Modeling First-Line Daratumumab Use for Newly Diagnosed, Transplant-Ineligible, Multiple Myeloma: A Cost-Effectiveness and Risk Analysis for Healthcare Payers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of two regimens regarded as the standard of care for the treatment of newly diagnosed, transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma in Singapore: (1) daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone and (2) bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone. Additionally, it aimed to explore potential strategies to manage decision uncertainty and mitigate financial risk. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis from the healthcare system perspective was conducted using a partitioned survival model to estimate lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with daratumumab-based treatment and the bortezomib-based regimen. The analysis used data from the MAIA and SWOG S0777 trials and incorporated local real-world data where available. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the findings, and a risk analysis was conducted to analyze various payer strategies in terms of their payer strategy and uncertainty burden (P-SUB), which account for the decision uncertainty and the additional cost of choosing a suboptimal intervention. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (DRd) compared with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) was US $90,364 per QALY gained. The results were sensitive to variations in survival for DRd, postprogression treatment costs, cost of hospice care, and hazard ratio for progression-free survival. The scenarios explored indicated that structural assumptions, such as the time horizon of the analysis, significantly influenced the results due to uncertainties arising from immature trial data and treatment efficacy over time. Among the various payer strategies compared, an upfront price discount for daratumumab emerged as the best approach with the lowest P-SUB at US $14,708. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study finds that daratumumab as a first-line treatment for myeloma exceeds the cost-effectiveness threshold considered in this evaluation. An upfront price reduction is the recommended strategy to manage uncertainties and mitigate financial risks. These findings highlight the importance of targeted payer strategies to address specific types and sources of uncertainty.

Consensus guidelines and recommendations for the management and response assessment of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in clinical practice for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a report from the International Myeloma Working Group Immunotherapy Committee.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown promise in patients with late-line refractory multiple myeloma, with response rates ranging from 73 to 98%. To date, three products have been approved: Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), which are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, the European Medicines Agency, Health Canada (ide-cel only), and Brazil ANVISA (cilta-cel only); and equecabtagene autoleucel (eque-cel), which was approved by the Chinese National Medical Products Administration. CAR T-cell therapy is different from previous anti-myeloma therapeutics with unique toxic effects that require distinct mitigation strategies. Thus, a panel of experts from the International Myeloma Working Group was assembled to provide guidance for clinical use of CAR T-cell therapy in myeloma. This consensus opinion is from experts in the field of haematopoietic cell transplantation, cell therapy, and multiple myeloma therapeutics.

International Myeloma Working Group immunotherapy committee consensus guidelines and recommendations for optimal use of T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies in multiple myeloma.

Multiple myeloma remains an incurable disease, despite the development of numerous drug classes and combinations that have contributed to improved overall survival. Immunotherapies directed against cancer cell-surface antigens, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and T-cell-redirecting bispecific antibodies, have recently received regulatory approvals and shown unprecedented efficacy. However, these immunotherapies have unique mechanisms of action and toxicities that are different to previous treatments for myeloma, so experiences from clinical trials and early access programmes are essential for providing specific recommendations for management of patients, especially as these agents become available across many parts of the world. Here, we provide expert consensus clinical practice guidelines for the use of bispecific antibodies for the treatment of myeloma. The International Myeloma Working Group is also involved in the collection of prospective real-time data of patients treated with such immunotherapies, with the aim of learning continuously and adapting clinical practices to optimise the management of patients receiving immunotherapies.

Factors Affecting Patient and Caregiver Preferences for Treatment of Myeloma and Indolent Lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Treatment options for myeloma and indolent lymphoma are increasing exponentially, with distinct efficacy, side effects, and cost. We aim to determine the factors influencing patient and caregiver treatment preferences. METHODS: Patients and caregivers of patients with myeloma and indolent lymphoma were recruited from two cancer centers in Singapore. Preferences were elicited using a discrete choice experiment. Attributes and levels were selected based on a previous qualitative study. The relative preference for levels within each attribute (part worth utility values) and the extent to which an attribute would influence decision making (relative importance) were calculated. Patient and caregiver participation in the treatment plan selection process were assessed using the Control Preference Scale. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-nine patients and 169 caregivers were recruited. Patients placed the highest importance on out-of-pocket costs (relative importance = 35%), followed by efficacy (25%), persistent side effects (19%), administration route (8%), treatment duration (7%), and short-term side effects (5%). Caregivers ranked efficacy (27%) as the most important attribute, over out-of-pocket costs (24%). Most patients preferred a collaborative role in the shared decision-making process, while similar proportions of caregivers favored active and collaborative roles. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that both patients and caregivers consider cost seriously when making treatment decisions. Furthermore, as patient and caregiver preferences may differ, there are implications for treatment selection and counseling, especially in cultures where caregivers have more prominent roles in treatment planning.

Response-Adapted Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The development of potent novel agents has improved outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Heterogeneity of response to therapy, an expanding arsenal of treatment options, and cost are however major challenges for physicians making treatment decisions. Response-adapted therapy is hence an attractive strategy for sequencing of therapy in MM. Despite its successful application in other haematologic malignancies, response-adapted therapy is yet to become a standard of care for MM. We provide our perspective on response-adapted therapeutic strategies evaluated thus far and how they may be implemented and improved on in treatment algorithms of the future. RECENT FINDINGS: While older studies suggested that early response based on International Myeloma Working Group response criteria could impact long-term outcomes, recent data have contradicted these findings. The advent of minimal residual disease (MRD) as a powerful prognostic factor in MM has raised the promise of MRD-adapted treatment strategies. The development of more sensitive techniques for paraprotein quantification as well as imaging modalities to detect extramedullary disease is likely to change response assessment in MM. These techniques combined with MRD assessment may provide sensitive and holistic response assessments which could be evaluated in clinical trials. Response-adapted treatment algorithms have the potential to allow an individualised treatment strategy, maximising efficacy, while minimising toxicities and cost. Standardisation of MRD methodology, incorporation of imaging into response assessment, and the optimal management of MRD positive patients are key questions to be addressed in future trials.

Patterns of Oncogene Coexpression at Single-Cell Resolution Influence Survival in Lymphoma.

Cancers often overexpress multiple clinically relevant oncogenes, but it is not known if combinations of oncogenes in cellular subpopulations within a cancer influence clinical outcomes. Using quantitative multispectral imaging of the prognostically relevant oncogenes MYC, BCL2, and BCL6 in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), we show that the percentage of cells with a unique combination MYC+BCL2+BCL6- (M+2+6-) consistently predicts survival across four independent cohorts (n = 449), an effect not observed with other combinations including M+2+6+. We show that the M+2+6- percentage can be mathematically derived from quantitative measurements of the individual oncogenes and correlates with survival in IHC (n = 316) and gene expression (n = 2,521) datasets. Comparative bulk/single-cell transcriptomic analyses of DLBCL samples and MYC/BCL2/BCL6-transformed primary B cells identify molecular features, including cyclin D2 and PI3K/AKT as candidate regulators of M+2+6- unfavorable biology. Similar analyses evaluating oncogenic combinations at single-cell resolution in other cancers may facilitate an understanding of cancer evolution and therapy resistance. SIGNIFICANCE: Using single-cell-resolved multiplexed imaging, we show that selected subpopulations of cells expressing specific combinations of oncogenes influence clinical outcomes in lymphoma. We describe a probabilistic metric for the estimation of cellular oncogenic coexpression from IHC or bulk transcriptomes, with possible implications for prognostication and therapeutic target discovery in cancer. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1027.

Favorable outcomes of COVID-19 in vaccinated hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: A single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: A high incidence of mortality and severe COVID-19 infection was reported in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic; however, outcomes with subsequent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants, such as the omicron variant, have yet to be reported. Additionally, rollout of COVID-19 vaccinations in subsequent pandemic waves may modify COVID-19 disease severity and mortality in this immunocompromised population. We describe COVID-19 outcomes among a highly vaccinated population of HSCT recipients at a single center during successive waves of community transmission arising from the SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron variants. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all HSCT recipients at our institution who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 from May 2021 to May 2022. Descriptive statistics were reported; the chi-square test was utilized to identify factors associated with 90-day all-cause mortality and severity of COVID-19 infection. RESULTS: Over the 1-year study period, 77 HSCT recipients at our center contracted COVID-19 (43 allogenic; 34 autologous). Twenty-six (33.8%) patients were infected with the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant, while 51 (66.2%) had the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant. Thirty-nine (50.6%) patients required hospitalization. More than 80% had received prior COVID-19 vaccination (57.1% with two doses, 27.3% with three doses). The majority (90.9%) had mild disease; only one (1.3%) patient required mechanical ventilation. Active hematological disease at time of COVID-19 infection was associated with increased odds of mortality [odds ratio (OR) = 6.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.20-40]. The 90-day all-cause mortality was 7.8% (six patients). Infection with the omicron variant (vs. delta) was associated with less severe illness (OR = 0.05, 95% CI = 0.01-0.47) and decreased odds of mortality (OR = 0.08, 95% CI = 0.01-0.76). Being on immunosuppression (OR = 5.10, 95% CI = 1.10-23.60) and being unvaccinated at disease onset (OR = 14.76, 95% CI = 2.89-75.4) were associated with greater severity of COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSION: We observed favorable outcomes with COVID-19 infection in a cohort of vaccinated HSCT patients. The SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant was associated with both less severe illness and decreased odds of mortality. As COVID-19 moves toward endemicity, early access to treatment and encouraging vaccination uptake is crucial in mitigating the challenge of COVID-19 management among HSCT recipients. Surveillance and assessment of clinical outcomes with new SARS-CoV-2 variants also remains important in this immunocompromised population.

The use of medium cutoff dialyzers in patients with multiple myeloma and acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Patients with multiple myeloma and high serum levels of circulating free light chains (FLC) have increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) secondary to cast nephropathy and is associated with poor survival. Despite removal of FLC by medium cutoff (MCO) dialyzer, the role of MCO hemodialysis (HD) in the treatment of cast nephropathy and its clinical benefits remain unknown. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to establish the effectiveness of MCO dialyzer and clinical outcomes, compared to other forms of dialyzers in the removal of FLC, in myeloma patients with AKI. The primary outcome was effectiveness of MCO-HD in reducing serum FLC. The secondary outcomes were HD independence, estimated glomerular filtrate rate, mortality rates, length of hospitalization, rebound of serum FLC before the next dialysis, removal of other molecules during dialysis, and adverse events. RESULTS: We identified three case series, with a total of 17 patients. There were no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies. These case series showed that MCO dialyzer was effective in the removal of FLC and led to a reduction in FLC concentration post-dialysis. The majority of the case series did not have comparator arm and renal and/or other clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: MCO dialyzer appeared to be effective in the removal of FLC based on the existing limited data. However, more data, particularly large-scale RCTs, are needed to assess the use of MCO dialyzer in reducing serum FLC and its effect on clinical outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma and AKI.

AL amyloidosis: Singapore Myeloma Study Group consensus guidelines on diagnosis, treatment and management.

AL amyloidosis is the most common form of systemic amyloidosis. However, the non-specific nature of presenting symptoms requires the need for a heightened clinical suspicion to detect unexplained manifestations in the appropriate clinical setting. Early detection and treatment are crucial as the degree of cardiac involvement emerges as a primary prognostic predictor of survival in a patient with AL amyloidosis. Following the diagnosis of AL amyloidosis with appropriate tissue biopsies, prompt treatment with a bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone-based first-line induction with or without daratumumab should be initiated. The goal of treatment is to achieve the best haematologic response possible, ideally with involved free light chain <20 mg/L, as it offers the best chance of organ function improvement. Treatment should be changed if patients do not achieve a partial response within 2 cycles of treatment or very good partial response after 4 cycles or after autologous stem cell transplant, as achievement of profound and prolonged clonal responses translates to better organ response and long-term outcomes. Early involvement of multidisciplinary subspecialists such as renal physicians, cardiologists, neurologists, and gastroenterologists for optimal maintenance and support of involved organs is recommended for optimal management of patients with AL amyloidosis.

An ex vivo platform to guide drug combination treatment in relapsed/refractory lymphoma.

Although combination therapy is the standard of care for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (RR-NHL), combination treatment chosen for an individual patient is empirical, and response rates remain poor in individuals with chemotherapy-resistant disease. Here, we evaluate an experimental-analytic method, quadratic phenotypic optimization platform (QPOP), for prediction of patient-specific drug combination efficacy from a limited quantity of biopsied tumor samples. In this prospective study, we enrolled 71 patients with RR-NHL (39 B cell NHL and 32 NK/T cell NHL) with a median of two prior lines of treatment, at two academic hospitals in Singapore from November 2017 to August 2021. Fresh biopsies underwent ex vivo testing using a panel of 12 drugs with known efficacy against NHL to identify effective single and combination treatments. Individualized QPOP reports were generated for 67 of 75 patient samples, with a median turnaround time of 6 days from sample collection to report generation. Doublet drug combinations containing copanlisib or romidepsin were most effective against B cell NHL and NK/T cell NHL samples, respectively. Off-label QPOP-guided therapy offered at physician discretion in the absence of standard options (n = 17) resulted in five complete responses. Among patients with more than two prior lines of therapy, the rates of progressive disease were lower with QPOP-guided treatments than with conventional chemotherapy. Overall, this study shows that the identification of patient-specific drug combinations through ex vivo analysis was achievable for RR-NHL in a clinically applicable time frame. These data provide the basis for a prospective clinical trial evaluating ex vivo-guided combination therapy in RR-NHL.

Practical management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with acalabrutinib.

Treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been transformed in the past two decades. The introduction of targeted therapies has improved patient outcomes and the deliverability of effective therapies. Making the best use of the next wave of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors requires an understanding of the nuances that separate the drugs in this class of agents. This paper reviews the newer BTK inhibitors and provides practical guidance on the management of CLL using acalabrutinib. Acalabrutinib is a safe and efficacious BTKi in the treatment of CLL. While some side effects appear to be an "on-target" effect of BTK inhibition, the selectivity of second-generation covalent BTK inhibitors such as acalabrutinib may result in a favorable safety profile due to less off-target kinase inhibition. Acalabrutinib represents a well-tolerated and effective alternative to ibrutinib in the management of CLL.

Treatment outcomes of T and natural-killer/T-cell lymphoma with ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary data of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) and natural-killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTL) patients treated with ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (ICE) are limited. AIMS: We performed a retrospective analysis to estimate outcomes of ICE-treated PTCL and NKTL patients at three tertiary cancer centres in Singapore. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were identified through lymphoma databases from National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS), National University Hospital, Singapore (NUHS), and Singapore General Hospital (SGH). Responses and survival outcomes were determined from electronic medical records. A total of 75 patients with a median age of 50 were included. ICE was used as first-line treatment in 14 patients (19%) and as subsequent lines of treatment in 61 patients (81%). The overall response rates (ORR) for all patients was 63% (40% complete response [CR]). The ORR and CR in the first line were 86% and 64% respectively. At a median follow-up duration of 71.0 months, the median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients were 4.4 months (95%CI, 2.7-6.0) and 16 months (95%CI, 8.3-45.4) respectively. CONCLUSION: In summary, ICE showed high ORR but poor PFS in relapsed/refractory PTCL and NKTL. ORR of ICE in the first line setting appears better than real-world CHOP data and warrants further study.

High-dose methotrexate is effective for prevention of isolated CNS relapse in diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

The role of central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis with high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) in DLBCL is controversial. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the efficacy of prophylactic HDMTX on isolated CNS relapse, concomitant CNS and systemic relapse, systemic relapse, and survival outcomes in 226 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL and high-risk CNS International Prognostic Index (CNS-IPI) score treated with RCHOP. The three-year risk of isolated CNS relapse was significantly lower in patients who received HDMTX, at 3.1% compared to 14.6% (P = 0.032) in those who did not. However, neither concomitant CNS-systemic relapse rates, systemic relapse rates, nor three-year PFS and OS were significantly different between treatment groups in multivariable analysis. Among propensity score-matched patients (N = 102), HDMTX was also associated with significantly lower isolated CNS relapse rates (HR 0.06, 95% CI 0.004-0.946, P = 0.046). HDMTX was well tolerated with manageable toxicities when given at a dose of 3 g/m2 by day 3 of RCHOP chemotherapy. Using propensity score matching and multivariable regression to yield treatment groups with well-balanced covariates, we showed that prophylactic HDMTX improved isolated CNS relapse rates but did not decrease concomitant CNS-systemic relapse rates, systemic relapse rates, or improve survival outcomes.

Epidemiology of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis in Asia: A Systematic Review.

The epidemiology of cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) in Asia is less well-studied and differs from that in the western countries. Here, we systematically examine population based and hospital-based studies reported between 1995 and 2020 to understand the epidemiology of CAT in Asia. From population-based studies, the estimated incidence of VTE in cancer patients was 1.85-9.88 per 1,000 person-years. The incidence of CAT in Asia is significantly higher than non-cancer associated VTE in the general population and cancer is perhaps the most important risk factor for VTE. Hospital-based studies were heterogeneous in study designs and reveal a wide range of prevalence of VTE among cancer patients at 0.5-44.6% while the cancer prevalence rates among VTE patients ranged from 6.1 to 65.5%. The cancer sites most associated with VTE and risk factors were similar between Asian and Western studies. CAT has a major impact on the survival of patients with cancer in Asia, but thromboprophylaxis is not commonly practiced and validated risk assessment tools are lacking. This study highlights the urgent need for large multinational epidemiological studies in Asia to establish the true burden of CAT and to guide appropriate prevention strategies.

BCMA-targeting approaches for treatment of multiple myeloma.

Recent advances in treatment modalities have led to improved survival in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, despite these, MM remains an incurable disease. Many MM patients relapse through and become refractory to current treatment strategies or are intolerant due to toxicities arising from therapy. As such, novel strategies addressing new targets are crucial in improving care for MM patients. BCMA has emerged as a rationale therapeutic target for treatment of MM as it is preferentially expressed in mature B-lymphocytes and plasma cells with the overexpression and activation of BCMA via its ligands associated with the disease progression in multiple myeloma. Given the high expression of BCMA in malignant Plasma cells compared to those from normal healthy volunteers, targeting BCMA should reduce risks of on-target off-tumor toxicities. The main BCMA-targeting approaches currently used for treatment of MM include: 1) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy; 2) bi- and multi- specific antibodies; and 3) monoclonal antibodies and their drug conjugates. This review will outline these therapeutic agents and present their emerging clinical data.

HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT IN AGGRESSIVE T AND NK/T CELL LYMPHOMA - ROLE OF UPFRONT AUTOLOGOUS TRANSPLANT IN NODAL PERIPHERAL T-CELL LYMPHOMA.

Aggressive T and NK/T-cell lymphoma are known to have a high risk of relapse and poor long-term prognosis. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been performed as part of consolidation or salvage treatment. We retrospectively studied the outcomes of autologous (A) and allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in aggressive T and NK/T-cell lymphoma at our center between 2010 to 2020. Patients with nodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) that were younger than 65 years old who did not receive upfront autologous SCT (ASCT) at first complete remission were selected from our registry data for further comparison. Thirty-six patients underwent ASCT, and 16 patients underwent alloSCT. In the ASCT cohort, 18 patients with nodal PTCL who underwent upfront ASCT at first complete remission (upfront ASCT) were compared with 15 patients with nodal PTCL who were in first complete remission after single-line induction but did not receive ASCT. The two-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates for the ASCT cohort were 58% and 73%, respectively. The two-year PFS and OS for the alloSCT cohort were 47% (P=0.35, P=0.02, respectively). Twenty-four patients who received SCT at first remission (21 ASCT and three alloSCT) had a two-year PFS and OS of 75% and 89%, respectively. In comparison, 28 patients who received SCT at relapse/refractory (15 ASCT and 13 alloSCT) had a two-year PFS and OS of 40% and 50%, respectively (P=0.047, P=0.024, respectively). Patients in complete remission prior to transplantation (n=42) had a two-year PFS and OS of 59% and 73%, respectively. In contrast, patients in partial remission prior to transplantation (n=10) had a two-year PFS and OS of 40% and 48%, respectively (p>0.05). Non-relapse mortality occurred in 6% and 43% of ASCT and AlloSCT, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that EBV-positivity at diagnosis indicated poorer PFS. EBV-positivity at diagnosis and more than two prior lines of treatment at transplant were associated with poorer OS. For nodal PTCL, the two-year PFS and OS were 79% and 100% for the upfront ASCT cohort and 78% and 92% for the non-upfront ASCT cohort, respectively (p>0.05). Hematopoietic SCT is a feasible treatment option for aggressive T and NK/T-cell lymphoma. Patients who underwent SCT at first remission had better survival rates than those who underwent SCT at relapse/refractory. Nevertheless, due to the limited sample size of the current study, the role of upfront ASCT in patients with nodal PTCL who achieved first complete remission remains unclear.