RESUMO
The genus Equus is unusual in that five of the ten extant species have documented centric fission (Robertsonian translocation) polymorphisms within their populations, namely E. hemionus onager, E. hemionus kulan, E. kiang, E. africanus somaliensis, and E. quagga burchelli. Here we report evidence that the polymorphism involves the same homologous chromosome segments in each species, and that these chromosome segments have homology to human chromosome 4 (HSA4). Bacterial artificial chromosome clones containing equine genes SMARCA5 (ECA2q21 homologue to HSA4q31. 21) and UCHL1 (ECA3q22 homologue to HSA4p13) were mapped to a single metacentric chromosome and two unpaired acrocentrics by FISH mapping for individuals possessing odd numbers of chromosomes. These data suggest that the polymorphism is either ancient and conserved within the genus or has occurred recently and independently within each species. Since these species are separated by 1-3 million years of evolution, this polymorphism is remarkable and worthy of further investigations.
Assuntos
Equidae/genética , Polimorfismo Genético/genética , Homologia de Sequência do Ácido Nucleico , Translocação Genética/genética , Adenosina Trifosfatases/genética , Animais , Proteínas Cromossômicas não Histona/genética , Cromossomos Humanos Par 4/genética , Evolução Molecular , Humanos , Especificidade da Espécie , Ubiquitina Tiolesterase/genéticaRESUMO
Przewalski's wild horse (E. przewalskii, EPR) has a diploid chromosome number of 2n = 66 while the domestic horse (E. caballus, ECA) has a diploid chromosome number of 2n = 64. Discussions about their phylogenetic relationship and taxonomic classification have hinged on comparisons of their skeletal morphology, protein and mitochondrial DNA similarities, their ability to produce fertile hybrid offspring, and on comparison of their chromosome morphology and banding patterns. Previous studies of GTG-banded karyotypes suggested that the chromosomes of both equids were homologous and the difference in chromosome number was due to a Robertsonian event involving two pairs of acrocentric chromosomes in EPR and one pair of metacentric chromosomes in ECA (ECA5). To determine which EPR chromosomes were homologous to ECA5 and to confirm the predicted chromosome homologies based on GTG banding, we constructed a comparative gene map between ECA and EPR by FISH mapping 46 domestic horse-derived BAC clones containing genes previously mapped to ECA chromosomes. The results indicated that all ECA and EPR chromosomes were homologous as predicted by GTG banding, but provide new information in that the EPR acrocentric chromosomes EPR23 and EPR24 were shown to be homologues of the ECA metacentric chromosome ECA5.