Accuracy and Feasibility of Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients After Abdominal Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Glycemia management in critical care is posing a challenge in frequent measuring and adequate insulin dose adjustment. In recent years, continuous glucose measurement has gained accuracy and reliability in outpatient and inpatient settings. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and accuracy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in ICU patients after major abdominal surgery. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We included patients undergoing pancreatic surgery and solid organ transplantation (liver, pancreas, islets of Langerhans, kidney) requiring an ICU stay after surgery. We used a Dexcom G6 sensor, placed in the infraclavicular region, for real-time CGM. Arterial blood glucose measured by the amperometric principle (ABL 800; Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark) served as a reference value and for calibration. Blood glucose was also routinely monitored by a StatStrip bedside glucose meter. Sensor accuracy was assessed by mean absolute relative difference (MARD), bias, modified Bland-Altman plot, and surveillance error grid for paired samples of glucose values from CGM and acid-base analyzer (ABL). RESULTS: We analyzed data from 61 patients and obtained 1,546 paired glucose values from CGM and ABL. Active sensor use was 95.1%. MARD was 9.4%, relative bias was 1.4%, and 92.8% of values fell in zone A, 6.1% fell in zone B, and 1.2% fell in zone C of the surveillance error grid. Median time in range was 78%, with minimum (<1%) time spent in hypoglycemia. StatStrip glucose meter MARD compared with ABL was 5.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows clinically applicable accuracy and reliability of Dexcom G6 CGM in postoperative ICU patients and a feasible alternative sensor placement site.

Transplantation of Pancreatic Islets Into the Omentum Using a Biocompatible Plasma-Thrombin Gel: First Experience at the Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine in Prague.

BACKGROUND: Islet transplantation represents an established therapeutic option for people with type 1 diabetes who have hypoglycemia unawareness syndrome and frequent problematic hypoglycemic episodes when other methods comprising diabetes education and use of technological support fail. Because the current standard method of islet infusion into the liver has some limitations, novel approaches are under investigation. METHODS: We report our first results with 2 cases of islet transplantation into an omental pouch using a biocompatible plasma-fibrin gel. The recipients received 12,350 and 5,350 islet equivalents per kilogram that were mixed with autologous plasma, seeded during a laparoscopic procedure on the omentum, overlaid with human thrombin solution, and fixed by flapping the omentum over. RESULTS: During a 9-month follow-up, neither patient experienced any moderate or severe hypoglycemia. Their glucose control significantly improved, insulin dose decreased by approximately 50%, and C-peptide at 1 year was 0.22 and 0.14 pmol/mL, respectively. The postoperative course was uneventful, but C-peptide production in the first patient progressively declined at 1 year and hypoglycemic episodes recurred. CONCLUSIONS: Though the results for these first 2 cases are not fully satisfactory, we have demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and ability of this novel method to restore insulin production. Further refinements to improve immediate islet survival seem necessary.

Early worsening of diabetic retinopathy after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation-Myth or reality?

Early worsening of diabetic retinopathy due to sudden glucose normalization is a feared complication of pancreas transplantation; however, its rate or severity has not been studied prospectively. We followed up 43 pancreas and kidney recipients for a composite endpoint comprising new need for laser therapy, newly diagnosed proliferation, macular edema, visual acuity worsening, and blindness over 12 months. Although 37% of patients met this primary endpoint, its severity was rather low. Mean central retinal thickness and proportion of patients with subclinical macular edema increased significantly, with spontaneous resolution in half of them. Visual acuity did not change. There was no significant difference in the absolute glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) drop, age, and diabetes duration between the patients who met and those who did not meet the primary endpoint, but a higher proportion of patients with worsening had a recent history of laser treatment. Retinopathy remained stable in 62.8% of patients. In 26%, the visual acuity significantly improved. Although retinopathy worsening was documented in more than one-third of patients, its evolution was not related to the magnitude of metabolic change; rather, it corresponded to the expected natural course of retinopathy. Nonetheless, comprehensive ophthalmologic care should be a substantial component of the recipient management.

Benefits of Islet Transplantation as an Alternative to Pancreas Transplantation: Retrospective Study of More Than 10 Ten Years of Experience in a Single Center.

BACKGROUND: Pancreas transplantation (PTx) represents the method of choice in type 1 diabetic patients with conservatively intractable hypoglycemia unawareness syndrome. In 2005, the Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM) launched a program to investigate the safety potential of islet transplantation (ITx) in comparison to PTx. AIM: This study aims to compare the results of PTx and ITx regarding severe hypoglycemia elimination, metabolic control, and complication rate. METHODS: We analyzed the results of 30 patients undergoing ITx and 49 patients treated with PTx. All patients were C-peptide-negative and suffered from hypoglycemia unawareness syndrome. Patients in the ITx group received a mean number of 12,349 (6,387-15,331) IEQ/kg/person administered percutaneously into the portal vein under local anesthesia and radiological control. The islet number was reached by 1-3 applications, as needed. In both groups, we evaluated glycated hemoglobin, insulin dose, fasting and stimulated C-peptide, frequency of severe hypoglycemia, and complications. We used the Mann Whitney test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and paired t-test for analysis. We also individually assessed the ITx outcomes for each patient according to recently suggested criteria established at the EPITA meeting in Igls. RESULTS: Most of the recipients showed a significant improvement in metabolic control one and two years after ITx, with a significant decrease in HbA1c, significant elevation of fasting and stimulated C-peptide, and a markedly significant reduction in insulin dose and the frequency of severe hypoglycemia. Seventeen percent of ITx recipients were temporarily insulin-independent. The results in the PTx group were comparable to those in the ITx group, with 73% graft survival and insulin independence in year 1, 68% 2 years and 55% 5 years after transplantation. There was a higher rate of complications related to the procedure in the PTx group. Severe hypoglycemia was eliminated in the majority of both ITx and PTx recipients. CONCLUSION: This report proves the successful initiation of pancreatic islet transplantation in a center with a well-established PTx program. ITx has been shown to be the method of choice for hypoglycemia unawareness syndrome, and may be considered for application in clinical practice if conservative options are exhausted.

[Islet transplantation as a treatment for hypoglycemia unawareness syndrome. Evaluation of the pilot program and comparison with pancreas transplantation]. / Transplantace Langerhansových ostruvku v lécbe syndromu poruseného vnímání hypoglykemie. Vyhodnocení pilotního programu a porovnání s transplantací pankreatu.

Islet transplantation (ITx) started in 2005 in IKEM as a potentially safer alternative to pancreas transplantation (PTx), which so far had represented the method of choice in type-1 diabetic patients with conservatively intractable hypoglycemia unawareness syndrome. The aim of the study was to compare these two methods with regard to severe hypoglycemia elimination and to frequency of complications.Up to November 2015 a total number of 48 patients underwent ITx. The results from 22 patients with hypoglycemia unawareness were statistically analyzed. The mean number of transplanted islet equivalents was 12,096 (6,93316,705) IEQ/kg administered percutaneously in local anesthesia under radiological control to the portal vein. 44 patients underwent PTx from 1996. We evaluated glycated hemoglobin(HbA1c), insulin dose, fasting and stimulated C-peptide, frequency of severe hypoglycemia and complications. Medians (interquartile range) were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.One and two years after ITx, HbA1c decreased, C-peptide became significantly positive, insulin dose and frequency of severe hypoglycemia decreased and 18 % of ITx recipients were temporarily insulin-independent. Bleeding was present in 41 % of patients. One year after PTx, 73 % of patients were insulin and hypoglycemia-free, after two years 68 % of patients were insulin and hypoglycemia-free; graftectomy occurred in 20 % of recipients.Both methods led to restoration of insulin secretion and severe hypoglycemia elimination. PTx made more recipients insulin-independent at the cost of serious complications.