Preoperative low Hounsfield units in the lumbar spine are associated with postoperative mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity.

PURPOSE: To determine the most valid bone health parameter to predict mechanical complications (MCs) following surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD). METHODS: This multicenter study retrospectively examined the records of patients who had undergone fusion of three or more motion segments, including the pelvis, with a minimum two-year follow-up period. Patients with moderate and severe global alignment and proportion scores were included in the study and divided into two groups: those who developed MCs and those who did not. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and femoral neck was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and Hounsfield units (HUs) were measured in the lumbar spine on computed tomography. Radiographic parameters were evaluated preoperatively, immediately after surgery, and at final follow-up. RESULTS: Of 108 patients, 30 (27.8%) developed MCs, including 26 cases of proximal junctional kyphosis/failure, 2 of distal junctional failure, 6 of rod fracture, and 11 reoperations. HUs were significantly lower in patients who experienced MCs (113.7 ± 41.1) than in those who did not (137.0 ± 46.8; P = 0.02). BMD did not differ significantly between the two groups. The preoperative and two-year postoperative global tilt, as well as the immediately postoperative sagittal vertical axis, were significantly greater in patients who developed MCs than in those who did not (P = 0.02, P < 0.01, and P = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients who experienced MCs following surgery for ASD had lower HUs than those who did not. HUs may therefore be more useful than BMD for predicting MCs following surgery for ASD.

An appropriate method for predicting the femoral angle on whole-body X-ray images from full-spine X-ray images.

INTRODUCTION: The importance of lower-limb compensation in patients with spinal malalignment due to spinal pathologies has been emphasized. The latest whole-body X-ray images (WBX) have enabled evaluations of whole-body alignment from head to toe. However, WBX is still not commonly available. Thus, the present study aimed to examine an alternative measurement method of the femoral angle on usual full-spine X-ray images (FSX) that approximates the femoral angle on WBX. METHODS: A total of 50 patients (age, 52.8 ± 25.3 years; female, n = 26; male, n = 24) underwent WBX and FSX. The following parameters were measured on lateral view X-rays: WBX and FSX femoral angle (angle between the femoral axis and a perpendicular line); FSX femoral distance (distance from the center of femoral head to the distal femur on FSX); WBX intersection length (length between the center of the femoral head and the intersection point [the point at which the line connecting the center of the femoral head and the midpoint of the femoral condyle intersects the center line of the femur] on WBX). RESULTS: The WBX femoral angle, and FSX femoral angle were 0.16 ± 4.2°, and -0.53 ± 4.1°, respectively. The FSX femoral distance was 102.7 ± 41.1 mm. An ROC curve analysis revealed that the cut-off value of the FSX femoral distance associated with minimal difference in the WBX and FSX femoral angles (<3°) was 73 mm (sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 87.5%, AUC 0.80). The WBX intersection length was 105.3 ± 27.3 mm. CONCLUSION: To calculate the femoral angle on FSX that approximates the WBX femoral angle, the femoral distance on FSX ≥73 mm is preferable. We suggest using the FSX femoral distance within the range of 80 mm-130 mm as a simple numerical value that meets all criteria.

Impact of Obesity, Osteopenia, and Scoliosis on Interobserver Reliability of Measures of the Spinopelvic Sagittal Radiographic Parameters.

Introduction: We investigated the relationships between patient factors, including obesity, osteopenia, and scoliosis, and the reliability of measures of the spinopelvic sagittal parameters using conventional X-radiography (Xp) and slot-scanning Xp devices (EOS) and examined the differences in interobserver measurement reliability between them. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 55 patients (52.7±25.3 years, 27 females) with conventional whole-spine Xp and EOS images taken within three months. Patients were classified according to obesity (Body mass index≥25 kg/m2), osteopenia (T score<-1), and scoliosis (Cobb angle>20°). The associations between patient factors and reliability of radiological parameter measurements were examined with interobserver intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), defined as poor, <.40; good, 40-.79; and excellent, ≥.80. Results: All parameters measured with EOS showed excellent reliability except for L4-S (ICC:.760, 95% CI:.295-.927) in the obesity+ group. All parameters measured with conventional Xp were excellent except for those classified as good: L4-S (.608,.093-.868) and pelvic incidence (PI) (.512,.078-.832) in the obese+ group; T1 slope (.781,.237-.952), L4-S (.718,.112-.936), sacral slope (SS) (.792,.237-.955), pelvic tilt (PT) (.787,.300-.952), and center of acoustic meatus and femoral head offset (CAM-HA) (.690,.090-.928) in the osteopenia+ group; and lumbar lordosis (LL, L4-S) (.712,.349-.889), SS (.608,.178-.843), and CAM-HA (.781,.480-.917) in the scoliosis+ group. Conclusions: Reliability of EOS measurements was preferable except for L4-S in patients with obesity. The reliability of conventional Xp measurements of pelvic parameters SS, PT, and PI was affected by patient factors, including obesity, osteopenia, and scoliosis. When evaluating lower lumbar and pelvic parameters in patients with these factors, we recommend substituting thoracic parameters, LL (L1-S), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and T1 pelvic angle (TPA), or combining computed tomography (CT) measurements.