 1, and therefore sequential treatment could be considered. Cases with a clinical score of 2 should be strongly considered for protocols evaluating more aggressive preoperative treatment, such as combined modality preoperative treatment.

Neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum: tumor response and acute toxicity.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the down-staging effect and acute toxicity of preoperative radiation and chemoradiation for primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum. METHODS: The results of pretreatment staging with transrectal ultrasound and computed tomography were compared with final histologic stage in 260 consecutive patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and proctectomy for primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Patients underwent short-course radiation (2,000 cGy in five fractions), long-course radiation (4,500 cGy in 25 fractions), or chemoradiation (4,500 cGy in 25 fractions with concurrent chemotherapy). RESULTS: Down-staging of one or more T stages occurred in 116 of 260 (45 percent) patients overall (short-course radiation 34/82 (42 percent), long-course radiation 55/122 (45 percent), chemoradiation 27/56 (48 percent), P = not significant). Down-staging of one or more N stages occurred in 85 of 178 (48 percent) patients overall (short-course radiation 12/45 (27 percent), long-course radiation 49/86 (57 percent), chemoradiation 24/47 (51 percent), P = 0.003). Complete pathologic response was observed in 16 of 260 (6 percent) patients overall (short-course radiation 4/82 (5 percent), long-course radiation 5/122 (4 percent), chemoradiation 7/56 (13 percent), P = 0.08). Resection with negative margins (distal, proximal, and radial) was achieved in 211 of 227 patients (93 percent) in whom complete radial margin data were available. Permanent stomas were created in 35 percent of patients; temporary stomas were created in 15 percent. Thirty-three Grade 3 or 4 toxicities occurred in 22 of 260 (8 percent) patients overall during neoadjuvant therapy. Toxicity was more frequent in patients receiving chemoradiation (14/56; 25 percent) and long-course radiation (8/122; 7 percent) than in those receiving short-course radiation (0/82; 0 percent), P < 0.0001. Perioperative complications occurred in 93 patients overall (36 percent). The postoperative mortality rate was 0.4 percent (1/260). There was no significant difference in the complication rate between patients treated with short-course radiation (26/82; 32 percent), long-course radiation (46/122; 36 percent), and chemoradiation (21/56; 38 percent). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum is well tolerated and can produce substantial down-staging and a high curative resection rate. Chemoradiation can achieve high complete pathologic response rates, although toxicity during neoadjuvant therapy is greater than for radiation alone. Short-course radiation can achieve down-staging of both T stage and N stage.

Dosimetry and techniques for simultaneous hyperthermia and external beam radiation therapy.

An increased biological effect is realized when hyperthermia and radiation therapy are combined simultaneously. To take advantage of this effect, techniques have been developed that combine existing hyperthermia devices with a linear accelerator. This allows concomitant delivery of either ultrasound or microwave hyperthermia with photon radiation therapy. Two techniques have been used clinically: the orthogonal technique, in which the microwave or ultrasound beam and the radiation beam are orthogonal to one another, and the en face technique, in which the ultrasound or microwave beam and the radiation beam travel into the tumour through the same treatment window. The en face technique has necessitated the development of special attachments so that the hyperthermia device can be mounted to the linear accelerator and so that non-uniform portions of the hyperthermia device can be removed from the radiation beam. For microwave therapy, applicators are mounted onto the linear accelerator using the compensating filter tray holder. For ultrasound, special reflector devices are mounted to a frame that is mounted onto the compensating filter tray holder of the linear accelerator. Because the linear accelerator is an isocentric device, the height of the radiation source is fixed, and this has necessitated specially designed devices so that the ultrasound support system is compatible with the linear accelerator. The treatment setups for both the en face technique and the orthogonal technique require the interaction of both hyperthermia and radiation therapy personnel and equipment. The dosimetry and day-to-day operations for each technique are unique. The simulation for the en face technique is much different from the simulation of a normal radiation treatment and requires the presence of a hyperthermia physicist. Also, for the en face technique, the attenuation of the microwave applicator and the thickness and attenuation of the ultrasound reflector system are taken into account for radiation dosimetry. This paper presents details of the dosimetry and logistics of the techniques for simultaneous thermoradiotherapy based on 7 years of experience treating more than 50 patients.

Conservative alternatives to radical surgery for favorable rectal cancers.

Selected cases of favorable rectal cancer can be treated with less than radical surgery. The literature demonstrates that excellent local control can be achieved using either local excision or carefully confined high dose radiation to treat the primary tumor site. Two treatments to the tumor site appear equally effective: local excision (usually a full thickness en bloc procedure) or low energy (50 kVp) endocavitary radiation. For many patients treated conservatively there is also a role for external beam radiation to the pelvis-this treats subclinical disease in regional nodes and around the tumor bed. The locoregional control for T1 lesions is excellent. For T2 lesions about 15% of patients can experience recurrence after conservative treatment. Close follow up of these patients is important, since local failures after conservative treatment are more amenable to salvage surgery than failures after standard radical surgery. Careful selection of cases, using endorectal ultrasound or MRI whenever possible, is important. The incidence of unexpected T3 disease or tumor at the margin of resection has been reported as high as 40% in series that do not utilize endorectal T staging.

The impact of ultrasonic parameters on chest wall hyperthermia.

A transient, three-dimensional acousto-thermal numerical model for chest wall anatomies was developed to evaluate the impact of ultrasonic parameters on thermal coverage. The following independent variables were considered: (1) the relative output intensities of the low and high frequency components of an unfocused dual-frequency ultrasonic beam (xi1); (2) the depths of the soft-tissue bone (d(b)) and soft-tissue-lung (d(u)) interfaces; (3) the intensity reflectivities of these interfaces; and (4) the intensity attenuation coefficient of bone. Several important results were obtained. First, acoustic reflections from the underlying bone and lung surfaces may contribute significantly to heating of the overlying soft-tissue. Secondly, a strong dependence of optimal xi1 values on d(b) and d(u) values was found. Chest wall volumes with 2-3 cm of soft-tissue overlying the ribs were optimal targets for unfocused ultrasound hyperthermia. Thirdly, the maximum steady state temperature in bone also strongly depended on xi1. Finally, the largest difference between the maximum temperature in bone and the maximum temperature in soft-tissue during initial transient heating was between -1.4 degrees C and 0.8 degrees C. That is, the maximum temperature in the field, either during the transient period or at steady state, did not always occur in bone. It is concluded that control of power deposition penetrability offers great potential for improving hyperthermia to chest wall targets in real time.

Outcome of patients with rectal adenocarcinoma and localized pelvic non-nodal metastatic foci.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with primary rectal adenocarcinoma and soft tissue metastatic foci restricted to the pelvis and to determine whether this entity, which is considered N1 disease in the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, behaves like completely replaced nodal disease or the first sign of M1 disease. The clinical course for patients with this finding is not well-described in the literature. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 395 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who received radiation treatment. Eighteen patients had pelvic soft tissue metastatic foci. Exclusions from this study included 1) cases without metastatic pelvic foci; 2) cases of recurrent cancer; 3) cases with known distant metastatic disease as defined by American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria; and 4) cases with extrapelvic metastatic foci. All patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. Thirteen cases received preoperative radiotherapy. Four cases received postoperative radiotherapy. One case received both preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy. Eight cases received chemotherapy. RESULTS: All eighteen patients had T3 or T4 lesions. Thirteen patients had lymph nodes that contained metastatic disease and would therefore have been scored N1 or N2 even without the pelvic tumor implants. Sixteen of 18 (89 percent) patients died of disease after a survival time of 12 to 37 (mean, 25) months. Only 1 of 18 (6 percent) patients was disease free at five years. The other remaining survivor was undergoing palliative therapy for metastatic disease to the lung. This is significantly worse than our institution's experience with T3,4N+ disease after preoperative radiation (5-year survival, 11 vs. 56 percent; P = 0.0002, Generalized Wilcoxon of Breslow). There was a high incidence of local (9/18) and distant (14/18) failure. No other factor, including radiation dose, margin status, chemotherapy, T stage, and number of involved nodes or soft tissue implants, correlated independently with outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic metastatic foci confer a significantly worse prognosis than other T3,4N+ disease. Such cases should be excluded from prospective trials for localized disease. Although this entity probably represents M1 disease for most patients, survival can be long, and aggressive locoregional and systemic treatment is warranted.

A multi-user networked database for analysis of clinical and temperature data from patients treated with simultaneous radiation and ultrasound hyperthermia.

A database was developed using commercially available development software that allows the entry of clinical data and automatically analyses temperature and power data from a commercial ultrasound hyperthermia system. The database can be accessed via network connections by more than one authorized user, thus facilitating the entry, management, and analysis of clinical data. The software automatically estimates ultrasound induced temperature artifacts and calculates thermal dose parameters such as T90s, equivalent minutes at 43 degrees, and time at or above index temperatures using the corrected temperatures. These parameters also become part of the database. Digital photographs of treatment setup, probe placement, and tumour or normal tissue response can be included in the database for documentation and reference. Ultrasound diagnostic images that document the depth and reproducibility of probe placement can be scanned into the PC and included in the database as well. This short communication documents experiences developing this tool that may be useful to other investigators.

Simultaneous superficial hyperthermia and external radiotherapy: report of thermal dosimetry and tolerance to treatment.

BACKGROUND: In vitro and animal studies indicate that a moderate temperature of 41 degrees C maintained for approximately 1 h will provide radiosensitization if radiation (RT) and hyperthermia (HT) are delivered simultaneously, but not with sequential treatment. A minimum tumour temperature of 41 degrees C is a more feasible goal than the goal of >42 degrees C needed for sequential treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-four patients with 47 recurrent superficial cancers received simultaneous external beam radiotherapy and superficial hyperthermia on successive IRB approved phase I/II studies. All lesions had failed previous therapy, 35 were previously irradiated (mean dose 52.7 Gy). Hyperthermia was delivered with 915 MHz microwave or 1-3.5 MHz ultrasound using commercially available applicators. The average dimensions of 19 lesions treated with microwave were 4.7 x 3.6 x 1.7 cm and the average dimensions of 28 lesions treated with ultrasound were 8.0 x 6.1 x 2.9 cm. The most common sites were chest wall (15 cases) and head and neck (21 cases). Temperatures were monitored at an average of six intratumoral locations using multisensor probes. The median number of hyperthermia treatments was three and the median radiation dose 30 Gy. Radiation dose per fraction was 4 Gy with hyperthermia and 2 Gy or 4 Gy (depending on protocol) on non-hyperthermia days. RESULTS: Six different measures of minimum monitored temperature and duration were found to be highly correlated with each other. There was nearly a one-to-one correspondence between minimum tumour time at or above 41 degrees C (Min t41) and minimum tumour Sapareto Dewey equivalent time at 42 degrees C (Min teq42). After four sessions 63% of cases had a per session average Sapareto Dewey equivalent time at 41 degrees C which exceeded 60 min in all monitored tumour locations. The complete and partial response rate in evaluable lesions were respectively 21/41 (51%) and 7/41 (17%) and were best correlated with site (chest wall showing best response). Toxicity consisted of 10/47 (21%) slow healing soft tissue ulcers which healed in all cases but required a median of 7 months. The most important predictors for chronic ulceration were cumulative radiation dose >80 Gy and complete response to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Minimum tumour temperatures maintained for durations compatible in vitro with thermal radiosensitization (if RT and HT are delivered simultaneously) are clinically feasible and tolerable for broad but superficial lesions amenable to externally applied ultrasound or microwave hyperthermia. The current in-house protocol is evaluating the impact of more than four hyperthermia sessions on the overall thermal dose distribution and toxicity.