Novel nucleosomal particles containing core histones and linker DNA but no histone H1.

Eukaryotic chromosomal DNA is assembled into regularly spaced nucleosomes, which play a central role in gene regulation by determining accessibility of control regions. The nucleosome contains ∼147 bp of DNA wrapped ∼1.7 times around a central core histone octamer. The linker histone, H1, binds both to the nucleosome, sealing the DNA coils, and to the linker DNA between nucleosomes, directing chromatin folding. Micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digests the linker to yield the chromatosome, containing H1 and ∼160 bp, and then converts it to a core particle, containing ∼147 bp and no H1. Sequencing of nucleosomal DNA obtained after MNase digestion (MNase-seq) generates genome-wide nucleosome maps that are important for understanding gene regulation. We present an improved MNase-seq method involving simultaneous digestion with exonuclease III, which removes linker DNA. Remarkably, we discovered two novel intermediate particles containing 154 or 161 bp, corresponding to 7 bp protruding from one or both sides of the nucleosome core. These particles are detected in yeast lacking H1 and in H1-depleted mouse chromatin. They can be reconstituted in vitro using purified core histones and DNA. We propose that these 'proto-chromatosomes' are fundamental chromatin subunits, which include the H1 binding site and influence nucleosome spacing independently of H1.

Global 'bootprinting' reveals the elastic architecture of the yeast TFIIIB-TFIIIC transcription complex in vivo.

TFIIIB and TFIIIC are multi-subunit factors required for transcription by RNA polymerase III. We present a genome-wide high-resolution footprint map of TFIIIB-TFIIIC complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, obtained by paired-end sequencing of micrococcal nuclease-resistant DNA. On tRNA genes, TFIIIB and TFIIIC form stable complexes with the same distinctive occupancy pattern but in mirror image, termed 'bootprints'. Global analysis reveals that the TFIIIB-TFIIIC transcription complex exhibits remarkable structural elasticity: tRNA genes vary significantly in length but remain protected by TFIIIC. Introns, when present, are markedly less protected. The RNA polymerase III transcription terminator is flexibly accommodated within the transcription complex and, unexpectedly, plays a major structural role by delimiting its 3'-boundary. The ETC sites, where TFIIIC binds without TFIIIB, exhibit different bootprints, suggesting that TFIIIC forms complexes involving other factors. We confirm six ETC sites and report a new site (ETC10). Surprisingly, TFIIIC, but not TFIIIB, interacts with some centromeric nucleosomes, suggesting that interactions between TFIIIC and the centromere may be important in the 3D organization of the nucleus.

Regulation of histone gene expression in budding yeast.

We discuss the regulation of the histone genes of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These include genes encoding the major core histones (H3, H4, H2A, and H2B), histone H1 (HHO1), H2AZ (HTZ1), and centromeric H3 (CSE4). Histone production is regulated during the cell cycle because the cell must replicate both its DNA during S phase and its chromatin. Consequently, the histone genes are activated in late G1 to provide sufficient core histones to assemble the replicated genome into chromatin. The major core histone genes are subject to both positive and negative regulation. The primary control system is positive, mediated by the histone gene-specific transcription activator, Spt10, through the histone upstream activating sequences (UAS) elements, with help from the major G1/S-phase activators, SBF (Swi4 cell cycle box binding factor) and perhaps MBF (MluI cell cycle box binding factor). Spt10 binds specifically to the histone UAS elements and contains a putative histone acetyltransferase domain. The negative system involves negative regulatory elements in the histone promoters, the RSC chromatin-remodeling complex, various histone chaperones [the histone regulatory (HIR) complex, Asf1, and Rtt106], and putative sequence-specific factors. The SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex links the positive and negative systems. We propose that the negative system is a damping system that modulates the amount of transcription activated by Spt10 and SBF. We hypothesize that the negative system mediates negative feedback on the histone genes by histone proteins through the level of saturation of histone chaperones with histone. Thus, the negative system could communicate the degree of nucleosome assembly during DNA replication and the need to shut down the activating system under replication-stress conditions. We also discuss post-transcriptional regulation and dosage compensation of the histone genes.

Perfect and imperfect nucleosome positioning in yeast.

Numerous studies of nucleosome positioning have shown that nucleosomes almost invariably adopt one of several alternative overlapping positions on a short DNA fragment in vitro. We define such a set of overlapping positions as a "position cluster", and the 5S RNA gene positioning sequence is presented as an example. The notable exception is the synthetic 601-sequence, which can position a nucleosome perfectly in vitro, though not in vivo. Many years ago, we demonstrated that nucleosome position clusters are present on the CUP1 and HIS3 genes in native yeast chromatin. Recently, using genome-wide paired-end sequencing of nucleosomes, we have shown that position clusters are the general rule in yeast chromatin, not the exception. We argue that, within a cell population, one of several alternative nucleosomal arrays is formed on each gene. We show how position clusters and alternative arrays can give rise to typical nucleosome occupancy profiles, and that position clusters are disrupted by transcriptional activation. The centromeric nucleosome is a rare example of perfect positioning in vivo. It is, however, a special case, since it contains the centromeric histone H3 variant instead of normal H3. Perfect positioning might be due to centromeric sequence-specific DNA binding proteins. Finally, we point out that the existence of position clusters implies that the putative nucleosome code is degenerate. We suggest that degeneracy might be a crucial point in the debate concerning the code. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Chromatin in time and space.

A polar barrier to transcription can be circumvented by remodeler-induced nucleosome translocation.

Many eukaryotic genes are regulated at the level of transcript elongation. Nucleosomes are likely targets for this regulation. Previously, we have shown that nucleosomes formed on very strong positioning sequences (601 and 603), present a high, orientation-dependent barrier to transcription by RNA polymerase II in vitro. The existence of this polar barrier correlates with the interaction of a 16-bp polar barrier signal (PBS) with the promoter-distal histone H3-H4 dimer. Here, we show that the polar barrier is relieved by ISW2, an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler, which translocates the nucleosome over a short distance, such that the PBS no longer interacts with the distal H3-H4 dimer, although it remains within the nucleosome. In vivo, insertion of the 603 positioning sequence into the yeast CUP1 gene results in a modest reduction in transcription, but this reduction is orientation-independent, indicating that the polar barrier can be circumvented. However, the 603-nucleosome is present at the expected position in only a small fraction of cells. Thus, the polar barrier is probably non-functional in vivo because the nucleosome is not positioned appropriately, presumably due to nucleosome sliding activities. We suggest that interactions between PBSs and chromatin remodelers might have significant regulatory potential.

Repression by binding of H-NS within the transcription unit.

H-NS inhibits transcription by forming repressing nucleoprotein complexes next to promoters. We investigated repression by binding of H-NS within the transcription unit using the bgl and proU operons. Repression of both operons requires a downstream regulatory element (DRE) in addition to an upstream element (URE). In bgl, H-NS binds to a region located between 600 to 700 bp downstream of the transcription start site, whereas in proU the DRE extends up to position +270. We show that binding of H-NS to the bgl-DRE inhibits transcription initiation at a step before open complex formation, as shown before for proU. This was shown by determining the occupancy of the bgl transcription unit by RNA polymerases, expression analysis of bgl and proU reporter constructs, and chloroacetaldehyde footprinting of RNA polymerase promoter complexes. The chloroacetaldehyde footprinting also revealed that RNA polymerase is "poised" at the osmoregulated sigma70-dependent proU promoter at low osmolarity, whereas at high osmolarity poising of RNA polymerase and repression by H-NS are reduced. Furthermore, repression by H-NS via the URE and DRE is synergistic, and the efficiency of repression by H-NS via the DRE inversely correlates with the promoter activity. Repression is high for a promoter of low activity, whereas it is low for a strong promoter. Inefficient repression of strong promoters by H-NS via a DRE may account for high induction levels of proU at high osmolarity and for bgl upon disruption of the URE.

The protease Lon and the RNA-binding protein Hfq reduce silencing of the Escherichia coli bgl operon by H-NS.

The histone-like nucleoid structuring protein H-NS represses the Escherichia coli bgl operon at two levels. H-NS binds upstream of the promoter, represses transcription initiation, and binds downstream within the coding region of the first gene, where it induces polarity of transcription elongation. In hns mutants, silencing of the bgl operon is completely relieved. Various screens for mutants in which silencing of bgl is reduced have yielded mutations in hns and in genes encoding the transcription factors LeuO and BglJ. In order to identify additional factors that regulate bgl, we performed a transposon mutagenesis screen for mutants in which silencing of the operon is strengthened. This screen yielded mutants with mutations in cyaA, hfq, lon, and pgi, encoding adenylate cyclase, RNA-binding protein Hfq, protease Lon, and phosphoglucose isomerase, respectively. In cyaA mutants, the cyclic AMP receptor protein-dependent promoter is presumably inactive. The specific effect of the pgi mutants on bgl is low. Interestingly, in the hfq and lon mutants, the downstream silencing of bgl by H-NS (i.e., the induction of polarity) is more efficient, while the silencing of the promoter by H-NS is unaffected. Furthermore, in an hns mutant, Hfq has no significant effect and the effect of Lon is reduced. These data provide evidence that the specific repression by H-NS can (directly or indirectly) be modulated and controlled by other pleiotropic regulators.

The histone-like nucleoid structuring protein H-NS represses the Escherichia coli bgl operon downstream of the promoter.

Specificity of repression by the histone-like nucleoid structuring protein and pleiotropic regulator, H-NS, is exceptionally high in case of the Escherichia coli bgl (beta-glucoside) operon. Here we present evidence that H-NS represses the operon at two levels. The binding of H-NS to an upstream silencer results in an approximately threefold repression of the catabolite gene regulator protein (CRP) dependent bgl promoter. In addition, H-NS binds to a silencer region located approximately 600-700 base pairs downstream of the promoter, within the coding region of first gene, bglG, resulting in a approximately sevenfold further decrease of expression. Repression by H-NS at the downstream silencer requires termination factor Rho and is reduced by translation of the bglG mRNA, but is independent of the promoter. This suggests that H-NS induces polarity of transcription by acting as a roadblock to the elongating RNA polymerase. The control of the bgl operon by H-NS at two levels results in a highly specific repression.