Effect of intravenous flumazenil on oral midazolam pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for use as a cytochrome P450 3A probe.

UNLABELLED: Phenotyping intestinal and hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A activity with oral midazolam can be limited by midazolam-induced central nervous system (CNS) side effects. Determining methods to minimize CNS side effects optimizes use of midazolam as a CYP3A probe. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the effect of intravenous (i.v.) flumazenil on midazolam apparent oral clearance (a surrogate marker of CYP3A activity). Midazolam pharmacodynamics were also evaluated. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, two-way crossover study. 16 healthy volunteers (8 women) were concomitantly administered i.v. flumazenil 0.005 mg/kg or i.v. placebo and oral midazolam 0.075 mg/kg. Blood samples were obtained to determine midazolam and flumazenil plasma concentrations. Bioequivalence was assessed by determining geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 90% confidence intervals (90% CI). Baseline and post dose digit symbol substitution tests (DSST), Groton maze learning tests (GMLT), and Stanford sleepiness scales (SSS) were conducted. RESULTS: Apparent oral clearance was 2,030 +/- 651 and 1,939 +/- 658 ml/min for the midazolam plus flumazenil and midazolam plus placebo groups. Equivalence in midazolam apparent oral clearance was observed (%GMR flumazenil/placebo, 90% CI 104.8, 94 - 116.6%). Flumazenil partially attenuated oral midazolam pharmacodynamics. Exploratory post hoc analyses revealed that midazolam exposure was 1.9-fold higher in men compared to women. CONCLUSION: i.v. flumazenil can be used in conjunction with oral midazolam for CYP3A phenotyping.

Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic target attainment of ertapenem in normal-weight, obese, and extremely obese adults.

Little is known of the effects of obesity on ertapenem drug disposition and pharmacodynamics. Thirty healthy volunteers in three body mass index (BMI) groups (10 per group), normal weight (BMI, 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2), class I-II obesity (BMI, 30 to 39.9 kg/m2), and class III obesity (BMI, >or=40 kg/m2), were administered a 1-g dose of ertapenem. Serum concentrations were obtained over 24 h. Population pharmacokinetic data were obtained using a nonparametric adaptive grid followed by Monte Carlo simulation to determine the probability of obtaining the free drug exposure targets of the time that the free drug concentration remains above the MIC (fT>MIC) of 20% and 40% for bacteriostatic and maximal bactericidal activity, respectively. Compared to the subjects in the obese groups, area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity was significantly higher in the normal-weight subjects, whereas the total central compartment volume was higher in the class III obese subjects (PMIC of 20% with a 90% probability was attained at MICs of MIC, 40%), no group attained the target at the 90% probability level at any tested MIC. The results suggest that the standard 1-g ertapenem dose may not provide adequate drug exposure for any body mass index classification for MICs in excess of 0.25 to 0.5 microg/ml.

Design issues in the combination of international data from two rural community cardiovascular intervention programs.

OBJECTIVES: To compare and contrast two rural cardiovascular community intervention programs (CCIP) in northern Sweden and the US by discussing the methods used to select and combine similar data from two separately designed and implemented CCIP in order to describe and evaluate their effectiveness in reducing cardiovascular risk. METHODS: Two rural intervention populations and their reference populations were compared. A comparison was made of the intensity and duration of the intervention programs using an overall intervention intensity score. Population-based surveys were conducted at 5-year intervals in both countries. The methods used for data pooling and comparison are described. A description of statistical analyses using a mixed analysis of variance model is provided. RESULTS: The data were pooled. taking into consideration comparable ages. New variables were created in order to define the relationship between similar data that did not permit direct comparison. CONCLUSIONS: Combination and comparison of international data from two programs allowed evaluation of community intervention programs that were developed independently for similar communities. The effectiveness of interventions can be compared using such methods.

The Otsego-Schoharie healthy heart program: prevention of cardiovascular disease in the rural US.

OBJECTIVES: To describe a rural, hospital-based public health intervention program and to evaluate its effectiveness in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduction using cross-sectional studies and a panel study. METHODS: A rural population of 158,000 located in New York state comprised the intervention population. A similar but separate population was used for reference. A multifaceted, multimedia 5-year program provided health promotion and education initiatives to increase physical activity, decrease smoking, improve nutrition, and identify hypercholesterolemia and hypertension. To evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention, surveys were conducted at baseline in 1989 (cross-sectional) and at follow-up in 1994-95 (cross-sectional and panel). For cross-sectional studies, a random sample of adults was obtained using a three-stage cluster design. Self-reported and objective risk factor measurements were obtained. Comparison of pre- to post- changes in intervention versus reference populations was done using 2 x 2 randomized block ANOVA, 2 x 2 mixed ANOVA. and extension of the McNemar test. RESULTS: Smoking prevalence declined (from 27.9% to 17.6%) in the intervention population. Significant adverse trends were observed for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides. Systolic blood pressure was reduced while diastolic blood pressure remained stable. Body mass index increased significantly in both populations. CONCLUSIONS: This rural. 5-year CVD community intervention program decreased smoking. The risk reduction may be attributable to tailoring of a multifaceted approach (multiple risk factors, multiple messages, and multiple population subgroups) to a target rural population. The study period was too short to identify changes in CVD morbidity and mortality.

The Norsjö-Cooperstown healthy heart project: a case study combining data from different studies without the use of meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This paper aims to develop and describe a method for combining. comparing, and maximizing the statistical power of two longitudinal studies of risk factors for cardiovascular disease that did not have identical data collection methodologies. METHODS: Subjects from a 1986 cross-sectional study (n = 180) were pair-matched with subjects of corresponding gender and age (+5 years) from a 1990 cross-sectional study. The methodology is described and results are calculated for various measures of cardiovascular risk or risk factors (e.g. cholesterol. Finnish Risk Score). RESULTS: Box's test of equality and symmetry of covariance matrices gave chi-square values of 223.8 and 710.0 for two cardiovascular risk factors (cholesterol and cardiac risk score, respectively); these values were highly significant (p=0.0001) For the North Karelia Risk Score, repeated measures ANOVA revealed a borderline significant interaction for treatment by time (p=0.054) and a significant interaction for treatment by time by country (p=0.035). These probabilities compared favorably with a randomized blocks model. CONCLUSIONS: Creation of a synthetic longitudinal control group resulted in a statistically valid ANOVA model that increased the statistical power of the study.

Different outcomes for different interventions with different focus!--A cross-country comparison of community interventions in rural Swedish and US populations.

OBJECTIVES: There is a need among healthcare providers to acquire more knowledge about small-scale and low budget community intervention programmes. This paper compares risk factor outcomes in Swedish and US intervention programmes for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim was to explore how different intervention programme profiles affect outcome. METHODS: Using a quasi-experimental design, trends in risk factors and estimated CVD risk in two intervention areas (Norsjö. Sweden and Otsego-Schoharie County, New York state) are compared with those in reference areas (Northern Sweden region and Herkimer County, New York state) using serial cross-sectional studies and panel studies. RESULTS: The programmes were able to achieve significant changes in CVD risk factors that the local communities recognized as major concerns: changing eating habits in the Swedish population and reducing smoking in the US population. For the Swedish cross-sectional follow-up study cholesterol reduction was 12%, compared to 5% in the reference population (p for trend differences <0.000). The significantly higher estimated CVD risk (as assessed by risk scores) at baseline in the intervention population was below that of the Swedish reference population after 5 years of intervention. The Swedish panel study provided the same results. In the US, both the serial cross-sectional and panel studies showed a > 10% decline in smoking prevalence in the intervention population, while it increased slightly in the reference population. When pooling the serial cross-sectional studies the estimated risk reduction (using the Framingham risk equation) was significantly greater in the intervention populations compared to the reference populations. CONCLUSIONS: The overall pattern of risk reduction is consistent and suggests that the two different models of rural county intervention can contribute to significant risk reduction. The Swedish programme had its greatest effect on reduction of serum cholesterol levels whereas the US programme had its greatest effect on smoking prevention and cessation. These outcomes are consistent with programmatic emphases. Socially less privileged groups in these rural areas benefited as much or more from the interventions as those with greater social resources.

Effects of oral vitamin K on S- and R-warfarin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: enhanced safety of warfarin as a CYP2C9 probe.

Evidence for the selectivity of S-warfarin metabolism by CYP2C9 is substantial, suggesting that warfarin may be a potential CYP2C9 phenotyping probe. It is, however, limited by its ability to elevate the international normalized ratio (INR) and potentially cause bleeding. The effect of vitamin K to attenuate the elevation of INR may enable the safe use of warfarin as a probe. The objective of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of S- and R-warfarin in plasma following the administration of warfarin alone versus warfarin and vitamin K in CYP2C9*1 homozygotes. Healthy adults received, in a randomized crossover fashion in a fasted state, warfarin 10 mg orally or warfarin 10 mg plus vitamin K 10 mg orally. Blood samples were obtained over 5 days during each phase. INR measurements were obtained at baseline and day 2 in each phase. INR, AUC0-infinity, and t1/2 of plasma S- and R-warfarin were examined. Eleven CYP2C9*1 homozygotes (3 men, 8 women) were enrolled. INR at day 2 following warfarin 10 mg was 1.18 +/- 0.19, which differed significantly from baseline (INR = 1.00 +/- 0.05) and warfarin with vitamin K (INR = 1.06 +/- 0.07). INR at baseline was not significantly different from warfarin with vitamin K. t1/2 and AUC0-infinity of both enantiomers did not significantly differ between the phases. It was concluded that INR is apparently attenuated by concomitant administration of a single dose of vitamin K without affecting the pharmacokinetics of either warfarin stereoisomer. Warfarin 10 mg may be safely used as a CYP2C9 probe in *1 homozygotes when given concomitantly with 10 mg of oral vitamin K.

Use of midazolam urinary metabolic ratios for cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) phenotyping.

Midazolam (MDZ) total clearance (ClT) is widely used for cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) phenotyping, but requires up to eight blood samples. This study was conducted to compare the use of midazolam ClT to use of a midazolam urinary metabolic ratio for CYP3A phenotyping. Ten male and 10 female subjects received i.v. midazolam 0.025 mg/kg eight times over a 4-month period at approximately 2-week intervals. The first six phenotyping measures were used to estimate baseline CYP3A activity, then subjects received the moderate CYP3A inhibitor fluvoxamine 150 mg/day for the last 4 weeks (two phenotyping visits) of the study. Serial blood samples were obtained for calculation of ClT. Urine was collected for 6 h following each midazolam dose. Midazolam, 1'-hydroxymidazolam (1-OHMDZ), and 4-hydroxymidazolam were measured in plasma and urine by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Analysis of 148 samples from 20 subjects revealed a weak overall correlation between the urinary ratio of 1-OHMDZ/MDZ to midazolam ClT of r(s) = 0.372 (P = 0.0001). There was no correlation when examining either baseline samples or fluvoxamine-inhibited samples alone (r(s) = 0.101, P = 0.289 and r(s) = 0.266, P = 0.123, respectively). The median (range) urinary ratio decreased significantly with fluvoxamine [219 (141-409) versus 127 (50-464); P = 0.005] and to a similar extent to the midazolam ClT (-33.6% versus -42.4%, respectively; P > 0.05). Median urinary recovery of the i.v. midazolam dose varied between 1.4% and 53% and was significantly lower in samples collected while patients were receiving fluvoxamine (34.3% versus 23.1%; P= 0.0004). Based on these results, although this midazolam urinary ratio was not very reflective of baseline CYP3A activity, it may be a useful indicator of CYP3A inhibition.

A dose-ranging study of gentamicin pharmacokinetics: implications for extended interval aminoglycoside therapy.

Prolonged distribution time has been noted for high-dose (7 mg/kg) gentamicin. Higher doses are used for extended-interval aminoglycoside therapy (EIA). The authors investigated whether the increase in distribution time was proportional to the dose of gentamicin. Twelve healthy volunteers were given low (LD, 2 mg/kg), medium (MD, 4.5 mg/kg), and high (HD, 7 mg/kg) doses of gentamicin in a randomized, crossover fashion. Gentamicin was infused over 30 minutes, with 15 concentrations obtained over 8 hours after each dose. Data were fit to a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Distribution half-life for HD (31.1 +/- 5.7 min) differed significantly (p < 0.05) from LD (22.4 +/- 6.1 min) and MD (23.8 +/- 5.1 min) with no significant difference being seen between LD and MD. This study verifies that when using EIA dosing with HD gentamicin, sampling within 90 minutes after the beginning of the infusion provides information that leads to overestimation of peak serum concentration/minimum inhibitory concentration and inaccurate calculation of pharmacokinetic parameters.

Individualized pharmacokinetic monitoring results in less aminoglycoside-associated nephrotoxicity and fewer associated costs.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of individualized pharmacokinetic monitoring (IPM) on the development of aminoglycoside-associated nephrotoxicity (AAN). DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: Two teaching hospitals. SUBJECTS: Two thousand four hundred five patients who received aminoglycosides. INTERVENTION: Aminoglycoside therapy dosed by either IPM or physicians' directions. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients receiving IPM were significantly less likely to develop AAN by both univariate (7.9% vs 13.2%, p=0.02) and multivariate methods (odds ratio 0.42, p=0.002). Female sex was protective against AAN. Age 50 years and above, high initial aminoglycoside trough, long duration of therapy, and concurrent piperacillin, clindamycin, or vancomycin increased risk of AAN. We estimated that IPM decreased AAN costs by $90,995/100 patients. CONCLUSION: Individualized pharmacokinetic monitoring significantly decreased the frequency of AAN and its associated economic costs.

Combined phenotypic assessment of CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A, N-acetyltransferase-2, and xanthine oxidase with the "Cooperstown cocktail".

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous administration of several probes enhances the utility of phenotyping, but poor specificity, side effects, and use of drugs not approved by the Food and Drug Administration limit the usefulness of prior phenotyping cocktails. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate potential drug-drug interactions associated with use of a cocktail of caffeine, omeprazole, dextromethorphan, and midazolam for simultaneous phenotyping of CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A, N-acetyltransferase-2, and xanthine oxidase. METHODS: Twelve subjects received caffeine + dextromethorphan, omeprazole, and midazolam (each alone), and a cocktail of caffeine + dextromethorphan + omeprazole + midazolam. Blood samples were collected at 120 minutes for omeprazole and 5/-hydroxyomeprazole, and at 0, 5, 30, 60, 120, 240, 300, and 360 minutes for midazolam. Twelve-hour urine samples were collected for analysis of dextromethorphan, caffeine, and metabolites. RESULTS: The median CYP1A2 metabolic ratio after administration of caffeine + dextromethorphan was not significantly different from that obtained with the cocktail (P = .84). Likewise, the median N-acetyltransferase-2, xanthine oxidase, and CYP2D6 metabolic ratios were not significantly different after cocktail administration (P = .977 for each N-acetyltransferase-2; P = .795 for xanthine oxidase; P = .75 for CYP2D6). The median CYP2C19 metabolic ratio after cocktail administration was not significantly different from that obtained after omeprazole administered alone (P = 1.000). Also, midazolam plasma clearance was not significantly different after cocktail administration compared with that after administration of midazolam alone (P = .708). The only side effect was sedation, which was associated with intravenous midazolam and occurred to a similar extent after both individual and cocktail phenotyping. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate no pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions that would limit the utility of this phenotyping cocktail for simultaneous measurement of the activity of multiple drug-metabolizing enzymes.

The absolute bioavailability of oral melatonin.

The absolute bioavailability of oral melatonin tablets was studied in 12 normal healthy volunteers. Subjects were administered, in a randomized crossover fashion, melatonin 2 mg intravenously and 2 and 4 mg orally. Blood was sampled over approximately eight (estimated) half-lives. Both the 2 and the 4 mg oral dosages showed an absolute bioavailability of approximately 15%. No difference in serum half-life was seen in any of the study phases. Oral melatonin tablets in dosages of 2 and 4 mg show poor absolute bioavailability, either due to poor oral absorption, large first-pass metabolism, or a combination of both. Further studies examining larger doses, in an attempt to saturate first-pass metabolism if it occurs, may be warranted.

Phenotyping of drug-metabolizing enzymes in adults: a review of in-vivo cytochrome P450 phenotyping probes.

Cytochrome P450 phenotyping provides valuable information about real-time activity of these important drug-metabolizing enzymes through the use of specific probe drugs. Despite more than 20 years of research, few conclusions regarding optimal phenotyping methods have been reached. Caffeine offers many advantages for CYP1A2 phenotyping, but the widely used caffeine urinary metabolic ratios may not be the optimal method of measuring CYP1A2 activity. Several probes of CYP2C9 activity have been suggested, but little information exists regarding their use, largely due to the narrow therapeutic index of most CYP2C9 probes. Mephenytoin has long been considered the standard CYP2C19 phenotyping probe, but problems such as sample stability and adverse effects have prompted the investigation of potential alternatives, such as omeprazole. Several well-validated CYP2D6 probes are available, including dextromethorphan, debrisoquin and sparteine, but, in most cases, dextromethorphan may be preferred due to its wide safety margin and availability. Chlorzoxazone remains the only CYP2E1 probe that has received much study. However, questions concerning phenotyping method and involvement of other enzymes have impaired its acceptance as a suitable CYP2E1 phenotyping probe. CYP3A phenotyping has been the subject of numerous investigations, reviews and commentaries. Nevertheless, much controversy regarding the selection of an ideal CYP3A probe remains. Of all the proposed methods, midazolam plasma clearance and the erythromycin breath test have been the most rigorously studied and appear to be the most reliable of the available methods. Despite the limitations of many currently available probes, with continued research, phenotyping will become an even more valuable research and clinical resource.

Comparison of central nervous system adverse effects of amantadine and rimantadine used as sequential prophylaxis of influenza A in elderly nursing home patients.

BACKGROUND: Amantadine hydrochloride and rimantadine hydrochloride are recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for prophylaxis of influenza A. While data suggest that rimantadine is better tolerated, there are no data examining the rate of adverse reactions in elderly patients who receive amantadine vs rimantadine. Our objective was to assess the adverse reaction rate in elderly nursing home patients receiving sequential amantadine and rimantadine for influenza A prophylaxis. METHODS: Data were collected in 156 nursing home patients (70% women; mean+/-SD age, 83.7+/-10.1 years) in a single care setting who received sequential therapy with amantadine and rimantadine during the 1997-1998 influenza season. Patients were assessed for central nervous system adverse effects and therapy discontinuation occurring with each agent. RESULTS: Twenty-nine (18.6%) of the 156 patients experienced an adverse effect when receiving amantadine compared with 3 patients (1.9%) when rimantadine was given (P<.01). Drug use was discontinued due to adverse events in 17.3% (n = 27) of the amantadine courses and 1.9% (n=3) of the rimantadine courses (P<.001). Confusion was the most frequently observed adverse event (amantadine, 10.6%; rimantadine, 0.6%; P<.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that significant risk factors for central nervous system adverse events included male sex (odds ratio, 3.65), reduced calculated creatinine clearance (odds ratio, 1.78), and use of amantadine (odds ratio, 12.73). CONCLUSIONS: Amantadine use was associated with a significantly higher incidence of central nervous system adverse events than rimantadine use in this elderly population receiving influenza prophylaxis. In addition, the discontinuation rate of amantadine was significantly higher than that with rimantadine.

A study of the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin and nelfinavir when coadministered in healthy volunteers.

A two-way, open-label, crossover study in 12 subjects was undertaken to study the potential for azithromycin to alter the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and/or its active metabolite, M8. A secondary objective was to characterize any potential interaction that nelfinavir may have with azithromycin. During one dosing arm, subjects received a single 1200 mg oral dose of azithromycin. During the other, subjects received 11 days of nelfinavir 750 mg q8h with a single 1200 mg oral dose of azithromycin given concurrently with the Day 9 morning nelfinavir dose. Serum samples were collected after each azithromycin dose for 168 hours and after the Day 8 and 9 morning nelfinavir doses for 8 hours to characterize azithromycin, nelfinavir, and M8 pharmacokinetic parameters during both control and test periods. Both dosing regimens were well tolerated, with only mild to moderate GI side effects being the most frequently reported. Azithromycin was found to cause a statistically, though not clinically, significant decrease in nelfinavir and M8 exposures. In contrast, nelfinavir caused azithromycin Cmax and exposure (AUC) values to increase by > 100%. Inhibition of p-glycoprotein by nelfinavir may be responsible for this significant interaction. This increase in azithromycin exposure has the potential to increase clinical antibacterial efficacy without significantly increasing gastrointestinal side effects, though the impact on other systemic sites needs to be studied.

Dose dependency of dextromethorphan for cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) phenotyping.

Most dextromethorphan CYP2D6 phenotyping studies use a 30-mg dose, but data that show superiority of any particular dose are lacking. We compared metabolic ratios from six different dextromethorphan phenotyping doses to ascertain whether linearity existed over a dosage range. Forty subjects were enrolled in the study. Each subject received 0.05 mg/kg, 0.15 mg/kg, 0.3 mg/kg, 30 mg, 0.8 mg/kg, and 1.2 mg/kg dextromethorphan in a randomized crossover fashion. Urinary dextromethorphan to dextrorphan molar ratios were used to measure CYP2D6 activity. Single blood samples were obtained for CYP2D6 genotyping, which revealed one poor metabolizer and 39 extensive metabolizers. A statistical difference was found for the molar ratio between the 0.8 mg/kg and the 1.2 mg/kg dose compared with the other four doses. None of the 39 genotypic extensive metabolizers were incorrectly phenotyped with any of these doses. These data support the use of moderate doses of dextromethorphan for phenotyping to avoid dose dependency.

Lack of effect of dirithromycin on theophylline pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers.

Twelve healthy volunteers were enrolled in an open-label, randomized, crossover study. Subjects received single doses of theophylline (5 mg/kg) alone and after a 10 day course of dirithromycin (two 250 mg tablets od). The study phases were separated by a 3 week washout period. Serum samples were collected before and for 24 h after theophylline doses. Serum theophylline concentrations were measured via a validated immunoassay system and the data were modelled via non-compartmental analysis. When the control phase (i.e. no dirithromycin) was compared with the treatment phase (i.e. with dirithromycin), theophylline exposures as measured by AUC0-->infinity were not significantly different: 141.7+/-25.9 and 136.4+/-33.1 mg x h/L respectively (P = 0.16). No significant changes in other theophylline pharmacokinetic parameters were evident. These results indicate that theophylline can be safely co-administered with dirithromycin.