Perceptions of a State-Level HPV Vaccine Mandate and Exemption Option in Rural Virginia: A Qualitative Study.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States; yet, despite the availability of safe and effective HPV vaccines, only half of eligible adolescents have completed the vaccine series. School-entry requirements are one proven strategy to increase vaccination rates among children and youth and reduce the burden of HPV-related cancer. This study investigated community perceptions of an HPV vaccine school-entry mandate in Virginia and the consequences of a low threshold exemption option included in the legislation. We conducted 40 interviews with community members including 15 interviews with parents, 19 with healthcare providers, and 6 with community leaders. Interviews asked about knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes concerning the HPV vaccine and mandate. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. Despite healthcare provider support for the mandate, there was widespread confusion over the school-entry policy and concern that the exemption option undermined vaccination efforts. Understanding variations in community-level perceptions and response to school-based vaccination mandates is crucial for designing effective public health strategies. Findings suggest statewide vaccination initiatives should preemptively identify low uptake areas and provide targeted information to communities. Future mandates should avoid the use of ambiguous and contradictory language in vaccine-related legislation.

Implementation of a Cancer Education Program in Rural Counties with the Lowest HPV Vaccination Rates and Health Rankings.

Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection (STI). To address STIs, one rural county public school district developed a series of Family Life Programs to educate pre-teens about pertinent health information. The Schooling Cancer Program (SCP) was developed in partnership with the local Cancer Research and Resource Center to raise awareness about cancer risk factors including HPV-related cancers and HPV prevention methods. Methods: We collected a post-evaluation survey from students who attended a SCP session at one of the targeted middle schools. The SCP educated students about topics focusing on healthy lifestyles. The survey asked students' knowledge on the SCP topics, HPV knowledge, tobacco usage, and factors that reduced cancer development. Results: 87% agreed that tobacco products are associated with cancer, and 81% did not agree that E-cigarettes are scientifically proven to be safer than cigarettes. Although we do not have pre-evaluation data about these students' HPV knowledge, our evaluation survey shows that 80% of students correctly identified HPV as the most common STI, and 84% of students correctly identified the factors that decrease their risk of developing cancer. Conclusion: Through this initiative, students learned essential health concepts and HPV-related risk factors.

Perceptions about human papillomavirus vaccine and oropharyngeal cancers, and the role of dental care providers in human papillomavirus prevention among US adults.

BACKGROUND: The authors examined adults' perceptions about the importance of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in preventing oropharyngeal cancers and dental care providers' role in HPV prevention and identified associated factors. METHODS: Adults (≥ 18 years) completed a national survey of consumer and patient attitudes, experiences, and behaviors on oral health. Descriptive and multivariable logistic regression models determined associations between perceptions regarding HPV and attitudes toward dental care providers' role and HPV knowledge, HPV vaccine recommendation, and sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: One in 3 adults (32.8%; n = 5,320) said the HPV vaccine was very important, 1 in 2 said it was somewhat important (48.1%), and 1 in 5 said it was not important (19.1%) in preventing mouth and throat cancers. More than one-half (56.7%) of adults had positive perceptions about dental care providers' role in HPV education and were comfortable discussing the HPV vaccine with a dental care provider (59.4%). Adults with knowledge about HPV and oral health linkage and those who received HPV vaccine recommendation from a dental care provider had 2.0 to 2.5 times higher odds of reporting positively for all 3 outcomes (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Most adults are comfortable discussing HPV and the HPV vaccine with their oral health care provider. Perceptions about the HPV vaccine's importance in preventing oropharyngeal cancers and the role of dental care providers in HPV prevention can be improved by means of increasing adults' knowledge about the relationship between HPV and oral health. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dental care providers' engagement in HPV conversations with patients may increase their knowledge about the HPV and oral health linkage and their understanding of the role of the HPV vaccine in preventing oropharyngeal cancers.

Comprehensive pregnancy dental benefits improved dental coverage and increased dental care utilization among Medicaid-enrolled pregnant women in Virginia.

Objectives: To evaluate the changes in dental insurance and utilization among pregnant women before and after the pregnancy Medicaid dental benefit policy implementation in 2015 in Virginia. Methods: We used pooled cross-sectional data from six cycles of the Virginia Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System on women aged ≥21 years. Using logistic regression models and a difference-in-difference design, we compared the effects of policy implementation on dental insurance and utilization between pre-policy (2013-2014) and post-policy period (2016-2019) among women enrolled in Medicaid (treatment, N = 1,105) vs. those with private insurance (control, N = 2,575). A p-value of 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Among Medicaid-enrolled women, the report of dental insurance (71.6%) and utilization (37.7%) was higher in the post-period compared to their pre-period (44.4% and 30.3%, respectively) estimates but still remained lower than the post-period estimates among women with private insurance (88.0% and 59.9%, respectively). Adjusted analyses found that Medicaid-enrolled women had a significantly greater change in the probability of reporting dental insurance in all post-period years than women with private insurance, while the change in the probability of utilization only became statistically significant in 2019. In 2019, there was a 16 percentage point increase (95% CI = 0.05, 0.28) in the report of dental insurance and a 17 percentage point increase (95% CI = 0.01-0.33) in utilization in treatment group compared to controls. Conclusions: The 2015 pregnancy Medicaid dental benefit increased dental insurance and dental care utilization among Medicaid-enrolled women and reduced associated disparities between Medicaid and privately insured groups.

Prenatal and Pediatric Oral Health Education Among Dental Hygiene Programs in the United States.

Purpose: Health care and dental providers must be prepared to address the oral health needs of mothers and children in order to reduce the burden of dental disease in these populations. The purpose of this study was to describe the curriculum and clinical experiences related to prenatal and pediatric oral health in the university and community college dental hygiene programs in the United States (US).Methods: Dental hygiene program directors (PDs) from across the US were invited to participate in a cross-sectional electronic survey regarding the prenatal and pediatric oral health curriculum at their institution. In addition to program characteristics, the survey included items pertaining to curriculum and competencies, content delivery methods and hours spent, locations for clinical experiences, collaboration efforts, and professional policy guidelines. Responses were summarized, and descriptive analyses were conducted to examine program competency and curriculum by program type.Results: A total of 124 PDs responded to the survey for a 37.9% response rate; over half (54%) were based in community colleges. Overall, most PDs indicated prenatal (77.3%) and pediatric oral health (66.1%) as a part of their program's core curriculum. However, prenatal oral health was a core competency for 52% of the respondents and less than half (46%) considered pediatric oral health a core competency. Most programs (>75%) reported teaching professional policies and guidelines. Universities reported more hours for prenatal and didactic and clinical experiences than community colleges. The most common barrier reported for prenatal and pediatric clinical experience was the lack of patients (55% and 35%, respectively).Conclusions: Most dental hygiene programs are utilizing a variety of methodologies to incorporate prenatal and pediatric content into the curriculum and students are being exposed to professional guidelines and recommendations for these populations. However, patient care experiences for prenatal and pediatric patients were low due to lack of patients.

Oral Health Knowledge, Barriers to Dental Care, and Awareness of a Medicaid Pregnancy Dental Coverage Among Reproductive-Age Women.

Objectives: Oral health is an integral part of women's health, yet many women face barriers and go without necessary dental care. The objectives of this study were to (1) examine and compare pregnancy-related oral health knowledge and barriers to dental care access during pregnancy among women with private and public insurance and (2) estimate awareness of available Medicaid pregnancy dental benefit among Medicaid-enrolled women and explore associated factors. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered to a convenience sample of 21- to 45-year-old women (n = 187) visiting a large urban academic health center in Virginia. Data on pregnancy-related oral health knowledge, barriers to dental care access, Medicaid dental benefit awareness, health insurance, socio-demographics, health information source, and last dental visit were collected. Chi-square tests, t-tests, and multivariable regression were used to examine associations at p ≤ 0.05. Results: More than half of the women reported private insurance (52.4%), 40.3% reported Medicaid, and 8.3% reported being uninsured. Medicaid-enrolled women reported a lower prevalence of a routine dental checkup in the past year (44% vs. 71%, p = 0.002), lower knowledge scores (2.9 vs. 3.6, p < 0.001), and more barriers to accessing dental care during pregnancy compared with privately insured women. One in every three Medicaid-enrolled women (34%) was unaware of the Medicaid pregnancy dental benefit. Benefit awareness was associated with the receipt of health information from a health care source (p = 0.030) and a high oral health knowledge score (p = 0.018). Conclusions: There was a significant gap in dental care use and knowledge between Medicaid-enrolled and private-insured women in our study sample. Targeted programs should be developed to educate women about the importance of oral health and share information about available Medicaid dental coverage to reduce barriers to dental care during pregnancy.

Association between periodontal disease and oral cancer screening among US adults: NHANES 2011-2014.

OBJECTIVES: To examine oral cancer screening rates and associated factors among adults with periodontal disease (PD). We hypothesized that adults with severe PD will be less likely to report receipt of any type of oral cancer screening than adults with no PD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data on adults ≥30 years. PD status was classified as no PD, mild/moderate PD and severe PD. Survey-adjusted logistic regression analysis was used to examine the model adjusted risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the outcome of not receiving intraoral, extraoral or both types of oral cancer screenings among adults with PD. Control variables included age, sex, race/ethnicity, health insurance, education, income level, smoking status, alcohol use and last dental visit. RESULTS: The analytic sample included 6962 adults weighted to the national population of adults who had a periodontal examination during 2011-2014. Overall, 31.5%, 26.8% and 20.9% of adults reported receipt of intraoral, extraoral and both types of oral cancer screening, respectively. Almost 40% of adults had some form of PD (7.6% severe and 32.4% mild/moderate PD). A higher proportion of 45-64-year-olds, males, non-Hispanic Blacks, those with less than high school education, with income level less than 200% federal poverty level, or those with no insurance had severe PD than no PD. In adjusted analyses, adults with severe PD were significantly more likely to report no receipt of intraoral (RR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.12-1.40), extraoral (RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.07-1.27) or both types of oral cancer screenings (RR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.10-1.27) than those with no PD. CONCLUSIONS: Significantly low proportion of adult's age ≥30 years with severe PD reported receiving any type of oral cancer screening. The association between PD and risk of oral cancers points to the need to improve oral cancer screening rates among adults with PD.

Opioid and Nonopioid Analgesic Prescriptions for Dental Visits in the Emergency Department, 2015-2017 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Prescription and nonprescription opioid misuse and the rising number of dental visits in emergency departments (EDs) are growing public health concerns in the US. Our study objective was to examine the relationship between prescription analgesics (opioids and nonopioids) and the type of ED visits (dental and nondental) at the national level. METHODS: We used data from the 2015-2017 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to examine the association between opioid, nonopioid, and combination of opioid and nonopioid analgesic prescriptions and dental and nondental visits in the ED. Covariates included socioeconomic variables, time of visit, provider type, triage level, hospital location (urban vs rural), and pain level. We conducted descriptive, bivariate, and multivariable analyses using weighted estimates. RESULTS: The final study sample included 57,098 ED visits from approximately 6 million dental and 414 million nondental visits to EDs during 2015-2017 nationally. Among dental visits, 20.8% received nonopioid analgesics (vs 23.4% among nondental visits), 36.6% received opioid analgesics (vs 14.0% among nondental visits), and 17.7% received both opioids and nonopioid analgesics (vs 8.7% among nondental visits). Adjusted multinomial logistic regression model indicated that, compared with nondental visits, dental visits had 4.8, 1.9, and 3.4 times higher likelihood of receipt of an opioid, nonopioid, or both opioid and nonopioid analgesic prescription, respectively, in the ED than no analgesic prescriptions. CONCLUSION: Dental visits resulted in receipt of a significantly higher proportion of opioid prescriptions compared with nondental visits during 2015-2017. The study findings highlight the need for developing interventions to reduce opioid prescriptions in the ED, especially for dental visits.

Emergency department use for nontraumatic dental conditions among children and adolescents: NEDS 2014-2015.

OBJECTIVES: Despite great efforts to improve paediatric dental care access in the last two decades, the use of emergency departments (ED) for dental conditions among children that are more appropriately addressed in dental offices remains a public health concern in the United States. We examined factors associated with ED visits for nontraumatic dental conditions or NTDCs and ED visits for any other reason among children and adolescents. METHODS: A retrospective secondary data analysis of ED visits was conducted using the 2014-2015 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) data. NTDCs were further categorized as diseases of hard tissue (eg dental caries), pulp/periapical (eg root canal infections), gingival/periodontal (eg conditions that affect the supporting tissues) and other. We included patient/socioeconomic characteristics, disposition, time of visit, and the Grouped Charlson Comorbidity Index (GRPCI) in our analysis. Bivariate associations were tested using chi-squared test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: There were 70 616 194 ED visits in 2014-15, with 465 353 (0.7%) visits for NTDCs. Statistically significant differences were observed for all patient characteristics tested, except for gender when comparing children visiting the ED for NTDCs and children visiting for any other reason. Medicaid was the expected payer for nearly 60% of all ED visits, and the uninsured shared a larger proportion of NTDC visits (19.4%) than other visits (8.8%). Late adolescents (aged 18-21) accounted for over 50% of NTDC visits but only one-fifth of all other types of ED visits. Late adolescents (18-21 years old) who were uninsured had a significantly higher proportion of NTDC visits. Of all NTDC visits, 19.1% were related to hard tissue disease, 25.3% pulp/periapical, 7.9% periodontal disease, and the remaining were grouped as other dental diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The ED use for NTDCs is more common among late adolescents, Medicaid and uninsured groups. Examining and implementing new approaches that improve access to routine dental care for these groups may help in reducing inefficient ED use related to NTDCs.

The contribution of different permanent tooth types to untreated caries: Implications for public health surveillance and prevention.

BACKGROUND: Untreated caries (UC), although highly prevalent, is largely preventable. Information on the contribution of different teeth to UC prevalence and severity could be helpful in evaluating UC surveillance protocols and the relative benefits of caries prevention interventions. METHODS: The authors combined data from 3 cycles (2011-2016) of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for participants aged 6 through 11 years, 12 through 19 years, 20 through 34 years, 35 through 49 years, 50 through 64 years, 65 through 74 years, and 75 years and older. For each age group the authors calculated the contribution of successive permanent tooth types (for example, first molars and second molars) to UC prevalence and severity. RESULTS: UC prevalence and the percentage of prevalence detected by means of screening molars were, respectively, 5% and 95% among participants aged 6 through 11 years; 16% and 92% among participants aged 12 through 19 years; 29% and 86% among participants aged 20 through 34 years; 26% and 70% among participants aged 35 through 49 years; 21% and 48% among participants aged 50 through 64 years; 16% and 36% among participants aged 65 through 74 years; and 17% and 25% among participants 75 years and older. Among adults aged 50 years and older, no teeth appeared to capture a disproportionate share of UC prevalence. Molars accounted for 87%, 79%, and 56% of severity among participants aged 6 through 11 years, 12 through 19 years, and 20 through 34 years, respectively. After age 34 years, molars accounted for less than 50% of severity. CONCLUSIONS: Molars are the tooth type most susceptible to UC well into adulthood. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Molars could be used as sentinel teeth for surveillance of UC and adults could benefit from caries prevention that targets molars.

Antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance: Evaluation of the knowledge, attitude, and perception among students and faculty within US dental schools.

PURPOSE: This study examined knowledge, attitudes, perceptions, and awareness regarding antibiotic use among students and academic faculty in US dental schools. METHODS: Two questionnaires, 1 for third-year/fourth-year dental students and the other for academic deans/department chairs were administered electronically. Questions on demographics, antibiotic knowledge, educational formats, and the role of dentistry in antibiotic stewardship were included. Knowledge about antibiotics and antibiotics stewardship was compared between third-year and fourth-year students and between students and academic faculty using t-test and chi-squared test at 0.05 significance level. RESULTS: A total of 18 responses on the academic dean and department chair survey and 172 responses on the dental student survey were collected. Overall, 71% of students reported that they could benefit from more education regarding antibiotics. Both faculty and students agreed that dentistry should play an important role in reducing antimicrobial resistance, but most dental students were "not at all familiar" with the term antimicrobial stewardship and several (32%) were unsure if clinical guidelines were present at their schools. CONCLUSION: Improvements to the dental educational curriculum regarding the responsible use of antibiotics, along with the implementation of stewardship programs within dentistry are strongly encouraged.

Oral Health Knowledge, Practices, and Awareness of Oral Health Guidelines and Dental Coverage Policies among Midwives.

INTRODUCTION: Good oral health during the prenatal period translates into better oral and overall health for women and their infants. Although the importance of oral health during pregnancy is well established, oral health assessments are not routinely included in prenatal care visits. The purpose of this study was to explore prenatal care providers' practices regarding oral health assessments and identify reasons for the gap in oral health integration in prenatal care. Data were gathered from midwives in Virginia, United States. Information on midwives' knowledge about oral health, education, practices, and awareness of oral health guidelines and the pregnancy-related Medicaid dental benefit policy in Virginia was collected. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to midwives practicing in Virginia through their state-level professional organization. The data were collected online, and descriptive data analyses were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 30 midwives (mean age 51.9 years) participated in the survey for an overall response rate of 13.6%. Among survey participants, knowledge of oral health was high (score of 4.69 out of 5). Nearly 20% of participants reported receiving no education about oral health during professional training, and 72.4% reported no receipt of continuing education about oral health in the past year. Although 86% of the participants reported discussing oral health in clinical practice, only 10.3% reported conducting oral health assessments. Awareness of Virginia's Medicaid dental benefit policy was high (75.9%), but less than half of the participants were aware of oral health guidelines (44.1%). Although many midwives did not conduct oral health assessments, 79.3% reported that they provided oral health referrals to pregnant patients. DISCUSSION: Enhancing and integrating education about oral health in the academic curriculum for midwives and providing them with opportunities for continuing education about oral health can improve their engagement with oral health. Sharing of evidence-based guidelines through organizational newsletters, meetings, and other venues can be ways to increase awareness of new guidelines and health coverage benefits among midwives.

Opioid prescriptions in emergency departments: Findings from the 2016 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

In the past decade, there has been a rising trend in the emergency department (ED) visits in the US and these visits carry a significant burden of prescription opioids. This study utilized the latest available data from the 2016 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) and examined the factors associated with opioid prescriptions in the ED. The outcome variable was receipt of opioid prescription, and the primary variable of interest was the type of visit (dental/non-dental). Other variables included age, gender, race/ethnicity, region, payer, day of the visit, and pain level. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were conducted and predicted marginal probabilities were determined. P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. In 2016, 22.5% of visits in ER received opioid prescriptions. In the unadjusted analysis, opioid prescriptions were associated with all correlates except day of the visit. In the adjusted model, odds of receiving opioid prescription were 3.5 times more among dental visits compared to non-dental visits (95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 2.4-5.1) and 9.4 times more among visits with severe pain compared to visits with mild pain (95% CI = 7.7-11.4). Opioid prescriptions among 45-64 years old were 7.1 times (95% CI = 5.5-9.1] more likely compared to those among under 18 age-group. Opioid prescriptions in ED differed significantly by the type of visit and pain level. Given the higher likelihood of opioid prescriptions among dental visits, it is imperative to develop better prescription guidelines for dental visits in ED.

Self-Reported Oral Health Status Among Adults Aged 40+ Years With and Without Vision Impairment: National Health Interview Study, 2008.

PURPOSE: To examine self-reported oral health among adults aged 40 years and older with and without vision impairment. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, with a nationally representative sample. METHODS: We used publicly available data from the Oral Health Module, last administered in 2008, of the National Health Interview Survey. Outcome variables included fair/poor oral health status, mouth condition compared to others the same age, mouth problems (mouth sores, difficulty eating, dry mouth, bad breath, and/or jaw pain), teeth problems (toothache; broken/missing fillings or teeth; loose, crooked, or stained teeth; and/or bleeding gums), and lack of social participation. Using descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression, we examined the association (P < .05) between vision impairment and oral health outcomes by age group, sociodemographics, and other explanatory variables. RESULTS: Our study sample included 12,090 adults; 12.8% of adults aged 40-64 years reported vision impairment, and among them, 44.5% reported fair/poor oral health status and 47.2% reported any mouth problems. Among adults aged ≥65 years, 17.3% reported vision impairment, of whom 36.3% reported fair/poor oral health status and 57.3% reported any mouth problems. There is a strong association between vision impairment and poorer oral health of adults; adults aged 40-64 years with vision impairment reported 90%-150% greater odds of oral health problems, including fair/poor oral health status, mouth problems, and teeth problems, compared to people without vision impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Oral health disparities exist between adults with and without vision impairment. Targeted interventions are required to improve oral health in this vulnerable population.

Impact of Making Dental Care Affordable on Quality of Life in Adults Aged 45 Years and Older.

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the associations between self-reported ability to afford dental care and quality of life in adults aged 45 years and older. Method: We used publicly available cross-sectional data from the 2008 National Health Interview Survey and its oral health supplement for 11,760 adults aged 45+ years. The increased probabilities of reporting dental problems attributable to an inability to afford dental care were estimated from multivariate models and combined with respective dental problem disability weights from the Global Burden of Disease to measure loss in quality of life. Results: Prevalence of reported inability to afford dental care, severe tooth loss, severe periodontitis, and untreated caries were 11.9%, 8.5%, 14.3%, and 37.9%, respectively. Inability to afford dental care was associated with an increase of 0.017 disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) per person per year under base case and 0.020 DALYs under generous assumptions. Conclusion: Making dental care affordable could improve adult's (age 45 and above) quality of life at a reasonable cost.

Cost-Savings of Fluoride Varnish Application in Primary Care for Medicaid-Enrolled Children in Virginia.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the cost-benefit of fluoride varnish application during pediatric well-visits for the Medicaid/Children's Health Insurance Program population in Virginia (VA) from a Medicaid payer perspective. To provide initial cost estimates from the primary care provider (PCP) perspective. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic search of recent literature was completed to obtain input data for a Monte Carlo cost-benefit simulation and for the fluoride varnish application time, labor, and materials costs for PCPs. The analysis was conducted from a Medicaid perspective; costs and savings related to fluoride varnish application in primary dentition through 7.5 years were calculated for all Medicaid-eligible children up to 3 years of age in VA. Sensitivity analysis was performed to mitigate the effects of parameter uncertainty. RESULTS: Delivering fluoride varnish to all children <3 years old in VA who annually receive well-visits through Medicaid but did not receive fluoride varnish at those visits would reduce the percent of 7.5 year olds with decay from 63.2% to 39.8%. Accounting for averted restoration cost, PCP fluoride varnish application would save $75.32 per child, or a total population savings of almost $2 million/year for VA Medicaid. From the PCP perspective, the Medicaid reimbursement rate for fluoride varnish is 3.8-12.0 times the direct fluoride varnish application cost (labor and materials). CONCLUSIONS: Application of fluoride varnish by a PCP to children under 3 years of age is cost-saving in this study population. Costs to provide fluoride varnish from the PCP perspective are favorable compared with the Medicaid reimbursement, but additional studies on optimizing fluoride varnish application into the well-visit workflow are needed.

Factors Associated with Preventive Dental Visits Before and During Pregnancy.

Objective: Poor prenatal oral health has implications for maternal, fetal, and infant health. Studies have shown an association between periodontal disease and adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm delivery, low birth weight, and pre-eclampsia. The objective of this study was to identify the factors associated with preventive dental visits before and during pregnancy and examine the relationship of dental insurance with those visits among Virginia women. Methods: The Virginia Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (2012-2014) cross-sectional data were used to explore the use of dental cleaning visit among women. The bivariate and multivariate analyses included sociodemographic variables, health risk factors, chronic conditions, oral health knowledge, and oral health promotion variables. All estimates were weighted; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 1,344 weighted respondents represented ∼293,608 women in Virginia. Overall, 56% of women reported a before pregnancy dental cleaning visit, and 47% of women reported a during pregnancy dental cleaning visit. Nearly 60% of women were non-Hispanic white, 78% were between 20 and 34 years of age, and 67% reported having dental insurance. Dental insurance (odds ratio [OR] = 3.5; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 2.17-5.67) and oral health knowledge (OR = 2.8; 95% CI = 1.42-5.48) were associated with before pregnancy dental visit. During pregnancy dental visit was strongly associated with dental insurance (OR = 5.8; 95% CI = 2.80-11.97), before pregnancy dental visit (OR = 20.72, 95% CI = 11.14-38.54), and oral health promotion by health provider (OR = 12.37, 95% CI = 7.31-20.93). Conclusions: Overall, the use of a preventive dental visit before and during pregnancy was low among Virginia women. Improving the use of routine dental visits before pregnancy, increasing access to dental insurance, and engaging health care providers to promote oral health can impact the use of dental care during pregnancy.

Dental visits and associated emergency department-charges in the United States: Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, 2014.

BACKGROUND: Use of hospital emergency department (ED) for dental care is on the rise. This study estimates the total ED dental visits and determines mean charges by the type of disease and other patient characteristics. METHODS: Using the first-listed diagnosis from the 2014 National Emergency Department Sample, the number and types of dental visits in the ED were identified and descriptive statistics were summarized. Using bivariate analyses, we determined the mean ED charges for adults and children by the type of dental disease and other sociodemographic correlates, comorbidity index, income, disposition, and payer. RESULTS: There were 2.43 million dental-related ED visits in 2014 with average charge of $992: $994 for adults and $971 for children under age 18. Bivariate analyses suggested that ED visits were higher among adults aged 19 through 45, those from urban areas, low-income neighborhoods, with higher comorbidity index, or those uninsured/Medicaid. A P-value of ≤ .05 was considered significant. CONCLUSIONS: High number of ED visits result due to dental problems. Our results provide most current estimates of volume and charges of dental-related ED visits. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dental treatment in emergency room is costly. Collaborative care approaches need to be identified and tested to provide effective care for dental patients in the ED.

Variations in Cigarette Smoking and Quit Attempts by Health Insurance Among US Adults in 41 States and 2 Jurisdictions, 2014.

OBJECTIVES: Information on the impact of health insurance on smoking and quit attempts at the state level is limited. We examined the state-specific prevalence of cigarette smoking and past-year quit attempts among adults aged 18-64 by health insurance and other individual- and state-level factors. METHODS: We used data from 41 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, the jurisdictions that administered the Health Care Access module of the 2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Data on quit attempts included current smokers with a past-year quit attempt and former smokers who quit during the past year. RESULTS: Overall, smoking prevalence ranged from 14.6% among those with private insurance to 34.7% among Medicaid enrollees, and past-year quit-attempt prevalence ranged from 66.4% among the uninsured to 71.5% among Medicaid enrollees. By insurance group, differences in the prevalence of state-specific past-year quit attempts ranged from 15 to 26 percentage points. Regardless of insurance type, people who were non-Hispanic white and had lower education levels were less likely to attempt quitting than were Hispanic people, non-Hispanic black people, and adults with more than a high school education. CONCLUSIONS: We found disparities in smoking and quit attempts by insurance status and state. Opportunities exist to increase access to cessation treatments through comprehensive state tobacco control programs and improved cessation insurance coverage, coupled with promotion of covered cessation treatments.