Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Occup Environ Med ; 61(12): 1019-1029, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31592942

RESUMO

: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) represents the second most common occupational disease in the United States. Although the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has promulgated an occupational noise exposure standard and associated recordkeeping requirements, OSHA inspections increasingly document practices that violate both the noise standard and recordkeeping regulation. This article describes five deviations from good clinical practices masking the true societal costs of NIHL, leading to missed prevention opportunities, and creating burdens for individuals and society. These include attributing NIHL to nonoccupational sources, exculpating the workplace because of audiogram patterns without careful documentation, ignoring symptoms or physical examination findings, and simply denying work-relatedness, leading to employers inappropriately lining out cases from the OSHA 300 log. The practices identified by OSHA suggest that many individuals are not following widely recognized and accepted practices when administering hearing conservation programs.


Assuntos
Ruído Ocupacional , Medicina do Trabalho , Padrões de Prática Médica , Adulto , Feminino , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...